Here's the full headers returned by Yahoo on that same error, when
sending to one of the affected account.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 17 23:46:16
2007
X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via
209.191.85.52; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:46:17 -0800
X-Originating-IP:
Set up MX records.
On 1/17/07, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point, this problem is really paralizing, so I implore anyone for
some help and assistance.
Okay, this is a repeat, and a renewed effort to try to get to the bottom of
this - I am starting to believe that there is
I tried to update simscan-toaster package. But, when rebuild package of
simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1.src.rpm had error :
configure: error: Unable to find your clamav databases,
specify --enable-clamavdb-path.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.34058 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad
Since you are using the devel clamav, try using the devel simscan
package. It has a fix for this exact problem.
Erik
On 1/14/07, Wiliarto Prio Utomo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to update simscan-toaster package. But, when rebuild package of
simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1.src.rpm had error :
On Jan 18, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Set up MX records.
Holy cow - right on.
There were no MX records. I guess the virtualhosting package I use
doesn't create the MX records since the last updates...
Thanks for the fast response on that one.
Hello all,
I would like to setup a QT site where the 2 email servers will be doing
replication to each other 24 hours live.
eg: when mail coming from Internet to Mail Server 1, it will automatically
replicate to Mail Server 2.
Jake has point me the backup restore script guides, but that
Hi Guys,
Does anyone know where the file simscan-toaster.spec is kept? I've looked in
/usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ but it's not there. As far as I know the src install
for simscan-toaster-1.3.1 went OK. I need the file, so I can edit it before
building the RPM, so as to be albe to get Spamassassin to
A newly built QT, the mail can sent out without difficulty. However,
after 15 min. then from the log, qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject appear.
Any idea what did I done wrong.
I have anopther one running smoothly without any question.
Thank you.
--
Jakin Lee
-
libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 is already installed in sandbox, not built
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10 is already installed in sandbox, not built
Building courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 ...
error: unpacking of archive failed on file
Dave wrote:
Hi Erik,
We're here about the QmailToaster Project. Don't get
me wrong, this
community always goes above and beyond to help out a
straggled user,
but come on . . .
My apologies if anyone is offended.
No offense taken
The impressive amount of customization and
Robert Giddings wrote:
Hi Guys,
Does anyone know where the file simscan-toaster.spec is kept? I've
looked in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ but it's not there. As far as I know
the src install for simscan-toaster-1.3.1 went OK. I need the file, so I
can edit it before building the RPM, so as to be
Jakin Lee wrote:
A newly built QT, the mail can sent out without difficulty. However,
after 15 min. then from the log, qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject appear.
Any idea what did I done wrong.
I have anopther one running smoothly without any question.
Thank you.
Need more info.
Dan Herbon wrote:
-
libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 is already installed in sandbox, not built
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10 is already installed in sandbox, not built
Building courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 ...
error: unpacking of archive failed on file
Hey Lazaro,
Did you ever get this fixed up?
Lazaro Ferreira wrote:
Hi all,
I have removed servercert.pem and start receiving email from sendmail
hosts, google mail sending ok too, so the workaround seems to be
working
I will keep trying ( with your help ) a fix to this problem
Thanks
Gabriel,
Please look at
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT_Failover_replication_Setup
This page gives you a procedure to configure a backup qmt server that
will be available for failover in the event of primary server failure.
The backup server will only ever be 1 minute out
rpm -e --nodeps courier-authlib-toaster
yum install libtool-ltdl-devel libtool-ltdl
rpm -Uhv courier-authlib-toaster-NEW.rpm
On 1/18/07, Dan Herbon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The log now states:
-
Installing courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 in the sandbox ...
error: Failed
Trung,
Is your toaster on a dynamic or static IP address?
I have static IP since my company has the Business DSL line.
Trung Pham wrote:
So in my case, I am forwarding my mail through Yahoo. I should not
bother
setting up SPF, SRS, and Domainkeys since I won't see any benefit at
all.
