[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 error, line 5974 - Object doesn't support this property or method

2012-06-11 Thread nbezzala
The code I pasted is from prototype.js, and I didn't write the code. There seems to be an IE8 error, when prototype.js is defining getElementsByClassName. I just used magento, with wowslider, and got this error. I'm not sure where it is coming from. On Jun 8, 8:53 pm, Jason Westbrook

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 + Prototype AJAX = HTTP Status 12019

2011-12-19 Thread Eric
Hi, Is your application running on some kind of intranet network? This seems close to an issue we got with IE9 and I wouldn't be surprised if the issue was already present on IE8. Basically, (and for some reason only known from MS), when on a Trusted Site IE9 revert to compatibility mode, which

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 + Prototype AJAX = HTTP Status 12019

2011-12-16 Thread Phil Petree
Unless you're getting paid by the hour, you loose nothing by temporarily trying a later version of prototype. Try eliminating the easy stuff before working on the hard and you'll avoid that headslap moment that comes when you realize you wasted two weeks for nothing. On Dec 15, 2011 3:35 PM,

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 + Prototype AJAX = HTTP Status 12019

2011-12-15 Thread web_dev_ajax
Thanks for the suggestion. That's an option that we plan to do with the next Production release. Unfortunately, we have release cycles that we have to adhere to and in the mean time, the client is unhappy with getting these 12XXX status code errors. I have also done a diff between version 1.4.0

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 problem

2011-06-23 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi, Anyone please help.  What am I do wrong?!! You're using the same `id` value on more than one element. That is invalid markup[1] and will not work correctly. `id` values *MUST* be unique on the page.[2][3] You may have wanted to use a `class`[4][5] instead: div class=num1/div div

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 problem

2011-06-23 Thread Julien Lenne
Hi, I would say that it comes from your ids. In fact, an id should be unique in a page. You should use class instead when you want several object to have the same behaviour. To access them, simply do $$('.num') and in your div's, change id=num by class=num (it's a good practice to put s as you

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 problem

2011-06-23 Thread KingKong99
T.J. and Julien Thank you On Jun 23, 3:17 pm, Julien Lenne tyrsen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would say that it comes from your ids. In fact, an id should be unique in a page. You should use class instead when you want several object to have the same behaviour. To access them, simply

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8

2010-02-16 Thread bill
On 2/15/2010 3:33 AM, gwyohm wrote: hi, why not using prototype cross-browser document.viewport methods ? document.viewport.getHeight() simple answer: still learning. I very much appreciate the suggestion ! -- Bill Drescher william {at} TechServSys {dot} com -- You received this message

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8

2010-02-15 Thread gwyohm
hi, why not using prototype cross-browser document.viewport methods ? document.viewport.getHeight() On 13 fév, 14:32, bill will...@techservsys.com wrote: On 2/13/2010 8:05 AM, Alex McAuley wrote: you dont need the quote before hand ... $('leftPane').style.height = '' + ((.99 *ah)-20 ) +

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 Invalid argument @ setStyle function

2009-11-17 Thread david
Hi Mostafa, What line have an invalid argument ? And what is the function trying to do? means which style is trying to be modified ? -- david On 10 nov, 15:46, Mostafa ms.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, i have a problem when working with iGoogle style drag and drop portlets on ie8 my code runs

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 responseXML ?

2009-09-18 Thread david
Hi Jason, the way you write it is good even in IE. When write onComplete: parent_response() , you launch the function at initialisation time, and the AJAX was not call, so you input is undefined. If you test alert(originalRequest) you should also have undefined. When should this be

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 responseXML ?

2009-09-18 Thread Jason Frisvold
On 09/18/2009 06:43 AM, david wrote: Hi Jason, In fact by writting parent_response(), it indicate that you execute the function on the creation of the AJAX request, and the retruned of the execution of the function value will be used for the onComplete. So the onComplete value will be

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 responseXML ?

2009-09-18 Thread Jason Frisvold
On 09/18/2009 03:00 PM, Jason Frisvold wrote: via IE8? It returns nothing. I tried adding: alert($H(originalRequest).inspect()); to the parent_response method and the alert never shows up when running via IE8. I have discovered more.. Adding an onException block like this : function

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 responseXML ?

2009-09-18 Thread Jason Frisvold
AHA!!! I have resolved this. We had a base element in the head of the document. Apparently this is to reference where the images/css/etc are. This causes IE8 to prevent javascript from retrieving a page due to security restrictions. I'd feel dumb about it if I didn't think this was a really

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 responseXML ?

2009-09-17 Thread david
Hi Jason, the way you write it is good even in IE. When write onComplete: parent_response() , you launch the function at initialisation time, and the AJAX was not call, so you input is undefined. If you test alert(originalRequest) you should also have undefined. For your trouble, what is the

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 responseXML ?

