At 10:58 AM +0100 03/08/2000, Serge Paulus wrote:
>Ever tried DLT tapes? it's expensive but I NEVER had a damaged tape
>in 5 years. On the contrary, ± 50 DAT tapes (120m) are damaged
>(after incremental backups, never reusing a tape) in my archives of
>±250 tapes...
Thanks for all of the respo
3000 W. Alameda Ave.
Burbank CA 91523
818.840.6610 (voice)
818.840.3390 (fax)
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Paulus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 1:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: DDS-3 or DDS-4?
>
>
> Ever tried
Ever tried DLT tapes? it's expensive but I NEVER had a damaged tape in 5 years. On the
contrary, ± 50 DAT tapes (120m) are damaged (after incremental backups, never reusing
a tape) in my archives of ±250 tapes...
--
Serge Paulus
Helpdesk
Microscript s.a.
51 rue du Poinçon
B-1000 Brussels
322/2
At 10:18 PM -0800 03/06/2000, Chuck Hornish wrote:
>We have a Sony DDS-4 which can write to 90-meter tapes, but not the
>60-meter variety.
Thanks for the enlightening info, Chuck!
Will DDS-4 at least read the older 60 metre DAT media?
Stephen K. Suh
rchiving CDs onto DVD-RAM soonat least
I'll be able to get 8 CDs on a single disc.
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Bateman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: DDS-3 or DDS-4
gt; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:20:52 -0500
> To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: DDS-3 or DDS-4?
>
> Have verified those archives recently? I've found that many of my DDS-2
> archives from three years ago, on Sony, Maxell, Verbatim, and Fuji tapes,
>
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: DDS-3 or DDS-4?
> At 8:35 PM -0800 03/06/2000, Chuck Hornish wrote:
> >I'd suggest getting rid of the 60-Meter tapes and re-writing the
> >data onto longer tapes. Are you keeping the catalogs as well as the
&g
SK Suh wrote:
>
> At 8:35 PM -0800 03/06/2000, Chuck Hornish wrote:
> >I'd suggest getting rid of the 60-Meter tapes and re-writing the
> >data onto longer tapes. Are you keeping the catalogs as well as the
> >tapes? Are these tapes archives or backups?
>
> We would hopefully be keeping old cata
At 8:35 PM -0800 03/06/2000, Chuck Hornish wrote:
>I'd suggest getting rid of the 60-Meter tapes and re-writing the
>data onto longer tapes. Are you keeping the catalogs as well as the
>tapes? Are these tapes archives or backups?
We would hopefully be keeping old catalogs and 60/90 metre tapes, a
SK Suh wrote:
>
> Am shopping for a DAT drive replacement for our aging Dynatek DDS-1
> (or -2?) unit for archival use. This DAT would be attached to an
> older beige Power Macintosh G3 and would be writing data from a local
> hard drive, not over the network.
>
> Ideally I'd like to be able to
Am shopping for a DAT drive replacement for our aging Dynatek DDS-1
(or -2?) unit for archival use. This DAT would be attached to an
older beige Power Macintosh G3 and would be writing data from a local
hard drive, not over the network.
Ideally I'd like to be able to utilize newer, faster and
11 matches
Mail list logo
