things work now..
On May 11, 10:34 am, minkzanity wrote:
> Corporate LDAP server
>
> On May 11, 3:26 am, Paul Schulz wrote:
>
>
>
> > What LDAP are you authenticating to?
>
> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:54 PM, minkzanity wrote:
> > > Update:
>
> > > After making sure the User Mask was identical
Hey Andy,
Thanks! Sorry for the late response. I kept meaning to add this but have
been distracted all week.
The Looxcie looks pretty cool. Must be fun to play with :)
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmwar
So it does look as if the Subversion server or perhaps some proxy that's
inbetween Review Board and the SVN server is actually breaking when doing an
HTTP OPTIONS call. I can't guess at this point what the cause would be, but
it seems that Review Board isn't the problem. You'd need to track down wh
It's a bit too late in the game for 1.6, but it's something I'd love to see
us get in after that. We've wanted this functionality before and had a
couple attempts for doing it as part of student projects.
At some point if we get a patch up on reviews.reviewboard.org, we'll see
what it'd take to ge
Spoke too soon. Although the list of revisions is now getting
populated, when selection one of the check-boxes and clicking the
'Create' button, it comes back with 'Select a valid choice. 1880 is not
one of the available choices.' however manually entering revision 1880
in the text box does cre
Ignore me - further code inspection led me to realise that my
reviewboard userid wasnt the same user that had done the subversion
checkin. On changing my reviewboard userid to match, the button now
populates a nice list of revisions.
Great job.:-)
Now to convince
the team at work that this
Hi Chris,
I posted the logs at http://pastebin.com/aB4a8iMr . I see the errors that
indicate something wrong. But I can't reproduce the problem at the command
line. Thanks in advance.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> It still looks like Review Board is having a problem
Hi Philipp,
I've pulled your latest code from git and updated my
install. It no longer errors, but just displays "No pending revisions
found." on clicking on the 'Get Revisions' button.
I've checked in a
handful of new revisions too in case it remembered the revisions I had
previously liste
It still looks like Review Board is having a problem accessing your
Subversion repository. It's failing in some way. Might want to check the
Review Board log file to see if anything is coming up, and attempt a 'svn
info' on the repository path from the Review Board server.
It could be some issue w
Hi,
I upgraded to version 1.5.5 and I am running mod_python with Python 2.6.
Only asks me for my password once now.
Less errors, but still a error:
post-review -pd --summary="review board test" --description="REVIEW BOARD
TEST" USE_SVN_README --username=tvincent
>>> RBTools 0.3.2
>>> Home = /home
Ah, I suspected that it might be in the database.
Thanks,
Dan
On May 11, 2:54 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> It fixes all future ones going forward. We need to reset the broken 1.6 beta
> 1 counts, which I'm still trying to figure out the best way to do. It'll
> happen by the next beta, unless t
You're running exactly 1.5? Try upgrading. There are a lot of API issues in
1.5, which I want to rule out first.
Also, are you using mod_python, or something else?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
It fixes all future ones going forward. We need to reset the broken 1.6 beta
1 counts, which I'm still trying to figure out the best way to do. It'll
happen by the next beta, unless there's some emergency that forces us to put
the beta out sooner than planned.
We have a Review Board instance with
Corporate LDAP server
On May 11, 3:26 am, Paul Schulz wrote:
> What LDAP are you authenticating to?
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:54 PM, minkzanity wrote:
> > Update:
>
> > After making sure the User Mask was identical, I do not get the "Bad
> > search filter" error. I still get the "bind"
I changed the site setting from http to https. Now I get:
[13:07:36 tvincent@SERVER02:~/puppet]$ post-review -pd --
summary="review board test" --description="REVIEW BOARD TEST"
USE_SVN_README --username=tvincent
>>> RBTools 0.3.2
>>> Home = /home/tvincent
>>> svn info
>>> diff --version
>>> reposi
Upgrade to 1.6 beta 2 went fine for me. However, I noticed there are a
couple lines in the release note indicating some fixes for incoming
review and starred review request counts. This doesn't seem to have
fixed the counts for me. I currently have -15 incoming reviews and -1
outgoing reviews. I've
Hi,
Thanks for getting back to me Christian. I tried svn diff and svn diff works
fine. . The diff was also able to be generated locally. Any other ideas?
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> What type of repository are you using? I assume Subversion?
>
> It looks like ther
I don't know how hg postreview works, but at some point it calls post-review,
correct? I think it would need to be modified to use --submit-as to suit your
case.
- David
On May 10, 2011, at 4:40 PM, "Jeffrey Reynolds"
wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> I'm posting here because we are starting to use
There's no way to add a link with inline text, like that. However, if you
just include the link itself in the comment, it should be turned into a
hyperlink. Most people do it like this:
blah blah comment, see http://test for info.
-David
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:02 AM, shilpageo wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
I want to add href in line comments.
Following tag is not working:
http://test";> testComments
Is there any way to add href to comment?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/use
Rob,
The fix is committed. Could you please test with the latest version of
reviewboard/scmtools/svn_post_tracker.py?
- Philipp
On May 10, 8:58 pm, Philipp Henkel
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks, I'm glad you like it.
> Currently I rely on svn:log property in order to extract the commit
> descripti
What LDAP are you authenticating to?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:54 PM, minkzanity wrote:
> Update:
>
> After making sure the User Mask was identical, I do not get the "Bad
> search filter" error. I still get the "bind" failure.
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> ht
Update:
After making sure the User Mask was identical, I do not get the "Bad
search filter" error. I still get the "bind" failure.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~---
More info:
Apache + mod_python
User Mask is copy + paste form working machine
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubs
I am cloning a ReviewBoard machine (ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on RHEL5) and
copied all settings, in particular LDAP settings. LDAP works on the
original machine, but not on the second one.
This is what I see in the logfile:
2011-05-10 23:09:53,683 - WARNING - LDAP error: {'info': ':
LdapErr: DSI
25 matches
Mail list logo
