Announcing a new site built on Radiant:
http://westportbookfestival.org/
Designed by Will Brady, built by myself.
I was determined to keep it simple, so kept the number of extensions
to a minimum:
* Reorder[1]
* Sass[2]
* Subscriber lists[3]
* Wrappits[4]
* Markdown
I considered
having just heard about wrappits from this post, I am moved to wonder why
this isn't part of core radiant behaviour
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Andrew Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Announcing a new site built on Radiant:
http://westportbookfestival.org/
Designed by Will
having just heard about wrappits from this post, I am moved to wonder why
this isn't part of core radiant behaviour
I thought so too, and submitted a patch[1] for it a while ago. I don't think
I managed to convince the gatekeepers to let it in, so I finally got round
to releasing it as an
Nice site! Well done.
Thanks.
Couldn't you use the published date to order the events instead of reorder?
Although, I personally haven't tried much with dates in the future.
I was under the impression that if a page has a publishing date set in the
future, it would only become visible on
Drew,
Thanks for the advice (and the vote!). My original patch included tests, but
now that Radiant has moved on to specs I guess it has gone stale. I will try
forking Radiant, and translating my tests into specs. Does anyone know a
rough schedule for the next release?
Assuming I get some
On Jul 22, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Andrew Neil wrote:
I was under the impression that if a page has a publishing date set
in the
future, it would only become visible on the site from that date
onwards. Now
that you mention it, I'm not sure if this is true in Radiant,
although it is
the case with
Some anecdotal evidence:
On a site I've been working on recently that is still on 0.6.4, I added
a published-date selector (like what is in 0.6.5+) to the UI using an
extension, and converted a page that had been cherry-picking individual
articles to use the aggregation extension. When I did
Chris Parrish wrote:
Joe Van Dyk wrote:
So, how does that work? I mean, how do you deploy changes? Just by
copy/pasting the updated snippets and css stuff to the live site and
enter it into the form? How do you version control it?
You pretty much have it right and it's this way for two
David Piehler wrote:
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
Just a brief update on the Summer Reboot Documentation project. I just
spent a couple of hours copying and moving stuff to the site from a
couple of places to pull things into the project :)
My schedule hasn't gone according to plan so far
Hi,
I spent part of my day getting more into Radiant. I really like what
I see so far. It is pretty awesome how much such a simple looking
tool can accomplish right out of the box. I am confident that radiant
will work well for my project needs, and I am looking for any
suggestions on
On 2008/07/21, at 13:37, Tim Gossett wrote:
But if it automatically installs extensions as git submodules, I'd
be much more
interested. Especially if the presence of a .git directory at the
project's
root automatically puts it in git mode.
I just pushed the changes up to github to support
Hi all,
I just ran into an issue with Shards, and wanted to know if what I
experienced is normal or a bug. I'm using Radiant 0.6.6 gem and Shards
from the 0.6.6 SVN tag.
I have two extensions that use Shards, both of which have a similarly
named file:
If your site doesn't get a lot of traffic (or won't), I would suggest
using sqlite3 and git locally in your project, and using the copy
strategy in Capistrano. These settings should do the trick:
set :deploy_via, :copy
set :copy_strategy, :export
set :scm, :git
set :repository,
Putting the sqlite3 database is a nifty idea, as long as you never
make changes to your site in production mode.
-Alex
http://beautifulpixel.com
On Jul 22, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
If your site doesn't get a lot of traffic (or won't), I would
suggest using sqlite3 and git
This is a known issue, and has more to do with Rails than Shards. It
will not be resolved, but should be documented because the workaround is
simple. I would suggest naming the partials something that refers back
to your extension, like _aaa_css_overrides.rhtml for example.
Sean
David
Sean Cribbs wrote:
This is a known issue, and has more to do with Rails than Shards. It
will not be resolved, but should be documented because the workaround is
simple. I would suggest naming the partials something that refers back
to your extension, like _aaa_css_overrides.rhtml for
Exactly.
Sean
David Piehler wrote:
Sean Cribbs wrote:
This is a known issue, and has more to do with Rails than Shards. It
will not be resolved, but should be documented because the workaround is
simple. I would suggest naming the partials something that refers back
to your extension,
I'm on a fairly recent freeze of Radiant Edge and I'm using the
Database Form extension. I'm getting an error on the redirect_to
value, it tells me that I'm passing 1 argument for 2. I know this was
working with 0.6.7.
Here's the relevant code from database_form_page.rb:
if
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:26 AM, john muhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008/07/21, at 13:37, Tim Gossett wrote:
But if it automatically installs extensions as git submodules, I'd be much
more
interested. Especially if the presence of a .git directory at the
project's
root automatically
So if the Ray extension makes it stupid-easy to install Radiant extensions
and can use Git to schlep the code around, does it need to be on my
production box? Can I add it as a submodule for my local repo and ignore it
for my remote repo? The idea is to streamline the production box so that it
On 2008/07/22, at 13:35, Tim Gossett wrote:
So if the Ray extension makes it stupid-easy to install Radiant
extensions
and can use Git to schlep the code around, does it need to be on my
production box? Can I add it as a submodule for my local repo and
ignore it
for my remote repo? The idea
More discussion on dropping IE6:
http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/07/ie6_on_its_way_out
Will Emerson
Livelihood Technology
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:
Hi All,
I came across a couple of mentions in the archives of people asking
how to set a default filter for articles, but no “here’s
how” answers. Did anyone manage to do this, either via extension
or config/enironment.rb?
thanks in advance!
peace - oli
This has been added to Radiant edge. If you freeze your vendor/
radiant to edge you should have a new defaults.page.filter config
setting you can set to whatever you like.
-Alex
http://beautifulpixel.com
On Jul 22, 2008, at 9:50 PM, Oli Studholme wrote:
Hi All,
I came across a couple
24 matches
Mail list logo
