Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 314 by xiaof...@google.com: need to give a tag for all
repeated booleans?
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=314
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: CannotReproduce
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #4 on issue 318 by xiaof...@google.com: Unit tests
CommandLineInterfaceTest.OutputDirectoryIsFileError failes on Windows 7
VS2008
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=318
(No comment was
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #6 on issue 323 by xiaof...@google.com: Add SupprrssWarnings to
generated Java code
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=323
Using the annotation "javax.annotation.Generated" seems to be
Updates:
Status: CannotReproduce
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 325 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf shared library can
not work correctly on Android 2.1(NDK),2.2 (NDK) , but it can work well
on Android 2.3(NDK).
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues
Updates:
Status: OutOfScope
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #4 on issue 326 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf shared library
works well in android 2.3(NDK), but can not work on Android 2.1(NDK) and
2.2NDK
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=326
(No comment
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 327 by xiaof...@google.com: Support for C++0x enum class
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=327
FYI. We won't add any C++11 features in the near future.
--
You received this message be
Comment #8 on issue 607 by gli...@chromium.org: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Niall, which Clang version are you using? Clang 3.5 must have this header
(in fact we've just ch
Comment #9 on issue 607 by nialldouglas14: Replace TSan API declarations in
atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
I would assume at the time of report I would be running 3.4 as 3.5 wasn't
out yet. Actually, until
Updates:
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #10 on issue 607 by xiaof...@google.com: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Yes, I think we need to make the header work on Clang 3.4
Comment #11 on issue 607 by nialldouglas14: Replace TSan API declarations
in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
I can verify someone else's work after they have tested it themselves. I
don't believe I am aut
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0
Comment #4 on issue 329 by xiaof...@google.com: Add support for [deprecated
= true] on all types of definitions
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=329
The "deprecated"
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #5 on issue 330 by xiaof...@google.com: add the possiblity to
choose TextFormat default printer in java
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=330
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 334 by xiaof...@google.com: Let
ExtendableMessage.getExtensionFields() be public for Java runtime!
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=334
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 335 by xiaof...@google.com: migrate repository to git
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=335
Our github site is now live at:
https://github.com/google/protobuf
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
Updates:
Status: OutOfScope
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 339 by xiaof...@google.com: maven hangs on windows when
compiling protobuf java
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=339
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 346 by xiaof...@google.com: Python: expecting 0L, but
the default value of uint64 field is 0
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=346
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Updates:
Status: CannotReproduce
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 349 by xiaof...@google.com: ShortDebugString making core
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=349
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this
Comment #5 on issue 226 by nadersal...@gmail.com: Python API doesn't
support reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
Any reason why?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #15 on issue 361 by xiaof...@google.com: Fix warnings
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361
Closing this as "WontFix".
If you still get warnings with the newly released 2.6.0, please help
Comment #16 on issue 361 by dholb...@gmail.com: Fix warnings
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361
RE:
It's the convention at Google to use "int" as
loop counters, which makes it pointless to
update the code to use "size_t"
Surely the max-value
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #3 on issue 364 by xiaof...@google.com: Make static serialization
and deserialization of messages in java
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=364
We are considering adding a new Java implementation
Updates:
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #6 on issue 226 by xiaof...@google.com: Python API doesn't support
reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
I searched around our internal code base and it appears there are very few
Comment #7 on issue 226 by brian.olson: Python API doesn't support
reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
The lack of an API for a framed stream of protobuf messages is a feature
for lack of which projects have decided to go with T
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #4 on issue 381 by xiaof...@google.com: Do not use heap where stack
can be used
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=381
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #3 on issue 423 by xiaof...@google.com: Cannot compile protobuf
example code on AIX 6.1
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=423
Marking this as "Won't Fix" as we don't have the env
Comment #3 on issue 499 by johnzhj...@gmail.com: using protobuf on ios
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=499
in xcode build phases, add all you protoc generated .a library
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #10 on issue 447 by xiaof...@google.com: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
FYI.
Google's Style Guide now permits rvalue references to be used in move
constructor
Comment #11 on issue 447 by chen3feng: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
Very disappointed to hear this message.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust
Comment #12 on issue 447 by cbsm...@gmail.com: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
Speaks volumes that after 22 months after submission and 5 months after a
working plugin was contributed, there isn't even a direct answer.
