I'm sooo old... I use pspad (and have for 10 years)... it's way more
advanced than edlin (joke).
I really need to update to a modern editor with php on my laptop so I'd be
curious as to how everyone has their systems configured.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Alastair Young
Ive not done any new work since http://www.presspeek.com but im still using
prototype.
On Jan 3, 2014 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
It's been mighty quiet here, and I'm wondering if everyone just knows how
to use Prototype, and doesn't have any questions, or if you've all
Php on the back end? What headers are you sending back?
On Nov 24, 2013 7:53 AM, blumus leiman.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
I'm a newbie to html, js and protype.js. I've written a small script to
try out Ajax.request.
$(sendFormSimple)
.observe(
Let me fire up my laptop and look at some code I have... I'm returning xml
and it seems there was something I had to do differently but I don't recall
what (or if) it was...
On Nov 24, 2013 9:00 AM, blumus leiman.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Using Java
*Here is the header code from Java*
public
I will add this... updating prototype, in my experience, has minimal side
affects and most of those are actually positive.
On Jul 17, 2013 6:22 PM, Joseph Lust lifeofl...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. I wonder why it just this minute came up for moderation? That's
Google Groups for you...
Just ran
What question do you have (notice how I'm creating work for others? )?
On Jun 28, 2013 10:44 AM, Jason Westbrook jwestbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marco
There is nothing official other than those 2 pages - however there are
plenty of examples that the community has written all over Stack
show()/hide()
Set the style inline with style=display:none and show/hide works but set
the style in css and all of a sudden it doesn't work.
http://jsfiddle.net/ppetree/pA5eN/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To
This just seems really, really odd... THATS where they decide to draw the
line? LOL
Finally working on that context sensitive help system, will post it later
today.
On Jun 9, 2013 12:56 PM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
show
That's when you add a flag that when true includes CSS... I mean if the
whole point of using a framework is for simplicity that would surely cover
it.
On Jun 9, 2013 1:07 PM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
This just seems really
Here's what I've come up with on the context sensitive help system (thanks
to a few tips from Walter). I'm not crazy about the idea of having to
include the hidden modalWindow on each page that uses the help but I found
it much simpler than doing it all inline (maybe that's just my lacko skill
set
);
$(document.body).insert( mhw);
});
might want to inline all of the css on the shell div parts.
On 6/9/2013 2:03 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
Here's what I've come up with on the context sensitive help system (thanks
to a few tips from Walter). I'm not crazy about the idea of having to
include
in a data-attribute. That
depends on how much content there would be. It would be completely
instantaneous.
Walter
On May 30, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
I'll play around with it on Sunday and see what I can cobble
together... of course it looks like you did most of the work in 5
Has anyone developed an inline help system? Am I barking up the wrong tree
or is there an easier way to do this?
Ideally we could just drop the div in anywhere we wanted, the help icon
would always float to the right of the label/input and when the user
clicked the help icon we'd get a context
to make
this possible, the bulk of this effort would probably go into the CSS to
style your tooltips.
On May 30, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Phil Petree wrote:
Has anyone developed an inline help system? Am I barking up the wrong
tree or is there an easier way to do this?
Ideally we could just drop
I'm expanding the table row highlighting ya'll helped me with before. Now
I have two tables on a page and each table has rows that I want to
highlight on mouseover.
Can't give the tables the same id so what I was doing was creating a div
with a class:
table class='blah' id='blah' ...
trthCol
:
On May 17, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
I'm expanding the table row highlighting ya'll helped me with before.
Now I have two tables on a page and each table has rows that I want to
highlight on mouseover.
Can't give the tables the same id so what I was doing was creating a div
Neither the original example or Jasons worked in IE9 with or without
compatibility view
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:48 PM, ayson...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you both! I will give it a try. The example in jsfiddle is basic. I
have more functionality in my actual script and will look how the solution
']:checked) //this is probably more safe but
it will match more elements as it gets all elements that have a name
attribute that starts with kitcat (starts with is ^= instead of =)
Jason Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Phil Petree
| jwestbr...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.comwrote:
// this works with names that contain spaces and arrays[]...
