I think you may mean "database connection" instead of "statement handle".
When you are finished with processing a statement, you should either reset (if
you intead to use it again later) or finalize it. Otherwise SQLite must assume
that you want to continue later and needs to keep around
You may also like to consider sqlite3_stmt_readonly() which will return TRUE
for all statments that do not (directly) modify the db contents
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im Auftrag
What is the exact sequence of calls?
If you call sqlite3_column_text() on a blob value, the new type will be text
and a subsequent call to sqlite_column_text16() must by definition perform
transcoding.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
This has been discussed several times on the list. SQLite (and all other
databases) try very hard to resolve the names you refer to in your query and
will search all the tables you mention to find *unqualified* references. They
give up if they do not find exactly one definition.
Try " delete
It looks like you have unfinalized statements in your transaction. You are
preparing statements inside the loop, but finalizing only 1 (the last)
statement. And attempting to commit even before finalizing only the last
statement. So sqlite3_close() is complaining about improper call sequence,
omes from and how to deal with it.
As you already stated, a local variable in your callback procedure goes out of
scope automatically. I have no idea how VB6 implements local variables; in C
they are located on the stack, which may be overwritten by other function calls.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 a
The rules are quite simple:
If the pointer refers to static memory (preallocated string constants, global
variables that you can guarantee won't change while SQLite uses them) use
SQLITE_STATIC
If the pointer refers to memory obtained from sqlite3_malloc (directly or
indirectly e.g. via
Does it revert back to slower speed after dropping the index?
Can you compare the EXPLAIN output produced with and without the index?
There is no difference on my machine (Version 3.7.14); if yours behaves the
same way then whatever changes speed is definitely not because SQLite is doing
You are probably falling into the cache effect trap again. There is no point in
indexing on the primary key, it only wastes space and CPU cycles
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
>...
>We need a metric calendar. I propose redefining the second so that a day is
>100,000 seconds long... ;)
>
>--
>Scott Robison
And while we are already redefining the fundamental constants of measuring, we
could redefine the meter to be exactly three feet and the kilogram to be
exactly two
1) disregard the results of the first query timing (this one has to read the
data into the cache)
2) run each query in a new process (so each one will need to read the data from
disk)
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
There is always an implicit index on the SQLite rowid and this is the fastest
method to locate a row.
The next best thing for retrieval speed is an index that matches the where
clause. If you do not have one, SQLite may decide to create a temporary index
anyway, but this depends on the query.
7, 2015, at 3:30 AM, Hick Gunter wrote:
>
> Maybe you are looking for the INSERT INTO ... SELECT or CREATE TABLE ... AS
> SELECT syntax? This would be one write transaction instead of two separate,
> incompatible transactions.
>
> -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht--
Maybe you are looking for the INSERT INTO ... SELECT or CREATE TABLE ... AS
SELECT syntax? This would be one write transaction instead of two separate,
incompatible transactions.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces
You can always write a virtual table for exporting to whatever flavor of CSV
you like. Mine exports/imports strings/blobs containing nonprintable characters
in x'' notation.
Basically it implements:
For export:
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE _csv_exp USING CSV (,); ->
create a CSV table with the
You give no indication of the schema you are using or the statement that went
wrong.
If you can reproduce the error using the sqlite3 shell, then it is probably
within sqlite3. If not, then it is most probably your own program which is
causing the fault, maybe by passing incorrect (stale or
It is up to your xBestIndex method to confern this information to your xFilter
method, e.g. by setting the idxStr return parameter in a way these methods
understand (e.g. leave it pointing to a character that encodes the required
comparison). The idxStr is passed to xFilter unchanged from what
>> Another good good way to think of IEEE I was presented once with, and
>> which kind of gave me a ah-ah moment, is the fact that numbers with
>> exact representation fall on the nodes of grid, and there's plenty of
>> "space" in between the nodes for values which cannot be exactly
>>
>17 -> 0x10001 mantissa
>-1 -> 0xf exponent ( or however many bits the exponent is represented by
>exact
Still thinking in decimal...