--
You received
Comment #13 on issue 447 by chen3feng: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
let't make a fork on github?
2014-10-16 上午11:01于 写道：
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
Updates:
Summary: Officially support Maven protoc plugin
Status: Accepted
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #10 on issue 476 by xiaof...@google.com: Officially support Maven
protoc plugin
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=476
(No comment was entered
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 489 by xiaof...@google.com: 2.5.0 build failed on
sparc-sun-solaris2.10
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=489
Atomicops support for solaris is added in this commit:
https://github.com
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 673 by weegreen...@gmail.com: protoc: can't control output
directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=673
I am working on integrating the protoc compiler to my build system, however
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 674 by weegreen...@gmail.com: protoc: can't control output
directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=674
May be related to #693.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. unzip pr
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 673 by xiaof...@google.com: protoc: can't control
output directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=673
This is just how protocol compiler is designed to work. For C+
Comment #2 on issue 673 by weegreen...@gmail.com: protoc: can't control
output directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=673
Please document how it's designed to work.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifi
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 674 by xiaof...@google.com: protoc: can't control
output directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=674
Here is how it works:
Support you invoke protoc as:
protoc -I
Comment #2 on issue 674 by weegreen...@gmail.com: protoc: can't control
output directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=674
Why not improve the documentation with this ticket?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 675 by vxm...@gmail.com: memory leak
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=675
A memory leak is detected by vld(visual leak detector).
I think the problem is caused by this function:
void
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.1
Comment #1 on issue 675 by xiaof...@google.com: memory leak
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=675
Fixed in:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/commit
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 676 by klocksve...@gmail.com: protoc does not warn for Java
keyword "super"
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=676
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Be mindless and forget
Comment #7 on issue 266 by blakeman...@gmail.com: Protoc generates unused
variable in Java for protobuf with single repeated field
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=266
Still waiting on a fix for this...
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
Comment #9 on issue 570 by azxf...@gmail.com: build 2.4.1 failed on mac os
x 10.9
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=570
it the cofing.h file
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust
Comment #10 on issue 570 by zhen...@ayasdi.com: build 2.4.1 failed on mac
os x 10.9
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=570
Adding #include isn't working for me. What's the change to the
config.h?
--
You received this message because this project is configur
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #11 on issue 570 by xiaof...@google.com: build 2.4.1 failed on mac
os x 10.9
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=570
The latest code includes which I believe has fixed this issue:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master/src
Comment #8 on issue 226 by vladimir...@gmail.com: Python API doesn't
support reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
You have few use cases in your codebase? Lame reason. Disappointing.
--
You received this message because this proje
Comment #9 on issue 226 by vladimir...@gmail.com: Python API doesn't
support reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
Here's a workaround - assuming you want to do this because you are writing
protobuf messages to sockets. The
Comment #10 on issue 226 by vladimir...@gmail.com: Python API doesn't
support reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
Here's a workaround - assuming you want to do this because you are writing
protobuf messages to sockets. The
Comment #8 on issue 324 by wouter.b...@gmail.com: Feature: Add a new
primitive type for a DateTime format
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=324
Temporenc (http://temporenc.org) is a comprehensive binary encoding format
for dates and times that tries to solve the problem
Comment #2 on issue 549 by arglanir: Cannot install to anywhere except
/usr/local/lib
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=549
I have found the missing option at
https://www.mail-archive.com/protobuf@googlegroups.com/msg02998.html.
So if someone needs it, you should use
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 677 by m...@jargenstedt.se: emacs 24.4: Eager macro-expansion
failure: (void-function cl-macroexpand-all)
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=677
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1
Comment #14 on issue 187 by austin.l...@gmail.com: Command-line argument to
override the "optimize_for" option
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
I was able to use Keaton's plugin as a starting point and am using it now.
