Edward McLain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
But I have messages that are getting stuck in the queue sometimes for
more than 3 weeks. I have /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime set to
345600 (4 days). Anyone have any idea why this is happening?
You broke something. You didn't restart qmail
Edward,
I've had problems with qmail-remote hanging - it had nothing to do
with the queue lifetime, but with some code in qmail-remote failing,
possibly due to an O/S bug.
A fix which works for me is to enable socket keep-alives. This will
kill the socket if it has died after
anyone.
Later,
Ed McLain
-Original Message-
From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail-queue question
Edward McLain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
But I have messages that are getting stuck
Edward McLain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK... Let me explain this a little bit better and maybe clear some
things up.
Okay.
2. The only patch on this system is the qmailqueue-patch for the
qmailscanner.
This can cause qmail-queue to not be run, but not qmail-remote to crash.
5. To get
3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23 I
tend to think that it actually arrive at 3:08 on Jul 30 of 2001, that is
unless qmail is doing something funking with date and time stamps. ;)
But you didn't show the log entry that corresponds to this message. As
a
-Original Message-
From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail-queue question
3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23
I
tend to think that it actually arrive at 3:08 on Jul 30
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:39:28PM -0500, Edward McLain allegedly wrote:
-Original Message-
From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail-queue question
3. When the queue shows the message arriving
Edward McLain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to start anything else, but is there any better way to stop qmail
when using tcp-daemonts than svc -d /service/qmail-send ?
No -- that is the proper way to stop qmail with daemontools.
This doesn't seem to always work [...]
Nope -- it always
09, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Edward McLain
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail-queue question
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:39:28PM -0500, Edward McLain allegedly wrote:
-Original Message-
From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ok.. so as someone pointed out I have to now search by the deliver
number.. So I ran:
[root@mail send]# grep delivery 366 * | /usr/local/bin/tai64nlocal
2001-08-09 13:41:28.533103500.s:@40003b72c36a2839ff1c starting
delivery 366: msg 112603 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[root@mail
Edward McLain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok.. so qmail-remote crashed.. but why?
Who knows? Did you kill it?
It had also been running for over 3 hours?
So? Long messages to a slow host can do this.
Well to test it out I did the following:
[...]
You didn't use proper SMTP syntax, which
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 02:22:59PM -0700, Jon Rust wrote:
Print the error message to standard output and the server will return this
message.
This doesn't work with qmail-queue. I have yet to find anyway to get a
message either returned to the sending server or to the logs. I've tried
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wrote custom script which substitute qmail-queue, it unpack received
message, starting antivirus and if message infected anyone, return
code '111' i.e. temporary problem, and deny message relay via server.
but, user cannot understand reason of
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 06:57:33AM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wrote custom script which substitute qmail-queue, it unpack received
message, starting antivirus and if message infected anyone, return
code '111' i.e. temporary problem, and deny
i wrote custom script which substitute qmail-queue, it unpack received
message, starting antivirus and if message infected anyone, return
Why re-invent the wheel?
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net
Jeff Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:19:19PM +0200, Andreas Grip wrote:
Well, a smtp-server receiving a lot of mail can reach the limit of
maximum allowed simultanius connection. If the smtp server close the
connection faster there will be more time over and the server is able to
receive more mail. So
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this is a great idea; it means you have to accept every message,
then scan them, then generate late bounces, instead of rejecting them during
the initial SMTP conversation.
qmail-scanner do not reject
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:57:08AM +0200, Andreas Grip wrote:
Nope, I'm not misstaken. An infected mail is not rejected while my smtp
server is receiving the mail, it turn of the connection with an ok. No
bounce at this time. And then it sends an bounce to the sender with
virus warning
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the qmail-queue-patch together with the qmail-scanner and I'm also
thinking about to put some spamfilters before or after the antivirus
scanning.
[...]
Is it ok to let the sending smtp server to wait so long time before
[qmail-scanner] has
At 12:27 07.07.2001 -0600, you wrote:
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm thinking about to create another queue that the mail can be
placed in
first so qmail can tell the sender that it has ben received and then start
to scan and filtering the mail in that queue before it
Lukas Beeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:27 07.07.2001 -0600, you wrote:
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm thinking about to create another queue that the mail can be
placed in first so qmail can tell the sender that it has ben received
and then start to scan and
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the qmail-queue-patch together with the qmail-scanner and I'm also
thinking about to put some spamfilters before or after the antivirus
scanning.
[...]
Is it ok to let the sending smtp server to wait so long time
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
connection faster there will be more time over and the server is able to
receive more mail. So I think a server, that are faster with closing the
connection should be more efficient.
Then the backlog is on your server. You still have to scan the mails
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this is a great idea; it means you have to accept every message,
then scan them, then generate late bounces, instead of rejecting them during
the initial SMTP conversation.
qmail-scanner do not reject them, it just bounce them.
