In a message dated 27/04/05 11:44:05 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What would one do with a separately bought PTR_GEN and WMAN and no
program which uses it, I wonder
Not much - except from having non-destructable windows, probably nothing.
I bought QPTR so that I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], jms1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
clip
Perhaps we may now understand why it is difficult for somebody to try the
QL.
What can we do to improve compatability so newcomers can try without help?
Yes, interesting proposition.
We have to take a good look at QDOS, the
What would one do with a separately bought PTR_GEN and WMAN and no
program which uses it, I wonder
Not much - except from having non-destructable windows, probably
nothing.
Eh? Use one of the many freeware etc programs which need PE but don't
usually supply PE with it of course - or am I
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] was... Just an idea for a new Product.
In a message dated 26/04/05 01:33:54 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember that i'm still
In a message dated 26/04/05 13:28:16 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, the silly thing in past years was that you could buy programs like
QPAC2 or QD which happened to include Pointer Environment but AFAIK you could
never buy Pointer Environment by itself!
H! I
Excellent. If it it will work with that, it'll probably work with
anything. Does anyone still use AH, when Minny is freely available?
Jeremy
Not many with AH, but plenty with the next two common versions (JM and JS). My
Aurora has a JM ROM and my QL+Gold Card have a switchable JM and
H! I now wonder what I bought from Jochen when he sent me QPTR. I thought
that was the Pointer Environment by itself. What I got was the QPTR Manual
(now much used), a set of Qmac macros for programming assembler pointer programs
using Qmac, QPTR extensions for programming Pointer
Apologies if this is duplication Roy, the Tesco Webmail beastie timed out on me
while I was trying to send the first copy and I don't think it got through.
I've been given so much advice that my head is spinning. In one email I
was advised to by QPAC2, but was then told that its the same as
Oops. That was meant to be forwarded to Roy not replied to this list (Tesco
Webmail strikes again). But as it ended up here, suggest adding difference
between QPTR and PE and all the other terms too!
Dilwyn Jones
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/27 Wed PM 01:00:46 GMT
To:
For me, the silly thing in past years was that you could buy programs like
QPAC2 or QD which happened to include Pointer Environment but AFAIK you
could
never buy Pointer Environment by itself!
H! I now wonder what I bought from Jochen when he sent me QPTR. I thought
that
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
Roy, I don't think this type of query can be answered too often. Could
you perhaps do something for your beginners series along these lines:
I had planned to do something on 'Essential Programs and Very Useful
Ones' I am
- Original Message -
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [ql-users] was... Just an idea for a new Product.
Some platforms actually offer the best of both worlds to some degree. Q40
and Q60 users can use
- Original Message -
From: Roy wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] was... Just an idea for a new Product.
Ok some of the advice was maybe not quite worded concisely. The Pointer
Environment is the three files
In a message dated 26/04/05 01:33:54 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember that i'm still using Qdos. Has Turbo been kept compatible with
that, or does it only support SBasic and SMSQ/E? If it is not compatible
what is the most recent version of turbo that is compatible
Jeremy Taffel wrote:
I've been given so much advice that my head is spinning. In one email I
was advised to by QPAC2, but was then told that its the same as the
pointer environment I already have.
No, PE and QPAC2 are not one and the same. QPAC2 is *based* on the PE,
though. As the PE is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when v4.21 is
finally produced it will have to work on my AH rom.
Excellent. If it it will work with that, it'll probably work with
anything. Does anyone still use AH, when Minny is freely available?
Jeremy
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In a message dated 26/04/05 01:33:54 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember that i'm still using Qdos. Has Turbo been kept compatible with
that, or does it only support SBasic and SMSQ/E? If it is not compatible
what is the
Dilwyn Jones writes:
QPAC2 is NOT as many assume a more recent version of QPAC1!
But strangely enough QPAC2 is a successor to QRAM for all practical
purposes. However, most Qram utilities no longer work with the versions of
PE that came with and after Qpac2.
The general advice seems to be
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeremy Taffel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
Remember that i'm still using Qdos. Has Turbo been kept compatible with
that, or does it only support SBasic and SMSQ/E? If it is not
compatible what is the most recent version of turbo that is compatible
with my system?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], P Witte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The general advice seems to be to decide if you want maximum
compatibility with older QL software, stick with QDOS, or if you
want the benefits of the new facilities available under SMSQ/E you
will need to go down that route.
But
Try Turbo v4g21 when it goes on the site sometime this week.
If it still needs up grading George will listen.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Remember that i'm still using Qdos. Has Turbo been kept compatible with
21 matches
Mail list logo
