Reviewed by List

Is there a way to find out what all reviews were done by a particular person? I checked ou the documentation for both Review Board and its RBTools and couldn't find anything. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at

Re: Reviewed by List

Are you looking for a list of reviews made across all review requests by a given person? If so, that feature is mostly done, and will make it into an upcoming release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. -

CRITICAL: tuple index out of range error with RBTools 0.6 and Mercurial

Hello, I had installed ReviewBoard 2.0 and set it up to work with Mercurial. Unfortunately when I do an *rbt post*, I get this error: CRITICAL: tuple index out of range Adding --debug at the end produces this output: RBTools 0.6 Python 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:56) [GCC

Loading Diffs takes a lot of time, and sometimes proxyerror

Hello again, We have a problem of timeouts when trying to visualize the diff via the View Diff button. Sometimes it loads, after a lot of times, sometimes it displays a proxyerror. Anyway in the logs we find for every user trying to display diffs this critical error in reviewboard.log : #

Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

After updating from 1.7.2x to 2.0, my users get occasional error 500 messages. The site seems to be down more often than it is up. I have no errors in my reviewboard logs or my httpd logs. My update process was as follows: easy_install -U ReviewBoard rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

That's certainly not normal. Can you provide the error logs from reviewboard.log? I also need to know everything you can tell me about your configuration. Versions, software, database type, Apache config, whether you use mod_worker, etc. Christian On Friday, May 23, 2014, Sara Rayburn

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

Hi Christian, Looking further, I was getting some errors about incompatibility between mod_wsgi and python. After updating mod_python and mod_wsgi, this is the error I'm left with: [Fri May 23 17:51:49 2014] [error]

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

Hi Sara, That warning can be ignored. It's harmless. Is there anything in the Apache error_log? Also, are there any operations that reliably produce the 500? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. -

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

I wish I had more information to give you, it doesn't seem like anything specific happens to make it work or fail. Here's my apache error_log since the last httpd restart. It seems like after restarting httpd, it takes a long time (~10 minutes) before we get anything besides the error 500.

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

Hey Sara, Yeah, that all looks normal. Some more questions... Are any other services being run off this Apache using either mod_python or mod_wsgi? Wondering if something is conflicting. (Multiple Python services need to be separated out using some additional directives.) If not, you may want

Re: CRITICAL: tuple index out of range error with RBTools 0.6 and Mercurial

Can you show us the output of `hg showconfig`? -David On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:57 AM, OPL X oplx.0...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I had installed ReviewBoard 2.0 and set it up to work with Mercurial. Unfortunately when I do an *rbt post*, I get this error: CRITICAL: tuple index out of range

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

There are no other services. This is running on a VM dedicated solely to hosting reviewboard. I disabled mod_python and I am having the same problem. I was using mod_wsgi both before and after, although mod_python was not disabled. serayburn@reviewboard httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.15

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

Hi Sara, I'll need the full information from httpd -V. Several pieces in there are useful, though the most crucial to see are the Server MPM and the few lines below that. The database should remain unaffected if you upgrade the package. I wouldn't expect a problem there. However, mixing RPMs and

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

oops. here's the httpd -V output, I'll try the debug configuration next. serayburn@reviewboard httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Apr 3 2014 23:56:16 Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:25 Server loaded: APR 1.3.9, APR-Util 1.3.9 Compiled using: APR 1.3.9, APR-Util

Re: Content-Disposition is inline instead of attachment in response to Download Diff

Okay, I'm happy switching it over then. Would you mind filing a bug (or a review request, if you want to just make the switch)? We can get it in for a 2.0.x. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

I've emailed you the detailed error 500 page generated. On Friday, May 23, 2014 2:21:03 PM UTC-5, Sara Rayburn wrote: oops. here's the httpd -V output, I'll try the debug configuration next. serayburn@reviewboard httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Apr 3 2014

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

Hi Christian, Thanks for your help, I think I've fixed it. I still had a beta version of the PowerPack installed. Uninstalling that seems to have corrected our issues. Sara -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at

Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500

Hi Sara, Oh, that could certainly do it. The more recent versions should work a lot better with 2.0, if you were still interested in trying it out. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On

Re: how to apply review code on local machine

It should be fixed as of commit 09ee08e in rbtools git. -David On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:58 PM, shankar KC shankark...@gmail.com wrote: I raised a bug and its resoled as fixed. Fixed version is 0.6.x. Is this version available for download. I downloaded the latest version from GIT repo but

Re: Loading Diffs takes a lot of time, and sometimes proxyerror

Is the server local to your network? This is definitely a lot longer than I would expect. 63 seconds is a bit crazy... svn+ssh is not inherently that slow. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

Re: Broken Link on Main Page

Hi, Thanks for pointing this out! I've made the fix. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Stein, Ruben ruben.st...@mevis.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hi, the link

Re: ReviewBoard: Create a diff file to send for Code review in ReviewBoard where the source depot is TFS and not Git

I believe there's a TFS-SVN bridge that can be set up. I've heard of people using this with Review Board before. Might be worth looking into until we have official support. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. -

Re: Issue 3369 in reviewboard: When I try to add file to a review request, It sends request to download a file file-attachments. If we save, find or close the download file, the upload gets aborted

Comment #2 on issue 3369 by gaya3...@gmail.com: When I try to add file to a review request, It sends request to download a file file-attachments. If we save, find or close the download file, the upload gets aborted. I have attached the file given for download for reference

Issue 3372 in reviewboard: not able to upload diff

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3372 by ankitmat...@gmail.com: not able to upload diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3372 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be

Issue 3373 in reviewboard: Revision selection sliders do not behave as expected

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3373 by shafiq.j...@curvedental.com: Revision selection sliders do not behave as expected http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3373 What version are you running? 2.0 What's the URL of the page containing

Re: Issue 3372 in reviewboard: not able to upload diff

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 3372 by trowb...@gmail.com: not able to upload diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3372 We need you to answer the questions here or we can't help. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: Issue 3373 in reviewboard: Revision selection sliders do not behave as expected

Updates: Labels: Milestone-Release2.0.x Browser OpSys-Windows Comment #1 on issue 3373 by chip...@gmail.com: Revision selection sliders do not behave as expected http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3373 There may be a bug on IE11. We'll look into this. It should

Re: Issue 3373 in reviewboard: Revision selection sliders do not behave as expected

Updates: Labels: Component-DiffViewer Comment #2 on issue 3373 by chip...@gmail.com: Revision selection sliders do not behave as expected http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3373 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this

Re: Issue 3329 in reviewboard: Show proper error message when attempting to publish review request with duplicate commit ID

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 3329 by trowb...@gmail.com: Show proper error message when attempting to publish review request with duplicate commit ID http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3329 Fixed in release-2.0.x (eec377b). Thanks! -- You received

Re: Issue 3328 in reviewboard: rbt -I allows two separate review requests have identical commit ID

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 3328 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt -I allows two separate review requests have identical commit ID http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3328 Fixed in release-0.6.x (a65ee8d). Thanks! -- You received this message because this