[qmailtoaster] Yahoo error header on 'Relay access denied' error

2007-01-18 Thread Harry Zink


Here's the full headers returned by Yahoo on that same error, when  
sending to one of the affected account.



--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 17 23:46:16
2007
X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via
209.191.85.52; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:46:17 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [209.191.85.52]
Return-Path: 
Authentication-Results: mta247.mail.re2.yahoo.com
from=yahoo.com; domainkeys=pass (ok)
Received: from 209.191.85.52  (HELO
web36801.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.85.52)
  by mta247.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 17
Jan 2007 23:46:17 -0800
Received: (qmail 17250 invoked for bounce); 18 Jan
2007 07:46:16 -
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Date:From:To:Subject;



b=mv5O6D62+MEQCv+t7Y0FLJ1rPsL7exKryhH9oNkqgaZQCKuRfyfp+b4IPP55C/ 
PtT8nRycUtUJqNbLowkoe44CTSOA9X1vfkLCHqxEaZ2tEA8WoehMpWkxNdeKZdCK/ 
4vrye8PRT6M6VGUmLF9oagr5mAN2cTx82z75pdbooAKo=


 ;
Date: 18 Jan 2007 07:46:16 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Content-Length: 1035

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to
the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it
didn't work out.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
216.193.231.146 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access
denied
Giving up on 216.193.231.146.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 17247 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Jan
2007 07:46:16 -
Message-ID:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;



h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME- 
Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;





b=yTqQ4qj77MKhJHIvTGuUuqEEDUd5AvZT9vRLPTCpj1tmiGrn3BsIOutfGPlw84vvCLjnpO 
AHIfyLgg5IGeBppI7wsiGhgESTAUfMqPT+bfpOGNMTFD7gh2rdF8FynfloH/ 
8i8bDudI6b44jYUrI8D6PEesOFxhd5F/UB+zOPQEw=;


X-YMail-OSG:


Y6garL4VM1mrSDS5TirP_e1K2oM0Y0U5CnpQWMnyc6D73zguGJ8zbUK36Irb6grHWWSZ0PPf 
jwStsFb65Aw2FwhwikimUC4nkFHNMLjFnPijDEwn34uv6u5Y5Wdarief004TEWjC_.POx.g-


Received: from [203.146.247.80] by
web36801.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 17 Jan
2007 23:46:16 PST
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:46:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Vancouver Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: yahoo mail test
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

yahoo mail test








-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] reason: 554 : Relay access denied / Returned mail: see transcript for details

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

Set up MX records.



On 1/17/07, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


At this point, this problem is really paralizing, so I implore anyone for
some help and assistance.

Okay, this is a repeat, and a renewed effort to try to get to the bottom of
this - I am starting to believe that there is something screwed up on my
qmail toaster, as this odd behavior seems to have started around the same
time I performed the last update - but that's speculation.

Anyway, here's the scenario:

QmailToaster installed on a Centos 4.4 box (frequently updated via yum)

Pre-existing accounts work just fine.

When creating a new domain (either via vqadmin, or vadddomain), and
subsequently setting up new accounts using qmailadmin, the error below
happens every single time when someone tries to send mail *TO* those
accounts.

Anyone else on the same server can send and receive mail from those
accounts.

Someone from an outside server, say Yahoo, dot-mac, or gmail, for example,
will get the error message below back, claiming inability to deliver.

Other domains and accounts on that same server, that existed previously,
work just fine. Only new domains and accounts act that way.

Essentially, it acts as if someone tried to relay through it, but in fact,
how would that pop up if one is just sending mail, simply, from an outside
account?

Only additional piece of that puzzle might be that this is a separate mail
server box, from the domain's web-server, and DNS server. Within the DNS
record, it simply points properly to the IP of the web-server, and the one
from the mail server - just as the others are doing. Is there something in
DNS I should be checking out?

Anyway, from Yahoo.com sent mail gets the error message below:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
216.193.231.146 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access
denied
Giving up on 216.193.231.146.

All other accounts get the error message as follows:


Begin forwarded message:

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: January 17, 2007 11:30:23 PM PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details


The original message was received at Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:30:23 -0800 (PST)
from smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]

   - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access denied)

   - Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to realasia-services.com.:

DATA
 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access denied
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
 554 Error: no valid recipients
Reporting-MTA: dns; smtpout.mac.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; smtpin05-en2
Arrival-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:30:23 -0800 (PST)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; realasia-services.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access
denied
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:30:23 -0800 (PST)

From: Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: January 17, 2007 11:30:20 PM PST
To: Dr. Harald K. Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new test (from mac.com)










-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Update Simscan Error Package.

2007-01-18 Thread Wiliarto Prio Utomo
I tried to update simscan-toaster package. But, when rebuild package of 
simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1.src.rpm had error :


configure: error: Unable to find your clamav databases, 
specify --enable-clamavdb-path.

error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.34058 (%build)


RPM build errors:
   Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.34058 (%build)

My old simscan : simscan-toaster-1.1-1.2.6
I Think, this packages conflict with Clamav packages. 
clamav-toaster-0.90rc2-1.3.8.


So, How can I update simscan packages..?



Warm Regards
Tommy


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Update Simscan Error Package.

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

Since you are using the devel clamav, try using the devel simscan
package. It has a fix for this exact problem.

Erik

On 1/14/07, Wiliarto Prio Utomo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I tried to update simscan-toaster package. But, when rebuild package of
simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1.src.rpm had error :

configure: error: Unable to find your clamav databases,
specify --enable-clamavdb-path.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.34058 (%build)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.34058 (%build)

My old simscan : simscan-toaster-1.1-1.2.6
I Think, this packages conflict with Clamav packages.
clamav-toaster-0.90rc2-1.3.8.

So, How can I update simscan packages..?



Warm Regards
Tommy


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] reason: 554 : Relay access denied / Returned mail: see transcript for details

2007-01-18 Thread Harry Zink


On Jan 18, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Erik Espinoza wrote:


Set up MX records.


Holy cow - right on.

There were no MX records. I guess the virtualhosting package I use  
doesn't create the MX records since the last updates...


Thanks for the fast response on that one.




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Site to Site QT Server Replication - 24 hours

2007-01-18 Thread Gabriel Lai
Hello all,

I would like to setup a QT site where the 2 email servers will be doing 
replication to each other 24 hours live. 
eg: when mail coming from Internet to Mail Server 1, it will automatically 
replicate to Mail Server 2.

Jake has point me the backup  restore script guides, but that needs manual job 
when Mail Server 1 is down, someone have to 
manually restore the backup in Mail Server 2, then only can replace Mail Server 
1.

Have anyone tried to do so?

Please assist.


 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

[qmailtoaster] No simscan-toaster.spec file

2007-01-18 Thread Robert Giddings
Hi Guys,

Does anyone know where the file simscan-toaster.spec is kept? I've looked in
/usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ but it's not there. As far as I know the src install
for simscan-toaster-1.3.1 went OK. I need the file, so I can edit it before
building the RPM, so as to be albe to get Spamassassin to lookup user prefs
in an SQL table.

Thanks,

Rob


[qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject

2007-01-18 Thread Jakin Lee
A newly built QT, the mail can sent out without difficulty.  However,
after 15 min. then from the log, qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject appear.

Any idea what did I done wrong.

I have anopther one running smoothly without any question.

Thank you.


-- 
Jakin Lee



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors

2007-01-18 Thread Dan Herbon
-

libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 is already installed in sandbox, not built

qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10 is already installed in sandbox, not built

Building courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 ...

error: unpacking of archive failed on file
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2;45af8f5d: cpio: read

error: /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
cannot be installed

Installing
/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm

-

 

I am running Fedora Core 5. All patches, etc. Anyone have any idea what
could be causing this to fail?

 

Thanks.

 

Dan



Re: [qmailtoaster] Should I use qmail toaster?

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Dave wrote:
 Hi Erik,
 
 We're here about the QmailToaster Project. Don't get
 me wrong, this
 community always goes above and beyond to help out a
 straggled user,
 but come on . . .

 My apologies if anyone is offended.

