Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam emails

Create a rule in spamdyke that should work. > Il giorno 2 lug 2020, alle ore 22:07, ChandranManikandan > ha scritto: > >  > Hi Friends, > > Any luck to block permanently or how to tight the spam rules. > Any help is appreciated. > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:21 PM ChandranManikandan

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam emails

I run them all. This is on the user level the spamdyke and spamassassin are at the smtp level. You will be fine to run them. > Il giorno 13 mag 2020, alle ore 21:33, ChandranManikandan > ha scritto: > >  > Hi Eric & Remo, > > I have installed dspam package with the below step for my

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam emails

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qmtoaster/dspam/master/readme.txt. I use server side filter per user (If you've enabled dspam for a domain) .mailfilter.dspam and .qmail file on github (https://github.com/qmtoaster/dspam), maildrop must be installed. I also use training scripts and run them

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam emails

Hi Eric, How do i install dspam and blocked spam emails in dspam. Can you help me. On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:45 AM Eric Broch wrote: > I use Dspam myself, but for clients I spec out a paid service like > Sonicwall. I know of someone else who uses Barracuda. > On 5/11/2020 8:31 PM,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam emails

Thanks! On Tue, 12 May 2020, 12:39 pm Eric Broch, wrote: > rpm -e --nodeps httpd > > yum install httpd > > > On 5/12/2020 12:37 AM, Tahnan Al Anas wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > How we can remove specific service such as httpd and reinstall it? I have > found if I go to remove httpd, php, vqadmin and

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam emails

rpm -e --nodeps httpd yum install httpd On 5/12/2020 12:37 AM, Tahnan Al Anas wrote: Hi Eric, How we can remove specific service such as httpd and reinstall it? I have found if I go to remove httpd, php, vqadmin and some more service need to uninstall -- -- Best Regards Muhammad

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam emails

Hi Eric, How we can remove specific service such as httpd and reinstall it? I have found if I go to remove httpd, php, vqadmin and some more service need to uninstall -- -- Best Regards Muhammad Tahnan Al Anas On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:44 AM Eric Broch wrote: > I use Dspam myself, but for

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam emails

I use Dspam myself, but for clients I spec out a paid service like Sonicwall. I know of someone else who uses Barracuda. On 5/11/2020 8:31 PM, ChandranManikandan wrote: Hi Friends, Anyone help me. On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:15 PM ChandranManikandan > wrote: Hi

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: ***SPAM***[ds] RE: [qmailtoaster] Qmail reject email from several domain Reason TIMEOUT

I don’t have any error in logs. The error appear in outlook or other email client when I try send test mail. I think is the authentication reason. But I don’t see any advice in logs L From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 11:18 PM To:

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: ***SPAM***[ds] RE: [qmailtoaster] Qmail reject email from several domain Reason TIMEOUT

104.47.42.63 is the client of my client (this is a dupont.com server. I don’t have any idea why he use TLS to port 25. I don’t any chance to do something with 104.47.42.63 server The 104.47.42.63 don’t know any passwords. They send an email for my client. On my server (192.168.0.95 is local ip

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Emails generating from server

Thanks Eric. Even that is done. Amit Dalia   On 09/12/2013 09:02 PM, Amit Dalia wrote: I'm using roundcube webmail as well. Anyway I had already blacklisted 127.0.0.1 in my spamdyke configuration and it worked. Thanks. Amit Dalia You must have roundcube configured to authenticate

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Emails generating from server

I'm using roundcube webmail as well. Anyway I had already blacklisted 127.0.0.1 in my spamdyke configuration and it worked. Thanks. Amit Dalia   -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: 13 September 2013 06:42 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM so sick of it!

Hi Eric, Yes Spamdyke is in use and here is the config in use... dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org #dns-blacklist-entry=bl.spamcop.net #dns-blacklist-entry=cbl.abuseat.org #dns-blacklist-entry=spamsources.fabel.dk #dns-blacklist-entry=zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam filter configuration change

thanks Eric for you replay I now install spamdyke.. I could tell where they are inserted spam emails and how to release in the event of a false positive? thanks 2012/10/22 Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net On 10/22/2012 12:13 PM, Giuseppe Perna wrote: thanks for your replay. i wont install

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam filter configuration change

