4722
>
> It's spam.
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______
> Razor-users mailing list
>
"installed into" "/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1" \
> LINKTYPE "dynamic" \
> VERSION "2.14" \
> EXE_FILES "bin/razor-client" \
> >> /perllocal.pod
> echo Appending installation info to
> /u
FS-mounted or some such, thus obscuring the
> definition of "the system".
Yes, all CPAN modules do this... It's built into MakeMaker.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely di
is a bug in razor, if all the
> other modules wrote into it as well, then there is a more general problem on
> his system...
True. I tried here, and it writes to the correct perllocal.pod. So most
likely it's something specific to Gary's setup.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
ttp://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Soft
on the list so please send any mail to me in addition to the list.
>
> See the SA FAQ. http://www.spamassassin.org/faq.html
>
> 2nd question.
>
> --
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "A handing out orgy..." - Prof. Brown
--
Vipul Ved Praka
sQCgpI72
> XiMpliEwesuJm1UMl/CA/ec=
> =TScE
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
---
1
>
> de'i Monday 30 September 2002 20:55 la Vipul Ved Prakash cusku di'e
> > Bounce me a copy and send me the debug output?
>
> The spam is attached to my previous message.
>
> cmeclax
> - ---
> neofelis% razor-report -d msg.Kgl
# Oct 02 23:46:11.470805 report[14051]: [ 6] response to sent.3
> # -res=1
> # err=230
> # .
> # Oct 02 23:46:11.471825 report[14051]: [ 5] mail 1, orig_email, special
> # case eng 1: Server accept
> # ed report.
> # Oct 02 23:46:11.472228 report[14051]: [ 8] mail 1.0, eng 4:
Which is not necessarily a good thing. :-)
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:28:13PM -0700, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Even a small snippet of the message is enough to keep it out of some of
> our mailboxes :)
>
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just n
xactly
that: "Daily progress on useful code", most of which is not visible in the
client side software. If you undertook a networked project of that size,
which I assume you haven't, you'd know what I am talking about.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The
ded to reduce
> frustration and wasted time.
This is definitely a clear, constructive suggestion. It was lost in your
previous mail that tried to draw attention by being ill-informed,
insulting and speculative.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future i
YI) on the various Razor servers to check for availability with a
> small timeout before trying to connect for data with a presumably
> larger timeout.
razor-agents use TCP port 7 (TCP echo) to determine what servers are
closest to it.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | &
\n in prep_part() but before that
stage, the code should take \r's into consideration. I've modified this,
and a couple of lines later in (my @tmpparts = split
/\n\Q--$boundary\E\r*\n/, $body;) Will introduce this in the next release.
Let me know if you notice anything else...
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:42:18AM -0700, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
>
> You are right. \r\n is converted to \n in prep_part() but before that
> stage, the code should take \r's into consideration. I've modified this,
> and a couple of lines later in (my @tmpparts = split
>
reported spam will offset what we charge for usage.
The pricing quoted in Sven's mail was part of an on-going discussion to
determine something that works for both of us. For current pricing people
should contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The
code.
· Made ::Agent taint friendly.
· Added support for passing an already open filehandle
to "::Agent::checkit()" and "::Agent::parse_mbox()"
· Made logic_method 4 the default.
· Added Razor2::Syslog to th
bmissions will not have enough confidence to cross
the average.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ |
HTML
dir and run perl Makefile.PL; make; make test; make install.
Then install razor-agents. Let me know if it helps.
best,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vip
--
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en
>
> _______
&g
ing on the network.
Equally important is to revoke. Razor is entirely based on human input so
unless people explicitly voice their disagreement the system will be
unable to self adjust.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:29:27PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> > Hmm. After untarring the distribution, go into the Razor2-Preproc-deHTML
> > dir and run perl Makefile.PL; make; make test; make install.
> >
> > Then install razor-agent
s sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to
> $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v?
> http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
&
7;t exist, but in future it will return a negative confidence.
> For now I think I'll use ac + 10 or something like that and see how it goes.
I would be interested in your results too.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
So
ould you send me the output of
razor-check -d?
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
tity file to report spam?
You can't... I'd suggest using a derivative like [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
a username.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.ne
TECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
> of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
> Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program n
nce values of spam, so people can set local cf values.
> "What is a thousand times nothing much? Fast, then expel worms."
>-- http://paulm.com/toys/surrealism/
Cool toy. :-)
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it'
-
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
> Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
> fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTE
T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
an file
> for razor-agent.conf? I thought it was in the man file at one point but
> I had to go to the source to figure out what the different methods did
> for 2.20.
I don't think it ever got added. I will add it in the next release.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:49:18AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> This is a question for the razor developers:
>
> Does my trust or the state of the system change in any way if I report
> the same spam message twice?
Nope.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is he
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:25:24PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> Suggested addition:
Thanks, I have added your submissions to the FAQ... they will be reflected
on the site in a day or two.