 
 No offense taken   
 
 The impressive amount of customization and packaging
 effort that has been put into QmailToaster project
 solves some of the biggest problems that a new
 sysadmin would face in setting up an email server.
 
 As you rightly point out, much of remaining points are
 not at all about qmail. 
 
 This project almost provides a turn-key  solution
 that even the most harried office administrator could
 use to set up a small email server. 
 
 The suggestions, if implemented, would simply move the
 project further down the appliance path. 
 
 -- David
 
 

I agree David (and EE). Ultimately, I'd like to see this project be as easy
to administer as IPCop (for example). We've a long way to go to get to that
point, but not so far as the project's already come (I think, I could be
wrong, again).

Post-installation appears to be a (somewhat glaring) hole in the project's
current state. If you'd like to contribute something to this area, that'd be
great. The wiki is a good starting point. Would you care to take the ball on
this and get something started? I'd be happy to assist. I know that the
Troubleshooting section of the wiki needs some work. Rather than being
reactive with a comprehensive Troubleshooting section, I'd rather see a
comprehensive post-installation section that would eliminate the need for
much troubleshooting.

What say you?

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] No simscan-toaster.spec file

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Robert Giddings wrote:
 Hi Guys,
  
 Does anyone know where the file simscan-toaster.spec is kept? I've
 looked in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ but it's not there. As far as I know
 the src install for simscan-toaster-1.3.1 went OK. I need the file, so I
 can edit it before building the RPM, so as to be albe to get
 Spamassassin to lookup user prefs in an SQL table.
  
 Thanks,
  
 Rob
It's there when I do:
# rpm -ivh simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.3.src.rpm
Note, it gets removed when the binary rpm is built.
Which distro are you running? Non-RH distros put it in different places.
Which simscan-toaster-1.3.1 file did you install?
-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Jakin Lee wrote:
 A newly built QT, the mail can sent out without difficulty.  However,
 after 15 min. then from the log, qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject appear.
 
 Any idea what did I done wrong.
 
 I have anopther one running smoothly without any question.
 
 Thank you.
 
 
Need more info.
Distro/versions?
IIRC, the latest qmail-toaster package has more detail with the qq error
messages (thanks to Alexey).
-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Dan Herbon wrote:
 -
 
 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 is already installed in sandbox, not built
 
 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10 is already installed in sandbox, not built
 
 Building courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 ...
 
 error: unpacking of archive failed on file
 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2;45af8f5d: cpio: read
 
 error:
 /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
 cannot be installed
 
 Installing
 /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
 
 -
 
  
 
 I am running Fedora Core 5. All patches, etc. Anyone have any idea what
 could be causing this to fail?
 
  
 
 Thanks.
 
  
 
 Dan
 
Out of disk space? (just a guess)

# df

Corrupted download?

# md5sum courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
51d46db59287bce41d49a4de0246c370  courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm

# md5sum courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2
dbfc58a17149fd0f8c0983662ecc8ba8  courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2

If you can't free up enough disk space, (re)building a linked sandbox might
help (depending on how your toaster's partitioned).

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Stop receiving email from most servers after Qmail update

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Hey Lazaro,
Did you ever get this fixed up?

Lazaro Ferreira wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I have removed servercert.pem and start receiving email from sendmail
 hosts, google mail sending ok too, so the workaround seems to be
 working
 
 I will keep trying ( with your help ) a fix to this problem
 
 Thanks for your help
 
 
 On 1/12/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There shouldn't be. I don't have a 64 bit machine to reproduce this
 issue at the moment.

 Thanks,
 Erik

 On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Erik,
 
  Any issue with the libraries listed here ?
 
  On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hi,
  
   ldd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
  libssl.so.4 = /lib64/libssl.so.4 (0x002a95566000)
  libcrypto.so.4 = /lib64/libcrypto.so.4 (0x002a956a2000)
  libresolv.so.2 = /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x003552d0)
  libm.so.6 = /lib64/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00355230)
  libcrypt.so.1 = /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00355290)
  libc.so.6 = /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 (0x003551e0)
  libgssapi_krb5.so.2 = /usr/lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2
   (0x00355410)
  libkrb5.so.3 = /usr/lib64/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00355470)
  libcom_err.so.2 = /lib64/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00355370)
  libk5crypto.so.3 = /usr/lib64/libk5crypto.so.3
 (0x00355430)
  libdl.so.2 = /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00355210)
  libz.so.1 = /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 (0x002a958d5000)
  /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003551c0)
  
  
  
   On 1/11/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like EE's on the right track...
   
Erik Espinoza wrote:
 That's not the issue. Those files don't need to exist.

 The problem is that qmail-smtpd is attempting to open a tty.
 Here is
 what an strace shows on a working server:

 open(control/clientca.pem, O_RDONLY)  = -1 ENOENT (No such
 file or
 directory)
 open(control/clientcrl.pem, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
 file or
 directory)
 open(control/servercert.pem, O_RDONLY) = 5

 Looks like something is wrong with one of the libraries that
 qmail is
 linked against. It shouldn't be pulling in a tty interface. Do
 an ldd
 on qmail-smtpd.


 Thanks,
 Erik


 On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I have ran strace again this time emulating the real thing
 (strace
 tcpserver then forks qmail-smtpd)

 This what happens : it seems like it is looking for files
 (clientca.pem and clientcrl.pem ) that doesn't exist there :
 -
 28887 open(control/clientca.pem, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No
 such file
 or directory)
 28887 open(control/clientcrl.pem, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No
 such
 file or directory)
 28887 open(/dev/tty, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_NOCTTY) = -1 ENXIO
 (No such
 device or address)
 28887 writev(2, [{*** glibc detected *** , 23}, {free():
 invalid
 pointer, 23}, {: 0x, 4}, {0035520306b8, 16}, {
 ***\n, 5}],
 5) = 71

 -
 I have the whole session trace here, I can sent you if needed


 On 1/11/07, Lazaro Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I'm running latest version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10
  But the same problem with previous version
 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7
 
  I have made strace like you said this is the output , any
 ideia ?
 
  ...
  select(1, [0], NULL, NULL, {1200, 0}STARTTLS
  )   = 1 (in [0], left {1188, 766000})
  read(0, STARTTLS\n, 1024) = 9
  brk(0)  = 0x6bf000
  brk(0x6e)   = 0x6e
  open(control/servercert.pem, O_RDONLY) = 3
  fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1693, ...}) = 0
  mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
 MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
  0) = 0x2a95557000
  read(3, -BEGIN CERTIFICATE-\nMIIC..., 4096) = 1693
  getpid()= 28774
  read(3, , 4096)   = 0
  close(3)= 0
  munmap(0x2a95557000, 4096)  = 0
  open(control/clientca.pem, O_RDONLY)  = -1 ENOENT (No
 such file or
 directory)
  open(control/clientcrl.pem, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No
 such file or
 directory)
  open(/dev/tty, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_NOCTTY) = 3
  writev(3, [{*** glibc detected *** , 23}, {free(): invalid
  pointer, 23}, {: 0x, 4}, {0035520306b8, 16}, {
 ***\n, 5}],
  5*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer:
 0x0035520306b8
  ***
  ) = 71
  rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [ABRT], NULL, 8) = 0
  tgkill(28774, 28774, SIGABRT)   = 0
  --- SIGABRT (Aborted) @ 0 (0) ---
  +++ killed by SIGABRT +++
  Process 28774 detached
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On 

RE: [qmailtoaster] Site to Site QT Server Replication - 24 hours

2007-01-18 Thread Joseph Lundgren
Gabriel,

 

Please look at
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT_Failover_replication_Setup

 

 

This page gives you a procedure to configure a backup qmt server that
will be available for failover in the event of primary server failure.
The backup server will only ever be 1 minute out from the primary.

 

 

I believe that it covers what you're trying to achieve.

 

 

 

Sincerely,


--
Joseph Lundgren
Systems Engineer
Peak Internet, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:12 AM
To: Qmail Toaster List 2
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Site to Site QT Server Replication - 24 hours

 

Hello all,

 

I would like to setup a QT site where the 2 email servers will be doing
replication to each other 24 hours live. 

eg: when mail coming from Internet to Mail Server 1, it will
automatically replicate to Mail Server 2.

