Hi Ian,
For Subversion repositories, we attempt to query the information on the
remote server for UUID comparisons. It sounds like this is what's failing.
I'm guessing your SVNBridge doesn't implement the call we need, or we assume
some info is returned that doesn't actually exist there.
What
Hi,
Do you mean the revision of the diff being reviewed? When you say review, do
you mean a review of a diff, or a review request?
I need more clarification on what you need.. So let me see if I have the
right understanding.
You have a review request with two diffs: Revision 1 and revision 2.
Okay, so we'll need to do some extended debugging.
What version of Review Board are you using?
Do you have any experience with Python? To figure this out in more detail,
we'll need to introduce some logging into the CVS support and see how far
we're getting and what output we're seeing.
Hi Christian,
I get the following information returned (using SilkSVN):
Path: tfs2010:8081
URL: http://tfs2010:8081
Repository Root: http://tfs2010:8081
Repository UUID: 6999ed95-b81c-411e-912e-8b8ee48a20fa
Revision: 39
Node Kind: directory
Last Changed Author: unknown
Last Changed Rev: 39
Last
Hi Christian,
I am using version 1.5.2 of reviewboard.
I do not have any experience with python.
However, that shouldn't be a problem. i will look up the internet and
learn whatever is required.
Please let me know the steps needed to enable more logging in CVS from
reviewboard side.
Thanks
Okay, so that works. Perhaps it's a failure elsewhere.
How comfortable are you with Python code? We'd need to add some logging to
find out exactly what the failure is.
Specifically, in reviewboard/webapi/json.py:repository_info, you want to
change:
except:
return
I looked over the documentation but couldn't find an answer... is
there any way to hide certain fields that are not required on the
'Create New Review Request' page?
'branch' and even 'diff' may not be relevant when only reviewing
graphics.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Want to help the Review Board
Hi ,
I am trying to integrate VSS and an internal SCM of my company with
ReviewBoard. I am kind of short on time and unable to find any good
walk through on integrating a new SCM with ReviewBoard.
Specifically, what all files would i need to modify/add in order to
add a new repository from
Hi Daniel,
If using Review Board 1.5.x, then selecting None (Graphics only) for the
Repository will hide those fields.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Daniel
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Support
Comment #1 on issue 1959 by chip...@gmail.com: Looking for a list of DIFF
file settings - using Mercurial 1.7.3
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1959
We expect a unified diff in a format that our tools can parse. A
Comment #1 on issue 1885 by ruben.st...@mevis.fraunhofer.de: Permissions to
restrict viewing of all commits and closing review requests
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1885
I would appreciate that feature too. At our institute there are projects
whose code is
Comment #8 on issue 1632 by jira.s...@gmail.com: Alphabetial sorting of
review requests should not be case sensitive
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1632
This seems to be database related (the order_by() function in django can
order by a list of fields from a table,
Comment #2 on issue 1953 by jeffl...@gmail.com: Addressing comments
on View Diff page is not usable
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1953
This issue is definitely what I'm experiencing as well, but it's not very
succinct. I'll try to explain in a different way.
Look
Comment #3 on issue 1953 by jeffl...@gmail.com: Addressing comments
on View Diff page is not usable
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1953
This issue is definitely what I'm experiencing as well, but it's not very
succinct. I'll try to explain in a different way.
Look
Comment #4 on issue 1953 by jeffl...@gmail.com: Addressing comments
on View Diff page is not usable
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1953
This issue is definitely what I'm experiencing as well, but it's not very
succinct. I'll try to explain in a different way.
Look
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1961 by anthony@gmail.com: Git SSH repository: Cannot spawn
rbssh
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1961
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What version are you
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 1961 by chip...@gmail.com: Git SSH repository: Cannot
spawn rbssh
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1961
This looks to me like there are a couple problems.
First, your Apache configuration likely was never updated to
Comment #2 on issue 1961 by anthony@gmail.com: Git SSH repository:
Cannot spawn rbssh
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1961
Thanks for writing back quickly!
I see now that another user had overridden the system path to point at a
different python scripts directory,
Comment #3 on issue 1961 by anthony@gmail.com: Git SSH repository:
Cannot spawn rbssh
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1961
2011-01-26 17:28:23,963 - ERROR - Git: Failed to find valid repository
ssh://xxx.xxx.com/somerepo.git:
Comment #4 on issue 1961 by anthony@gmail.com: Git SSH repository:
Cannot spawn rbssh
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1961
P.S. I have pycrypto 2.1 installed for python 2.5
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #5 on issue 1961 by chip...@gmail.com: Git SSH repository: Cannot
spawn rbssh
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1961
pwd is a Linux-only Python module, as far as I can tell. It looks like
Python assumes it can access it, even though it can't. This is outside our
Comment #6 on issue 1961 by anthony@gmail.com: Git SSH repository:
Cannot spawn rbssh
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1961
Ah, good idea. I made my username part of the SSH URL now and it is able
to skip over the pwd call.
It now complains that the authentication
Comment #7 on issue 1961 by chip...@gmail.com: Git SSH repository: Cannot
spawn rbssh
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1961
It *should* try both password and public key.
Did you try re-generating/uploading a key since making the %HOME% change?
If so, it no longer
23 matches
Mail list logo
