On 11/3/2007, Faith Saint Francis (fesanfranci...@hotmail.com) wrote:
Respected Forum!
In my previous post: Re Cs/Ozone
I mentioned Manatial, which is not correct
Respected Faith,
No offense, but your reply in no way answered his question, so why did
you respond at all?
He was asking
Actually what they (rain and waterfalls) produce is negative ions, not ozone.
An negative ions are associated with an invigorating, calming effect.
Now, lightning will produce ozone, as well as oxides of nitrogen. These however
I do not believe tend to be invigorating like the negative ions are.
Pirate ships are hard to lug up into the mountains? [Chuckle]
Ode
See, now I have to go chasing up the dangers of living at the
seaside... Interestingly, the Ancients used to say that every
thousands steps higher you lived up in the mountains added a decade to your
life!
Himagain -
Perhaps a good analogy would be that of using rubbing compound on a car.
A little elbow grease and compound makes it shine and protects the
paint...too much, too often, for too long... no paint.
Of course, people completely repaint themselves every 7 years...unless you
only live for 6.
There is an interesting article about the toxicity of ozone here:
http://www.oxygenmedicine.com/ozonetoxicity.html
in which the experimenter places a very sick mouse in an ozone
rich environment, expecting it to die.
The mouse was indeed in very pathetic condition. All fur was
gone from its head
I find ozone to be invigorating...is it not so that waterfalls and thunder
storms create O3 naturally?...it is just something natural...polution
unfortunately makes it necessary to be aware
Norm
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for
At 01:37 AM 25/11/04, you wrote:
I have learned all I need to know about ozone in the past 7 years I have
been actively reseraching its potential for treating degenerative
disease. My criteria are that something has to be number one safe,
affordable and available. You see Nenah most of the
with the disinformation spread by a few about
CS.
Ozone must be used properly and in the right concentrations. Of course it
will
irritate your lungs if it's at too high a concentration -- but that
doesn't
mean
ozone is toxic.
Yes actually it does mean that ozone is toxic because
- Original Message -
From: Garnet garnetri...@earthlink.net
To: Silver List silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: CS Ozone
[Nenah]
I know what poisonous means, Garnet. Ozone is not poisonous.
[Garnet]
That is a totally irresponsible
It proves that the research you base your statements on is not supported
by a consensus of the world's experts. Are your references published in
peer reviewed journals? That is the difference between bona fide studies
and simple publications. The sources one chooses to follow speaks to the
Interesting, that site says:
Contrary to popular understanding ozone is not toxic to the body -
hundreds of peer reviewed published articles not only confirm this but
attest to the medical benefits of ozone.
Only one paper is actually cited though:
January 1980: The German Medical Society
...@bestweb.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:33 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS Ozone
- Original Message -
From: Garnet garnetri...@earthlink.net
To: Silver List silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: CS Ozone
[Nenah]
I know
- Original Message -
From: sol sol...@sweetwaterhsa.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: CS Ozone
Interesting, that site says:
Contrary to popular understanding ozone is not toxic to the body -
hundreds of peer reviewed published
Thanks!
sol
Nenah Sylver wrote:
McCabe, Ed. Oxygen Therapies: A New Way Of Approaching Disease (Morrisville, New
York: Energy Publications, 1988)
LaRaus, Julius, Ed. Medical Applications of Ozone: based on papers presented at
the medical seminar May 24-25, 1983 in Washington D.C. at the Sixth
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 12:58, Joy wrote:
Garnet - if the consensus of the world's experts is to be the basis of
what is right then all of us using colloidal silver, the topic of this
list, are in the wrong.That one just doesn't fly.
Not what I said Joy. I did not define right and
- Original Message -
From: Garnet garnetri...@earthlink.net
To: Silver List silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:11 AM
Subject: CS
Toxic as defined in Stedman's Medical Dictionary means poisonous.
Poisonous is defined as injurious or dangerous to health.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