 

Jake has point me the backup  restore script guides, but that needs
manual job when Mail Server 1 is down, someone have to 

manually restore the backup in Mail Server 2, then only can replace Mail
Server 1.

 

Have anyone tried to do so?

 

Please assist.

 



Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.



Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

rpm -e --nodeps courier-authlib-toaster
yum install libtool-ltdl-devel libtool-ltdl
rpm -Uhv courier-authlib-toaster-NEW.rpm

On 1/18/07, Dan Herbon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The log now states:

-
Installing courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 in the sandbox ...
error: Failed dependencies:
libltdl.so.3 is needed by courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.i686
-

I then attempt to 'yum install libtool-ltdl.i386' which contains
libltdl.so.3 and then I get:

-
--- Package libtool-ltdl.i386 0:1.5.22-2.3 set to be updated
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Conflict: courier-authlib-toaster conflicts libtool-ltdl
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: courier-authlib-toaster conflicts with libtool-ltdl
-




-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:15 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors

Dan Herbon wrote:
 -

 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 is already installed in sandbox, not built

 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10 is already installed in sandbox, not built

 Building courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 ...

 error: unpacking of archive failed on file
 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2;45af8f5d: cpio: read

 error:
 /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
 cannot be installed

 Installing
 /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm

 -



 I am running Fedora Core 5. All patches, etc. Anyone have any idea what
 could be causing this to fail?



 Thanks.



 Dan

Out of disk space? (just a guess)

# df

Corrupted download?

# md5sum courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
51d46db59287bce41d49a4de0246c370  courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm

# md5sum courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2
dbfc58a17149fd0f8c0983662ecc8ba8  courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2

If you can't free up enough disk space, (re)building a linked sandbox might
help (depending on how your toaster's partitioned).

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] smtproutes and domainkeys, spf, srs

2007-01-18 Thread Trung Pham
 Trung,
 Is your toaster on a dynamic or static IP address?

I have static IP since my company has the Business DSL line.


 Trung Pham wrote:
 So in my case, I am forwarding my mail through Yahoo. I should not
 bother
 setting up SPF, SRS, and Domainkeys since I won't see any benefit at
 all.

 Supposed if I handle my own outbound email and setup all those features
 properly. Do you think Yahoo will still put my mails in the Bulk folder?

 TTBOMK, yahoo will not put your mail in bulk folders if you have DK
 configured properly.


I will give this a shot.


 Another question, is it necessary for us to setup reverse IP DNS?
 Because
 I think SBC will not help me do it.

 SRS and SPF can be used if your upstream isp publishes spf records.
 You can use the include statement (more info at openspf.org) to
 include their spf entries into your spf records. SBC, however, doesn't
 publish SPF records as Yahoo handles their infrastructure.

 The Qmail DomainKey implementation is to spec, but doesn't implement
 the optional h= header that limits the scope of the DomainKey
 signature to certain parts. Because of this, DomainKeys will fail if
 it is forwarded through a third party server.

 Erik

 On 1/16/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I currently have all my outgoing emails forwarded to my ISP server
 using
 smtproutes. So I am curious if I can still use domainkeys, spf, or srs
 features since my ISP will definitely modify the email header.

 FYI, I am using SBC Business DSL. I had to resolve to smtproutes
 otherwise
 Yahoo will put emails coming from me into the bulk folder.

 Please let me know if those features still work if I use my ISP to
 relay
 my mails.

 My goal is to stop incoming spams that forge my own address.





 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Did you remove djbdns (and djbdns-extcache and djbdns-localcache) after the
sandbox was built? If so, it's still installed in the sandbox. To remove it
from the sandbox, you can tell qtp-newmodel to rebuild the sandbox, or you
can do it manually (saving a lot of time) by:
# chroot /opt/qtp-sandbox
# mount -t proc none /proc
# rpm -e djbdns djbdns-extcache djbdns-localcache
# umount /proc
# exit

Let us know how you make out.

Dan Herbon wrote:
 Thank you, I got through authlib finally and now I'm running into errors
 with DJBDNS:
 
 
 Installing djbdns-1.05-1.0.3 in the sandbox ...
 error: Failed dependencies:
 djbdns-extcache conflicts with djbdns-1.05-1.0.3.i686
 djbdns conflicts with djbdns-extcache-1.05-1.0.3.i686
 djbdns-localcache conflicts with djbdns-extcache-1.05-1.0.3.i686
 djbdns-extcache conflicts with djbdns-localcache-1.05-1.0.3.i686
 
 
 Rpm -qa | grep djbdns doesn't return anything. I'm not sure whats causing it
 to conflict.
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:59 PM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors
 
 rpm -e --nodeps courier-authlib-toaster
 yum install libtool-ltdl-devel libtool-ltdl
 rpm -Uhv courier-authlib-toaster-NEW.rpm
 
 On 1/18/07, Dan Herbon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The log now states:

 -
 Installing courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 in the sandbox ...
 error: Failed dependencies:
 libltdl.so.3 is needed by courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.i686
 -

 I then attempt to 'yum install libtool-ltdl.i386' which contains
 libltdl.so.3 and then I get:

 -
 --- Package libtool-ltdl.i386 0:1.5.22-2.3 set to be updated
 -- Running transaction check
 -- Processing Conflict: courier-authlib-toaster conflicts libtool-ltdl
 -- Finished Dependency Resolution
 Error: courier-authlib-toaster conflicts with libtool-ltdl
 -




 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:15 PM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel upgrade errors

 Dan Herbon wrote:
 -

 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 is already installed in sandbox, not built

 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.10 is already installed in sandbox, not built

 Building courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4 ...

 error: unpacking of archive failed on file
 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2;45af8f5d: cpio:
 read
 error:
 /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
 cannot be installed

 Installing
 /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm

 -



 I am running Fedora Core 5. All patches, etc. Anyone have any idea what
 could be causing this to fail?



 Thanks.



 Dan

 Out of disk space? (just a guess)

 # df

 Corrupted download?

 # md5sum courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
 51d46db59287bce41d49a4de0246c370
 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
 # md5sum courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2
 dbfc58a17149fd0f8c0983662ecc8ba8  courier-authlib-0.59.tar.bz2

 If you can't free up enough disk space, (re)building a linked sandbox
 might
 help (depending on how your toaster's partitioned).

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Trung Pham
I have setup my domain key correctly.
But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they confirmed
my domainkey setting.

Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by .com.

I have static IP business line BTW.

If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
Folder?

Thanks.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

Put your IP in this: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html

See if you are on any of the RBL's. Perhaps Yahoo's scoring you very
low because you're on a list.

Erik

On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have setup my domain key correctly.
But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they confirmed
my domainkey setting.

Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by .com.

I have static IP business line BTW.

If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
Folder?

Thanks.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Trung Pham
I have setup my domain key correctly.
But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they confirmed
my domainkey setting.

Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by .com.

I have static IP business line BTW.

If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
Folder?

Thanks.





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

Find a way to contact Yahoo!. The problem is on their side.

For hotmail, you can go to support.msn.com and report mislabeled spam.
I'd imagine Yahoo has something similar.

You can also try going here: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html and
seeing if you are listed on any of the rbl's that they may use.

Erik

On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have setup my domain key correctly.
But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they confirmed
my domainkey setting.

Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by .com.

I have static IP business line BTW.

If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
Folder?

Thanks.





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread James Jarrett
I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
need some serious help.

First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.

I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
the outside world is getting in.

According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).

A bit of information in no partcular order:

I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.

I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
started with the VM build from:

http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579

This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
isolog-2.1

I checked my queue with the:

qmailctl queue

command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
empty.

The results of the qmailctl stat command are:

authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds

I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
give me some idea how to provide this I will.

I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
just vanishes.

Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
and I'm at my wits end.

Thanks,

James


PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.