Validation.add('validate-one-array', 'Error message text',
function(value, element) {
var elmName = input:checkbox[name=' +element.name
Happy Easter!
I have an array of checkboxes on a form (about 15 of them) arranged in rows
like this:
trtdinput type='checkbox' name='kitcat[]'
.../tdtdname/tdtddescription/td/tr
What I have been trying to use is this:
$(input:checkbox[name=kitcat]:checked).each(function() {
// if one is
-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.comwrote:
Happy Easter!
I have an array of checkboxes on a form (about 15 of them) arranged in
rows like this:
trtdinput type='checkbox' name='kitcat[]'
.../tdtdname/tdtddescription/td/tr
What I
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.comwrote:
Has anyone found a good form validator?
I have been using the one by Andrew Tetlaw for several years and its
worked really well but now with proto 1.7 and ie 9 I'm finding it no longer
works (as in it doesn't see select
Has anyone found a good form validator?
I have been using the one by Andrew Tetlaw for several years and its worked
really well but now with proto 1.7 and ie 9 I'm finding it no longer works
(as in it doesn't see select where no option has been chosen.
i.e.
You guys are the best!
Walter, I would have never thought of using radio buttons but I bet that's
what they do on the clothing sites where you can pick different
shirt/pant/shoe colors... they all work like yours does so I'll implement
it the way you did. Should work perfectly.
Thanks for the
, at 3:12 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
I want users to be able to pick from one of 6 colors for a folder (like
a file folder).
At first I thought about doing this as a selectoption
value='color_blue' style='background-image: url(blue.png);'/option
But I'm discovering this will really only render
I want users to be able to pick from one of 6 colors for a folder (like a
file folder).
At first I thought about doing this as a selectoption value='color_blue'
style='background-image: url(blue.png);'/option
But I'm discovering this will really only render well in firefox...
Has anyone
Not sure what you're expecting but under ie 9, neither worked for me... not
even in compatibility mode.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.comwrote:
Have a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/ZYDjc/
Any thoughts? Should I raise a ticket?
Thanks,
Walter
--
You
Try name=appleprice=1.00
On Feb 14, 2013 8:14 AM, Sakthi Dasan shakthyd...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a rest web service like
@Path(/postItem)@Produces({ MediaType.APPLICATION_XML,
MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON })public Item postItem(@QueryParam(name) String
name, @QueryParam(price) String
The parameters are passed but only the first one because you either have to
serialize the data or build your own serialized string.
If you want just a few fields and your form contains many more than that
you can build your own like this:
parameters: 'name='+escape($F('idName'))
answered a similar question in more depth on StackOverflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14306045/codeigniter-script-aculo-us-inplaceedit-produces-duplicates-on-update/14313622#14313622
Jason Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Phil Petree
Hi All!
I'm implementing the scriptaculous inplace editor and I have it working
except for one small detail:
If I activate the editor, click cancel, activate the editor again I get two
inplace editors. cancel those and activate again and I get three. cancel
those and activate again and I get
Thanks Walter.
I tried that already and found the editor to be essentially disabled (you
could click but not get the form).
On Jan 27, 2013 6:14 PM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Jan 27, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
Hi All!
I'm implementing the scriptaculous
Yes, multiple instances are being created.
Your stackoverflow solution doesn't work for me. The elements to be
inplace edited don't exist when the dom is loaded and may not ever exist.
I'm using a tab control, when the tab is activated an ajax call is made and
some html is returned. In this
Hi Greg!
Thanks for looking at this...
Turns out that if I remove the submit handler from the wizard class and
stop trapping the submit button it works just fine...
Not sure why this oddity is but it is and it works...