I
I hope the webmin qmail module wouldn't screw up my config
qmail+Vpopmail+Qmailadmin
Regards
Sumith
if all you wanted to do is to look at what is in
the queue you could do what I did (although there are probably
lots of other solutions that I would be interested in hearing).
My
Sumith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I know how many concurrent qmail deliveries are taking place on my
qmail server, both qmail-local and qmail-remote
qmail's logs include this information in the "status:" lines.
Charles
--
"Sumith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I know how many concurrent qmail deliveries are taking place
on my qmail server, both qmail-local and qmail-remote
Look at your qmail-send logs. You should see something like:
@40003abb67f02a8b74e4 status: local 0/60 remote 14/500
where
Sumith,
if all you wanted to do is to look at what is in
the queue you could do what I did (although there are probably
lots of other solutions that I would be interested in hearing).
My solution, as well as the solution to other problems, was to
install Webmin 0.84. There is a third-party
-Original Message-
From: Sumith
To: Qmail
Sent: 3/22/01 11:03 PM
Subject: qmail queue
How can I know how many concurrent qmail deliveries are taking place on
my qmail server, both qmail-local and qmail-remote
Regards
Sumith
Call me old fashioned, but when I want to see what my
: Qmail
Objet : Re: Qmail Queue is out of control
Frdric Belteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seems as if I have a problem with my qmail queue. A lots of mails are
stuck in it and I do not know how to send them.
Having messages in the queue isn't a problem -- that's what a queue is for.
Why do
Frdric Belteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing is, that mails are stuck in the queue and I want to make them go
...
I've tried kill -ALRM qmail-send without succes :((
And now, I'm still stuck and I become crazy #:{{
If they're "stuck" in the queue, there's a reason for it. That reason
My log file looks like this :
984126108.972553 warning: trouble opening remote/19/66328; will try again
later
Right now, I have 12536 lines in it !!
-Message d'origine-
De : Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoy : vendredi 9 mars 2001 15:19
: Qmail
Objet : Re: Qmail Queue
Frdric Belteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My log file looks like this :
984126108.972553 warning: trouble opening remote/19/66328; will try again
later
Ah, this is different -- this isn't just messages sitting in the queue, this
is queue corruption. Did you try deleting files out of
I've just tried to fix je queu with queue-fix and It made nothing more :((
Is their another solution ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoy : vendredi 9 mars 2001 15:35
: Qmail
Objet : Re: Qmail Queue is out of control
Frdric Belteau [EMAIL
Frdric Belteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just tried to fix je queu with queue-fix and It made nothing more :((
I don't quite follow this. However...
Is their another solution ?
Yes:
-stop qmail
`rm -rf /var/qmail/queue`
-cd into the qmail source directory
`make setup
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: Qmail Queue is out of control
Frdric Belteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just tried to fix je queu with queue-fix and It made nothing more
:((
I don't quite follow this. However...
Is their another solution ?
Yes:
Frdric Belteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seems as if I have a problem with my qmail queue. A lots of mails are
stuck in it and I do not know how to send them.
Having messages in the queue isn't a problem -- that's what a queue is for.
Why do you think it's a problem? It's probably just mail
qmailu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have setup qmail with 3.5 lac users and my filesystem which contains
qmail,vpopmail and hence the queue has become full. How can i move the
qmail-queue to a different file system (I already have another file system
with plenty of disk space. I currently
Jos Carreiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm wondering if exists some binaries or scripts to cleanup/fix
the qmail queue
Read www.qmail.org. There's several links there that do precisely this.
i'm also receiving messages from foreign hosts about outgoing messages
bouncing from my server
i'm wondering if exists some binaries or scripts to cleanup/fix
the qmail queue
( /opt/qmail/queue/mess
/remote
/info
/bounce)
Have a look at:
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1217/fid/206 :
Am 20.01.2001 um 22:05:42 schrieb NDSoftware:
Hi,
Hi Nicolas,
Can you send me a qmail-queue patched for use with qmail-scanner,
why don't we try to get it to run on your computer? It might not be a
good idea to take a program from someone you do not know, sent to you per
mail. You can
"NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where i can get log for QMail Queue because i have '451 qq Temporary Problem
(#4.3.0)' when in send a mail after install AVP.
How did you configure your logging?
-Dave
It's officailly documented as this :
root:/usr/local/src/qmail-1.03# patch -p1 /path/to/qmail-103.patch
from the qmail-howto. But this command did not work for me, who knows, maybe I
did something wrong.
regards
chris
* lkhanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
can anybody tell me how can i apply qmail-queue patch on existing
running qmail-1.03, qmail patch ois available on qmail.org site but i
don't know how to aply that , bcoz its neither a tar file nor a rpm,
So could u pl help me in applying that
u nd t rd
"Robin" == Robin S Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robin u nd t rd th fckng mn pg fr ptch nd ptch th qml srcs, rcmpl,
Robin stp qml nd rnstll. And IYAM, this shorthand thingy is kind hrd
Robin t rd.