Value = mantissa * 2 ^ exponent
And not
Vale = mantissa * 10 ^ exponent
___
Gunter Hick
Software Engineer
>> Can you reproduce the problem using the sqlite shell?
>This won't be easy as the UDF is in an ActiveX dll, not in sqlite3.dlll
>
>This is the output from explain, run on this SQL:
>SELECT XXX(F1, F2) as A, XXX(F1, F2) as B FROM UDF_TEST limit 3 XXX will just
>add the results of the integer
not be
> > a
> "statement handle".
>
> Yes, you are right there. Not sure now how I thought it was a
> statement handle, but this doesn't alter the problem.
> Thanks in any case for correcting this mis-conception.
>
> RBS
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM,
The "context" passed to a user defined function is not and cannot be a
"statement handle". How would an aggregate function tell the difference between
Select SUM(x) ...
and
Select SUM(x), SUM(y) ...
if not by virtue of sqlite3_aggregate_context() returning different adresses?
It should be possible with a custom collation sequence.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im Auftrag von Cecil
Westerhof
Gesendet: Freitag, 09. Oktober 2015 12:08
An: sqlite-users at
I expect users running SQLite on embedded devices would be thrilled...
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im Auftrag von Filip
Navara
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 08. Oktober 2015 15:55
An:
Indeed you did reproduce in that you selected all of the 1 entries you inserted
into table item and inadvertently used the field name from the table in the
subquery in the NOT IN case ;)
A subquery "select itemcode from tmp_salesitm", is allowed to refer to fields
from the outer "select * from
AFAICT the FROM clause is superflous, as the function has no (supported) way of
detecting which table(s) the FROM clause contains. What is your
"reindex_virtual_table()" function (I assume it is a user implemented function)
supposed to do?
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Eduardo Morras
1) Each connection needs to load the image(s) that contain(s) the virtual
module code (unless you have already linked it into a single image).
2) Each connection needs to declare the virtual module(s) by calling
sqlite3_create_module(_v2).
3) Each connection needs to declare the tables using
I suspect you are having a chracter encoding problem. SQLite supports UTF
encoding.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jonathan [mailto:jonathanmejiaa at hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 06. Oktober 2015 15:27
An: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] Problem sqlite
>
We are using multiple processes accessing the same on-disk db with almost
exclusively virtual tables.
Once the tables have been declared (CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE...), all other
connections need only to load the modules. The xConnect method gets called on
first access.
-Urspr?ngliche
The main difference between HAVING and WHERE ist that WHERE operates on the
input set and HAVING operates on the output set.
If your condition requires computing an aggregate, then HAVING is a viable
method of avoiding a subquery that needs to repeatedly scan the input table:
SELECT
Nope. The reason to define datatype in SQLite is because other databases do so.
The difference ist hat SQLite does not enforce typing but uses the concept of
affinity instead.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nicolas J?ger [mailto:jagernicolas at legtux.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27.
But you have to run the query as opposed to just parsing EXPLAIN
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Richard Hipp [mailto:drh at sqlite.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. August 2015 15:37
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] explain plan change between SQLite 3.8.3.1
Are you looking for "NOT NULL DEFAULT 0"?
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Will Parsons [mailto:varro at nodomain.invalid]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. August 2015 04:47
An: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] design problem involving trigger
I'm working on a program that
SQLITE_DONE means that there are no (more) rows to be retrieved.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephan Beal [mailto:sgbeal at googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 10:12
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Strange behaviour of sqlite3_stmt_busy
On
Not quite. Try printing the generated statement. It should read
ATTACH myfilepath AS UPD;
Intead of
ATTACH 'myfilepath' AS UPD;
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Parsonson [mailto:z2668856 at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 09:10
An: General Discussion of SQLite
You are converting the "start of day" (UTC) to "localtime". Your timezone is
obviously 4 hours behind UTC...
