Would not
Replace into A () select ,,
from A [cross] join B on( );
do the trick? If a.rowid has an alias (i.e. integer primary key) then the
modified rows would be deleted, but reinserted with their respective previous
rowids. This may required switching foreign keys off fort he duration of
Yes, I missed the trailing 00
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im Auftrag von
Jean-Christophe Deschamps
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 08. Juni 2016 09:37
An: SQLite mailing list
That the same character is found in both encodings is no surprise. You need to
look at the actual sequence of bytes.
Comparing a file containing just the "capital A with diaresis" yields
A 1 Byte sequence 0xC4 in ANSI
A 2 Byte sequence 0xC384 in en_US.UTF8 on a RH5 linux system
A 3 Byte
As already stated, this is not a problem of SQLite.
SQLite assumes all input to be correctly encoded in UTF (unicode), the precise
flavor of which may be set (once, between creating a db file and the first
insert) by a pragma.
If you insert ISO (latin) encoded strings, SQLite will faithfully
I estimate that you have about a 1 : 2^^32 chance of assigning the correct
value. I guess it is an index into a table of cursors required for processing
the statement and there will be assertions to satisfy.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Prakash Premkumar
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/clear_bindings.html
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Baruch Burstein [mailto:bmburst...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2014 13:47
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: [sqlite] Unbinding parameters
It says here
SQLite treats each attached database as a separate entity. Attaching the same
file twice is just asking for problems.
The query specifies that the destination db be locked for write and the source
db for read; which translates to two locks that cannot coexist on one
underlying db file.
2014 09:43
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] quasi-bug related to locking, and attached databases
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Hick Gunter <h...@scigames.at> wrote:
> SQLite treats each attached database as a separate entity. Attaching
> the same fil
TEMP tables get created in database temp; which is located in "a file" or "in
memory" depending on the SQLITE_TEMP_STORE preprocessor symbol and the pragma
temp_store.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephan Beal [mailto:sgb...@googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 11:44
An:
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] quasi-bug related to locking, and attached databases
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Hick Gunter <h...@scigames.at> wrote:
>
>> TEMP tables get created in database
Can you give an example of what such a beast would look like?
CREATE TABLE not_exist (A, B, C, D, E);-- for illustrative purposes
CREATE INDEX no_table ON not_exist (A,B,C,D,E); -- has to be covering index
The only efficient order to return and/or select rows is by {A}, {A,B},
{A,B,C}, ...
Hi,
we have extensive experience with respect to the use of virtual tables in
SQLite. In fact, the only native SQLite tables we use are in a configuration
checking tool.
We have "providers" from in-memory indexed tables, CTree (r) files, Oracle
tables (read only), structured disk files,
ive me an idea of what a minimal xBestIndex/xFilter skeleton
might look like? I walked though "ext/misc/amatch.c" from the
www.sqlite.org/src/artifact tree, but I'm a little lost.
Thanks,
Mike Beddo
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-user
I get the following results for the second select:
A
B
a (lowercase!!!)
Are you sure you ran the exact query stated?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: James K. Lowden [mailto:jklow...@schemamania.org]
Gesendet: Samstag, 08. November 2014 01:52
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: Re:
Your tree is wrong. I would expect that operator precedence is handled in the
parser. The code generator will happily implement any tree, regardless of how
insane it may be.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Prakash Premkumar [mailto:prakash.p...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. November
11. November 2014 00:05
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Does using e.g. LTRIM function remove collation?
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 08:43:24 +
Hick Gunter <h...@scigames.at> wrote:
> I get the following results for the second select:
>
> A
> B
> a (lowercase!!!)
>
&g
This is the I (Isolation) in ACID.
WAL mode allows the writer to pretend that no transactions are outstanding and
begin and even commit a write transaction. This change sits in the Wal file
until all prior transactions have been completed and the change can be copied
to the db. As long as your
Data types are 64bit integer (~18 decimal digits) and 64 Bit IEEE Float(11 bit
exponent, 52 bit fraction), so no.