JJ




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] *.pem security issue

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
EE (or anyone),

Any word about this? Seems to me that servercert.pem shouldn't be world
readable since it contains the private (signing) key and all parent
directories are world readable. (I seem to remember EE answering this, but
can't find nor remember the answer)

Also, I came across this at http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/qfixpermissions:

# some broken install guides (i.e. qmailrocks) tell you to create
# servercert.pem and clientcert.pem as a single file, with one as a symbolic
# link to the other. this is wrong, since qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote (the
# two programs which need to read these files) run as different userids and
# different group ids. the only way that a symbolic link scenario will work
# is if the file is readable to every userid on the system- and this is a
# major security hole, since the file contains the secret key for encrypting
# your SMTP sessions, both incoming and outgoing.

How is the toaster handling this? I can't figure out how/why the toaster
seems to work with clientcert.pem symlinked.

Eric Shubes wrote:
 I just configured SSL on my server, and noticed what I think is a bit of a
 security risk.
 
 All of the *.pem files are readable by any account, e.g.:
 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root qmail   14 Sep 10 10:08 clientcert.pem - servercert.pem
 -rw-r--r--  1 root qmail 1693 Jun 21 08:21 servercert.pem
 
 Isn't this a bad idea, given that this file in particular contains a private
 key?
 
 To fix it, I did:
 # cd /var/qmail/control
 # chgrp vchkpw *.pem
 # chmod  o-r *.pem
 # rm -f clientcert.pem
 # cp -p servercert.pem clientcert.pem
 # chgrp qmail clientcert.pem
 
 Is this a non issue, or should it be changed in the basic toaster?


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread Jean-Paul van de Plasse

Hi James,

Anything about the delivery in the send log?
/var/log/qmail/send/current

It should at least tell you to what account it went.

JP
- Original Message - 
From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?



I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
need some serious help.

First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.

I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
the outside world is getting in.

According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).

A bit of information in no partcular order:

I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.

I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
started with the VM build from:

http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579

This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
isolog-2.1

I checked my queue with the:

qmailctl queue

command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
empty.

The results of the qmailctl stat command are:

authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds

I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
give me some idea how to provide this I will.

I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
just vanishes.

Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
and I'm at my wits end.

Thanks,

James


PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.

JJ




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Accepting mail from local mail servers

2007-01-18 Thread Jean-Paul van de Plasse

Any updates on this matter?

JP
- Original Message - 
From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:56 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Accepting mail from local mail servers



Question is, why is the toaster at company.com rejecting the message? I'm
not quite sure. A look at /var/log/qmail/smtp/current on the toaster 
should

tell. I'm curious to know exactly why the message is failing (I'm still
learning this stuff too!). In any case, the changes to tcp.smtp should 
give
a green light (open relay) for any session coming from the specified 
address.



I'd wager that the relay was denied because the internal machines
hostnames aren't resolve-able in DNS on the real Internet.

Suppose my public internet is kabewm.com and my internal
infrastructure runs on internal.kabewm.com. Since my public DNS
records don't have any A, MX or other entries for internal.kabewm.com,
then the QmailToaster will reject e-mail coming from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] since it couldn't possibly be a real return
e-mail.

shamelessplugBy the way, my blog is http://www.kabewm.com/ and
contains info on things going on with QmailToaster. :)/shamelessplug

Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread James Jarrett
I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
I got it, all the info is in the send log.

James



On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
 Hi James,
 
 Anything about the delivery in the send log?
 /var/log/qmail/send/current
 
 It should at least tell you to what account it went.
 
 JP
 - Original Message - 
 From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
 Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?
 
 
  I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
  spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
  talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
  need some serious help.
  
  First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
  somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.
  
  I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
  server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
  rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
  the outside world is getting in.
  
  According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
  but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).
  
  A bit of information in no partcular order:
  
  I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
  off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
  and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
  both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
  out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.
  
  I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
  started with the VM build from:
  
  http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579
  
  This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
  isolog-2.1
  
  I checked my queue with the:
  
  qmailctl queue
  
  command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
  delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
  empty.
  
  The results of the qmailctl stat command are:
  
  authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
  clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
  imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
  imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
  pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
  pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
  send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
  smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
  spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
  authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
  clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
  imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
  imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
  pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
  pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
  send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
  smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
  spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds
  
  I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
  give me some idea how to provide this I will.
  
  I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
  not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
  NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
  just vanishes.
  
  Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
  and I'm at my wits end.
  
  Thanks,
  
  James
  
  
  PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.
  
  JJ
  
  
  
  
  -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread Jean-Paul van de Plasse

Ok clear..

Are the emails that do not arrive from other locations then the ones that do 
arrive?


JP

- Original Message - 
From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?



I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
I got it, all the info is in the send log.

James



On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:

Hi James,

Anything about the delivery in the send log?
/var/log/qmail/send/current

It should at least tell you to what account it went.

JP
- Original Message - 
From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?


 I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
 spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
 talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind 
 and

 need some serious help.

 First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
 somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.

 I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
 server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
 rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
 the outside world is getting in.

 According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
 but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).

 A bit of information in no partcular order:

 I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on 
 the

 off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
 and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
 both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering 
 appliance

 out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.

 I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
 started with the VM build from:

 http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579

 This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
 isolog-2.1

 I checked my queue with the:

 qmailctl queue

 command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
 delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
 empty.

 The results of the qmailctl stat command are:

 authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
 clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
 imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
 imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
 pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
 pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
 send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
 smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
 spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
 authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
 clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
 imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
 imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
 pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
 pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
 send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
 smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
 spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds

 I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
 give me some idea how to provide this I will.

 I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
 not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
 NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
 just vanishes.

 Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
 and I'm at my wits end.

 Thanks,

 James


 PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.

 JJ




 -
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
What does
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
show you?

James Jarrett wrote:
 I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
 just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
 I got it, all the info is in the send log.
 
 James
 
 
 
 On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
 Hi James,

 Anything about the delivery in the send log?
 /var/log/qmail/send/current

 It should at least tell you to what account it went.

 JP
 - Original Message - 
 From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
 Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?


 I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
 spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
 talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
 need some serious help.

 First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
 somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.

 I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
 server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
 rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
 the outside world is getting in.

 According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
 but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).

 A bit of information in no partcular order:

 I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
 off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
 and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
 both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
 out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.

 I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
 started with the VM build from:

 http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579

 This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
 isolog-2.1

 I checked my queue with the:

 qmailctl queue

 command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
 delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
 empty.

 The results of the qmailctl stat command are:

 authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
 clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
 imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
 imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
 pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
 pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
 send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
 smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
 spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
 authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
 clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
 imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
 imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
 pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
 pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
 send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
 smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
 spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds

 I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
 give me some idea how to provide this I will.

 I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
 not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
 NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
 just vanishes.

 Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
 and I'm at my wits end.

 Thanks,

 James


 PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.

 JJ



-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

Ensure that you don't have the same entry in locals and virtualdomains.

Erik

On 1/18/07, James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
I got it, all the info is in the send log.

James



On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
 Hi James,

 Anything about the delivery in the send log?
 /var/log/qmail/send/current

 It should at least tell you to what account it went.

 JP
 - Original Message -
 From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
 Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?


  I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
  spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
  talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
  need some serious help.
 
  First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
  somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.
 
  I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
  server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
  rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
  the outside world is getting in.
 
  According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
  but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).
 
  A bit of information in no partcular order:
 
  I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
  off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
  and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
  both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
  out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.
 
  I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
  started with the VM build from:
 
  http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579
 
  This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
  isolog-2.1
 
  I checked my queue with the:
 
  qmailctl queue
 
  command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
  delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
  empty.
 
  The results of the qmailctl stat command are:
 
  authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
  clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
  imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
  imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
  pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
  pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
  send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
  smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
  spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
  authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
  clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
  imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
  imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
  pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
  pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
  send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
  smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
  spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds
 
  I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
  give me some idea how to provide this I will.
 
  I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
  not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
  NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
  just vanishes.
 
  Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
  and I'm at my wits end.
 
  Thanks,
 
  James
 
 
  PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.
 