P~
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:57 PM, greg i...@wildanimaltracks.com wrote:
I'm working on submitting a form using a hidden iFrame target... inside
the wizzard class the f.submit(); throws the method error but as soon as
you step over it in the debugger it calls the forms processor and the form
data is processed. If you ignore the error in normal browser mode I get an
I think the keyhole method seems to be the best mechanism. I'll play
around with the callback for a bit and see what I can cobble together.
My overall problem is, the user is creating a folder and I want to make
adding the initial contents as easy as possible... in other words, I don't
want the
-alone document
first to check.
Dave
On 1 January 2013 22:53, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an empty div that gets an ajax result that contains a table
which
looks like this:
HTML:
table class='form' id='mail' width='100%' border='1'
tr
thSubject:/th
('removeClassName', 'over');
elm.addClassName('over');
});
$('mail').on('mouseout', 'tr', function(evt, elm){
rows.invoke('removeClassName', 'over');
});
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.comwrote:
On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Phil Petree wrote:
$('mail
wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
Thanks Walter! I tried quite a few things... borrowed 1/2 dozen
snippets from various places and nothing was working till yours.
I still have one question, how do you undo (stopObserving) these events?
When I
', ...
and then you would only capture the tables that you had deliberately
marked as being stripe-able. Or use the ID of that tab to scope the
selection, or any other CSS tricks you can think of. It's a very flexible
approach.
Walter
On Jan 3, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
OK, I
Victor,
Thanks for the links... I'd already seen control.tabs and it doesn't appear
to support ajax (if it does its not documented and the api makes no
reference to it).
The one on sourceforge appears to be a fork of the control.tabs and also I
do see references to ajax in the source, it has no
Amen... that would definately be a good move! There are a number of things
on scripteka that are dead and gone (broken links)
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Victor vkhomyac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm actually planning on taking whatever is still available on scripteka
and rehosting it on
there it
was easy to supply an AJAX script which then worked just like an existing
tab... actually pretty cool.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All!
I'm now looking for/at tab controls that support ajax calls. The few that
I've found are pretty static
. I've just updated to the latest.
Walter
On Dec 25, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
On ie9.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
agnese.camell...@gmail.com wrote:
I got one example but it's orizontal scrolling:
http://scripty.walterdavisstudio.com/
it's a repo of one other member of this list.
Hope to help.
Agnese
2012/12/22 Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com
I'm working on a site that needs to have some images (logos) from
cycle but this
is good enough.
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.comwrote:
On Dec 25, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Phil Petree wrote:
Thanks for that pointer... but that's still not what I'm looking for
(and Walter, if you're still haning out here, two of those demos
I'm working on a site that needs to have some images (logos) from featured
products scrolled vertically and the images should loaded via ajax.
I've looked all over and not found anything using prototype... anyone have
any suggestions?
(looks like the prototype eco system is diminishing)
--
You
Try using the onsuccess on failure parameters in Ajax updater.
onFailure: function() {alert(bombed);},
onSuccess: ...
On Jul 27, 2012 12:04 AM, Jim Longo jimlong...@gmail.com wrote:
If it helps, I can replace the js with something real simple (an alert)
and it still won't run in the AJAX page.
then perhaps we're not understanding what you mean by passed
normal process is:
onSuccess: call a function that processes the incoming data
onFailure: tell the user what happened
what gets passed is data.
what gets called are functions.
having code in an external file indicates to me you want
Jim,
Did Jason's code not work?
And you're right, the examples and docs totally suck... it's like trying to
decipher some secret code that someone forgot to let the rest of us
normal programmers in on.
The purpose of AJAX calls is to reduce bandwidth and server hits by
reducing the number of
');
$('my_div').innerHTML = h1AJAX Response/h1p +json.text +/p;
}
}
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim,
Did Jason's code not work?
And you're right, the examples and docs totally suck... it's like trying
to decipher some secret code that someone forgot
).update(content) function. Or by using
the $(elmentid).insert(content) function if appropriate.