Store the numbers as TEXT (human readable) or BLOB (e.g. 128Bit binary) and
write user-defined functions to manipulate them.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dinesh Navsupe
IIRC there was a programmer working for a bank that managed to siphon off the
sub-unit fractions that the interest calculating software generated (how much
interest is owed for $1 at 0,25% p.a. for 2 days*) onto his own account and
temporarily got rich quick.
$1 * 0,25% = $25 (interest
I would agree with the suspicion that your data is "changing shape" i.e. the
cardinality of index fields is becoming very different from what ANALYZE stored.
As for bypassing the query planner/code generator you might want to contact
Prakash Premkumar who is apparently
SELECT table_name FROM sqlite_master;
And then, in your programming language of choice, execute
SELECT count() FROM
For each received table name.
You cannot use a variable instead of a table name in SQL.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Sanderson
I think the error messages are distinct enough as is.
SQLITE_BUSY means that some connection is BUSY with a write transaction and has
locked the database file; presumably, it will be possible to write to the
database when the current writer has finished, just not now or within the
specified
Both, I guess
Insert into ... select a,b,sum(theCount) group by a,b;
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Simon Slavin [mailto:slav...@bigfraud.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014 12:39
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: [sqlite] replace many rows with one
Dear folks,
Units are "CPU Seconds". "user" time is spent within user code, i.e. SQLite,
"sys" time is spent within system calls, i.e. reading/writing files.
The balance between the times depends on various parameters, including the
state of the disc cache and the complexity of your INSERT...SELECT
I would concur in that SQLite is asking "which subset of the given constraints
yields the most efficient access".
The possible query plans are
1) A() -> B(ID) -> C(LINKID)
2) C() -> B(LINKID) -> A(ID)
3) B() -> A(ID) + C(LINKID) or B() -> C(LINKID) + A(ID)
4) A() -> C() -> B(ID,LINKID) or
SELECT ...,sum(...),count() FROM ... WHERE security(...) ...
With a user defined function security().
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Roland Martin [mailto:rolandsmar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014 17:09
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] Row filtering
.@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Dezember 2014 11:28
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Row filtering prior to aggregate function execution
Would this work?
SELECT SUM(...),COUNT(...), ... FROM ...
WHERE ...
GROUP BY ...
HAVING security(...)
...
Staffan
On Fri,
create the primary key index ordered properly
CREATE TABLE t (..., PRIMARY KEY ( a ASC, b DESC)...);
SELECT b FROM t WHERE a = ? LIMIT 1;
If you insist on using a partial index for this (for example if each a has a
lot of b entries) you could add a field b_is_max and keep it current using
Select * from child01 where p01_id in (select rowid from parent01 where ...);
Or
Select c.* from parent01 p join child01 c on p.rowid=c.p01_id where ...;
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jonathan Leslie [mailto:jlesli...@yahoo.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Dezember 2014 15:58
An:
table:child02.xxx_id = 2432...
etc.
the idea is without knowing all the names of all the tables, find all
references to parent01.p01_id (where value is xxx)
From: Hick Gunter <h...@scigames.at>
To: 'Jonathan Leslie' <j...@jonathanleslie.com>; 'General Discussion of SQLite
Database' &
Temporary virtual tables sounds like an interesting concept. Does the
xDestroy() function get called on such a beast (as opposed to xDisconnect()
when the connection is closed)? Should that function delete the backing store
(even if a non-temporary virtual table is still connected)?
This is completely legal and well defined.
HAVING is applied to the RESULT set of a SELECT.
The select asks to count the "distinct kontrola" in each group of kvadrat and
datum, the HAVING clause specifies returning only those records with pocet > 1.