asql> SELECT datetime('now'), datetime('now','localtime'),datetime('now','start
of day'),datetime('now','localtime','start of day'),datetime('now','start of
day','localtime');
AFAICT the windows implementation of localtime() will honour the settings of
the environment variables TZ, _timezone, _daylight and _tzname. The environment
variables of a process are set (copied from the parent process) on process
creation. Subsequent changes in the parent process are NOT
Caveat: SQLite may call the xDisconnect method at other times too. I expect
this will happen if the schema changes while a statement is prepared.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Aronson [mailto:pbaronson at att.net]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juli 2015 01:20
An: General Discussion of
Try "locate memleak" if the file is not present in the working directory of the
process running the test.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sairam Gaddam [mailto:gaddamsairam at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 08:44
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: [sqlite]
A UNIQUE constraint is implemented in terms of a UNIQUE index anyway. The
difference is that you can DROP INDEX but cannot DROP CONSTRAINT.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michele Pradella [mailto:michele.pradella at selea.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 08:14
An: sqlite-users at
The record sort order is:
NULLs
Numeric by value
Text by collating function
Blob by memcmp order
So your result set will contain all rows having a FooColumn with numeric value
greater than 50, a text value or a blob value.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hayden Livingston
Consider creating a bitmapped index on the fields you expect to be queried the
most. Bitmaps may be stored and manipulated (combined by logical operations)
very efficiently as long as the field values conform to certain criteria
(usually "managable cardinality of distinct values").
Bitmap
AFAIKT you are attempting to determine the "size" of one row by the difference
in the file size. This must fail, because SQLite allocates and writes the
database file in units of "database pages".
Does your definition of "size" include the index entries pertaining to a row?
Does it include the
Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Contstant WHERE terms still require table scan?
On Fri Jun 12, 2015 at 09:49:29AM +, Hick Gunter wrote:
> Seems the correct code is already generated...
Thanks Hick, that shows a bit more detail I didn't think to look for.
It seems that this only works for b
Seems the correct code is already generated...
asql> explain select rowid from x where 1=?;
addr opcode p1p2p3p4 p5 comment
- - -- -
0 Trace 0 0 000 NULL
1
You are creating each table in a separate file; a foreign key may only
reference a table in the same file.
Your type declarations are faulty in that you are omitting an opening
parenthesis in a DECIMAL 4,3) declaration.
SQLite does not constrain sizes, a TEXT(10) or a CHAR(1) variable my
An INNER join (signified by the join operators "," (comma), JOIN or INNER JOIN)
is a very different beast than an OUTER join (signified by the join operators
LEFT JOIN or LEFT OUTER JOIN).
The first returns that subset of the cartesian product of the two tables where
the join condition is met.
Apart from the fact that latitude and longitude have defined ranges +-90 and
+-180 respectively, why are you choosing SQLite as the storage format for
densely populated single table of constant if all you want to do is
read the values?
If you are looking for a minimum space, uncompressed
Which method returns an error for a table that is missing it's backing store
determines what can be done.
xBestIndex: prevents SQLite from preparing a statement that requires reading
the table (even no rows will be retrieved)
xOpen: prevents SQLite from opening a cursor on the table (i.e. the
>-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
>Von: James K. Lowden [mailto:jklowden at schemamania.org]
>On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 15:13:47 +0000
>Hick Gunter wrote:
>
>> xConnect is called whenever SQLite decides it needs to do something
>> with the existing virtual table. There
Removing the persistant instance of a virtual table is the most common way of
tripping up a virtual table implementation.
Just because xCreate and xConnect have identical interfaces does not mean that
they are identical (although, with care, you can use the same routine to
perform both tasks).
Can you try changing LHS and RHS in the first ON expression?
The older, larger query has inventory_id on the LHS and film_id on the RHS. Now
you have all fields on the RHS.