Jason Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.comwrote:
Jim,
I shoulda put this in my last email...
Here are two ways
Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 |
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
Jim,
I shoulda put this in my last email...
Here are two ways to set the individual fields using prototype:
$('my_div').innerHTML = szUpdate;
$('my_form_field').value='what I want the value
At least by half ;-)
On Jul 16, 2012 11:59 AM, thinsoldier thinsold...@thinsoldier.com wrote:
I've actually found the cause of my problem.
Quite foolish of me. I had earlier experimented with having all my
javascript after the footer of the page rather than in the head. So I had
2 instances
Thin,
Thanks, that's a really great find... I'll work on adding that in over the
next week or so.
Greg shared his image uploader (iframe) code and was very patient and
helped me get that up and running... it was quite tricky as the json
response to an iframe had some very unexpected results.
We
I've spent the last few hours looking all over google for a prototype ajax
uploader and thumbnail creator and I'm coming up blank.
Has anyone found anything usable (we only need to upload one image per
user) or can you point me to some docs for this?
Thanks.
Pete
--
You received this message
like to do those without some kicking and screaming. I find that it's
easiest to create an iframe and post through that. The only trick then is
to send the message back to the outer page that the upload is complete.
Walter
On Jul 3, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
I've spent the last few
Best guess would be versioning... but regardless, link to the modules off
of Google instead of locally.
On May 15, 2012 8:29 AM, Robert shimield robs...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi
Ref: http://madrobby.github.com/scriptaculous/draggable/
My draggable script works fine when linking to
Couldn't have been a better choice!
On May 15, 2012 8:51 AM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi all,
If you've been on the list for any time at all, you'll know Walter Lee
Davis. :-)
Walter was good enough to step forward to help with moderating the list,
and we seem to have
/for
an IE-only filter attribute you can use in those browsers.
Walter
On May 8, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Phil Petree wrote:
Thanks... i was just getting ready to try this...
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com
wrote:
Sorry, make that position: fixed (brain
, and each one would trigger the overlay while it was
running. Note the use of defer inside these methods, you really need that
in Firefox, maybe Safari, or the overlay will either never show, or never
hide -- the page will just get stuck during the request.
Walter
On May 9, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Phil
Lets say I have this div imbedded in my page:
div id='systemWorking'img src='spinner.gif'Saving.../div
And I have a list with 1000 entries and the user has scrolled down mid
way... if I unhide the spinner using this:
document.getElementById('inProgress').style.display = 'inline';
It shows
).hide();});
Then slave the show/hide to your Ajax methods, or use the technique
outlined in the AjaxResponders docs to have one listener for all Ajax
events: http://api.prototypejs.org/ajax/Ajax/Responders/
Walter
On May 8, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Phil Petree wrote:
Lets say I have
I'm completely daft when it comes to css...
background: url(/images/working.gif) rgba(0,0,0,0.7);
Doesn't get loaded in the page in ie9.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks... i was just getting ready to try this...
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:39
That's what I thought too... but adding CB to the I'd name fixed it.
On Apr 28, 2012 12:35 PM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
On Friday, 27 April 2012 10:47:51 UTC+1, DaveK wrote:
input type='checkbox' id='1'
not a legal ID - must start with a letter
That's no longer true
Try it passing cb1 into a function as cbValue and then $(cbValue).checked...
On Apr 27, 2012 1:46 AM, Wojtek Zadora woj...@studioatrium.pl wrote:
Well, I tested it and in my case having input type=checkbox name=1
value=1 id=cb1
console.log($('cb1').checked); - returns false
Dang it... I knew it had to be something stpid!!! LOL
Thanks! Its 4a here, I'm gonna get some sleep.