If there were no pocet column in table b,
Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: James K. Lowden [mailto:jklow...@schemamania.org]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 08. Jänner 2015 03:56
>An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>Betreff: Re: [sqlite] New column in select will not mask column of the same
>name in having clause and sqlite won't warn
Maybe you mean (assuming there is not more than one record in t2 for a given
SSID-CELLID-SECTOR)
UPDATE t1 ...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: MikeSnow [mailto:michael.sab...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 09. Jänner 2015 00:12
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] Error while
SQLite is asking your virtual table questions:
1) what is the cost of a full table scan? (your answer: 1000)
2) what is the cost of a lookup by "id"? (your answer: 1)
3) when performing a key lookup, do you promise to return only rows matching
the key? (your answer in returned in the "omit"
BTW: SQLite will also ask your virtual table about GROUP BY/ORDER BY
capabilities if either of the clauses is included in the SELECT.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hick Gunter [mailto:h...@scigames.at]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. Jänner 2015 08:02
An: 'General Discussion of SQLite Database
Step 1: count the occurrences:
SELECT data1,count() AS count FROM table GROUP BY data1;
Step 2: get the rows with a count above the limit
SELECT data1,count() AS count FROM table GROUP BY data1 HAVING count >= 3;
Step 3: get the keys from the rows
SELECT data1 FROM (SELECT data1,count() AS
Use the following code snippet (add error checking, set v_file to the full path
name of your SQLite db file) to check.
It attempts to take the same locks as SQLite would, but prints the pid of the
blocking process. It also prints the journal mode.
#include
#include
#ifdef AIX64
#include
It depends in how you define "update the index".
If you mean "write to disk" then this happens "once, at the end of the
transaction" (the exact process differs depending on the journal mode).
If you mean "change the index structure in memory" then (as already noted) the
changes will happen
From what little you reveal I assume this is some kind of datalogging
application. I also assume there will be a primary key (call ?) and also
suspect that there are a number of secondary indices for data retrieval. Since
you make no mention of transactions, I must infer that you are using
Works as specified.
The .width command sets the output width of a column to a certain number of
characters;
output that is shorter is padded on the right (or the left, if the width is
negative);
output that is too long is truncated.
Use the printf() function to define the format of real
You are requesting the field Column Name (with embedded whitestpace in the
field name) from a query with a where clause that forces it to be the string
'Date'.
Perhaps your are looking for SELECT Date
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: MikeSnow [mailto:michael.sab...@gmail.com]
Yes. I'm using several layers of .read files to load the appropriate subset of
extensions for each class of process (OLTP, user query, subsystem, specific
tools,...)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Simon Slavin [mailto:slav...@bigfraud.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Jänner 2015 17:35
An:
I have always wondered why people will insist on using human readable column
names (with embedded spaces and special characters) in the implementation layer
(SQL code) instead of the presentation layer (user interface). The clutter
introduced into queries by having to quote the column names by
Maybe you can use the (linux, c) code I posted recently to determine which
process/thread is locking the database file.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lev [mailto:leventel...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Jänner 2015 01:36
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] database
It is never a good idea to rely on automatically assigned column names. If you
want reproducible, predictable, release independant column names then please
assign them with the AS clause.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marcus Bergner [mailto:marcusberg...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag,
[mailto:t...@clothears.org.uk]
Gesendet: Montag, 26. Jänner 2015 13:00
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Invalid column prefix returned in SELECT with joined
subquery
On 26 Jan 2015 at 07:33, Hick Gunter <h...@scigames.at> wrote:
> It is never a good ide
SCAN in the query plan = Rewind...Next LOOP in opcodes
SEARCH in the query plan = Column...Seek in opcodes
SQLite has determined that creating an automatic index on the referenced tables
should be faster than performing a full table scan for the general case.
asql> explain query plan select *
In serialized mode, SQLite will acquire the mutex when it detects you are
"starting to use" the database handle (somewhere between entering
sqlite3_prepare and the first sqlite3_step) and then HANG ON TO IT, NOT LETTING
GO until the calling thread is "finished" (like when sqlite3_step returns
Having personally written about a dozen virtual table implementations I can
confirm that those implementations needing a nontrivial xBestIndex function
are all based on building an SQLite interface on substantial proprietary
storage subsystems like an in-memory ISAM table (with configurable
SQLite does not use row level locking, only file level locking. You can use
BEGIN IMMEDIATE to exclude writers or BEGIN EXCLUSIVE to exclude readers and
writers. If you do not explicitly start a transaction, each statement
constitutes it's own transaction.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Ad 1)
You may be able to speed up deletion if you can partition your logging tables
by time, e.g. each table holds the changes within a certain time frame or a
fixed number of changes.