Did you remove djbdns (and djbdns-extcache and djbdns-localcache) after the
sandbox was built? If so, it's still installed in the sandbox. To remove it
from the sandbox, you can tell qtp-newmodel to rebuild the sandbox, or you
can do it manually (saving a lot of time) by:
# chroot /opt/qtp-sandbox
I have setup my domain key correctly.
But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they confirmed
my domainkey setting.
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by .com.
I have static IP business line BTW.
If they have confirmed my domain, why do they
Put your IP in this: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html
See if you are on any of the RBL's. Perhaps Yahoo's scoring you very
low because you're on a list.
Erik
On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have setup my domain key correctly.
But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder
I have setup my domain key correctly.
But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they confirmed
my domainkey setting.
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by .com.
I have static IP business line BTW.
If they have confirmed my domain, why do they
Find a way to contact Yahoo!. The problem is on their side.
For hotmail, you can go to support.msn.com and report mislabeled spam.
I'd imagine Yahoo has something similar.
You can also try going here: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html and
seeing if you are listed on any of the rbl's that they may
I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
need some serious help.
First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc
EE (or anyone),
Any word about this? Seems to me that servercert.pem shouldn't be world
readable since it contains the private (signing) key and all parent
directories are world readable. (I seem to remember EE answering this, but
can't find nor remember the answer)
Also, I came across this at
Hi James,
Anything about the delivery in the send log?
/var/log/qmail/send/current
It should at least tell you to what account it went.
JP
- Original Message -
From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
Any updates on this matter?
JP
- Original Message -
From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:56 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Accepting mail from local mail servers
Question is, why is the toaster at
I'ts not in there. Believe me I looked. The mail that has vanished is
just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
I got it, all the info is in the send log.
James
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Hi James,
Anything about the
Ok clear..
Are the emails that do not arrive from other locations then the ones that do
arrive?
JP
- Original Message -
From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck
What does
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
show you?
James Jarrett wrote:
I'ts not in there. Believe me I looked. The mail that has vanished is
just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
I got it, all the info is in the send log.
James
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at
Ensure that you don't have the same entry in locals and virtualdomains.
Erik
On 1/18/07, James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'ts not in there. Believe me I looked. The mail that has vanished is
just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
I got it, all the
I suppose that's a possibility. Have you verified that your reverse DNS is
not set up right? (http://www.dnstools.com)
Where/who is the authoritative DNS server for your domain? Are you doing
this or is SBC supposed to be handling that?
Trung Pham wrote:
Nope, not on any blacklist.
Maybe
This:
ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1
qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.1
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.1
vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2
ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.1
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.2
courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
You can't change reverse dns. Only SBC can do that.
That said, I don't know why Yahoo thinks your e-mail is spam, only
Yahoo can answer that. If you have DomainKeys configured and are not
on any rbl, I can't think of a reason why they would do that.
Aside from getting you to pay for a mailhop
Yes,
Everything is behaving like there is some kind of filter running that if
certain headers or content are in the message (or from a particular
domain?) the mail just vanishes.
I can get e-mail from amazon, mail from paypay goes poof (two verified
examples, but by no means all).
James
On
I'll answer this one with a not sure. I don't remember this question
being asked. Since all of my toasters have no users on them, I never
really thought about it.
Maybe Nick will have some insight, as I have no clue.
Erik
On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EE (or anyone),
Any
Would that not break *ALL* email?
Afterall I'm only using one virtual domain and not getting (or at least
not dealing with) and mail on the real domain.
James
But I checked, and that is not happening.
I can post my control files if you think it would help.
James
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:01
I'm guessing that SPF's rejecting them. The newer toaster gives you a
meaningful message, but the version you have simply quits and looks normal
on the log.
Change /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior from 3 to 1.
I'm not sure if restarting is necessary, but stop then start qmail to be safe.
Report
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I'll answer this one with a not sure. I don't remember this question
being asked. Since all of my toasters have no users on them, I never
really thought about it.
I don't have any users either (as I imagine is the case with most toasters),
so it's not a gaping hole. I just
I am the authoritative DNS server for my domain. This is how I am able to
setup SPF and Domainkey.