"f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng."
- Anonymous, 19alongtimeago
Sorry,
how do we properly clear the queue? right now i have about 98,000 messages
in queue and this is hanging qmail. please help, this is rather urgent
Sonam Wangchuk
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 01:50:26PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do we properly clear the queue? right now i have about 98,000 messages
in queue and this is hanging qmail. please help, this is rather urgent
what do you want to do ?
expire the messages (- 98'000 error messages),or
actually delete everything in queue. i found out about qmHandle but due to
so many messages, its taking a long time to even do a listing. i might as
well delete all the mails in queue manually. thanks
Sonam Wangchuk
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Olivier M. wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06,
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:30:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually delete everything in queue. i found out about qmHandle but due to
so many messages, its taking a long time to even do a listing. i might as
well delete all the mails in queue manually. thanks
well, what about stoping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do we properly clear the queue?
That depends on the nature of the messages in the queue. If they're
all spam, you can stop qmail, remove them, and restart qmail. If
they're valid messages that need to be delivered, qmail will deliver
them ASAP and clear them
there is one more directory in /var/qmail/queue called todo, should we
remove that too? what is that directory? thank you for your quick
response.
Sonam Wangchuk
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Olivier M. wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:30:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 08:48:13PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:30:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually delete everything in queue. i found out about qmHandle but due to
so many messages, its taking a long time to even do a listing. i might as
well delete
after removing all the files as mentioned, when i try to send email i get
"qmail-inject: fatal: qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)"
why is this error coming up?
before removing all the file i did try to move the todo directory on
another file system and created a link from
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:50:39PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is one more directory in /var/qmail/queue called todo, should we
remove that too? what is that directory? thank you for your quick
response.
well, it's empty on my servers, so I think you can also
empty them...
Olivier
actually these are mails that are no longer needed, so that's why i can
remove them. i can not send any mail and it seems to be because all these
messages in queue. i stopped and restarted qmail. i even rebooted the
box. that's why i used "hanging". but right now i am getting this error
message
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:55:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after removing all the files as mentioned, when i try to send email i get
"qmail-inject: fatal: qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)"
why is this error coming up?
mmm
the best would be to remove (or move)
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:55:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after removing all the files as mentioned, when i try to send email i get
"qmail-inject: fatal: qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)"
It sounds like you removed more than was suggested. You have now broken your
queue
thank you to all. i have removed the queue and started qmail. thank you
again.
Sonam Wangchuk
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 08:48:13PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:30:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Ricardo Albano wrote:
Any had implemented qmail-qfilter sucefully or any qmail-queue wrapper ?
RDA.-
I have a generic qmail-queue-wrapper program. It's written in perl and
in its standard form, does nothing but add another Received header to
the message before calling
Jorge Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May 16 16:21:05 lx1 qmail: 958504865.479739 delivery 38: deferral:
Connected_to_200.246.122.250_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4.2)/
After 3 days the message is bounced, but i already checked the remote
server and there are no error!
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 03:54:32PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
[snip]
200.246.122.250 is closing the SMTP connection to your qmail before
acknowledging the receipt of the message. Under these conditions,
qmail has to assume that the message didn't go through. This is a
violation of SMTP. Which
+ Fred backman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| My mail server has been working okay until recently, and I cannot
| figure out why it's not working. This is what I get when I try to
| send a message locally:
|
| # echo bollox | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
| qmail-inject: fatal: qmail-queue was killed
|
|
- Original Message -
As a first try, you could try to present a valid message to
qmail-inject:
# echo to: bollox | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
Sorry, that was a typo. I did exactly the line you suggested.
If it still fails, turn on process tracing (if your system allows it)
and
+ "Fred Backman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| If it still fails, turn on process tracing (if your system allows it)
| and see what happens to the process.
|
| Do you mean I should trace qmail-queue? If so, how do I do that when
| qmail-queue is invoked from qmail-inject?
You seem to be on a Solaris
- Original Message -
From: Harald Hanche-Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Do you mean I should trace qmail-queue? If so, how do I do that when
| qmail-queue is invoked from qmail-inject?
You seem to be on a Solaris system. Then use truss -f to trace the
children. (You can also use -o
On 30-Sep-99 Fred Backman wrote:
2761: open("/dev/zero", O_RDONLY) Err#13 EACCES
2761: open("/dev/zero", O_RDONLY) Err#13 EACCES
...
Check the privileges on /devices/pseudo/mm@0:zero, they should be
something like:
crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys
Just for the record:
The problem with "qmail-queue was killed" turned out to be bogus permission
mode on the root directory (which somehow affected qmail-queue's access to
/dev/zero).