Hello, thaks for you replay I noh spamdyke I installed and I can not install this software. the spam that I can be adjusted in any way? i read in the log this message: rblsmtpd: 69.64.42.16 pid 13125: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=69.64.42.16 Thanks 2012/10/17 Aleksander Podsiadły

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam filter configuration change

thanks for your replay. i wont install spamdyke 1) I must first remove any software? 2) I can proceed directly to the installation of spamdyke? 3) I just run this command? # qtp-install-spamdyke 4) for configuration and change filters as you go along? thanks 2012/10/22 Eric Shubert

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam filter configuration change

thaks for you replay, i read in the log this message: rblsmtpd: 69.64.42.16 pid 13125: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=69.64.42.16 How do I check if I use spamdyke? I can not do the installation spamdyke in a production server. thanks 2012/10/15 Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net On

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam filter configuration change

Dnia 2012-10-17, śro o godzinie 16:24 +0200, Giuseppe Perna pisze: How do I check if I use spamdyke? I can not do the installation spamdyke in a production server. thanks Something like: 10-17 01:39:09 spamdyke[20707]: DENIED_RBL_MATCH from: dfter...@hotmail.com to: s...@k888.tw origin_ip:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam attack I cannot control.

Hello Eric, See notes in text please... best wishes Tony White On 08/06/2012 03:58, Eric Shubert wrote: On 06/07/2012 02:41 AM, Tony White wrote: Hello, I am sending from my yahoo account as my ip is in the spamcop system. Of course QMT uses spamcop therefore I am unable to send email

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam attack I cannot control.

Hi Eric, Update: At this stage I think it is email from a valid account., The owner of the account will be in later today and I will test for virus/Trojans. best wishes Tony White On 08/06/2012 11:29, Tony White wrote: Hello Eric, See notes in text please... best wishes Tony White

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam attack I cannot control.

Hello Eric, Inserted is a snippet of my log for last night. -- log insert -- @40004fcb49a336ca19a4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from kenwri...@gmail.com:waver...@nnn.com.au: remote nnn.com.au;waver...@nnn.com.au:unknown:197.254.125.102 rcpt : sender

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM learning

On 10/04/2011 09:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 10/03/2011 07:57 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote: Good morning list, Recently on the list there was discussion on how to take the e mail addresses /characteristics of mail marked as spam from Thunderbird and modify SA rules. I can't seem to find the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help

On 09/28/11 20:48, Eric Shubert wrote: On 09/27/2011 08:50 PM, Pak Ogah wrote: On 09/27/11 22:54, Mike Tirpak wrote: ... Mike, First of all make sure you installed Spamdyke which can easily catch spam http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/wiki/Features#qtp-install-spamdyke

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Control

Would that be the actual name of the account ( ex: catchacco...@mydomain.com) or catchall.acco...@mydomain.com? I tried to use the actual name and that didn't work. On 9/22/2011 1:25 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 09/21/2011 08:55 PM, Pak Ogah wrote: On 09/21/11 20:06, Mike Tirpak wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Control

Yes, that is correct. The catchall account is not addressed specifically. On 9/22/2011 8:41 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: Yes, the actual account name. You would need to run qmailctl cdb after changing this file in order to activate the change. I believe the problem is, it would only work for

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Control

Easier said than done. I am starting from the beginning. I have never worked with sed scripts or have any idea how to get them to work with qmail. On 9/22/2011 8:47 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 09/21/2011 06:06 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote: Everyone, I'm looking for a way to stop spamassassin from

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Control

I'm not familiar with sed. Can you direct me to any documentation? Thanks for your help. On 9/21/2011 10:21 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 09/21/2011 06:06 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote: Everyone, I'm looking for a way to stop spamassassin from marking spam that goes to the catchall account. My company

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option

I agree with Eric on the Spamdyke portion. I was thinking the same thing, but didn't have an answer for the SpamAssassin portion, so I didn't reply! :-) I run SpamDyke more for the benefit of my server. The benefit for the client is secondary. If you disable it, your certainly going to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option

Hi, On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: that. Spamdyke false positives are practically nonexistent though, so you might want to just leave spamdyke active and not tell him about it. Then again, if he insists on receiving spam, I'd charge him extra for the load

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option

: Peter Peltonen [mailto:peter.pelto...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:38 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option Hi, On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: that. Spamdyke false positives