But still no luck with reverse DNS.
Is there anyone who is able to setup reverse DNS having SBC as their ISP?
Thanks.
I suppose that's a possibility. Have you verified that your reverse DNS is
Agreed, it's why I asked for Nick's input.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I'll answer this one with a not sure. I don't remember this question
being asked. Since all of my toasters have no users on them, I never
really thought about it.
I
SPF would be a really good guess since everything would appear to
arrive from the scanning appliance. The other good guess would be
DomainKeys. Check the log in the appliance for error 4xx/5xx
rejections from your server.
Erik
On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing that
To disable DK, go to /var/qmail/bin and type
rm -f qmail-queue ln -s qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue
Erik
On 1/18/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SPF would be a really good guess since everything would appear to
arrive from the scanning appliance. The other good guess would be
At the command line type:
yum -y install jwhois whois $IP replace $IP with your machines IP address.
It will tell you who is responsible for reverse DNS of your ip addresses.
Thanks,
Erik
On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am the authoritative DNS server for my domain. This is
Spot on Eric,
Looking at the spf records for amazon.com and paypal.com they end with a
?all and ~all respectively.When emails pass through James's email
filtering appliance they will be seen by the toaster as coming from it,
and amazons ?all causes the spf record to resolve as neutral where
Thanks all,
It works now.
What happened before was I initially setup my TXT key to include the t=y
flag. Even though I had removed it but it took Yahoo a while to reflect
that.
Now Yahoo has the latest entry, so they pass it straight to the INBOX
folder now.
I have setup my domain key
Trung,
I'm far from expert with reverse DNS. Perhaps
http://www.dyndns.com/support/kb/archives/reverse_dns.html might help you
out a little. I don't know if RDNS is something you can set up yourself
(given that you're the authoritative DNS for the domain) or whether it's
something that SBC would
I follow this link on the main page for SRS documentation but it's a
deadlink.
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/info/srs-readme.txt
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
/var/qmail/doc/README.srs or http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/
I will update the main site.
On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I follow this link on the main page for SRS documentation but it's a
deadlink.
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/info/srs-readme.txt
Hi guys, how can one reset what spamassasin has learned so it restarts
its learning process?
Thanks for the help
Terius
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
Hi guys, how can one reset what spamassasin has learned so it restarts
its learning process?
Thanks for the help
Terius
Simply remove or rename the /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin directory. It'll
recreate everything from scratch automatically.
--
-Eric
thanks
Eric Shubes wrote:
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
Hi guys, how can one reset what spamassasin has learned so it restarts
its learning process?
Thanks for the help
Terius
Simply remove or rename the /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin directory. It'll
recreate everything from scratch
Sorry for this silly question.
Is SRS even need if I don't plan to let anyone use my server to forward
their emails? In another word, this qmail server will only be used by my
domain.
/var/qmail/doc/README.srs or http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/
I will update the main site.
On 1/18/07,
I don't think so (probably not). Someone will undoubtedly let me know if
this isn't the case. See http://www.openspf.org/SRS for details.
Trung Pham wrote:
Sorry for this silly question.
Is SRS even need if I don't plan to let anyone use my server to forward
their emails? In another word,
Hello,
I want to setup a dedicated QmailToaster only box.
I want to exchange notes with how you suggest to go about securing this
qmailtoaster only box.
My current resources point to:
- Bastille Linux
- APF Firewall
- Mod Security
- PHP.ini hardening, disallowing certain functions
- making
It is only necessary if your users choose to change their account
routing from Normal to Forward in their acct.
Say [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I send an e-mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and my domain uses spf, then gmail will see an
e-mail coming from your server from my
Dnia środa, 17 stycznia 2007 16:39, Eric Shubes napisał:
Wojciech Gabor wrote:
vpopmail[24367]: vchkpw-smtp: password fail
(pass: '0b3acf566e0899014146fee9fa23f760') [EMAIL PROTECTED]:IP
Which encoding scheme is used by the scanner? Encoding scheme must match
what vpopmail is using (I'm not
56 matches
Mail list logo
