I am plunging into setting up a reviewboard per request. At this time the
general environment is that an SVN repository exists and is hosted on a
Win2k8R2 server. The repo is using a self signed cert so I have been
battling with the SSL issue for a bit and believe I have most of that
figured ou
>
> The SVNRoot\NetworkConfigs (my test SVN) is the data itself.. Forgive my
> novice questions but from what you have said it seems like this would be a
> task for the end user to have to do each time? Is there a way that when the
> project is checked in (programmers use VS2010 & the Win tools
David, I seriously appreciate the help you are giving me on this issue
OK so I have the syntax and implemented the --repository-url in the
post-commit-run.cmd file, which is called by the actual post-commit.cmd on
VisualSVN. As can be seen above, I was passing a set of authentication
creden
I found a reference (of yours, actually!) which shows the syntax of the
repo url to be "...=file://...". Tried the line as
--repository-url=file:///data/SVNRoot/NetworkConfigs
but back to the original issue then:
>>> Current directory = C:\Data\SVNRoot\NetworkConfigs
>>> Checking for a Subv
Trying to get up to 2.x to work on the SSL certificate errors. Environment
is:
Centos 65 updated.
Python 2.6 (yum installed)
ReviewBoard 1.7.25 (yum installed)
Setuptools are installed, so easy_install is available.
Attempting to do ANY upgrade (easy_install -U reviewboard or
reviewboard=1.7.2
>
> OK so given the yum install is topped out at RB 1.7.25, Python at 2.6 and
> others accordingly, would the best way to be rpm -e on everything and
> reinstalling from scratch? Again, I have a snapshot of the running base
> system so reverting is not an issue when I get down a dead end..
>
O
>
> Christian:
>
Again, just to be clear the machine is snapshot'd at the running
1.7.25 yum install, which is working. The steps above all related to
getting 1.7.25 upgraded to 1.7.27; the snapshot in question had never been
used to attempt a 2.0.x install.
I will revert, then uninsta
OK wow... Went back to square one and reloaded everything to keep it clean.
I believe the bulk of my problems were actually a combination of selinux &
iptables; once I temporarily disabled them and tracked out a bunch of deps
I have the 2.0.5 system up on a clean install (no yum reviewboard re
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 2:53:44 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> During that run, is selinux still disabled?
>
> Can you run this in a shell:
>
> $ python
> >>> import whoosh
> >>> whoosh.__file__
> >>> import reviewboard
> >>> reviewboard.__file__
>
> $ python
>
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:26:08 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> It’s definitely valid syntax.
>
> Make sure the __ is two underscores.
>
> Can you copy/paste that to a text file and attach it, so that the
> formatting is preserved?
>
> Christian
>
>
>
>
>
> Doing it with notepad as a m
>
> Looks like a lot of the battle is with SELINUX... I now have 2.0.5 running
> and it seems to be happy in its little world. Now to start tying it into
> the VisualSVN server again. At this time I have a snapshot of the unit in
> good condition however do you have an SELINUX exception that al
OK so first off thanks for all the help getting things this far; we at
least are up and running with RB itself! Now to tie it all together.
Versions:
RBTools 0.6.2
VisualSVN server v2.5.7 Standard Edition on Windows 2008R2
ReviewBoard 2.0.5 on Centos 6.5
Submitters will be running AnkhSVN integr
Thanks David. None of the options worked... Here is three different configs
and the output of a snip of the post-commit.log file (names changed to
protect the innocent):
With parameters --repository-url=file:///c:/data/svnroot/NetworkConfigs
>>> Making HTTP POST request to
http://itt-d-review.
No joy there either. Tried with and without the repo name in the file://
call
>>> Checking for a Subversion repository...
>>> Running: svn info file://C:/data/SVNRoot/svn/ --non-interactive
>>> Command exited with rc 1: ['svn', 'info',
'file://C:/data/SVNRoot/svn/', '--non-interactive']
svn: E18
>From a win8 desktop, I do a very simple edit of one text file:
svn co https://itt-d-cvs1.abc.local/svn/NetworkConfigs
cd NetworkConfigs
notepad test.txt (make small change in file)
svn ci -m "0807TestChgXX"
The rest is done in the post-commit hook itemized above.
Just for clarity, this is the
This seems to be getting overly complex... With the RBTools installed on
the VisualSVN server running Win2008R2, and the certificate now a valid
cert instead of self gen'd, should the rbt call be running as a
post-commit? It seems like what is happening is the RBT call is trying to
access the
16 matches
Mail list logo