When you jump back in time, dropping the tables created after the target
timestamp is faster than deleting
Even if there were a simple way to protect an SQLite db file from being
casually (or even maliciously) overwritten by a user (which there isn't), it is
quite impossible to prevent a user with "root privileges" from
accessing/altering/deleting/moving/renaming ANY file on any operating system
In sqlite 3.7.14 in debug mode it raises a constraint error that states that
the first argument is an invalid mem struct at location 7 in the trigger
subprogram
(gdb) print *pOp
$1 = {opcode = 75 'K', p4type = -4 '\374', opflags = 21 '\025', p5 = 107 'k',
p1 = 4, p2 = 11, p3 = 5, p4 = {i =
For native SQLite tables, DROP TABLE is much faster than DELETE FROM.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jonathan Moules [mailto:J.Moules at hrwallingford.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. April 2015 11:40
An: 'sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org'
Betreff: [sqlite] Best way to temporarily
Getting "NoMem" sounds very much like a memory leak somewhere, with the most
likely place being your own application, followed by the wrapper you are using,
the FTS code and lastly the SQLite core. Lastly because the SQLite core is
extensively tested with an explicit emphasis on not leaking
Are you looking for "NOT NULL DEFAULT 0"?
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Will Parsons [mailto:varro at nodomain.invalid]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. August 2015 04:47
An: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] design problem involving trigger
I'm working on a program that
But you have to run the query as opposed to just parsing EXPLAIN
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Richard Hipp [mailto:drh at sqlite.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. August 2015 15:37
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] explain plan change between SQLite 3.8.3.1
Nope. The reason to define datatype in SQLite is because other databases do so.
The difference ist hat SQLite does not enforce typing but uses the concept of
affinity instead.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nicolas J?ger [mailto:jagernicolas at legtux.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27.
You give no indication of the schema you are using or the statement that went
wrong.
If you can reproduce the error using the sqlite3 shell, then it is probably
within sqlite3. If not, then it is most probably your own program which is
causing the fault, maybe by passing incorrect (stale or
You can always write a virtual table for exporting to whatever flavor of CSV
you like. Mine exports/imports strings/blobs containing nonprintable characters
in x'' notation.
Basically it implements:
For export:
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE _csv_exp USING CSV (,); ->
create a CSV table with the
Maybe you are looking for the INSERT INTO ... SELECT or CREATE TABLE ... AS
SELECT syntax? This would be one write transaction instead of two separate,
incompatible transactions.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces
7, 2015, at 3:30 AM, Hick Gunter wrote:
>
> Maybe you are looking for the INSERT INTO ... SELECT or CREATE TABLE ... AS
> SELECT syntax? This would be one write transaction instead of two separate,
> incompatible transactions.
>
> -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht--
There is always an implicit index on the SQLite rowid and this is the fastest
method to locate a row.
The next best thing for retrieval speed is an index that matches the where
clause. If you do not have one, SQLite may decide to create a temporary index
anyway, but this depends on the query.
1) disregard the results of the first query timing (this one has to read the
data into the cache)
2) run each query in a new process (so each one will need to read the data from
disk)
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
>...
>We need a metric calendar. I propose redefining the second so that a day is
>100,000 seconds long... ;)
>
>--
>Scott Robison
And while we are already redefining the fundamental constants of measuring, we
could redefine the meter to be exactly three feet and the kilogram to be
exactly two
You are probably falling into the cache effect trap again. There is no point in
indexing on the primary key, it only wastes space and CPU cycles
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
Does it revert back to slower speed after dropping the index?
