Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread bowabos
On Friday, 9 February 2018 18:10:24 UTC, awokd wrote: > On Fri, February 9, 2018 5:56 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > > > > > I saw on qubes-users that you're updating the official documentation, > > that's great. > > Not only me! Some of the documents have already been updated, and others > are

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread Ivan Mitev
@ bowabos & awokd On 02/09/18 20:19, bowa...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, 9 February 2018 18:10:24 UTC, awokd wrote: On Fri, February 9, 2018 5:56 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: I saw on qubes-users that you're updating the official documentation, that's great. Not only me! Some of the documents

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread 'awokd' via qubes-devel
On Fri, February 9, 2018 6:52 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > @ bowabos & awokd > > > On 02/09/18 20:19, bowa...@gmail.com wrote: > So, do you think I should try to submit a PR for some of > the info present on the wiki page ? I think bowabos is already in process of doing this, but I can't find the PR?

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread brendan . hoar
On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 8:13:42 PM UTC-5, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > For anyone interested, here is instruction how to setup build > environment: > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-builder-windows/ > > I know Rafał "Omeg" used Visual Studio for development, but I have no >

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread Ivan Mitev
On 02/09/18 18:05, 'awokd' via qubes-devel wrote: On Thu, February 8, 2018 4:50 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: IMHO a public wiki - official or not - should not replace the current documentation: someone may add unsecure instructions (willingly or not) and there will always be users who blindingly

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread 'awokd' via qubes-devel
On Fri, February 9, 2018 6:10 pm, awokd wrote: > On Fri, February 9, 2018 5:56 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > > > > >> I saw on qubes-users that you're updating the official documentation, >> that's great. > > Not only me! Some of the documents have already been updated, and others > are being addressed

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread bowabos
On Friday, 9 February 2018 17:56:49 UTC, Ivan Mitev wrote: > On 02/09/18 18:05, 'awokd' via qubes-devel wrote: > > On Thu, February 8, 2018 4:50 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > > > >> > >> IMHO a public wiki - official or not - should not replace the current > >> documentation: someone may add unsecure

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread 'awokd' via qubes-devel
On Fri, February 9, 2018 5:56 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > I saw on qubes-users that you're updating the official documentation, > that's great. Not only me! Some of the documents have already been updated, and others are being addressed by people with more knowledge in those areas. > I *really*

[qubes-devel] Re: Port Forward using iptables broken?

2018-02-09 Thread joeviocoe
Yes, thanks for pointing out the typos. They are only mistakes in this post. I use a script running in dom0 to generate pretty much everything. The same script works when debian-8 is used. The interface is different depending on the template -- You received this message because you are

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread 'awokd' via qubes-devel
On Thu, February 8, 2018 4:50 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > > IMHO a public wiki - official or not - should not replace the current > documentation: someone may add unsecure instructions (willingly or not) > and there will always be users who blindingly copy/paste instructions. That and divergence

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread bowabos
On Saturday, 3 February 2018 18:58:14 UTC, Yuraeitha wrote: > On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 5:06:20 AM UTC+1, Andrew David Wong wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 2018-02-02 17:19, Yuraeitha wrote: > > > > > > It seems omeg who has been maintaining

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread bowabos
On Friday, 9 February 2018 19:20:40 UTC, awokd wrote: > On Fri, February 9, 2018 6:52 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > > @ bowabos & awokd > > > > > > On 02/09/18 20:19, bowa...@gmail.com wrote: > > > So, do you think I should try to submit a PR for some of > > the info present on the wiki page ? > > I

[qubes-devel] Re: Port Forward using iptables broken?

2018-02-09 Thread bowabos
On Friday, 9 February 2018 16:36:14 UTC, joev...@gmail.com wrote: > Yes, thanks for pointing out the typos. They are only mistakes in this post. > I use a script running in dom0 to generate pretty much everything. The same > script works when debian-8 is used. The interface is different

[qubes-devel] Re: Port Forward using iptables broken?

2018-02-09 Thread bowabos
On Friday, 9 February 2018 23:59:52 UTC, Alex Dubois wrote: > On Friday, 9 February 2018 16:36:14 UTC, joev...@gmail.com wrote: > > Yes, thanks for pointing out the typos. They are only mistakes in this > > post. I use a script running in dom0 to generate pretty much everything. > > The

[qubes-devel] Re: Port Forward using iptables broken?

2018-02-09 Thread joeviocoe
On Friday, 9 February 2018 19:02:09 UTC-5, Alex Dubois wrote: > On Friday, 9 February 2018 23:59:52 UTC, Alex Dubois wrote: > > On Friday, 9 February 2018 16:36:14 UTC, joev...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Yes, thanks for pointing out the typos. They are only mistakes in this > > > post. I use a

Re: [qubes-devel] Are there currently anyone assigned to update Qubes-Windows-Tools?

2018-02-09 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:11:50AM -0800, brendan.h...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 8:13:42 PM UTC-5, Marek > Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > For anyone interested, here is instruction how to setup build > > environment: > >

[qubes-devel] Re: Port Forward using iptables broken?

2018-02-09 Thread joeviocoe
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/3556 > An idea: Debian don't have nftables installed by default, so > qubes-firewal fallback to iptables. But not on Fedora - there nftables > is used. This applies to both sys-net and sys-firewall. > > A quick test: > > 1. List rules: > > nft

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Port Forward using iptables broken?

2018-02-09 Thread joeviocoe
On Friday, 9 February 2018 03:44:13 UTC-5, awokd wrote: > On Fri, February 9, 2018 7:33 am, bowabos wrote: > > On Friday, 9 February 2018 06:50:05 UTC, joev...@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> Fedora templates have a weird issue where the packet counter on the > >> sys-net nat FORWARD chain does not

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Port Forward using iptables broken?

2018-02-09 Thread 'awokd' via qubes-devel
On Fri, February 9, 2018 7:33 am, bowa...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, 9 February 2018 06:50:05 UTC, joev...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Fedora templates have a weird issue where the packet counter on the >> sys-net nat FORWARD chain does not increment. The PREROUTING chain does >> increment. I saw