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Softwa
idence level of individual parts. I plan to add
a switch that simply returns the confidence.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ |
ined are also prone to human
> error. If either of these statements are not humanly obvious to you, I
> suggest careful thought before leaping to any other conclusions.
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:
>
gt;
> > > Note: Emails authored under this address do not reflect the opinions of my
> > > employer unless otherwise stated. Facts contained are also prone to human
> > > error. If either of these statements are
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design
ue (not reported by anyone else), it is purged from
the database.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.
rry,
Please send me an example mail where you see the problem with 2.22
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://
---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is her
latest client. If someone has a good example, please send my way.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
st
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
>
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: PGP 8.0
> Comment: This message has been digitally signed by Mike Loiterman
>
> iQA/AwUBPh31X2jZbUnRudGOEQLqRwCglxirDaEEDmZ9fzDCx5sXMdMSDLsAoKJW
> 75ljXxVReJgwDxy2Kj6jKGip
> =9FCe
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your
> clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption.
> Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en
> ___
> Razor-users ma
f other ports
> that are open, so could I modify razor to use another port?
> Are the razor servers expecting tcp "ping" traffic on 4/tcp ? Does it
> matter if the port I use is open or closed on the receiving end?
>
> Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
>
> >Nope, they
; ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's jus
nts
> v2.22. I am not experienced with interpreting the razor debug
> information, so I may be missing something obvious.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distributed yet
--
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
> Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
> Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
> www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
>
start reporting spam I get a timeout. Here's the tail of the
> > > output from "razor-admin -d -register":
>
> [...]
>
>
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
> Can&
linking in
> the unix terminal.
>
> So, I tried to do 'razor-admin -register', but this time no file created
> and the process is never stopped again.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is h
David,
The reason your reports are not reflected immediately is because you don't
have enough trust in the system. Building up trust is an important
component of a collaborative system, because it's the only mechanism that
ensures we have a clean database for all to use. As a new user, it might
b
John,
We had some DB issues (missing content in catalogues) over the last 2
weeks which could have caused the false positives with E*TRADE/Ebay
messages. We have fixed this problem 90%, and over the next couple of days
all the relevant data will be available in the catalogue servers.
Regarding m
Liudvikas,
Thanks for the debug log. I believe changing the average confidence to a
number between 10-20 would mitigate the problem with list related FPs
considerably. We will do some statistical analysis and compute a new
recommended confidence.
Also, SpamNet (Outlook) users usually have bette
s and cool
down instead of taking pot shots at each other. Aggresion, in general,
is counter-productive and not welcome on this list.
cheers,
vipul.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist |widely distrib
e added this to
the FAQ as well as the README which will go out with the next version of
razor-agents.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloudmark Inc. PGP
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloudmark Inc. PGP Key: 1024R/D71918D5
"There is no way to peace. Peace is the way."
please ignore.
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloudmark Inc. PGP Key: 1024R/D71918D5
"There is no way to peace. Peace is the way."
please ignore.
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloudmark Inc. PGP Key: 1024R/D71918D5
"There is no way to peace. Peace is the way."
.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
As long as ISP does not publish commercial software that embeds Razor,
it's covered under personal usage.
cheers,
vipul
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:20:21PM -0700, Kelson Vibber wrote:
> At 01:35 PM 8/1/2003, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> >We now have a usage policy in place regard
Yes. The restrictions only apply to those who are selling commercial
systems that integrate Razor agents.
cheers,
vipul
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:35:09PM +, Mark wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vipul Ved Prakash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAI
r to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/
> >direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> >___
> >Razor-users mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
There was a little problem with 2.35 just posted. Please try 2.36 posted
at the same location.
http://razor.sourceforge.net/beta/
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder & Chief Scientist, http://www.cloudmark.com
Cloud
I've put up Razor Agents 2.35 with the Makefile.PL fix (and a couple of
other fixes) at:
http://razor.sourceforge.net/beta/razor-agents-2.35.tar.gz
If you were having Makefile.PL related problems, please test this release
and let me know how it works.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Pr
-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakashhttp://www.vipul.net
Founder &am
age has a bug.
>
>
> ---
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visu
ownload today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> _______________
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash
commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
> ___
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL P
Hi,
Those of you who have poked a whole in their firewall to
access Razor2 servers should note the IP changes to the
Razor2 servers. The new IP range is:
66.151.150.11 - 66.151.150.60
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "...not unpreced
--
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
> 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
> developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
> WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
>
: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> __
will induce less
network traffic. Please give it a test drive and let me know if you
encounter problems.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash
and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp
Folks,
razor-users is a members only list from now on, at least till we can find
a better way to screen posts to the lists.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash
and I'm delighted to say that I hav
; Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> ___________
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-u
nologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> ___________
> Razor-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
is happens.
Thanks for your continued paitence and support!
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash
and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp
www.vipul.net
o longer supported on the
backend. [Bug #975490]
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Sir, are you classified as human?"