Can you compare the EXPLAIN output produced with and without the index?
There is no difference on my machine (Version 3.7.14); if yours behaves the
same way then whatever changes speed is definitely not because SQLite is doing
The rules are quite simple:
If the pointer refers to static memory (preallocated string constants, global
variables that you can guarantee won't change while SQLite uses them) use
SQLITE_STATIC
If the pointer refers to memory obtained from sqlite3_malloc (directly or
indirectly e.g. via
omes from and how to deal with it.
As you already stated, a local variable in your callback procedure goes out of
scope automatically. I have no idea how VB6 implements local variables; in C
they are located on the stack, which may be overwritten by other function calls.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 a
It looks like you have unfinalized statements in your transaction. You are
preparing statements inside the loop, but finalizing only 1 (the last)
statement. And attempting to commit even before finalizing only the last
statement. So sqlite3_close() is complaining about improper call sequence,
This has been discussed several times on the list. SQLite (and all other
databases) try very hard to resolve the names you refer to in your query and
will search all the tables you mention to find *unqualified* references. They
give up if they do not find exactly one definition.
Try " delete
What is the exact sequence of calls?
If you call sqlite3_column_text() on a blob value, the new type will be text
and a subsequent call to sqlite_column_text16() must by definition perform
transcoding.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
You are attempting to compute 0/0 which is NULL and happens to be smaller than
0/47 which is 0.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bart Smissaert [mailto:bart.smissaert at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Februar 2015 09:49
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Can
We are using SQLite as the catch-all data access method (via custom extensions)
for
- Oracle tables and views
- Faircom CTree files
- Shared memory record stores ("Data Dictionary")
- Log file access
- Blob to record translation (TLV structures)
- Partitioned data stores (CTree and Data
Incremental BLOB I/O makes certain assertions that cannot be guaranteed (much
less verified at runtime) for virtual tables (e.g. 1: unique rowids that 2: can
be used for access) and needs to know how to read/write them (which is under
the control of the virtual table author).
ions against a BLOB column in
a virtual table
Thanks to Richard Hipp and Hick Gunter for their replies on this topic.
Given that support for support for BLOBs in virtual tables differs from that
for BLOBs in physical tables, is there any method or function available to the
sqlite3_x() caller that
The mem object is internal to sqlite, it is not intended to be created/changed
by user code.
What are you trying to do that makes you think you need to manipulate internal
structures?
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sairam Gaddam [mailto:gaddamsairam at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch,
] Regarding creating a mem object and copying contents to
it in SQLite
I am trying to optimize certain operations of SQLite internally, so i created
mem object.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Hick Gunter wrote:
> The mem object is internal to sqlite, it is not intended to be
> created/c
Maybe you are falling into the character/byte trap. The SQL function length()
returns the number of CHARACTERS in a string, which - for UTF encoded strings
containing non-latin characters - is smaller than the number of BYTES required
to represent them.
Typically you will be losing bytes at
AFAIKT you are attempting to determine the "size" of one row by the difference
in the file size. This must fail, because SQLite allocates and writes the
database file in units of "database pages".
Does your definition of "size" include the index entries pertaining to a row?
Does it include the
Consider creating a bitmapped index on the fields you expect to be queried the
most. Bitmaps may be stored and manipulated (combined by logical operations)
very efficiently as long as the field values conform to certain criteria
(usually "managable cardinality of distinct values").