It would seem the QP may be inferring LEFT OUTER JOIN ON
( = )
And placing the fields first in the argument list
And
] How to get length of all columns in a table
On 6/2/2015 2:28 AM, Hick Gunter wrote:
> Sqlite3_column_bytes will convert numeric values to strings and return the
> length of that "string representation" (excluding the terminating \0), not
> the byte size required to store the n
What is the reason for wanting the id of a record to be fixed at the unique
record number of the original insertion?
Do you need to access historical data regularly or only for specific inquiries?
For rarely required historical data, you could use a "history table" to hold
historic copies of
Sqlite3_column_bytes will convert numeric values to strings and return the
length of that "string representation" (excluding the terminating \0), not the
byte size required to store the numeric value itself.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: J Decker [mailto:d3ck0r at gmail.com]
Gesendet:
Which SQLite version?
Which operating system?
Where is the database file located? Local storage or network drive?
WAL mode or journal mode?
What does "pragma integrity_check;" return?
Is there a busy handler involved (in either process)?
Is there an interconnection between the two processes (e.g.
None of the queries named requires more than 1 parameter to xFilter. Why should
they?
xBestIndex will be called once with no usable constraints and once with
(value1, "=").
The difference is that xFilter will be called once for each constraint value,
i.e. once for query 1 and twice for
ATTACH is the command you are looking for
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: afriendandmore [mailto:afriendandmore at ymail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 15:15
An: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] Copy data between to databases unsing windows embedded
Try
alter table [database] add column [real_length] numeric;
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christoph P.U. Kukulies [mailto:kuku at kukulies.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 08:51
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: [sqlite] ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN
I used
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Eric Hill [mailto:Eric.Hill at jmp.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2015 22:44
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Virtual Table query - why isn't SQLite using my indexes?
Hey, Gunter,
...
But then what about a query like this:
Eric
Working backwards from your query, I think your schema would be similar to
(foreign keys omitted)
CREATE TABLE rental ( rentalID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, rental_date TEXT,
inventory_id INTEGER, customer_id INTEGER, ...);
CREATE TABLE inventory ( inventory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NOT
Are you setting the constraintUsage return parameters correctly?
SQLite ist asking two questions:
1) What is the cost of a full table scan on table inventory (your answer is
4581; I personally would leave idxNum=0 for this case)
2) What is the least cost of doing a partial table scan with any
Regarding SQLITE_PRIVATE
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Hick Gunter wrote:
> SQLITE_PRIVATE means that the function is PRIVATE.
How they achieved PRIVATE functions in C?
You are not allowed to call this function, it is not supported as part of
> the SQLite API. Because you are not
SQLITE_PRIVATE means that the function is PRIVATE. You are not allowed to call
this function, it is not supported as part of the SQLite API. Because you are
not allowed to call the function directly, it is not made available to the
linker.
You can call it indirectly through the EXPLAIN feature.
You are not supposed to know the value on the RHS because that would lure you
into performing lots of work that you should not be doing in the query planning
step. Remember that xBestIndex may be called multiple times with different
combinations of constraints. Running the equivalent of "select
I prefer my integers unsinged ;)
SQLIte:
- only signed integers up to 64 bit
- arrays and structures only if you are willing to extract them from blobs via
user written virtual tables
- no date/time type, but you can store microsecond resolution timestamps in
64bit integers
-Urspr?ngliche
The obvious solution would be to statically link beets to a properly compiled
SQLite library instead of relying on everybody else to get it "right"
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Simon Slavin [mailto:slavins at bigfraud.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 03. Mai 2015 02:18
An: General Discussion of
Actually it does. Sort of.
The beginning of the record is the "manifest" (actual type of data list) area.
This contains tokens representing the actual type/contents of the fields.
