Can you check your reviewboard.log file and Apache error_log and see what's
said?
Also, what version of Review Board?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:10 AM, bincy
Hi Christian,
can we install an older version of RB 1.6.11 its dependencies using
easy_install with net connectivity. if yes please let me know the proc for
it.
Thanks.
Peer
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 4:33:50 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
You can't. We require easy_install. You
Hi Peer,
The answer is the same for every version we ever shipped. What I recommend
is finding some box somewhere with internet access, fetching them there
(with the same version of Python), and copying over all the Python modules
to the new machine. You're going to have a painful time upgrading,
Hi,
Review board.log is like this.
CONFI2012-10-16 02:29:34,361 - ERROR - Internal Server Error:
/admin/settings/storage/
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.3-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py,
line 111, in get_response
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 21:13:48 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
That's the wrong humanize.
Your Djblets wasn't updated along with Review Board, which is the problem.
You need to update that package too.
Not sure I follow; is that ReviewBoard release tied to a specific version
of
Hello,
I am getting the following error while posting to reviewboard through
perforce.
=
RBTools 0.3.4
Home = C:\Users\hpai\AppData\Roaming\
User = hpai
Port = pf-sj1-netl.sj.broadcom.com:49001
p4 info
Hi,
Is there any options to export the below info from Review Board to excel
file?
1. Lines of code reviewed
2. Review Time
3. Defects
Regards,
Sgr
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
Hi all-
After upgrading to 1.6.12 last week, I finally got around to updating my
Git hook script to detect renames and send them to RB. Unfortunately it
looks like pure renames don't post correctly. For example, I generated a
trivial commit with a single rename:
Review Board does not currently measure or report these kinds of metrics.
-David
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:08 AM, sgr srinath...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any options to export the below info from Review Board to excel
file?
1. Lines of code reviewed
2. Review Time
3. Defects
Hello,
Just wanted to say thanks for the excellent tool. We have been using
reviewboard for over 2 years now. One question though. We use default
reviewers, and associate them with review groups. This helps reduce the
administration as users can join/leave groups as they see fit. We are
using
It's not an intentional decision, it's just not something that we've
had a need for in the past. It would be pretty trivial to add a new
resource for this, especially if you just need read-only (GET) access.
-David
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Scott Quesnelle
scott.quesne...@gmail.com
David,
Thanks. GET access is all that I would really want. This would let me build
up a view of 'who' owns what areas of our source, and also allow developers
to engage the right people when they are thinking of modifying a specific
piece. Will see if I have some time to take at doing this
I'm trying to setup a new ReviewBoard 1.6 instance and running into
some problems. I have Python 2.7 installed, on CentOS 5.4, by way of
Python's altinstall method. Here are the steps I'm executing.
sudo easy_install-2.7 -U ReviewBoard
# This complains about not knowing how to handle https:
Wow, you're having all sorts of strange problems there.
I'm thinking it all boils down to whatever altinstall is. I recommend just
using the system-packaged Python (assuming it' 2.6) for now. It'll be a
good while before that's deprecated.
If easy_install can't recognize https, you're going to
Hi Stephen,
We have support for that working in the 1.7 betas. 1.6 won't get it, as it
required some rewrites I don't feel comfortable backporting at this time.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
Christian-
Thanks for the update. Another good reason to upgrade to 1.7 when it
arrives (we're also looking forward to the issue summary table).
Thanks!
Stephen
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
We have support for that working in the
altinstall is a make option for Python. It allows you to run multiple
versions of Python in parallel. Unfortunately, Cent OS 5.4 still
ships with Python 2.4 and, since I'm building a new machine, I'm
trying to make sure it's possible to upgrade it in the future. What
if I have a different
Have you given Ubuntu a try? We've found them to be our best host for
Review Board when not using system packages.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Tucker
We'll have a new beta out this week I expect. For various reasons, work has had
to shift back to 1.6.x development for periods of time, so 1.7 was delayed, but
progress is picking up again.
Christian
On Oct 17, 2012, at 12:54, Stephen Bash scb...@gmail.com wrote:
Christian-
Thanks for
This is an it's not me, it's them moment. I'm limited by the
offerings we have in our datacenters. Since run a large production
network, we sacrifice flexibility for predictability. That means I
don't have anything available to me other than Cent OS 5.2 and 5.4.
My desktop runs Xubuntu quite
Can you show the full backtrace?
Still, no crash here can affect Apache. This is a crash in Python or a
Python module. I'm highly suspect of the Python install.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
I'm pretty confident with the Python install, since it's something
I've had to do a lot. I'm actually a little suspect of the wsgi
module that I had to build.
Traceback:
'
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://reviews.sre.zynga.com/account/login/
Django Version: 1.4.1
Python
Tested against Python2.6 as well and get the same strack trace
(pointed to python2.6 install though).
Interestingly, my ReviewBoard 1.7RC2 install works fine with a dev
server using Python2.7 built the same way.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pretty confident
Is there some place I could find that dependency mapping? The only
things I had to handle compile are wsgi, pysvn and Django (only with
2.7 because it doesn't like https right now). Everything else came
from the easy_install script.
Thanks for taking your time on this. I really appreciate it.
Found the list. I'll keep working on this.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there some place I could find that dependency mapping? The only
things I had to handle compile are wsgi, pysvn and Django (only with
2.7 because it doesn't like https right now).
Hi everyone,
The Django project just released new security releases that they're
advising everyone upgrade to. The next Review Board 1.6.x and 1.7 beta
releases will switch to these, but in the meantime, you can upgrade
yourself.
If you're using Review Board 1.6.x, you can upgrade by typing:
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2770 by gjun...@gmail.com: Publish/Discard buttons are not
disappearing and are showing to all users
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2770
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2771 by torsten@web.de: Can not log in
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2771
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate support, please contact
Comment #1 on issue 2771 by torsten@web.de: Can not log in
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2771
Please send me the link to reset my pw to torsten.eichsta...@web.de
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 2770 by trowb...@gmail.com: Publish/Discard buttons are
not disappearing and are showing to all users
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2770
Please upgrade to 1.6.12
--
You received this message because you are
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 2772 by haeri...@gmail.com: Add ability to see which requests
have open issues from dashboard
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2772
What version are you running?
1.6.13
What's the URL of the page
Comment #1 on issue 2772 by haeri...@gmail.com: Add ability to see which
requests have open issues from dashboard
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2772
I just realized this is a duplicated of 2723.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Summary: Show issue status in dashboard
Comment #2 on issue 2723 by trowb...@gmail.com: Show issue status in
dashboard
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2723
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #3 on issue 2723 by trowb...@gmail.com: Show issue status in
dashboard
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2723
Issue 2772 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To
34 matches
Mail list logo