I didn't know that the p
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 678 by kaspar.f...@dreizak.com: Clearing an extension message
clears it but HasExtension still reports it's not cleared (Protobuf 2.4.1)
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=678
What steps
Comment #1 on issue 678 by kaspar.f...@dreizak.com: Clearing an extension
message clears it but HasExtension still reports it's not cleared (Protobuf
2.4.1)
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=678
For the sake of completeness, here are the files contained in the ZIP:
Updates:
Summary: HasExtension() called on a repeated field should cause a compile
error (Protobuf 2.4.1)
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 678 by xiaof...@google.com: HasExtension() called on a
repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1)
https
Comment #3 on issue 678 by kaspar.f...@dreizak.com: HasExtension() called
on a repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1)
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=678
That makes sense – and is consistent with the other uses of "has" in the
API. Than
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 679 by islm.ya...@gmail.com: protobuf causes crash beacuse of
mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
What steps will reproduce the problem?
FreeBSD 10, it sometimes crashes on
Comment #1 on issue 679 by islm.ya...@gmail.com: protobuf causes crash
beacuse of mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
if i comment the line in common.cc on line 185
MutexLock lock(log_silencer_count_mutex);
everything looks well.
--
You received this
Comment #5 on issue 585 by mengxi...@gmail.com: No support compile for
Windows Phone 8
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=585
many many errors...
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may
Comment #8 on issue 515 by wonhee.jung: More intelligent enums
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
Isn't it common practice to add UNKNOWN to be enum's 0th field to allow
other side to pick it up as default value when there is a enum value that
isn't their
Comment #2 on issue 512 by austin.l...@gmail.com: Add support for atomic
operations on powerpc architecture
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=512
This still isn't fixed in the latest repo. I ran across this bug report
when debugging why my code wasn't working
Comment #3 on issue 512 by oded.gab...@gmail.com: Add support for atomic
operations on powerpc architecture
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=512
Hi,
I'm no longer working on PowerPC processors, and I don't have the platform
to test it.
So, please feel free
Comment #9 on issue 515 by peterhan...@yahoo.com: More intelligent enums
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
Wrapping enum with another message looks ugly to me, and only simple way
for this so far would be adding prefix for it, like
enum CURRENCY {
UNKNOWN = 0
Comment #5 on issue 464 by ryan.fog...@gmail.com: Inefficient Java handling
of repeated list of primitive types
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=464
In case anyone is wondering. I just diffed GPB versions 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 and
there is no significant changes that would
Comment #4 on issue 512 by rob.west...@gmail.com: Add support for atomic
operations on powerpc architecture
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=512
I pretty disappointed in the support for the PPC architecture. "WontFix"?
really.
--
You received this messa
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 680 by dbertoui...@gmail.com: Python pickling depends on the path
used during compilaton
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=680
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Extract the test
Comment #1 on issue 680 by xiaof...@google.com: Python pickling depends on
the path used during compilaton
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=680
Can you post the exception stack trace?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #2 on issue 680 by dbertoui...@gmail.com: Python pickling depends
on the path used during compilaton
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=680
In the first case (Step 2).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test.py", line 11, in
cPickle
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 681 by seymour@gmail.com: ar
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=681
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version of
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 681 by liuj...@google.com: ar
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=681
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address
Comment #7 on issue 270 by dave.hil...@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc binary
for OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
This is a unsatisfactory resolution, amounts to nothing more than, "can't
be bothered".
Do I really have to install a multi-giga
Comment #8 on issue 270 by peter.on...@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc binary
for OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
Well, if you trust third party binary here it is:
http://blog.ondruska.com/2014/11/google-protocol-buffers-compiler-binary.html
--
You received
Comment #9 on issue 270 by erdem...@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc binary
for OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
If you don't install Xcode and developer tools, you'll have to install the
required dependencies on your own.
Just for future refer
Comment #10 on issue 270 by forrest@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc
binary for OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
Building protobuf 2.5.0 under Darwin (Mac OS X) was straight forward enough
for me but getting it to build with the MATLAB extension was anything
Comment #2 on issue 679 by islm.ya...@gmail.com: protobuf causes crash
beacuse of mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
take care wher you call
google::protobuf::ShutdownProtobufLibrary()
also dont call it in worker process or worker thread!
--
You received
Comment #3 on issue 679 by islm.ya...@gmail.com: protobuf causes crash
beacuse of mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
take care where you call
google::protobuf::ShutdownProtobufLibrary()
also dont call it in worker process or worker thread!