  JJ
 
 
 
 
  -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
I suppose that's a possibility. Have you verified that your reverse DNS is
not set up right? (http://www.dnstools.com)

Where/who is the authoritative DNS server for your domain? Are you doing
this or is SBC supposed to be handling that?

Trung Pham wrote:
 Nope, not on any blacklist.
 
 Maybe because of reverse DNS?
 
 I still can not figure out how to setup reverse DNS using BIND. Plus I
 don't think it will be possible to do so anyway since I am using SBC DSL.
 
 Find a way to contact Yahoo!. The problem is on their side.

 For hotmail, you can go to support.msn.com and report mislabeled spam.
 I'd imagine Yahoo has something similar.

 You can also try going here: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html and
 seeing if you are listed on any of the rbl's that they may use.

 Erik

 On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have setup my domain key correctly.
 But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they
 confirmed
 my domainkey setting.

 Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
 .com.

 I have static IP business line BTW.

 If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
 Folder?

 Thanks.




-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread James Jarrett
This:

ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1
qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.1
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.1
vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2
ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.1
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.2
courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
maildrop-toaster-2.0.2-1.3.1
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.8-1.3.3
simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1
libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.1
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2
ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.2-1.3.1
spamassassin-toaster-3.1.5-1.3.3
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.1
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.1
qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.1
isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.1
clamav-toaster-0.88.4-1.3.3


On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:58 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
 What does
 # rpm -qa | grep toaster
 show you?
 
 James Jarrett wrote:
  I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
  just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
  I got it, all the info is in the send log.
  
  James
  
  
  
  On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
  Hi James,
 
  Anything about the delivery in the send log?
  /var/log/qmail/send/current
 
  It should at least tell you to what account it went.
 
  JP
  - Original Message - 
  From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
  Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?
 
 
  I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
  spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
  talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
  need some serious help.
 
  First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
  somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.
 
  I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
  server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
  rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
  the outside world is getting in.
 
  According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
  but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).
 
  A bit of information in no partcular order:
 
  I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
  off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
  and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
  both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
  out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.
 
  I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
  started with the VM build from:
 
  http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579
 
  This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
  isolog-2.1
 
  I checked my queue with the:
 
  qmailctl queue
 
  command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
  delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
  empty.
 
  The results of the qmailctl stat command are:
 
  authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
  clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
  imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
  imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
  pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
  pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
  send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
  smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
  spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
  authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
  clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
  imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
  imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
  pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
  pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
  send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
  smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
  spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds
 
  I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
  give me some idea how to provide this I will.
 
  I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
  not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
  NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
  just vanishes.
 
  Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
  and I'm at my wits end.
 
  Thanks,
 
  James
 
 
  PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.
 
  JJ
 
 
 
 -- 
 -Eric 'shubes'
 
 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org

Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

You can't change reverse dns. Only SBC can do that.

That said, I don't know why Yahoo thinks your e-mail is spam, only
Yahoo can answer that. If you have DomainKeys configured and are not
on any rbl, I can't think of a reason why they would do that.

Aside from getting you to pay for a mailhop service such as one
offered by DynDNS, I don't know what else you can try on your end. Try
sending an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It'll probably take  awhile
to get a response.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Nope, not on any blacklist.

Maybe because of reverse DNS?

I still can not figure out how to setup reverse DNS using BIND. Plus I
don't think it will be possible to do so anyway since I am using SBC DSL.

 Find a way to contact Yahoo!. The problem is on their side.

 For hotmail, you can go to support.msn.com and report mislabeled spam.
 I'd imagine Yahoo has something similar.

 You can also try going here: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html and
 seeing if you are listed on any of the rbl's that they may use.

 Erik

 On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have setup my domain key correctly.
 But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they
 confirmed
 my domainkey setting.

 Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
 .com.

 I have static IP business line BTW.

 If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
 Folder?

 Thanks.





 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread James Jarrett
Yes,

Everything is behaving like there is some kind of filter running that if
certain headers or content are in the message (or from a particular
domain?) the mail just vanishes.

I can get e-mail from amazon, mail from paypay goes poof (two verified
examples, but by no means all).

James

On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:57 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
 Ok clear..
 
 Are the emails that do not arrive from other locations then the ones that do 
 arrive?
 
 JP
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:52 PM
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?
 
 
  I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
  just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
  I got it, all the info is in the send log.
 
  James
 
 
 
  On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
  Hi James,
 
  Anything about the delivery in the send log?
  /var/log/qmail/send/current
 
  It should at least tell you to what account it went.
 
  JP
  - Original Message - 
  From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
  Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?
 
 
   I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
   spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
   talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind 
   and
   need some serious help.
  
   First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
   somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.
  
   I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
   server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
   rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
   the outside world is getting in.
  
   According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
   but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).
  
   A bit of information in no partcular order:
  
   I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on 
   the
   off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
   and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
   both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering 
   appliance
   out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.
  
   I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
   started with the VM build from:
  
   http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579
  
   This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
   isolog-2.1
  
   I checked my queue with the:
  
   qmailctl queue
  
   command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
   delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
   empty.
  
   The results of the qmailctl stat command are:
  
   authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
   clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
   imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
   imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
   pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
   pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
   send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
   smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
   spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
   authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
   clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
   imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
   imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
   pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
   pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
   send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
   smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
   spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds
  
   I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
   give me some idea how to provide this I will.
  
   I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
   not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
   NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
   just vanishes.
  
   Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
   and I'm at my wits end.
  
   Thanks,
  
   James
  
  
   PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.
  
   JJ
  
  
  
  
   -
   QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
  -
   QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For 

Re: [qmailtoaster] *.pem security issue

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

I'll answer this one with a not sure. I don't remember this question
being asked. Since all of my toasters have no users on them, I never
really thought about it.

Maybe Nick will have some insight, as I have no clue.

Erik

On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

EE (or anyone),

Any word about this? Seems to me that servercert.pem shouldn't be world
readable since it contains the private (signing) key and all parent
directories are world readable. (I seem to remember EE answering this, but
can't find nor remember the answer)

Also, I came across this at http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/qfixpermissions:

# some broken install guides (i.e. qmailrocks) tell you to create
# servercert.pem and clientcert.pem as a single file, with one as a symbolic
# link to the other. this is wrong, since qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote (the
# two programs which need to read these files) run as different userids and
# different group ids. the only way that a symbolic link scenario will work
# is if the file is readable to every userid on the system- and this is a
# major security hole, since the file contains the secret key for encrypting
# your SMTP sessions, both incoming and outgoing.

How is the toaster handling this? I can't figure out how/why the toaster
seems to work with clientcert.pem symlinked.

Eric Shubes wrote:
 I just configured SSL on my server, and noticed what I think is a bit of a
 security risk.

 All of the *.pem files are readable by any account, e.g.:
 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root qmail   14 Sep 10 10:08 clientcert.pem - servercert.pem
 -rw-r--r--  1 root qmail 1693 Jun 21 08:21 servercert.pem

 Isn't this a bad idea, given that this file in particular contains a private
 key?

 To fix it, I did:
 # cd /var/qmail/control
 # chgrp vchkpw *.pem
 # chmod  o-r *.pem
 # rm -f clientcert.pem
 # cp -p servercert.pem clientcert.pem
 # chgrp qmail clientcert.pem

 Is this a non issue, or should it be changed in the basic toaster?


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread James Jarrett
Would that not break *ALL* email?

Afterall I'm only using one virtual domain and not getting (or at least
not dealing with) and mail on the real domain.

James

But I checked, and that is not happening.

I can post my control files if you think it would help.

James

On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:01 -0800, Erik Espinoza wrote:
 Ensure that you don't have the same entry in locals and virtualdomains.
 
 Erik
 
 On 1/18/07, James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
  just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
  I got it, all the info is in the send log.
 
  James
 
 
 
  On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
   Hi James,
  
   Anything about the delivery in the send log?
   /var/log/qmail/send/current
  
   It should at least tell you to what account it went.
  
   JP
   - Original Message -
   From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
   Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
   Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?
  
  
I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
need some serious help.
   
First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.
   
