m using sqlite3 as backend. It seems that sqlite3 is limited to
SQLITE_MAX_VARIABLE_NUMBER, which defaults to 999, as found on
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7106016/too-many-sql-variables-error-in-django-witih-sqlite3.
Any way to bypass this limitation and bring back the search?
Thanks,
In a previous request for help, I learned that I was simply trying to use a
feature that is not there for gitlab-repos, yet.
Understood!
I got hinted to use the rbtools. I followed that advice, and for
test-purposes installed the rbtools, following the documentation.
rbt can be started, now.
I use the current (2 days old) bitnami stack for reviewboard.
Desparately trying to get rbtools running I found that a setting was
missing in reviewboard.
In
System Settings - General - General Settings - Site Settings
There is the server URL.
Now I use two Apaches one in the bitnami stack
Hi!
First: regarding reviewboard I am a newB!
I did setup the bitname-stack for RB ... that worked nicely.
I did configure my gitlab repository and with some latency and
experimentation, it showed up in the admin dashboard with no errors.
(First it did configure, but did not show up, maybe a
Hello --
Has anyone successfully ran Review Board on top of Heroku? Before I go
down this route, I'd like to know any roadblocks that may have been hit.
Cheers,
//adrian
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting
group and import them into a
separate ReviewBoard server?
The current proposal is to clone the existing server and manually sanitize
it by deleting groups/reviews/users from the administrative interface. I'm
hoping that there is a better way!
Thanks,
//adrian
--
Want to help the Review
.
//adrian
On Nov 7, 2:59 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Adrian,
post-review will try to compare the repository paths by default. However,
you can tell it explicitly which repository to use by specifying REPOSITORY
= 'name' in a .reviewboardrc file committed in the base
On Nov 4, 11:16 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
SSH is supposed to work. We use it (for repo verification, though you still
need the cgit, etc. method for getting files).
You'd need to go into RB and generate a new SSH key and then configure it
for access on the git server.
solution. Any other ideas?
//adrian
On Nov 4, 12:29 pm, adrian ve...@veshi.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 11:16 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
SSH is supposed to work. We use it (for repo verification, though you still
need the cgit, etc. method for getting files).
You'd need to go
is appreciated.
//adrian
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
10 matches
Mail list logo