"Uh, negative. I am a meat popsicle."
www.vipul.net
www.cloudmark.com
Title: RE: [Razor-users] What engine?
This was something of a design flaw (to store use_engines) in the config file, so 2.61 will override the use_engines in the config to insert engines 4 and 8.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John E Hein
Sent: Wed
Title: RE: [Razor-users] Servers Down?
We are having some issues with the servers. The OPS team is on it.
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Eisner
Sent: Thu 9/9/2004 7:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Razor-users] Server
Folks,
I have released version 2.66 of Razor Agents. This release improves
accuracy and provides privacy enhancements. I would urge everyone to
upgrade soon as possible. Here's the link to the tarball:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/razor/razor-agents-2.66.tar.gz?downlo
ad
Here's the chang
d an increase in accuracy due to ehash being used
everytime.
- Fixed a bug in report by message. Version 2.61 would drop MIME
headers on certain spam messages which would cause the backend
to ignore these messages as malformed.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash "Si
Folks,
Many of you have written to me over the last few months about
the possibility of caching Razor signatures to avoid network
latency of Razor check. We've come up with a plan and I want
your feedback, specially if you are running Razor in a high-
volume environment like an ISP.
As you know,
ing logic for finding the "fastest"
catalogue server; the configuration option for this logic
is now ignored. [Support #739464]
* Removed stale engine code for various signature types that
are no longer used.
cheers,
vipul
--
Vip
NS round robin. [Bug #604679]
* Remove the ICMP ping logic for finding the "fastest"
catalogue server; the configuration option for this logic
is now ignored. [Support #739464]
* Removed stale engine code for various signature types that
are no longer used.
Folks,
Version 2.75 of Razor Agents is now available. You can download this
release from SourceForge at:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/razor/razor-agents-2.75.tar.bz2?downl
oad
This release addresses all remaining bugs and feature requests that have
been logged on SourceForge. Also couple
Can you give me razor-check -H output for the word document mail?
Richard, could you look into the download issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin W.
Gagel
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:12 PM
To: Razor List
Subject: [Razor-users]
You need to create a razor identity using "razor-report -register". The
new version of the agents (2.77), which was released a few days ago,
will automatically create an identity. It also fixes some bugs with
amavis integration, so I suggest that you upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: [E
Ved Prakash; razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] razor2 report failed
I don't see razor-agents v2.77 available for download from the
sourceforge site? The latest is shown as razor-agents v2.75, released
on 7-19-05.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Vip
Folks,
In the last few weeks I have received tons of mail from people asking me
if they are covered by Razor service policy. Here's some clarification.
The spirit of the service policy is to restrict usage from those
companies that are charging their customers in some way for use of razor
agents
Title: RE: [Razor-users] false positives with centos-announce list
Terry,
Can you send me the signatures for this message? (razor-check -H)
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Terry Griffin
Sent: Mon 11/21/2005 8:47 AM
To: razor-users@lists.sourc
Nope.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
Griffin
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 8:45 AM
To: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] false positives with centos-announce list
>
> From: "Kevin W. Gagel" <[EMAIL PR
If that is the case, please send me razor-check -H output and I will
investigate.
Cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: Nix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:09 PM
To: Kevin W. Gagel
Cc: Vipul Ved Prakash; Terry Griffin; razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Folks,
For those of you who are interested, I have co-authored a paper on the
design of Razor2's trust metric (TeS) and overall architecture of the
Cloudmark backend. The paper is published in the November issue of ACM
Queue and is now on their website[1].
[1] (http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?
razor agents support SOCKS, so you should be able to use a
SOCKS server to proxy.
cheers,
vipul
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sampei02Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 7:19 AMTo: Matt
KettlerCc: razor-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re:
[
Title: RE: [Razor-users] Attachment only emails raising razor
Yosi,
This should not happen. If it does, it's a FP. Can you give me razor-check -H output of a few attachment only messages?
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Folks,
I am pleased to announce that with the release of razor-agents
2.81[1] a new service policy has been introduced, that makes the
use of Razor2 service completely open and free. A license
introduced in 2003 restricted usage by third party integrators,
but the new license unencumbers all usage
Please send me razor-check -H output of the messages and I
can investigate. It's impossible to figure out what's going on from your
description below.
cheers,
vipul
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006
Title: RE: False positive : help !!
I have contested the particular fingerprint that was causing this FP. Is this fixed now?
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 5/5/2006 3:37 AM
To: Vipul Ved Prakash; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
Title: RE: /tmp/ LOG files
I believe an older version of agents did that. Are you running 2.81?
cheers,
vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sun 5/28/2006 11:19 PM
To: Vipul Ved Prakash; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: razor-users
Folks,
The version 2.82 of Razor Agents is now available for download from
http://razor.sf.net/. This version fixes some long standing bugs in the
discovery and TCP connect() logic. The agents always connect to the
correct servers now. If this release proves to be stable, we expect to
begin the
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