I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
the outside world is getting in.
   
According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).
   
A bit of information in no partcular order:
   
I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.
   
I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
started with the VM build from:
   
http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579
   
This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
isolog-2.1
   
I checked my queue with the:
   
qmailctl queue
   
command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
empty.
   
The results of the qmailctl stat command are:
   
authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds
   
I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
give me some idea how to provide this I will.
   
I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
just vanishes.
   
Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
and I'm at my wits end.
   
Thanks,
   
James
   
   
PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.
   
JJ
   
   
   
   
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
  
   -
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
  -
   

Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
I'm guessing that SPF's rejecting them. The newer toaster gives you a
meaningful message, but the version you have simply quits and looks normal
on the log.

Change /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior from 3 to 1.
I'm not sure if restarting is necessary, but stop then start qmail to be safe.

Report back.

James Jarrett wrote:
 This:
 
 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1
 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.1
 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.1
 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2
 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.1
 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.2
 courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
 maildrop-toaster-2.0.2-1.3.1
 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.8-1.3.3
 simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1
 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.1
 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2
 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.2-1.3.1
 spamassassin-toaster-3.1.5-1.3.3
 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.1
 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.1
 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.1
 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.1
 clamav-toaster-0.88.4-1.3.3
 
 
 On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:58 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
 What does
 # rpm -qa | grep toaster
 show you?

 James Jarrett wrote:
 I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
 just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
 I got it, all the info is in the send log.

 James



 On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
 Hi James,

 Anything about the delivery in the send log?
 /var/log/qmail/send/current

 It should at least tell you to what account it went.

 JP
 - Original Message - 
 From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
 Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?


 I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
 spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
 talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
 need some serious help.

 First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
 somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.

 I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
 server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
 rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
 the outside world is getting in.

 According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
 but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).

 A bit of information in no partcular order:

 I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
 off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
 and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
 both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
 out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.

 I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
 started with the VM build from:

 http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579

 This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
 isolog-2.1

 I checked my queue with the:

 qmailctl queue

 command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
 delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
 empty.

 The results of the qmailctl stat command are:

 authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
 clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
 imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
 imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
 pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
 pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
 send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
 smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
 spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
 authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
 clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
 imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
 imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
 pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
 pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
 send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
 smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
 spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds

 I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
 give me some idea how to provide this I will.

 I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
 not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
 NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
 just vanishes.

 Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
 and I'm at my wits end.

 Thanks,

 James


 PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.

 JJ



-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional 

Re: [qmailtoaster] *.pem security issue

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Erik Espinoza wrote:
 I'll answer this one with a not sure. I don't remember this question
 being asked. Since all of my toasters have no users on them, I never
 really thought about it.

I don't have any users either (as I imagine is the case with most toasters),
so it's not a gaping hole. I just like seeing holes (however little) plugged up.

 Maybe Nick will have some insight, as I have no clue.
 
 Erik
 
 On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 EE (or anyone),

 Any word about this? Seems to me that servercert.pem shouldn't be world
 readable since it contains the private (signing) key and all parent
 directories are world readable. (I seem to remember EE answering this,
 but
 can't find nor remember the answer)

 Also, I came across this at
 http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/qfixpermissions:

 # some broken install guides (i.e. qmailrocks) tell you to create
 # servercert.pem and clientcert.pem as a single file, with one as a
 symbolic
 # link to the other. this is wrong, since qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote
 (the
 # two programs which need to read these files) run as different
 userids and
 # different group ids. the only way that a symbolic link scenario will
 work
 # is if the file is readable to every userid on the system- and this is a
 # major security hole, since the file contains the secret key for
 encrypting
 # your SMTP sessions, both incoming and outgoing.

 How is the toaster handling this? I can't figure out how/why the toaster
 seems to work with clientcert.pem symlinked.

 Eric Shubes wrote:
  I just configured SSL on my server, and noticed what I think is a
 bit of a
  security risk.
 
  All of the *.pem files are readable by any account, e.g.:
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root qmail   14 Sep 10 10:08 clientcert.pem -
 servercert.pem
  -rw-r--r--  1 root qmail 1693 Jun 21 08:21 servercert.pem
 
  Isn't this a bad idea, given that this file in particular contains a
 private
  key?
 
  To fix it, I did:
  # cd /var/qmail/control
  # chgrp vchkpw *.pem
  # chmod  o-r *.pem
  # rm -f clientcert.pem
  # cp -p servercert.pem clientcert.pem
  # chgrp qmail clientcert.pem
 
  Is this a non issue, or should it be changed in the basic toaster?



-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Trung Pham
I am the authoritative DNS server for my domain. This is how I am able to
setup SPF and Domainkey.

But still no luck with reverse DNS.

Is there anyone who is able to setup reverse DNS having SBC as their ISP?

Thanks.

 I suppose that's a possibility. Have you verified that your reverse DNS is
 not set up right? (http://www.dnstools.com)

 Where/who is the authoritative DNS server for your domain? Are you doing
 this or is SBC supposed to be handling that?

 Trung Pham wrote:
 Nope, not on any blacklist.

 Maybe because of reverse DNS?

 I still can not figure out how to setup reverse DNS using BIND. Plus I
 don't think it will be possible to do so anyway since I am using SBC
 DSL.

 Find a way to contact Yahoo!. The problem is on their side.

 For hotmail, you can go to support.msn.com and report mislabeled spam.
 I'd imagine Yahoo has something similar.

 You can also try going here: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html and
 seeing if you are listed on any of the rbl's that they may use.

 Erik

 On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have setup my domain key correctly.
 But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they
 confirmed
 my domainkey setting.

 Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
 .com.

 I have static IP business line BTW.

 If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
 Folder?

 Thanks.




 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] *.pem security issue

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

Agreed, it's why I asked for Nick's input.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Erik Espinoza wrote:
 I'll answer this one with a not sure. I don't remember this question
 being asked. Since all of my toasters have no users on them, I never
 really thought about it.

I don't have any users either (as I imagine is the case with most toasters),
so it's not a gaping hole. I just like seeing holes (however little) plugged up.

 Maybe Nick will have some insight, as I have no clue.

 Erik

 On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 EE (or anyone),

 Any word about this? Seems to me that servercert.pem shouldn't be world
 readable since it contains the private (signing) key and all parent
 directories are world readable. (I seem to remember EE answering this,
 but
 can't find nor remember the answer)

 Also, I came across this at
 http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/qfixpermissions:

 # some broken install guides (i.e. qmailrocks) tell you to create
 # servercert.pem and clientcert.pem as a single file, with one as a
 symbolic
 # link to the other. this is wrong, since qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote
 (the
 # two programs which need to read these files) run as different
 userids and
 # different group ids. the only way that a symbolic link scenario will
 work
 # is if the file is readable to every userid on the system- and this is a
 # major security hole, since the file contains the secret key for
 encrypting
 # your SMTP sessions, both incoming and outgoing.

 How is the toaster handling this? I can't figure out how/why the toaster
 seems to work with clientcert.pem symlinked.

 Eric Shubes wrote:
  I just configured SSL on my server, and noticed what I think is a
 bit of a
  security risk.
 
  All of the *.pem files are readable by any account, e.g.:
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root qmail   14 Sep 10 10:08 clientcert.pem -
 servercert.pem
  -rw-r--r--  1 root qmail 1693 Jun 21 08:21 servercert.pem
 
  Isn't this a bad idea, given that this file in particular contains a
 private
  key?
 
  To fix it, I did:
  # cd /var/qmail/control
  # chgrp vchkpw *.pem
  # chmod  o-r *.pem
  # rm -f clientcert.pem
  # cp -p servercert.pem clientcert.pem
  # chgrp qmail clientcert.pem
 
  Is this a non issue, or should it be changed in the basic toaster?



--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

SPF would be a really good guess since everything would appear to
arrive from the scanning appliance. The other good guess would be
DomainKeys. Check the log in the appliance for error 4xx/5xx
rejections from your server.

Erik


On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'm guessing that SPF's rejecting them. The newer toaster gives you a
meaningful message, but the version you have simply quits and looks normal
on the log.

