Premier contacted me today to inform me that Altium had updated my
records after considerable prompting from Premier. I tried to
registered again and everything worked so I have just downloaded the
training manual.
Premier have worked hard on this one and the problem appears not to be
down to th
Indeed! All CAD s/w that I have purchased professionally has been subject to
extended periods of 'private' evaluation, using various unmentionable
methods. I hasten to add that the private evaluation was exclusively
non-profit, as (don't tell anybody) electronics was (and remains) a hobby as
well
>As ever, my license number continues to be invalid. The UK distributor
>(Premier EDA) has promised (over two weeks ago) to resolve this. They are
>yet to come good on this promise. Are there any Protel users in the UK that
>can log in?
>
>Steve Casey
Steve,
My license number was also invalid wh
Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 December 2001 00:39
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
>
>
> At 04:15 PM 12/18/01 +, Andy Gulliver wrote:
> >I got an email from Premier recently with the following text at
> the bottom:
>
At 04:15 PM 12/18/01 +, Andy Gulliver wrote:
>I got an email from Premier recently with the following text at the bottom:
>
>"This message was sent to you because you are either currently a Premier
>customer or have previously expressed interest in Premier products. It is
>our policy to respec
At 11:37 AM 12/18/01 +1100, Geoff Harland wrote:
>My guess is that Altium has figured that many of the people using Protel do
>not have a "kosher" copy of this, and by providing additional documentation
>*solely* to those who can prove that they *are* "kosher" users, such users
>will then be at an
Phil,
It also says how to leave at the bottom of EVERY message.
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:07 AM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
&
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 December 2001 15:53
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
>
>
> How can I get out of the PEDA mail group? Any help would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Phil
>
> -Origi
To leave this list visit:
http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:53 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
&g
Not as yet. I am fairly sure that Premier are attempting to sort this
but, as of today, no. Both companies must have records of the license
numbers so surely all it requires is an exchange of user names to
synchronise one to the other.
All points to real gloomy future following the introduction
How can I get out of the PEDA mail group? Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
Regards,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Buckley.Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
sey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 December 2001 14:35
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
>
>
> As ever, my license number continues to be invalid. The UK distributor
> (Premier EDA) has promised (over two weeks ago) to resolve this. The
Steve,
I finally managed to log in yesterday after a few tries last week.
We have 4 licenses from Premier EDA.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2001 14:35
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
As
Well,
I called our distributor this morning and they gave me
my number and under what name ( actually a few possible)
I should be able to log in. I'm going to try it this evening.
If it doesn't help, I give the polling program a try.
The night phnoe fees are rather low, so a phone call of several
Rene,
The problem is the matching of the number and the company details (they
claim to use fuzzy logic - the whole ATS thing seems to be founded in fuzzy
logic).
Steve.
> It is a 9 digit number, of which '99' is known,
> leaving 7 digits. That makes 10^7 possibilities.
> It shouldn't be that ha
It is a 9 digit number, of which '99' is known,
leaving 7 digits. That makes 10^7 possibilities.
It shouldn't be that hard to write a program that
tries them all.
Rene
Stephen Casey wrote:
> As ever, my license number continues to be invalid. The UK distributor
> (Premier EDA) has promised (ove
As ever, my license number continues to be invalid. The UK distributor
(Premier EDA) has promised (over two weeks ago) to resolve this. They are
yet to come good on this promise. Are there any Protel users in the UK that
can log in?
Steve Casey
> I've tried entering my Protel 99SE license number
> > I've tried entering my Protel 99SE license number (purchased
> > before 1 Oct 2001) and this link doesn't work. My local
> > Protel distributor was under the impression this was for ATS
> > members only.
> >
> > Would anyone care to email the Protel 99SE training manual to me?
> >
> > Andrew I
um" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Dezember 2001 14:18
Betreff: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
> What is the difference between the license code and serial number?
>
> I was given a license number by my distributor in the form 99xxx,
> and I have secur
I don't know if it's a UK license problem but I tried registering last week
and failed.
Tried again today and no problem.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Ircha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 December 2001 10:18
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] License number no
]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17.12.2001 14:18
Please respond to "Protel EDA Forum"
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
What is the difference between the license code and serial n
The security key is what worked for me (---).
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Ircha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:19 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
What is the difference between the license
I used the 9 digit license number (not the 16 digit activation
code) and company name and it worked fine for me. The Fax I
received from Protel with my registration information is dated
May 28, 1999.
Matt Pobursky
Maximum Performance Systems
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:18:26 +, Andrew Ircha wro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 17 December 2001 21:18
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: [PEDA] License number not accepted
>
>
> I've tried entering my Protel 99SE license number (purchased
> before 1 Oct 2001) and this link doesn't work. My local
> Protel
PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: [PEDA] License number not accepted
Mine did not work either - have yet to chase Protel.
Ian Turner
>
> From: "Andrew Ircha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PEDA] License number not accepted
> Date: 17/12/20
Mine did not work either - have yet to chase Protel.
Ian Turner
>
> From: "Andrew Ircha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PEDA] License number not accepted
> Date: 17/12/2001 10:18:26
> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'
27 matches
Mail list logo