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option

to have to resolve the issue... Mike -Original Message- From: Peter Peltonen [mailto:peter.pelto...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 10:38 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option Hi, On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option

AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option Hi, On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote: that. Spamdyke false positives are practically nonexistent though, so you might want to just leave spamdyke active

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: ***SPAM*** RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication

On 4/18/11 7:30 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/18/2011 03:00 PM, Scott Hughes wrote: Yes, the path is correct. I double checked that. Also, I can run it from the command line in any directory I am in just by typing “sync-qmail”. Thanks, Scott What are you using to edit the crontab? Have

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

O thanks! Qmail-spam stop do it! -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 11:52 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam On 03/05/2011 03:34 PM, mattias wrote: I have set Spamd=no I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Assassasin

--- On Thu, 12/23/10, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Assassasin To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Date: Thursday, December 23, 2010, 3:44 AM On 12/23/2010 06:39 AM, Emmanuel Buamah wrote: Hi All, I was installing

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam relaying

Yes, but only for the subnets I allow. The ones listed in my tcp.rules. This was ok when the network did not have over a 1000 users on it. Not everyone uses my domain for email that is on my network. I have a rule on the gateway that stops all smtp traffic unless it is from my server only.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam relaying

Correct me if I am wrong but in order for every to authenticate to the server all I need to do is remove some rules in my tcp.rules? Here is what it looks like currently.. 192.168.:deny 172.168.:deny

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

Ok, here is Timo's response to my question: Am 11.07.2010 um 21:01 schrieb Timo Sirainen: On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Waschbuesch wrote: 1.) Is there any danger regarding maildir consistency in directly moving mail items about? No. Assuming you use mv and not cp (and it's

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

Hi. My experience was only when I deleted files. I think dovecot does not complain if there are new files in the folder, but if there are files missing, it complains. I think it's normel that programs deliver mail into the folder, but normaly, whitout dovecot no file is deleted. So dovecot

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

No, no vm, no nfs, all local Andreas Am Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2010 19:47:26 schrieb Jake Vickers: On 07/08/2010 12:58 PM, Andreas Galatis wrote: After having deleted some Mails and the user accesses the concerned folder via squirrelmail he gets a failure notice saying the imap-connection was

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

Interesting, I have a script that does just that (move files about in the maildir) and it has not lead to problems yet. Though, I can definitely understand how it might be problematic. I gotta watch out for that. If you want to be on the safe side, I guess Eric's suggestion of using dovecot's

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

After having deleted some Mails and the user accesses the concerned folder via squirrelmail he gets a failure notice saying the imap-connection was interrupted. In the logs I see the error message saying time went back, therefore dovecot was stopped. The error message is false, time is not

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

I never have such problems with e.g. horde or Mail on Mac OS X. Could that be IMAP client-related as well? But then I am investigating how to replace my manual operations with dovecot's deliver. I don't want to end up having such problems as well. Martin Am 08.07.2010 um 18:58 schrieb Andreas

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

On 07/08/2010 12:58 PM, Andreas Galatis wrote: After having deleted some Mails and the user accesses the concerned folder via squirrelmail he gets a failure notice saying the imap-connection was interrupted. In the logs I see the error message saying time went back, therefore dovecot was

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

From what I read in the deliver documentation, it cannot (unlike maildrop) take an email from standard input or a file? At least that is how I read the documentation. If that's true I do not see how it could be used for this type of scripting. Anyone can confirm / correct my observation? Martin

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

You know, sometimes I am just way too slow it seems. :-) Am 08.07.2010 um 20:29 schrieb Eric Shubert: I haven't looked at the deliver documentation much, let alone recently. I don't mean to sound like a broken record, but would you like to ask on the dovecot list? (dove...@dovecot.org) That

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

hi eric when the email arrives in the spam box its headers contained the delivered to email id in the header so my script will know where to which email id the message is to be delivered. so my concern about bcc is resolved. my second question is as such which would be better Simply move the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

Rajesh M wrote: hi the current system is such that all the emails that are spam (ie between 5 and 8) get tagged as spam in subject line and are are routed to the SPAM folder which can be viewed via squirrelmail my questions 1) is it possible to route these to a common mailbox which will

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Box Missing

On 6/18/10 6:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Scott Hughes wrote: On my secondary QMT server the spambox check box is missing in QmailAdmin. I tried to rebuild the qmailadmin-toaster package with the '--define 'spambox 1'' option and then install it, but with no luck. Obviously I am missing