Bitmap
The record sort order is:
NULLs
Numeric by value
Text by collating function
Blob by memcmp order
So your result set will contain all rows having a FooColumn with numeric value
greater than 50, a text value or a blob value.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hayden Livingston
A UNIQUE constraint is implemented in terms of a UNIQUE index anyway. The
difference is that you can DROP INDEX but cannot DROP CONSTRAINT.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michele Pradella [mailto:michele.pradella at selea.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 08:14
An: sqlite-users at
Try "locate memleak" if the file is not present in the working directory of the
process running the test.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sairam Gaddam [mailto:gaddamsairam at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 08:44
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: [sqlite]
Caveat: SQLite may call the xDisconnect method at other times too. I expect
this will happen if the schema changes while a statement is prepared.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Aronson [mailto:pbaronson at att.net]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juli 2015 01:20
An: General Discussion of
AFAICT the windows implementation of localtime() will honour the settings of
the environment variables TZ, _timezone, _daylight and _tzname. The environment
variables of a process are set (copied from the parent process) on process
creation. Subsequent changes in the parent process are NOT
You are converting the "start of day" (UTC) to "localtime". Your timezone is
obviously 4 hours behind UTC...
asql> SELECT datetime('now'), datetime('now','localtime'),datetime('now','start
of day'),datetime('now','localtime','start of day'),datetime('now','start of
day','localtime');
Not quite. Try printing the generated statement. It should read
ATTACH myfilepath AS UPD;
Intead of
ATTACH 'myfilepath' AS UPD;
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Parsonson [mailto:z2668856 at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 09:10
An: General Discussion of SQLite
SQLITE_DONE means that there are no (more) rows to be retrieved.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephan Beal [mailto:sgbeal at googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 10:12
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Strange behaviour of sqlite3_stmt_busy
On
Sqlite3_column_bytes will convert numeric values to strings and return the
length of that "string representation" (excluding the terminating \0), not the
byte size required to store the numeric value itself.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: J Decker [mailto:d3ck0r at gmail.com]
Gesendet:
What is the reason for wanting the id of a record to be fixed at the unique
record number of the original insertion?
Do you need to access historical data regularly or only for specific inquiries?
For rarely required historical data, you could use a "history table" to hold
historic copies of
] How to get length of all columns in a table
On 6/2/2015 2:28 AM, Hick Gunter wrote:
> Sqlite3_column_bytes will convert numeric values to strings and return the
> length of that "string representation" (excluding the terminating \0), not
> the byte size required to store the n
Can you try changing LHS and RHS in the first ON expression?
The older, larger query has inventory_id on the LHS and film_id on the RHS. Now
you have all fields on the RHS.
It would seem the QP may be inferring LEFT OUTER JOIN ON
( = )
And placing the fields first in the argument list
And
Removing the persistant instance of a virtual table is the most common way of
tripping up a virtual table implementation.
Just because xCreate and xConnect have identical interfaces does not mean that
they are identical (although, with care, you can use the same routine to
perform both tasks).
>-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
>Von: James K. Lowden [mailto:jklowden at schemamania.org]
>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 15:13:47 +0000
>Hick Gunter wrote:
>
>> xConnect is called whenever SQLite decides it needs to do something
>> with the existing virtual table. There
Which method returns an error for a table that is missing it's backing store
determines what can be done.
xBestIndex: prevents SQLite from preparing a statement that requires reading
the table (even no rows will be retrieved)
xOpen: prevents SQLite from opening a cursor on the table (i.e. the
Apart from the fact that latitude and longitude have defined ranges +-90 and
+-180 respectively, why are you choosing SQLite as the storage format for
densely populated single table of constant if all you want to do is
read the values?
If you are looking for a minimum space, uncompressed
An INNER join (signified by the join operators "," (comma), JOIN or INNER JOIN)
is a very different beast than an OUTER join (signified by the join operators
LEFT JOIN or LEFT OUTER JOIN).
The first returns that subset of the cartesian product of the two tables where
the join condition is met.
You are creating each table in a separate file; a foreign key may only
reference a table in the same file.
Your type declarations are faulty in that you are omitting an opening
parenthesis in a DECIMAL 4,3) declaration.
SQLite does not constrain sizes, a TEXT(10) or a CHAR(1) variable my
1 - 100 of 905 matches
Mail list logo