Change /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior from 3 to 1.
I'm not sure if restarting is necessary, but stop then start qmail to be safe.

Report back.

James Jarrett wrote:
 This:

 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1
 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.1
 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.1
 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2
 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.1
 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.2
 courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
 maildrop-toaster-2.0.2-1.3.1
 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.8-1.3.3
 simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1
 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.1
 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2
 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.2-1.3.1
 spamassassin-toaster-3.1.5-1.3.3
 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.1
 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.1
 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.1
 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.1
 clamav-toaster-0.88.4-1.3.3


 On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:58 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
 What does
 # rpm -qa | grep toaster
 show you?

 James Jarrett wrote:
 I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
 just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
 I got it, all the info is in the send log.

 James



 On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
 Hi James,

 Anything about the delivery in the send log?
 /var/log/qmail/send/current

 It should at least tell you to what account it went.

 JP
 - Original Message -
 From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
 Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?


 I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
 spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
 talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
 need some serious help.

 First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
 somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.

 I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
 server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
 rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
 the outside world is getting in.

 According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
 but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).

 A bit of information in no partcular order:

 I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
 off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
 and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
 both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
 out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.

 I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
 started with the VM build from:

 http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579

 This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
 isolog-2.1

 I checked my queue with the:

 qmailctl queue

 command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
 delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
 empty.

 The results of the qmailctl stat command are:

 authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
 clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
 imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
 imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
 pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
 pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
 send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
 smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
 spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
 authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
 clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
 imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
 imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
 pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
 pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
 send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
 smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
 spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds

 I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
 give me some idea how to provide this I will.

 I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
 not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
 NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
 just vanishes.

 Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for use yesterday
 and I'm at my wits end.

 Thanks,

 James


 PS, if you need any more info, just ask, I'll get it to you.

 JJ




Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

To disable DK, go to /var/qmail/bin and type
rm -f qmail-queue  ln -s qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue

Erik

On 1/18/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

SPF would be a really good guess since everything would appear to
arrive from the scanning appliance. The other good guess would be
DomainKeys. Check the log in the appliance for error 4xx/5xx
rejections from your server.

Erik


On 1/18/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm guessing that SPF's rejecting them. The newer toaster gives you a
 meaningful message, but the version you have simply quits and looks normal
 on the log.

 Change /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior from 3 to 1.
 I'm not sure if restarting is necessary, but stop then start qmail to be safe.

 Report back.

 James Jarrett wrote:
  This:
 
  ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1
  qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
  control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.1
  qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.1
  vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2
  ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.1
  vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.2
  courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
  ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
  maildrop-toaster-2.0.2-1.3.1
  squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.8-1.3.3
  simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1
  libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.1
  courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2
  ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
  maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.2-1.3.1
  spamassassin-toaster-3.1.5-1.3.3
  daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.1
  qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
  autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.1
  qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.1
  isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.1
  clamav-toaster-0.88.4-1.3.3
 
 
  On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:58 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
  What does
  # rpm -qa | grep toaster
  show you?
 
  James Jarrett wrote:
  I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
  just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
  I got it, all the info is in the send log.
 
  James
 
 
 
  On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
  Hi James,
 
  Anything about the delivery in the send log?
  /var/log/qmail/send/current
 
  It should at least tell you to what account it went.
 
  JP
  - Original Message -
  From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
  Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?
 
 
  I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
  spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
  talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
  need some serious help.
 
  First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
  somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.
 
  I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
  server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
  rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
  the outside world is getting in.
 
  According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
  but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).
 
  A bit of information in no partcular order:
 
  I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
  off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
  and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
  both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
  out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.
 
  I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
  started with the VM build from:
 
  http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579
 
  This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
  isolog-2.1
 
  I checked my queue with the:
 
  qmailctl queue
 
  command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
  delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
  empty.
 
  The results of the qmailctl stat command are:
 
  authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
  clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
  imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
  imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
  pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
  pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
  send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
  smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
  spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
  authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
  clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
  imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
  imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
  pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
  pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
  send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
  smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
  spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds
 
  I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
  give me some idea how to provide this I will.
 
  I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
  not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

At the command line type:
yum -y install jwhois  whois $IP replace $IP with your machines IP address.

It will tell you who is responsible for reverse DNS of your ip addresses.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am the authoritative DNS server for my domain. This is how I am able to
setup SPF and Domainkey.

But still no luck with reverse DNS.

Is there anyone who is able to setup reverse DNS having SBC as their ISP?

Thanks.

 I suppose that's a possibility. Have you verified that your reverse DNS is
 not set up right? (http://www.dnstools.com)

 Where/who is the authoritative DNS server for your domain? Are you doing
 this or is SBC supposed to be handling that?

 Trung Pham wrote:
 Nope, not on any blacklist.

 Maybe because of reverse DNS?

 I still can not figure out how to setup reverse DNS using BIND. Plus I
 don't think it will be possible to do so anyway since I am using SBC
 DSL.

 Find a way to contact Yahoo!. The problem is on their side.

 For hotmail, you can go to support.msn.com and report mislabeled spam.
 I'd imagine Yahoo has something similar.

 You can also try going here: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html and
 seeing if you are listed on any of the rbl's that they may use.

 Erik

 On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have setup my domain key correctly.
 But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they
 confirmed
 my domainkey setting.

 Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
 .com.

 I have static IP business line BTW.

 If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
 Folder?

 Thanks.




 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?

2007-01-18 Thread Jon Darrington

Spot on Eric,

Looking at the spf records for amazon.com and paypal.com they end with a 
?all and ~all respectively.When emails pass through James's email 
filtering appliance they will be seen by the toaster as coming from it, 
and amazons ?all causes the spf record to resolve as neutral where as 
the paypal record will resolve as paypal does not send through this 
sender and get rejected.


Your fix should work for him.

Regards,

Jon

Eric Shubes wrote:

I'm guessing that SPF's rejecting them. The newer toaster gives you a
meaningful message, but the version you have simply quits and looks normal
on the log.

Change /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior from 3 to 1.
I'm not sure if restarting is necessary, but stop then start qmail to be safe.

Report back.

James Jarrett wrote:
  

This:

ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1
qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.1
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.1
vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2
ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.1
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.2
courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
maildrop-toaster-2.0.2-1.3.1
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.8-1.3.3
simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1
libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.1
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2
ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1
maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.2-1.3.1
spamassassin-toaster-3.1.5-1.3.3
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.1
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6
autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.1
qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.1
isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.1
clamav-toaster-0.88.4-1.3.3


On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:58 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:


What does
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
show you?

James Jarrett wrote:
  

I'ts not in there.  Believe me I looked.  The mail that has vanished is
just gone, no delivery information in the SEND log *UNLESS* I got it, if
I got it, all the info is in the send log.

James



On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:46 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:


Hi James,

Anything about the delivery in the send log?
/var/log/qmail/send/current

It should at least tell you to what account it went.

JP
- Original Message - 
From: James Jarrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:33 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Where the heck is my mail going?


  

I'm a new list member, and usually, when I start on a list, I like to
spend a few days/weeks getting the feel of the place before I start
talking, but this time I don't have a choice, I'm in a bit of a bind and
need some serious help.

First of all, while I have a fair amount of unix / pc experience, I am
somewhat new to email in general and qmail in particular.

I have just set up a qmail box for my school to replace an aging exim
server.  We *THOUGHT* everything was working and had scheduled the
rollout for tonight when we realized that only some of the e-mail from
the outside world is getting in.

According to the smtp logs, everything is being delivered to the box,
but a fair amount of it is never actually delivered (per the send log).

A bit of information in no partcular order:

I don't think it is a virus/spam check that is stopping the mail, on the
off chance it was, I disabled both virus and spam checking in simscan
and the problem did not go away. Then just to be thurough, I turned off
both the clamd and spamd daemons.  We have an e-mail filtering appliance
out in front of this box anyway, so I don't need any of that.