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Box Missing

On 6/18/10 6:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Scott Hughes wrote: On my secondary QMT server the spambox check box is missing in QmailAdmin. I tried to rebuild the qmailadmin-toaster package with the '--define 'spambox 1'' option and then install it, but with no luck. Obviously I am missing

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

On 04/14/2010 11:18 AM, David Milholen wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: On 04/09/2010 05:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: On 04/09/2010 11:25 AM, madmac wrote: Is there then a way to secure squirrelmail, or any other webmail prog. This is a default install of

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:38 PM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam One other tip. My ISO install had openssl installed, but not mod_ssl. I had to add that. See Step 1. Todd -Original Message- From: Todd Beckstead [mailto:to...@csdcpa.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:32 PM

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

my method on the wiki for all. If the mods think it usefull. more soon. - Original Message - From: madmac sysad...@tricubemedia.com To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam Ok so far: I have a new install

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: On 04/09/2010 05:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: On 04/09/2010 11:25 AM, madmac wrote: Is there then a way to secure squirrelmail, or any other webmail prog. This is a default install

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Sorry eric I have just got to ask; what is TTBOMK - Original Message - From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:28 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam David Milholen wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Ok I got it, brain fart - Original Message - From: madmac sysad...@tricubemedia.com To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam Sorry eric I have just got to ask; what is TTBOMK - Original Message

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

to confirm security, I will make it ( The VM ) avaliable. Thanks all: madmac - Original Message - From: madmac sysad...@tricubemedia.com To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 2:28 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam Thanks Eric and Jake, Will test

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:01 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam Ok Guys n Gals I have rebuilt a new toaster on VM, from scratch. Using the CentQMT5-1.2.0.iso I am going to make this a ssl only, secure qmail server, if it kills me. As my current

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

One other tip. My ISO install had openssl installed, but not mod_ssl. I had to add that. See Step 1. Todd -Original Message- From: Todd Beckstead [mailto:to...@csdcpa.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:32 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Another thing that makes it very hard to use PHP-security-issues is to use the following-settings for Directory /usr/share/squirrelmail php_admin_value open_basedir /usr/share/squirrelmail:/etc/squirrelmail:/var/lib/squirrelmail:/var/spool/squirrelmail php_admin_value

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

no other web apps running. It's easy enough to configure squirrelmail to authenticate (and use port 587). Can you show me how plesae eric. Thanks - Original Message - From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 7:49 PM

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Thanks Eric and Jake, Will test fail2ban also on a VM - Original Message - From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 10:09 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam You should secure squirrelmail so that it only runs with

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

On 04/09/2010 05:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: On 04/09/2010 11:25 AM, madmac wrote: Is there then a way to secure squirrelmail, or any other webmail prog. This is a default install of qmail with the ISO. Not having it is not an option, as most of the clients can only use

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Thanks eric for the input, I will try spamdyke on a test box first, Can you point me to the config files for blocking IP`s etc. Eric Shubert wrote: madmac wrote: Some of our clients are saying they are getting tons more spam than usual. I have them send me the IP`s from the email headers,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Awesome, thanks eric Eric Shubert wrote: With spamdyke, you probably won't need to block specific IPs. These addresses most likely will have something else about them (missing or unresolvable rDNS for example) that will cause them to be blocked. You shouldn't need to tweak the spamdyke

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Last question, Should the need arise, what is the removal command for spamdyke. Thanks madmac wrote: Awesome, thanks eric Eric Shubert wrote: With spamdyke, you probably won't need to block specific IPs. These addresses most likely will have something else about them (missing or

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Sorry, did some more digging and found it. Disabling If you need to disable spamdyke, run the following commands: # cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp # ln -sf run.dist run # qmailctl restart madmac wrote: Last question, Should the need arise, what is the removal command for spamdyke.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam

Also, it is on the wiki: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spamdyke Thanks madmac wrote: Sorry, did some more digging and found it. Disabling If you need to disable spamdyke, run the following commands: # cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp # ln -sf run.dist run # qmailctl restart

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam filter

Its qmailctl cdb. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:50 AM, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote: You meen qmailctl reload? -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Skickat: den 10 mars 2010 20:11 Till: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Ämne: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam masquerade