2009-09-17 Thread Jason Frisvold
On 09/17/2009 07:14 AM, david wrote: Hi Jason, the way you write it is good even in IE. When write onComplete: parent_response() , you launch the function at initialisation time, and the AJAX was not call, so you input is undefined. If you test alert(originalRequest) you should also

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 getOpacity is ALMOST correct

2009-09-02 Thread david
Hi Mojito, it seems to be a problem on float and it's accuracy. If the resulted value must be exactly defined (0.3 and not 0.30004), then you should do a small calculation to set it to the correct value : value = parseInt(value*100,10) / 100 -- david On 1 sep, 22:51, Mojito

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 invalid argument line 4501

2009-07-30 Thread Eirik
I encountered this error in all versions of IE8 without non-alpha IDs. After a lot of debugging and head scratching i discovered that if you register an observer on the 'dom:load' event in a constructor (initialize) thats supposed to fire one of the object methods (like 'this.recolour()') it will

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 invalid argument line 4501

2009-07-30 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi, ...if you register an observer on the 'dom:load' event in a constructor (initialize) thats supposed to fire one of the object methods (like 'this.recolour()') it will end up as an infinite loop in IE6, IE7 and IE8... Can you post a small, self-contained, complete example demonstrating

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 invalid argument line 4501

2009-07-30 Thread Eirik
This will reproduce the issues sometimes (http://pastie.org/565352), but it is not consistent. In principle its the same code that cause the invalid handeler at line 4501, but it only produces the issue occationaly. When running it causes a stack overflow at first, and then produce the error at

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 invalid argument line 4501

2009-07-24 Thread ColinFine
On Jul 23, 12:28 pm, Jeff jtaylor...@gmail.com wrote: We've having this exact error with IE8 and it's always related to developers using element IDs that begin with non-Alpha characters. Doing something like adding and underscore to the id fixes the problem. Note that an underscore is not

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 invalid argument line 4501

2009-07-23 Thread Jeff
We've having this exact error with IE8 and it's always related to developers using element IDs that begin with non-Alpha characters. Doing something like adding and underscore to the id fixes the problem. On Jul 14, 6:37 am, adamski adam.elemen...@gmail.com wrote: We're now going through the

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 invalid argument line 4501

2009-07-17 Thread breed...@gmail.com
Hi to evebody! I'm getting the same error! Maybe you know the reason or how to fix it But i guess it's a big of RC3. Regards, Dmitry --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 invalid argument line 4501

2009-07-14 Thread david
Hi adamski, I use this version too, and have not this problem. But What could you do? if you have multiple js script, just supress all other script instead prototype. if the error is still there, try download again prototype. Otherwise, the problem could be in text encoding. -- david On 14

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 and Position.clone (prototype 1.4) and Element.clonePosition (prototype 1.6)

2009-03-25 Thread ced
yes, target is hidden: I'm using Autocompleter.selectbox (a scriptaculus plugin) http://www.glanzani.com.ar/select/ I had to change Autocompleter behaviur to solve this issue, but I preferred to solve the problem where it happens (as it's wrong how it is calculated in ie8 the delta, not the fact

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 and Position.clone (prototype 1.4) and Element.clonePosition (prototype 1.6)

2009-03-25 Thread Rod
See https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/tickets/618-getoffsetparent-returns-body-for-new-hidden-elements-in-ie8-final I've posted an HTML example there that shows the difference between shown and hidden elements. I'm not sure what the real solution is to this. -- Rod

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 and Position.clone (prototype 1.4) and Element.clonePosition (prototype 1.6)

2009-03-24 Thread Rod
Is your target element visible? I hit this same problem with IE8 in our app for elements that were created with display:none;, IE8 seems to think they don't have the right offsetParent. To fix, I simply made them visible before calling clonePosition and the parent delta was included correctly in

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 compatibility

2009-03-23 Thread T.J. Crowder
It might be new in the context of all versions of IE, but it can hardly be a new bug in a browser that hasn't been released yet. ;-) *Obviously* I meant new to the IE line. (And IE8 was released on Thursday, although Microsoft's own Internet Explorer home page is a bit divided about it...)

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 compatibility

2009-03-22 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi Juriy, Btw, as of today, all DOM tests fully pass on IE8. T.J., do you mind giving it a spin? On IE7, you mean? (I have only IE6 and IE7 systems right now.) IE7 on Windows still has issues in form, dom, and selector tests with the trunk (assuming git pull brings me up to date, I'm a git

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 compatibility

2009-03-22 Thread kangax
On Mar 22, 4:42 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: Hi Juriy, Btw, as of today, all DOM tests fully pass on IE8. T.J., do you mind giving it a spin? On IE7, you mean?  (I have only IE6 and IE7 systems right now.) I meant IE8 :) IE7 on Windows still has issues in form,

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 compatibility

2009-03-22 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi Juriy, Thanks. I could reproduce this in IE6 and just pushed a fixhttp://github.com/sstephenson/prototype/commit/2c986d8eaff47a6a181a1c... It's fixed in IE7 as well, nice one! -- T.J. :-) On Mar 22, 3:04 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 22, 4:42 am, T.J. Crowder

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 compatibility

2009-03-21 Thread T.J. Crowder
@masterleep: I think there are still some IE8 issues. Now that a final is out, they'll probably get resolved soon. I know kangax (at least) is working on some of them and several have already been resolved in the trunk version. Would you give the trunk version a go? @RobG: Then that is a

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 compatibility

2009-03-21 Thread Completely Free Dating - Andrew
Hi All, This appears to be a bug in IE, not prototype, as it is not applying the class attribute using the specified 'className' property (http:// msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms533560(VS.85).aspx), but using the attribute name 'class' instead, so as a work around I have added this around

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 compatibility

2009-03-21 Thread kangax
On Mar 21, 10:16 pm, Completely Free Dating - Andrew andrewjdi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, This appears to be a bug in IE, not prototype, as it is not applying the class attribute using the specified 'className' property (http:// msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms533560(VS.85).aspx), but

[Proto-Scripty] Re: IE8 compatibility

2009-03-19 Thread masterleep
OK, I found this particular one... if you call input_elem.readAttribute('value'); on an input element, and the value is equal to the empty string, then in IE8 the result is null. On other browsers, the result is the empty string. On Mar 19, 11:47 am, masterleep bill-goo...@lipa.name wrote: