Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Hammond
When upgrading to 1.7.1, both rb-site and a Manual Updates page should say these need to be added, tell you what to add, and then make you run an 'rb-site manage $sitedir resolve-check static-media' command to use the site. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: Upgrading to 1.7.1 results in weird timestamps

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Christian, Is this for new review requests? 1.7 added timezone support. If you go into your user settings (My Account under your username dropdown on the top bar), you can configure your timezone. You should see all times update relative to that timezone. The server's timezone settings

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-07 Thread Brian
Hey Christian, Sorry to bother you again about this. Did you have anything else you wanted me to check or try to help you debug? Thanks, Brian On Thursday, January 3, 2013 5:19:42 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Brian, One more thing to confirm. Hopefully I can get you some commands

Re: Reviewboard 1.7 broke my site

2013-01-07 Thread flash
I have the same problem Here is my apache config VirtualHost *:80 ServerName review. DocumentRoot /var/www/review./htdocs # Error handlers ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html WSGIPassAuthorization On WSGIScriptAlias /

RBTools Usage Problem and Add Repository Problem

2013-01-07 Thread 李海梅
Hello All, I have problems on using ReviewBoard. First I have been finished installing ReviewBoard. Second I add repository like this: Name: MainTrunk Hosting service: None-Custom Repository Repository Type:CVS Path:

RE: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

2013-01-07 Thread Dave Preston
Ok I'll give that a shot and report back. Thanks again Christian. Dave From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Christian Hammond Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 2:48 PM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: a couple of issues post 1.7.1

Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

2013-01-07 Thread Erik Putrycz
Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found bitnami review board but they only have 1.6 Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would CentOS 6.3 work? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at

Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon 07 Jan 2013 12:20:15 PM EST, Erik Putrycz wrote: Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found bitnami review board but they only have 1.6 Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would CentOS 6.3 work? CentOS 6.x doesn't yet have an

Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

2013-01-07 Thread Erik Putrycz
I don't think any type of hosting will work for us because our subversion repository access is very restricted. I had a quick look at OpenShift but it seems that you can only deploy packages on a remote server. Btw, how long do you think it will take you to complete the RPMS? That should be

Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon 07 Jan 2013 02:02:58 PM EST, Erik Putrycz wrote: I don't think any type of hosting will work for us because our subversion repository access is very restricted. I had a quick look at OpenShift but it seems that you can only deploy packages on a remote server. Btw, how long do you think

Re: Upgrading to 1.7.1 results in weird timestamps

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Wuerdig
Hi Christian, it's for new and existing requests. Updating the user timezone to Pacific/Auckland fixed it thanks. Cheers Christian On Monday, January 7, 2013 10:37:03 PM UTC+13, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Christian, Is this for new review requests? 1.7 added timezone support. If you go

Re: Testing 1.7.1 on Fedora 18

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 01/04/2013 04:07 AM, p...@talk21.com wrote: Hi Stephen, The following AVC denied errors occur: 1) named_connect to port 11211 (memcached) type=AVC msg=audit(1357289094.993:338): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=1668 comm=httpd dest=11211 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0

Re: Testing 1.7.1 on Fedora 18

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 01/04/2013 04:30 AM, p...@talk21.com wrote: Hi Stephen, Another SELinux error I missed: 3) write to data directory Occurs when user tries to login. type=AVC msg=audit(1357290519.860:433): avc: denied { write } for pid=1666 comm=httpd name=data dev=dm-1 ino=1884

Re: Testing 1.7.1 on Fedora 18

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 01/04/2013 04:34 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: If we can do anything intelligent in rb-site to handle this, I'll happily take a patch for it. It'd have to be conditional on SELinux actually being on there, though. Yeah, the conditional should be easy. libsemanage-python can check whether

Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Wuerdig
Hi Christian, Unfortunately I don't have the rb-site upgrade console output anymore but I'm pretty sure it didn't say anything in that regards (I went over it again yesterday to check if I missed anything). The webserver presented me with the page telling me to fix the access rights to the

Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Wuerdig
I installed it on a Ubuntu following http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/ step by step using MySQL as backend. No problems encountered. Hope this helps. On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 6:20:15 AM UTC+13, Erik Putrycz wrote: Are there any downloadable appliances

Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

2013-01-07 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2013-01-07 12:20, Erik Putrycz wrote: Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found bitnami review board but they only have 1.6 Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would CentOS 6.3 work? If you're willing to run non-LTS Fedora, and the

Re: LDAP configuration problem

2013-01-07 Thread Rolando Nieves
Well, I'm having the same error and I know my way around LDAP: LDAP Server: ldap://localhost:389 LDAP Base DN: ou=Users,dc=local Given Name Attribute: givenName Surname Attribute: sn Full Name Attribute: cn E-Mail LDAP Attribute: mail User Mask: (uid=%s) Anonymous User Mask: cn=proxyuser,dc=local

Re: Cannot add a remote SVN repo on 1.6.15 (Regression?)

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, No, because I can't reproduce this problem. I think, unfortunately, it's going to take someone who can who can also dig into the code to figure out where the failure is. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -

Re: Cannot add a remote SVN repo on 1.6.15 (Regression?)

2013-01-07 Thread Serhat Tekin
Hello Christian, Have you had a chance to investigate this any further? I'm running into the exact same problem on a Mac OS X Lion install. -- Serhat On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 7:36:41 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Liam, I'm really not sure what to say. It's strange that it

Error happens SVN HTTPS certificate not verified when adding a new repo.

2013-01-07 Thread Bing
Hi, all, When I create a new repo (SVN) with https:// link, the following error message shows after click Save button. A verified HTTPS certificate is required to connect to this repository. There were errors validating this certificate: The certificate is not issued by a trusted

Re: Loops when trying to add a svn repository

2013-01-07 Thread Bing
Martelo, How did you solve this issue? could you please tell me? I'm also encountering this issue currently. My reviewboard version is 1.7.1 I met these two options as well: I trust this host and Re edit repository. however, both buttons are gray. I cannot click it. 在

Re: Issue 2848 in reviewboard: Being able to view all review requests assigned to a developer

2013-01-07 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Component-Reviews Component-Dashboard Comment #1 on issue 2848 by chip...@gmail.com: Being able to view all review requests assigned to a developer http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2848 Seems like a good feature to add.

Re: Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.

2013-01-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #15 on issue 658 by gjun...@gmail.com: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 I would strongly vote and appreciate a solution/suggestions on this issue: Our environment is reviewboard 1.6.14 on Ubuntu 12.04

Re: Issue 2829 in reviewboard: Diff generation hangs when trying to Edit Review

2013-01-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 2829 by vl...@umich.edu: Diff generation hangs when trying to Edit Review http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2829 /* * Enables use of the inline editor. */ enable: function() { if (this._editing) { this.showEditor();

Re: Issue 2238 in reviewboard: unicode error in postreview

2013-01-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2238 by stem...@gmail.com: unicode error in postreview http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2238 I can reproduce this with RBTools 0.3, Python 2.7 on OS X 10.7, but this only seems to manifest on OS X when the posted data includes unicode. We have

Re: Issue 2238 in reviewboard: unicode error in postreview

2013-01-07 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Started Owner: trowb...@gmail.com Comment #4 on issue 2238 by trowb...@gmail.com: unicode error in postreview http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2238 Thanks for the traceback. I'm much more confident in what's going on now. -- You received

Issue 2849 in reviewboard: HTML not properly escaped in review editor

2013-01-07 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2849 by buck.a...@gmail.com: HTML not properly escaped in review editor http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2849 What version are you running? 1.6.13 What's the URL of the page containing the problem?