Thanks for you information Feb 23 17:29:54 mainserver spamdyke[28573]: DENIED_RBL_MATCH from: lyderep8...@iam.net.ma to: u...@domain origin_ip: 81.192.30.5 origin_rdns: adsl-5-30-192-81.adsl.iam.net.ma auth: (unknown) Spamdyke work with qmailtoaster On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:13 PM, PACOI

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam outgoing from host

I wanted to let the list know the outcome of this.. If you are an ISP on a average to large scale with your own DNS.MTAs and other services that reside on your internal network but are visible to your host inside your network. Here is a little topology of what I have:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam outgoing from host

David Milholen wrote: Eric, It is a host on the network.. He is only running a mail client. Right, but the virus would be spewing emails from the client machine - it kinda setups up an outgoing smtp service to send emails with. This is why most ISPs these days will allow port 25 traffic from

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam outgoing from host

Eric, It is a host on the network.. He is only running a mail client. Eric Shubert wrote: David Milholen wrote: Hi All, I have a customer on my net that has a machine that seems to be spewing some spam from it. So that I have a better understanding of how this occurs any explanations would

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam outgoing from host

W dniu 24.12.2009 21:00, David Milholen pisze: Eric, It is a host on the network.. He is only running a mail client. SMTP-proxy can help you: http://smtp-proxy.klolik.org/ You can also block DNAT for port 25. For example most of the Polish public mail servers now accept mail from clients only on

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam outgoing from host

W dniu 24.12.2009 21:12, Aleksander Podsiadły pisze: [...] You can also block DNAT for port 25. [...] Look at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2476 and http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2554 -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid:

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam issues

thanks eric it did the job. To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com From: e...@shubes.net Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 07:53:53 -0700 Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam issues Nicole, You need to add a --max-children=8 (for example) parameter to the command you've shown. See man spamd

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

Good point Eric... I didn't think of this, since I'm not yet using the QMT in production yet, and am still using Qmailrocks (Is that a 4 letter word around here? :-) ) w/Spamdyke set to handle TLS directly...So, in my case, only Spamdyke is handling TLS, since my Qmail doesn't support it. (I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

W dniu 05.11.2009 20:02, Eric Shubert pisze: I just came across what I think is a possible hole in spamdyke's configuration. I've been reading through the documentation regarding TLS, and it appears that with no tls-level option specified, if a spammer were to use TLS (advertised by

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

See response below; Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 05.11.2009 20:02, Eric Shubert pisze: I just came across what I think is a possible hole in spamdyke's configuration. I've been reading through the documentation regarding TLS, and it appears that with no tls-level option specified, if

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

Kent Busbee wrote: Did anyone else notice that he is missing spam_hits in his config file? Does it default to something without it? HIS: cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

Internet Services www.norcalisp.com   -Original Message- From: Rafael Andrade [mailto:raf...@riosulense.com.br] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 8:50 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz Hello, Eric and all list, First thank u

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

most of your spam.   Michael J. Colvin NorCal Internet Services www.norcalisp.com   -Original Message- From: Rafael Andrade [mailto:raf...@riosulense.com.br] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 8:50 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz Hello, Eric and all list, First thank u for the answer My users receiving lots of spams dont have a specific sender domain, or default spam type. My spamdyke is running see: spamdyke-stats /var/log

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz Hello, Eric and all list, First thank u for the answer My users receiving lots of spams dont have a specific sender domain, or default spam type. My spamdyke is running see

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

Rafael Andrade wrote: Hello, Eric and all list, First thank u for the answer My users receiving lots of spams dont have a specific sender domain, or default spam type. My spamdyke is running see: spamdyke-stats /var/log/maillog Allowed: 35619 Denied : 140729 Sum: 176348 % Spam : 79.80%

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spam Help Plz Hello, Eric and all list, First thank u for the answer My users receiving lots of spams dont have a specific sender domain, or default spam type. My spamdyke is running see: spamdyke-stats /var/log/maillog Allowed: 35619

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: [Spam] [qmailtoaster] Unknown localhost connection

Mark Burlingame wrote: I did a fresh install of CentOS 4.3 on a separate machine. The old server was CentOS 4.2 and the last released version of the qmail toaster packages. I used Jake Vicker's backup/restore scripts to move everything from the old server to the new server. Other email is fine.