putername, etc. Licensing is enforced at the server now. The client
no longer needs personalized with a serial number, license number,
computername, or anything else.
Thanks for listening to yet another rant, Lee. ;-)
Brad.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
on 12/30/2000 3:25 PM, "ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So... the question is, since I am planning to look at the market for
> backup software for bigger systems, would it be reasonable for me to
> include Retrospect in the candidate list? Is anyone on the list backing
> up systems on this scal
retro-talk
> Subject: Re: Anyone used Retrospect on medium-large systems?
>
>
> - with a lot of computers, the Retrospect catalog files can become
> large,
> and doing the comparisons between catalog and the current client
> filesystem structure prior to
]]On Behalf
Of Thone, Bradley A (Sbcsi)
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 9:27 AM
To: 'retro-talk'
Subject: RE: Anyone used Retrospect on medium-large systems?
Suppose the first client of the night meets the threshold value, so Backup
Server starts a backup.
30 seconds into the b
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Steven Karel
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 4:52 PM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: Anyone used Retrospect on medium-large systems?
We back up about 200 clients, half Mac, half Windows, including about a
dozen lap
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Steven Karel
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 4:52 PM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: Anyone used Retrospect on medium-large systems?
We back up about 200 clients, half Mac, half Windows, including about a
dozen laptops. We have less data turnover than you do, how
We back up about 200 clients, half Mac, half Windows, including about a
dozen laptops. We have less data turnover than you do, however, and only
back up each client about once a week.
In no particular order, here are my comments on backing up medium-size
networks with Retrospect vis-a-vis other s
___
> From: Chris Freemesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 09:05:13 -0500
> To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Anyone used Retrospect on medium-large systems?
>So... the question is, since I am planning to look at the market for
>backup software for bigger systems, would it be reasonable for me to
>include Retrospect in the candidate list? Is anyone on the list backing
>up systems on this scale?
>
>Any advice welcome.
>
>Ian.
Hi Ian.
I run a Retrospe
alf
Of ian
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 4:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Anyone used Retrospect on medium-large systems?
I've used Retrospect on my home network (two PCs and a Mac) for nearly
a
year and it is exactly right for my needs.
I am also responsible for my company'
on 12/30/00 7:45 PM, matt barkdull at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dealing with ArcServe, you probably have a good idea of how you want
> the backups to go. Retrospect is a lot easier to set up to do what
> you want it to do.
I'll second that. I used ArcServe at my last job, and while it did the
We're rather small, about 200 machines total for 3 backup servers.
One of the backup servers does only 10 clients and a ASIP server.
I use Retrospect and swear by it. We've used ArcServe and it's a
piece of junk compared to Retrospect on the same number of clients.
Backups are happening relia
I've used Retrospect on my home network (two PCs and a Mac) for nearly a
year and it is exactly right for my needs.
I am also responsible for my company's IT environment. We use ArcServe
for the backup software - the server running on a Windows NT server, a
Dell PowerVault twin-drive 30-tape li
13 matches
Mail list logo