Sticking with the example this will be 99 bytes containing the tokens "null",
"zero", "one" and "integer"
Getting "NoMem" sounds very much like a memory leak somewhere, with the most
likely place being your own application, followed by the wrapper you are using,
the FTS code and lastly the SQLite core. Lastly because the SQLite core is
extensively tested with an explicit emphasis on not leaking
For native SQLite tables, DROP TABLE is much faster than DELETE FROM.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jonathan Moules [mailto:J.Moules at hrwallingford.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. April 2015 11:40
An: 'sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org'
Betreff: [sqlite] Best way to temporarily
In sqlite 3.7.14 in debug mode it raises a constraint error that states that
the first argument is an invalid mem struct at location 7 in the trigger
subprogram
(gdb) print *pOp
$1 = {opcode = 75 'K', p4type = -4 '\374', opflags = 21 '\025', p5 = 107 'k',
p1 = 4, p2 = 11, p3 = 5, p4 = {i =
Even if there were a simple way to protect an SQLite db file from being
casually (or even maliciously) overwritten by a user (which there isn't), it is
quite impossible to prevent a user with "root privileges" from
accessing/altering/deleting/moving/renaming ANY file on any operating system
Ad 1)
You may be able to speed up deletion if you can partition your logging tables
by time, e.g. each table holds the changes within a certain time frame or a
fixed number of changes.
When you jump back in time, dropping the tables created after the target
timestamp is faster than deleting
The sub-select is within an "inner namespace" to the whole query. You are free
to reference fields defined in all tables occuring in the subselect's FROM list
IN ADDITION TO any fields defined in tables occurring in the main query's FROM
list. This is a requirement for correlated subqueries.
SQLite creates an ephemeral table for the IN list,giving O(log n) performance
for lookups.
>-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
>Von: James K. Lowden [mailto:jklowden at schemamania.org]
>Gesendet: Samstag, 21. M?rz 2015 20:43
>An: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
>Betreff: Re: [sqlite]
As is readily apparent the next at line 27 deals with the table "em".
Given the constraint "l.fame=em.age" it is blindingly obvious that there is
only one matching row from table "em".
Therefore it is always correct to exit the innermost loop after only 1
iteration.
Your calling sequence should be
- sqlite3_prepare() or sqlite3_prepare_v2()
- sqlite3_bind_xxx() if you have any parameters
- sqlite3_step()
- sqlite3_reset() or sqlite3_finalize() depending on if you want to run the
statement again or not
You need to *check* the return status of *every* call.
How about coding the collation in C and statically linking it into the SQLite
library you provide with your application?
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerry Snyder [mailto:mesmerizerfan at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. M?rz 2015 18:02
An: 'General Discussion of SQLite Database'
01
42 TableLock020 em00
43 TableLock090 lo00
44 TableLock070 mny 00
45 TableLock050 idv 00
46 Goto 010 00
How sqlite works in this c
If there can be not more than one row that satisfies the constraints (i.e. the
constraints specifiy a unique key) and there is an index (express or implied or
autocreated) available, then a simple index lookup will suffice.
How many rows do you expect to have a rowid of 1?
How many rows do you
When all names are disambiguated, simple typos and cut-and-paste errors become
less likely to go undetected by the SQL Parser.
See the "No diagnostic given for missing column" thread.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Keith Medcalf [mailto:kmedcalf at dessus.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17.
The zip should contain 4 files
shell.c
sqlite3.c
sqlite3.h
sqlite3ext.h
sqlite-amalgamation-3080803.zip
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: sonypsx [mailto:sonypsx at gmx.net]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. M?rz 2015 18:56
An: 'General Discussion of SQLite Database'
Betreff: Re: [sqlite]
The syntax diagram mandates 1 set of parentheses around the select for the IN
operator.
Putting a SELECT statement inside parentheses makes it a SCALAR SUBQUERY that
returns (at most) 1 row with 1 column. Any extra data is ignored.
Works as specified.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von:
You have swapped data and field names in the insert.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jason Vas Dias [mailto:jason.vas.dias at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. M?rz 2015 13:08
An: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] data which when inserted into a table cannot be
How are you inserting the blob?
If you are using sqlite3_bind_blob, be sure to give the correct size (maybe you
are inadvertently using strlen() or similar to compute a length?).
