Hi,
Can anybody please tell what is the default file storage in Review Board..
When I click on the link settings->File Storage settings page is giving
the error
Something broke! (Error 500)
It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is either a
bug in Review Board or a se
Can you check your reviewboard.log file and Apache error_log and see what's
said?
Also, what version of Review Board?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:10 AM, bincy wr
Hi Christian,
can we install an older version of RB 1.6.11 & its dependencies using
easy_install with net connectivity. if yes please let me know the proc for
it.
Thanks.
Peer
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 4:33:50 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> You can't. We require easy_install. Y
Hi Peer,
The answer is the same for every version we ever shipped. What I recommend
is finding some box somewhere with internet access, fetching them there
(with the same version of Python), and copying over all the Python modules
to the new machine. You're going to have a painful time upgrading,
Hi,
Review board.log is like this.
CONFI2012-10-16 02:29:34,361 - ERROR - Internal Server Error:
/admin/settings/storage/
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.3-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py",
line 111, in get_response
resp
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 21:13:48 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> That's the wrong humanize.
> Your Djblets wasn't updated along with Review Board, which is the problem.
> You need to update that package too.
>
Not sure I follow; is that ReviewBoard release tied to a specific version
o
Hello,
I am getting the following error while posting to reviewboard through
perforce.
=
>>> RBTools 0.3.4
>>> Home = C:\Users\hpai\AppData\Roaming\
>>> User = hpai
>>> Port = pf-sj1-netl.sj.broadcom.com:49001
>
Hi,
Is there any options to export the below info from Review Board to excel
file?
1. Lines of code reviewed
2. Review Time
3. Defects
Regards,
Sgr
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.
Hi all-
After upgrading to 1.6.12 last week, I finally got around to updating my
Git hook script to detect renames and send them to RB. Unfortunately it
looks like pure renames don't post correctly. For example, I generated a
trivial commit with a single rename:
9e22aa0f7b20d658147046e7f1cc4
Review Board does not currently measure or report these kinds of metrics.
-David
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:08 AM, sgr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any options to export the below info from Review Board to excel
> file?
> 1. Lines of code reviewed
> 2. Review Time
> 3. Defects
>
> Regards,
> Sgr
>
Hello,
Just wanted to say thanks for the excellent tool. We have been using
reviewboard for over 2 years now. One question though. We use default
reviewers, and associate them with review groups. This helps reduce the
administration as users can join/leave groups as they see fit. We are
using def
It's not an intentional decision, it's just not something that we've
had a need for in the past. It would be pretty trivial to add a new
resource for this, especially if you just need read-only (GET) access.
-David
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Scott Quesnelle
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just wanted
David,
Thanks. GET access is all that I would really want. This would let me build
up a view of 'who' owns what areas of our source, and also allow developers
to engage the right people when they are thinking of modifying a specific
piece. Will see if I have some time to take at doing this additio
I'm trying to setup a new ReviewBoard 1.6 instance and running into
some problems. I have Python 2.7 installed, on CentOS 5.4, by way of
Python's altinstall method. Here are the steps I'm executing.
sudo easy_install-2.7 -U ReviewBoard
# This complains about not knowing how to handle https: for
Wow, you're having all sorts of strange problems there.
I'm thinking it all boils down to whatever altinstall is. I recommend just
using the system-packaged Python (assuming it' 2.6) for now. It'll be a
good while before that's deprecated.
If easy_install can't recognize https, you're going to ha
Hi Stephen,
We have support for that working in the 1.7 betas. 1.6 won't get it, as it
required some rewrites I don't feel comfortable backporting at this time.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
Christian-
Thanks for the update. Another good reason to upgrade to 1.7 when it
arrives (we're also looking forward to the issue summary table).
Thanks!
Stephen
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> We have support for that working in the 1.7 betas. 1.6 wo
altinstall is a make option for Python. It allows you to run multiple
versions of Python in parallel. Unfortunately, Cent OS 5.4 still
ships with Python 2.4 and, since I'm building a new machine, I'm
trying to make sure it's possible to upgrade it in the future. What
if I have a different error,
Have you given Ubuntu a try? We've found them to be our best host for
Review Board when not using system packages.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Tucker wrote:
We'll have a new beta out this week I expect. For various reasons, work has had
to shift back to 1.6.x development for periods of time, so 1.7 was delayed, but
progress is picking up again.
Christian
On Oct 17, 2012, at 12:54, Stephen Bash wrote:
> Christian-
>
> Thanks for the update. Ano
Yes, each ReviewBoard hardcodes a required version of Djblets. See setup.py for
the dependency list.
The latest 1.6.x release introduced support for SVN properties, so I suspect
you'll have more luck when that release is installed.
Christian
On Oct 17, 2012, at 8:21, Neil Bird wrote:
>
>
This is an "it's not me, it's them" moment. I'm limited by the
offerings we have in our datacenters. Since run a large production
network, we sacrifice flexibility for predictability. That means I
don't have anything available to me other than Cent OS 5.2 and 5.4.
My desktop runs Xubuntu quite n
Can you show the full backtrace?
Still, no crash here can affect Apache. This is a crash in Python or a
Python module. I'm highly suspect of the Python install.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
I'm pretty confident with the Python install, since it's something
I've had to do a lot. I'm actually a little suspect of the wsgi
module that I had to build.
Traceback:
""'
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://reviews.sre.zynga.com/account/login/
Django Version: 1.4.1
Python V
Tested against Python2.6 as well and get the same strack trace
(pointed to python2.6 install though).
Interestingly, my ReviewBoard 1.7RC2 install works fine with a dev
server using Python2.7 built the same way.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Tucker wrote:
> I'm pretty confident with the Pytho
Is there some place I could find that dependency mapping? The only
things I had to handle compile are wsgi, pysvn and Django (only with
2.7 because it doesn't like https right now). Everything else came
from the easy_install script.
Thanks for taking your time on this. I really appreciate it.
Found the list. I'll keep working on this.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Tucker wrote:
> Is there some place I could find that dependency mapping? The only
> things I had to handle compile are wsgi, pysvn and Django (only with
> 2.7 because it doesn't like https right now). Everything else
Hi everyone,
The Django project just released new security releases that they're
advising everyone upgrade to. The next Review Board 1.6.x and 1.7 beta
releases will switch to these, but in the meantime, you can upgrade
yourself.
If you're using Review Board 1.6.x, you can upgrade by typing:
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:29:36 PM UTC+5:30, Hari wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the following error while posting to reviewboard through
> perforce.
>
>
> =
>
> >>> RBTools 0.3.4
>
> >>> Home = C:\Users\h
Please Can some one look in to the issue and help me solve.?
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:29:36 PM UTC+5:30, Hari wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the following error while posting to reviewboard through
> perforce.
>
>
> =
30 matches
Mail list logo