On Apr 27, 2012 4:10 AM, Wojtek Zadora woj...@studioatrium.pl wrote:
$(cbValue).checked returns boolean (true|false) and you compare it to
string:
if( cbState == checked )
simply
Well, that didn't work...
input type='checkbox' id='1' name='approved' onclick=saveChange(1);
checked='checked'/
select id='ajMode_1' name='mode' onchange=saveChange(1);
option value='read_write' selected='selected'Send and Receive/option
option value='read_only'Receive Only/option
/select
into the wee hours to see what
was wrong.
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Dave Kibble davekib...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 April 2012 09:12, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
Its 4a here, I'm gonna get some sleep.
On 27 April 2012 10:04, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote
How do you get the checked state of a single checkbox?
$('cbID').checked doesn't work... also tried $F('cbID').checked
in the following function, the alert comes back with undefined
cdValue is the id of the checkbox...
function saveChange(cbValue)
{
var strState;
var cbState;
// get
Hey All,
My need is to create a easy approval process for what could be a handful of
subscribers up to 1000's of subscribers.
The idea thus far is to create a table that has (and needs) only a few
columns of information:
RecordID (hidden) | Approved [checkbox] | Subscriber Name (read_only
Of *Phil Petree
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:39 AM
*To:* prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [Proto-Scripty] Tactical Advice: Many rows, one checkbox per
row
** **
Hey All,
My need is to create a easy approval process for what could be a handful
solely for the addressee. Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.*
** **
*From:* prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com [mailto:
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Phil Petree
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:01 PM
*To:* prototype-scriptaculous
just use: $('var_name').value = form_data_you_want;
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:01 PM, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
Does setValue() encode in anyway the value you set on a form input?
Specifically, I am setting a hidden form element.
I seem to be getting mixed results and I have both
$().value = is working across all browsers and versions on my site
On Mar 5, 2012 10:19 AM, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this supported across all the browsers? I'm still hoping to get some
input on the setValue method and the encoding that takes place behind the
sheets. I'd like to use
Mobile phone answer: You can't have multiple forms with the same name on
the same page.
On Feb 3, 2012 6:17 AM, Thats Broken thats.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a case where i have a form repeated several times on a page,
the goal is to be able to submit each form independently, using unique
I'm already doing 12 hour days x 7... I don't have time to get my own work
done and no money to pay someone else to do it! LOL
On Jan 7, 2012 4:32 AM, James Hargreaves james.hargrea...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wish I had time to commit...
Apple, fancy sponsoring?!
On 6 Jan 2012, at 19:09, T.J.
Last I heard was the developer said it was still active but on a catch as
catch can basis and then several other comments said it was dead. I have
seen no forward movement so my plan became to continue using it as long as
its still working but all new code is developed with an eye towards moving
the requests and responses to see if there's a pattern to
these seemingly intermittent errors, specifically request header
content-length that doesn't match the request body length.
Still, if anyone has any ideas or suggestions, I'd appreciate hearing
from you. Thanks.
On Dec 15, 1:55 pm, Phil Petree
I would try using a later version of proto on just that page.
On Dec 15, 2011 1:43 PM, web_dev_ajax lily.o...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a B2B web application that is developed on Struts JSP using
Prototype JS library (version 1.4.0) for AJAX. I have a client running
my application on IE8. She is
Hysterical!!! Thanks for that laugh!!!
On Dec 1, 2011 9:01 AM, Victor vkhomyac...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Declaration with value assignment
2. Declare loop variables and cache length inside of for() - this can
increase performance http://jsperf.com/caching-array-length/67 -
caching length
Back in the beginning (we're talking the 80's here), I wrote my first piece
of code in 8086 assember and I've migrated to C (had one of the original
windows SDKs), C++, ASP, .NET over to PHP, javascript and prototype etc.
I'm not generally the swiftest coder out there but given enough time I can
LOL i was sitting here with phone in hand, counting the lines and had just
zeroed in on the same line when your answer came in.
On Nov 8, 2011 5:38 PM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
It would have been really helpful if you'd pointed out which line was
line 37, since things
obsolete attributes should be ignored. I used the form name attribute as
a way of knowing which AJAX module to call on behalf of that form. That
allows my dofill() to serve many forms.