# ls -ld /
drwx---r-x 35 root root1536 Sep 4 08:47 //
should obviously have been
drwxr-xr-x 35
Eric Dahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail-queue reads a mail message from descriptor 0. It
then reads envelope information from descriptor 1.
In reference to this, I thought descriptor 0 was STDIN and descriptor 1
was STDOUT, How can qmail-queue read envelop information
So how does the message pass between the various parts of the qmail
structure (inject, queue, send), if not via STDIN and OUT?
I want to write a wrapper for qmail-queue, but am a novice. This is a
long term project. thx
Dave Sill escribió:
Eric Dahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:22 PM Monday 9/13/99, Eric Dahnke wrote:
So how does the message pass between the various parts of the qmail
structure (inject, queue, send), if not via STDIN and OUT?
I want to write a wrapper for qmail-queue, but am a novice. This is a
long term project. thx
Eric. These are more "How
Eric Dahnke writes:
DESCRIPTION
qmail-queue reads a mail message from descriptor 0. It
then reads envelope information from descriptor 1.
In reference to this, I thought descriptor 0 was STDIN and descriptor 1
Ben Heilman writes:
Hello all,
I have been trying to write a SPAM filter which is a wrapper for
qmail-queue, so that it may act on information in the actual email message.
Unfortunately, my C skills are not the best. I realize that qmail-smtpd will
first feed the email via file
On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 11:02:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody written a Perl module for Qmail::Queue?
For talking to qmail-queue? Not quite, but it would be almost trivial to
turn my mjinject code into one.
As someone who's looked at
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody written a Perl module for Qmail::Queue?
For talking to qmail-queue? Not quite, but it would be almost trivial to
turn my mjinject code into one.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
Wilson Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FAQ says this:
7.3. How do I rejuvenate a message? Somebody broke into Eric's computer
... I see it sitting here
in /var/qmail/queue/mess/15/26902...
Answer: Just touch /var/qmail/queue/info/15/26902. (This is the only
form of queue modification
On Jun 01 1999, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
The FAQ says this:
7.3. How do I rejuvenate a message? Somebody broke into Eric's computer
^ ^^
(...)
Haha! Anytime I read the FAQ I ROTFL, man! And I keep seeing
+ "Robert J. Adams" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Is it possible to have two machines accessing the same queue via NFS?
No! Your single copy of qmail-send assumes it is the only entity
making any changes in the queue (with the exception of qmail-queue,
which does however follow a specific protocol for
Network Administration - President, SISCOM Inc.
Phone: 937-222-8150 FAX: 937-222-8153
-Original Message-
From: Harald Hanche-Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Qmail Queue mounted via NFS?
+ "Robert J. Adams&qu
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
+ "Robert J. Adams" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Is it possible to have two machines accessing the same queue via NFS?
No! Your single copy of qmail-send assumes it is the only entity
making any changes in the queue (with the exception of
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Robert J. Adams wrote:
If we are speaking about reliability.. what if the local machine croaks..
then anything in the queue (of that local machine) is lost.. that isn't
acceptable.
Not necessarily. If the queue disk wasn't blown out when the machine
croaked, then you
I am running into some strange qmail behavior.
I have configured qmail under tcpserver.
Queues are permanently stuck and messages keep
accruing in the queue. When the machine is rebooted,
tcpserver starts, apparently qmail also does, but
qmail dies.
Apparently? You don't know? What
At 04:15 PM Wednesday 3/31/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I built qmail V1.03 on a Solaris 2.5.1 (SPARC) machine.
All went well, but when I tried to do some tests, a strange behaviour
appeared. I was successfully able to do a local-to-local delivery running
the following command as "pv" (a
Hmmm, don't you mean '/var/qmail/queue/lock' ?
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Frederic Woodbridge wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello everyone.
I think I just did a Really Stupid Thing! (tm) but I don't know how stupid yet.
We had all these messages in the queue and we decided to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 01:36 PM 1/12/99 , you wrote:
Hmmm, don't you mean '/var/qmail/queue/lock' ?
Yuppers, I do. Sorry.
Fred
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
iQA/AwUBNpuXlSWLl68ykPinEQKMdACgih4Iz/tee7+dyN7XBMccUmFjCigAn3rl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 01:34 PM 1/12/99 , you wrote:
Stop qmail-send. "make setup check". Run qmail-start. -- Jeff
Say, that did it!
Thanks for the information, Jeff. You're a life-saver!!
Fred.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
Then get queue-fix from the qmail homepage.
It should sort out your woes.
Cya,
John.
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Frederic Woodbridge wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 01:36 PM 1/12/99 , you wrote:
Hmmm, don't you mean '/var/qmail/queue/lock' ?
Yuppers, I do. Sorry.
86 matches
Mail list logo