I am using the centos version of qmail-toaster from qmailtoaster.com, I
started with the VM build from:

http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/579

This has qmail, vqadmin-2.3.4, qmailadmin-1.2.9, qmailmrtg7-42, and
isolog-2.1

I checked my queue with the:

qmailctl queue

command.  It says that there is one mail message in the queue pending
delviery, so that's not the issue. After a minute or two, it showed
empty.

The results of the qmailctl stat command are:

authlib: up (pid 2060) 144335 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2055) 144335 seconds
imap4: up (pid 2064) 144335 seconds
imap4-ssl: up (pid 2071) 144335 seconds
pop3: up (pid 2067) 144335 seconds
pop3-ssl: up (pid 2063) 144335 seconds
send: up (pid 26399) 54483 seconds
smtp: up (pid 26405) 54483 seconds
spamd: up (pid 2062) 144335 seconds
authlib/log: up (pid 2057) 144335 seconds
clamd/log: up (pid 2054) 144335 seconds
imap4/log: up (pid 2087) 144335 seconds
imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2069) 144335 seconds
pop3/log: up (pid 2058) 144335 seconds
pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2059) 144335 seconds
send/log: up (pid 2056) 144335 seconds
smtp/log: up (pid 2070) 144335 seconds
spamd/log: up (pid 2061) 144335 seconds

I'm not sure how to list what patches have been applied, if someone can
give me some idea how to provide this I will.

I have a test account on the box.  Some mail gets to me and some does
not.  I can't figure a rhyme or reason for it, and the mail that does
NOT get there shows up in the smtp logs as getting to the box, but then
just vanishes.

Any ideas PLEASE!! This box was supposed to go live for 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Trung Pham
Thanks all,

It works now.

What happened before was I initially setup my TXT key to include the t=y
flag. Even though I had removed it but it took Yahoo a while to reflect
that.

Now Yahoo has the latest entry, so they pass it straight to the INBOX
folder now.

 I have setup my domain key correctly.
 But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they confirmed
 my domainkey setting.

 Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
 .com.

 I have static IP business line BTW.

 If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
 Folder?

 Thanks.




 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Trung,
I'm far from expert with reverse DNS. Perhaps
http://www.dyndns.com/support/kb/archives/reverse_dns.html might help you
out a little. I don't know if RDNS is something you can set up yourself
(given that you're the authoritative DNS for the domain) or whether it's
something that SBC would have to set up. It appears to be likely though that
this is your problem with yahoo!.

Trung Pham wrote:
 I am the authoritative DNS server for my domain. This is how I am able to
 setup SPF and Domainkey.
 
 But still no luck with reverse DNS.
 
 Is there anyone who is able to setup reverse DNS having SBC as their ISP?
 
 Thanks.
 
 I suppose that's a possibility. Have you verified that your reverse DNS is
 not set up right? (http://www.dnstools.com)

 Where/who is the authoritative DNS server for your domain? Are you doing
 this or is SBC supposed to be handling that?

 Trung Pham wrote:
 Nope, not on any blacklist.

 Maybe because of reverse DNS?

 I still can not figure out how to setup reverse DNS using BIND. Plus I
 don't think it will be possible to do so anyway since I am using SBC
 DSL.

 Find a way to contact Yahoo!. The problem is on their side.

 For hotmail, you can go to support.msn.com and report mislabeled spam.
 I'd imagine Yahoo has something similar.

 You can also try going here: http://www.robtex.com/rbls.html and
 seeing if you are listed on any of the rbl's that they may use.

 Erik

 On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have setup my domain key correctly.
 But yahoo still puts my mail in the Bulk Folder even though they
 confirmed
 my domainkey setting.

 Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
 .com.

 I have static IP business line BTW.

 If they have confirmed my domain, why do they still put it in the Bulk
 Folder?

 Thanks.



 --
 -Eric 'shubes'



-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] SRS documentation?

2007-01-18 Thread Trung Pham
I follow this link on the main page for SRS documentation but it's a
deadlink.
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/info/srs-readme.txt





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] SRS documentation?

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

/var/qmail/doc/README.srs or http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/

I will update the main site.

On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I follow this link on the main page for SRS documentation but it's a
deadlink.
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/info/srs-readme.txt





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] How to reset spamassasin

2007-01-18 Thread Guillermo Villasana
Hi guys, how can one reset what spamassasin has learned so it restarts 
its learning process?


Thanks for the help
Terius


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] How to reset spamassasin

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
 Hi guys, how can one reset what spamassasin has learned so it restarts
 its learning process?
 
 Thanks for the help
 Terius
 
 

Simply remove or rename the /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin directory. It'll
recreate everything from scratch automatically.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] How to reset spamassasin

2007-01-18 Thread Guillermo Villasana

thanks

Eric Shubes wrote:

Guillermo Villasana wrote:

Hi guys, how can one reset what spamassasin has learned so it restarts
its learning process?

Thanks for the help
Terius




Simply remove or rename the /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin directory. It'll
recreate everything from scratch automatically.




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] SRS documentation?

2007-01-18 Thread Trung Pham
Sorry for this silly question.

Is SRS even need if I don't plan to let anyone use my server to forward
their emails? In another word, this qmail server will only be used by my
domain.

 /var/qmail/doc/README.srs or http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/

 I will update the main site.

 On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I follow this link on the main page for SRS documentation but it's a
 deadlink.
 http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/info/srs-readme.txt





 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] SRS documentation?

2007-01-18 Thread Eric \Shubes\
I don't think so (probably not). Someone will undoubtedly let me know if
this isn't the case. See http://www.openspf.org/SRS for details.

Trung Pham wrote:
 Sorry for this silly question.
 
 Is SRS even need if I don't plan to let anyone use my server to forward
 their emails? In another word, this qmail server will only be used by my
 domain.
 
 /var/qmail/doc/README.srs or http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/

 I will update the main site.

 On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I follow this link on the main page for SRS documentation but it's a
 deadlink.
 http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/info/srs-readme.txt



-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Securing a QmailToaster ONLY dedicated server

2007-01-18 Thread Edwin Casimero

Hello,

I want to setup a dedicated QmailToaster only box.
I want to exchange notes with how you suggest to go about securing this 
qmailtoaster only box.


My current resources point to:

- Bastille Linux
- APF Firewall
- Mod Security
- PHP.ini hardening, disallowing certain functions
- making /tmp noexec
- http://www.michael-and-mary.net/intro/node/12

Any other tips?



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] SRS documentation?

2007-01-18 Thread Erik Espinoza

It is only necessary if your users choose to change their account
routing from Normal to Forward in their acct.

Say [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I send an e-mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and my domain uses spf, then gmail will see an
e-mail coming from your server from my domain. Since your server isn't
authorized for my domain, then gmail will reject this as a spam.

Basically if anyone forwards outside of the domain, then you should
definitely setup srs. It takes 2 seconds (add 1 mx record and 1 line
into /var/qmail/control/srs_domain). In general I'd recommend everyone
do srs and spf whenever possible.

Thanks,
Erik

On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sorry for this silly question.

Is SRS even need if I don't plan to let anyone use my server to forward
their emails? In another word, this qmail server will only be used by my
domain.

 /var/qmail/doc/README.srs or http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/

 I will update the main site.

 On 1/18/07, Trung Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I follow this link on the main page for SRS documentation but it's a
 deadlink.
 http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/info/srs-readme.txt





 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Password fail

2007-01-18 Thread Wojciech Gabor
Dnia środa, 17 stycznia 2007 16:39, Eric Shubes napisał:
 Wojciech Gabor wrote:
  vpopmail[24367]: vchkpw-smtp: password fail
  (pass: '0b3acf566e0899014146fee9fa23f760') [EMAIL PROTECTED]:IP
 Which encoding scheme is used by the scanner? Encoding scheme must match
 what vpopmail is using (I'm not sure what that is off hand).

I dont know and no any info in doc. IMO it is md5 but CRAM or DIGEST ???

When I configure my kmail I check what encoding is used on SMTP server ... 
PLAIN and APOP only?  

I think it's problem in any rpm but what? qmail, vpopmail, 
courier-authlib ... ?
-- 
Tuptus
System uptime: 41 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours 45 minuts

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]