I've seen very few pages of any type that validates 100% and browsers
accomodate this and that's one reason
I'm not sure I understand, tell us again how you REALLY feel about IE7! LOL
On Oct 25, 2011 11:23 AM, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have spent days now (more than days really) trying to get my code to work
in IE7. I'm about to say, * screw it, IE7 not supported *. I can't begin
to explain
Colin, thanks for taking the time to look. Yes, the form has some hidden
fields with data (user must be logged in to access this particular form).
I found the problem... fixed it about 8 minutes ago, had to update the
entire site!
The problem only surfaces under IE9. If you click into
Hey All,
Wierdness... I've not seen this before and I swear on my grandma's knickers
this was working!
function dofill(url) {
var options = {
method: 'post',
parameters: $('myform').serialize(),
onSuccess: fill_in,
onFailure: ajax_err,
on0: ajax_err
};
new
I'm with you Richard.
I have a hidden div that loads the spinner and in the AJAX onCreate I
disable the form and unhide the div while in the onComplete I hide the div
and enable the form.
What I have found is that if the AJAX call starts and completes quickly then
the spinner never gets
I never meant to imply that onComplete did the same thing as onSuccess, what
I meant to state was that onComplete ALWAYS gets called last. onSuccess can
always set a flag and onComplete can do the UI updates right before turning
off the spinner. This is useful if you're experiencing those
This is an interesting problem... my first reaction is that you'd want
to use onComplete to update the div's instead of onSuccess.
Test this with a couple of alerts and see which one gets called first and
which is last (just as onCreate is the first call, onComplete is the last).
To my way if
trick of adding a random query string on to the
end of the image url:
http://www.somedomain.com/images/newname.jpg?id=random_number and since this
will always generate a new url, the browser will refresh the image.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote
then... create new
new Images() append to the div and finally add a query cheat link???
just a shot...
best
ncubica...
On 29 sep, 13:28, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
I didnt address the caching because I had to look to see if I could find
where I had saved this link off the last time I
I'm going to violate one of my personal rules about responding to posts when
I have had a glass or two of wine (or, in this case, margharitas):
What has been sticking in my head from Andrews response are these two
phrases (in quotes):
Prototype's development over the past few years has been
They are using a script called simple-slide-show.js which is a rewrite of
someone elses script.
http://www.deepbluesky.com/blog/-/simple-slide-show-for-prototype-scriptaculous_38/
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, omer omerjaw...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
I really like scriptaclusous and I see it
, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the same old discussion that's been going on for months and I
wonder
if it will ever get resolved to the satisfaction of those of us who use
the
tool to enhance our sites.
From what I can tell, there seems to be an uber-geek philosophy
This is the same old discussion that's been going on for months and I wonder
if it will ever get resolved to the satisfaction of those of us who use the
tool to enhance our sites.
From what I can tell, there seems to be an uber-geek philosophy of make it
better and they will come and, to a degree
I looked at that once for a project I was working on.. they weren't really
shifting left/right what they were doing was inserting a new listbox to the
right of the previous box.
So: listbox A has the drives and you click on one, you then insert another
listbox B to the right of A and then use an
I have found that you have to use post AND serialize your data in order to
get it to work.
function dofill(url) {
var options = {
method: 'post',
parameters: $('myform').serialize(), // just serialize for the one item
onSuccess: fill_in,
onFailure: ajax_err,
on0: ajax_err
The core devs need to appoint a Community Activist whose responsibility it
is to build the community and who has the decision making authority to
implement these changes without bugging the devs with all our needs.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jason jwestbr...@gmail.com wrote:
So based on
I certainly have the resouces to host the forums and would have no problem
in putting them up and maintaining them but it would take a consensus of the
powers that be because if none of the guys that answer the majority of the
questions are interested then it would just be like the french forums
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
