psx6zut'
> > > > >>>> import subprocess
> > > > > >>> p = subprocess.Popen(command, stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
> > > > > stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
> > > > >>>> p.stdout.read()
&
p.stdout.read()
> > > > 'patching file c:\\winnt\\temp\\reviewboard.zug54j\\tmp-wkiqd\r\n'
>
> > > > What could be wrong?
>
> > > > I am using the GnuWin32 patch version 2.5.9.
>
> > > > On Sep 22, 6:45 pm, "Lacoste, Dana (
file c:\\winnt\\temp\\reviewboard.zug54j\\tmp-wkiqd\r\n'
>
> > > What could be wrong?
>
> > > I am using the GnuWin32 patch version 2.5.9.
>
> > > On Sep 22, 6:45 pm, "Lacoste, Dana (TSG Software San Diego)"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
m, "Lacoste, Dana (TSG Software San Diego)"
> > wrote:
> > > OK, that makes sense.
>
> > > I was just hoping for a quicker solution to the "give me the whole file"
> > problem ☺
>
> > > I'll see what I can provide in the realm o
t; >
> > I'll see what I can provide in the realm of support for coding that ☺
> >
> > Dana
> >
> > From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Christian Hammond
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 4:38 PM
>
blem ☺
>
> I'll see what I can provide in the realm of support for coding that ☺
>
> Dana
>
> From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Christian Hammond
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 4:38 PM
> To: reviewboard@googlegroups.
an Hammond
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 4:38 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: post-review login issue
Hi Dana,
We specifically avoid this for a few reasons.
1) It's much more efficient to store a diff in the database instead of a full
file.
2) We need both an original, u
ff'd" file would
> already be available and so it would not need to be generated
>
>
>
> Dana Lacoste
>
>
>
> *From:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Christian Hammond
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2009
; > > > > comparison, we could remove some of these complications.
> >
> > > > > > Christian
> >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > > > Review Board -http://www.re
; > > if we
> > > > > > cached the results and allowed each repository backend to do its
> own
> > > > > > comparison, we could remove some of these complications.
> >
> > > > > > Christian
> >
> > > > > > --
> >
gt; > > > > comparison, we could remove some of these complications.
>
> > > > > Christian
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> >
w.vmware.com
> >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Lacoste, Dana (TSG Software San
> Diego)
> > > <
> >
> > > > dana.laco...@hp.com> wrote:
> > > > > Yeah, this one got me.
> >
> > > > > Particularl
.review-board.org
> > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Lacoste, Dana (TSG Software San Diego)
> > <
>
> > > dana.laco...@hp.com> wrote:
> > > > Yeah, this one got me.
>
> > > > Parti
009 at 12:41 PM, Lacoste, Dana (TSG Software San Diego)
> <
> >
> > dana.laco...@hp.com> wrote:
> > > Yeah, this one got me.
> >
> > > Particularly because what I set for my "$P4PORT" was NOT what the
> server
> > > returned in `p4
past, but the server returned its hostname.)
>
> > J
>
> > Dana Lacoste
>
> > *From:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
> > *On Behalf Of *Christian Hammond
> > *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2009 12:31 PM
> > *To:* reviewboard@
groups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Christian Hammond
> *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2009 12:31 PM
> *To:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: post-review login issue
>
>
>
> Make sure that the repository Path field matches *exactly*
mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Christian Hammond
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 12:31 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: post-review login issue
Make sure that the repository Path field matches *exactly* what you see when
running 'p4 info'. We do a
Make sure that the repository Path field matches *exactly* what you see when
running 'p4 info'. We do a literal string comparison.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:55
Thanks Christian. I resolved the issue by install the 1.0.3 version
and re-create the site.
Now post-review is able to logon the reviewer board server, but gets
problem of understanding the "repository_path" of the SCM (Perforce):
>>> Attempting to create review request for 388600
>>> HTT
Depends. You may just have logging turned off. Go in the Administration UI
-> Settings -> Logging and make sure it's enabled and being store in a
directory writable by the web server.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - h
The apache server was installed to just host the review board server,
so I doubt there is another vhost serviced by it. I noticed that the
logs directory of review board is empty. Is that strange?
On Sep 20, 7:23 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Okay, so Review Board itself is correct. However, po
Is there a debug flag on the review board server which can be turned
on to trace what is happening?
On Sep 20, 7:18 pm, Hui Lin wrote:
> "http://b00237d4f5dc7/reviews/vtm/"; redirect me to the dashboard.
> Going to "http://b00237d4f5dc7/reviews/vtm/api/json/accounts/login/";
> in the browser re
Okay, so Review Board itself is correct. However, post-review is somehow not
accessing the same server. This may be a configuration error on the web
server. How many other virtual hosts is that server serving? It may be worth
checking the log files of the other vhosts to find out which site is
actu
"http://b00237d4f5dc7/reviews/vtm/"; redirect me to the dashboard.
Going to "http://b00237d4f5dc7/reviews/vtm/api/json/accounts/login/";
in the browser returns an empty page.
On Sep 20, 6:17 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> It sounds like the server isn't configured at that URL correctly, or
> po
It sounds like the server isn't configured at that URL correctly, or
post-review is hitting the wrong IP address/server. Does
http://b00237d4f5dc7/reviews/vtm/ redirect you to the dashboard or login
page in your browser? What happens when going to
http://b00237d4f5dc7/reviews/vtm/api/json/accounts/
25 matches
Mail list logo