--
You received
Comment #1 on issue 338 by ben.thom...@gmail.com: google package name
conflict between google-apputils-python and protobuf
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=338
This appears to happen if google-apputils is installed separately from
google-protobuf. I am forced to
Comment #3 on issue 556 by bible.ma...@gmail.com: Unable to cross-compile
for i686-w64-mingw32 with Cygwin
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=556
Having the same issue. Did this get resolved?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #4 on issue 556 by xiaof...@google.com: Unable to cross-compile for
i686-w64-mingw32 with Cygwin
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=556
For cross-compiling, you can specify an protoc binary using
the
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 682 by dobba...@gmail.com: Windows phone 8.1 problem
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=682
I use protobuf in winrt app for Windows and windows phone.
I got this message when build for ARM
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 682 by xiaof...@google.com: Windows phone 8.1 problem
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=682
Hi dobballa, we moved to github not very long ago. Could you file this
issue on our github site?
https://github.com/google
Comment #2 on issue 682 by dobba...@gmail.com: Windows phone 8.1 problem
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=682
Thank you! Here is link of issue in github:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/132
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #3 on issue 399 by olli.s...@gmail.com: Add support for using batch
files to wrap plugins on Windows
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=399
This would also make the dart-protoc-plugin useable on windows...
https://github.com/dart-lang/dart-protoc-plugin
--
You
Comment #4 on issue 679 by jw...@dilect.us: protobuf causes crash beacuse
of mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
I am also seeing this, also from VerifyUTF8StringFallback(). My code does
not call google::protobuf::ShutdownProtobufLibrary().
--
You received
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 683 by bisteni...@gmail.com: Protocol buffers java
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=683
I have a .java class created by RestaurantBestLocationDTO.proto called
Comment #3 on issue 315 by clear...@gmail.com: erroneous duplicate
definition error if imported file in subdirectory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=315
When I use protoc to generate /nested_extension.proto from source(version
2.5.0), I get the error message:
exec
Comment #4 on issue 315 by clear...@gmail.com: erroneous duplicate
definition error if imported file in subdirectory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=315
Hi All
When I use protoc to generate /nested_extension.proto from source(version
2.5.0), I get the error message
Comment #7 on issue 670 by osu...@gmail.com: Not Able to compile protobuf
for mips platform
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=670
Note that protobuf 2.4.1 seems to cross-compile fine to MIPS
2.5.0 and 2.6.1 both fail for me as well with the reported error
I used gcc 4.4
Comment #8 on issue 670 by osu...@gmail.com: Not Able to compile protobuf
for mips platform
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=670
After more digging it appears to build to MIPS32 (2.4.1, 2.5.0, 2.6.1):
./configure -host=mips32 CXX=mips-linux-gnu-g++ CXXFLAGS="-D__MIP
Comment #11 on issue 270 by osu...@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc binary for
OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
You could also try this:
https://github.com/os72/protoc-jar
https://github.com/os72/protoc-jar-maven-plugin
Either directly via "java -jar ...
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 684 by edgar@gmail.com: integer overflow
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=684
What steps will reproduce the problem?
svn diff stringprintf_unittest.cc
Index: stringprintf_unittest.cc
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 685 by tryb...@gmail.com: java.lang.VerifyError: class
RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues
Comment #1 on issue 685 by xiaof...@google.com: java.lang.VerifyError:
class RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=685
We don't have 2.5.0 on the github release page
Comment #2 on issue 685 by tryb...@gmail.com: java.lang.VerifyError: class
RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=685
I'm getting the same error with 2.6.0
-
Comment #3 on issue 685 by tryb...@gmail.com: java.lang.VerifyError: class
RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=685
Created example project to show the errors i get
Comment #4 on issue 685 by tryb...@gmail.com: java.lang.VerifyError: class
RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=685
Ticket can be closed.
Look for solution here
https
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 686 by richardg...@gmail.com: Protoc does not provide a
dependency manifest output file for build tools like make
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=686
Protobuf files can have import
Comment #1 on issue 686 by haberl...@gmail.com: Protoc does not provide a
dependency manifest output file for build tools like make
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=686
this is what we're using - maybe can be built upon:
https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit
Comment #14 on issue 447 by mend...@gmail.com: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
So a move constructor (eventually marked as noexcept) is not a peformance
gain? Right!
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 686 by xiaof...@google.com: Protoc does not provide a
dependency manifest output file for build tools like make
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=686
Hi, could you help file this issue
301 - 400 of 2413 matches
Mail list logo