Are you using SQLITE_STATIC, SQLITE_TRANSIENT or passing a destructor function?
When retreiving the value, you
index look up work without looping as indexes are also represented by
cursor ?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Hick Gunter wrote:
> Are you trying to create tables with INTEGER PRIMARY KEY? You have to
> write EXACTLY "integer primary key" (not case specific) to achieve this.
>
Are you trying to create tables with INTEGER PRIMARY KEY? You have to write
EXACTLY "integer primary key" (not case specific) to achieve this. The em <=>
lo join would probably profit from this.
Your join specifies to compare em.name (a column with numeric affinity) to
idv.name (a column with
I personally would use "... EXISTS ( SELECT 1 ...", which requires no extra
columns to be acessed at all.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Wolfgang Enzinger [mailto:sqlite at enzinger.net]
Gesendet: Samstag, 07. M?rz 2015 19:25
An: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite]
Using LIKE on a BLOB is not the problem.
It is the LIKE optimization that is broken, because it requires a BLOB to sort
AFTER a text, which is never the case, while the LIKE function compares an
expression that may contain wildcards to the raw data, which may be the case.
-Urspr?ngliche
And then there remain to be considered the effects of the pragma
CASE_SENSITIVE_LIKE
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dominique Devienne [mailto:ddevienne at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 06. M?rz 2015 10:30
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Virtual Table
An: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Bitfield in Sqlite3-Table
On 2015-03-05 03:00 PM, Oskar Schneider wrote:
> I just created for each day a seperate column is this worse than your
> approach?
>
>
> Hick Gunter schrieb am 8:01 Donnerstag,
entry + retrieve K rows).
Which do you think will scale better? What happens when you reach the ?end of
days? (i.e. less than 3 years after the first task is scheduled)?
Von: Oskar Schneider [mailto:oskars93 at yahoo.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. M?rz 2015 14:00
An: Hick Gunter
Cc: 'General
todo.dayno,task.* from task join todo on task.id = todo.task_id where ?
[ORDER BY];
Von: Oskar Schneider [mailto:oskars93 at yahoo.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 04. M?rz 2015 18:57
An: Hick Gunter
Betreff: Re: AW: [sqlite] Bitfield in Sqlite3-Table
With normalize you mean i should create a column
In order of preference
a) use FastBit software
b) normalize your database design to eliminate the array
c) use a BLOB of 125 bytes and user defined functions to operate on them
d) use a string of 1000 characters ('0' or '1') and the SUBSTR() function
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Oskar
of SQLite Database
Betreff: [sqlite] FastBit-based vtable impl [WAS: Multi-table index ersatz?]
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Hick Gunter wrote:
> Properly implemented virtual tables do support indexing, but you have
> to write the code to support that yourself.
>
> I have personall
Only one writer may be active at any one time. The other(s) will recieve an
error return status. You can either wait a while and retry this in your
application or set a busy timeout to handle the "usual" cases for you.
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rohit Savaliya [mailto:rohit.savaliya
Properly implemented virtual tables do support indexing, but you have to write
the code to support that yourself.
I have personally implemented an index based on the fastbit package which is
ideally suited to retrieving large data sets via equality and range constraints.
See
Maybe an implicit ORDER BY random() ;)
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mohit Sindhwani [mailto:ml3p at onghu.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. M?rz 2015 18:22
An: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] full table scan ignores PK sort order?
On 3/3/2015 6:59 PM,
quot; from one database file to another?
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-bounces at mailinglists.sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Hick Gunter
Sent: dinsdag 3 maart 2015 13:08
To: 'General Discussion of SQLite Database'
Subject: Re: [sq
Your expectation is wrong. What follows SELECT is the "result column list",
which may contain arbitrary expressions. SQL will attempt to identify all the
objects mentioned in the result column list by searching the defined objects of
the statement (which includes the definitions of all the data
601 - 700 of 905 matches
Mail list logo