I think maybe "Normalization" could be one of the best underutilized
features of modern database design by most practicing "Database
Consultants." Never have I seen such a rule with so many exceptions!
Each normalization decision must be prefaced with "It Depends" in every
instance. Ah the potent
It would most likely be much quicker (and simpler) just to utilize the
OS's file coping feature to copy the table. What would be gained with
the attaching databases approach over just a straight file copy?
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Rattanni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
I figure the only reasons it is written in C is for portability and
Assembler programming is a bitch!
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of P Kishor
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:36 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLi
Well said!
C++ provides the average programmer "automated" Object Orientation, or
better stated, good programming practices, at a price. A good C programmer
can equal and most times exceed the results of a C++ programming project.
As previously stated C is really just a lazy man's Assembler, and
Nothing to do with relational databases, but if you are developing for a
future animal husbandry environment I would plan on supporting clones. Like
it philosophically or not.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of Ib
I think your problems have nothing to do with SQLite, yet.
To begin you need some help related to the "C" programming language. The
three files you have listed are the "Make", "Source" and "Header" files for
a C program. You must compile these to develop an executable program.
Once you have acc
Is this a violation of SQL Standards? Seems like it should be.
I'm not for dumbing down the system to compensate for the occasional idiot
programmer. After all, we are not the government, nor should we strive to
act like it (IMHO).
If someone chooses to attempt to create a column/table/databas
Is this a violation of SQL Standards? Seems like it should be.
I'm not for dumbing down the system to compensate for the occasional idiot
programmer. After all, we are not the government, nor should we strive to
act like it (IMHO).
If someone chooses to attempt to create a column/table/databas
: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of Igor Tandetnik
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:57 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Datatypes (D. Richard Hipp)
Fred Williams
wrote:
> Is this a violation of SQL Standards? Seems like it should
PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Datatypes (D. Richard Hipp)
Fred Williams
wrote:
> What! The standard is lacking? Will wonders never cease?
>
> Thanks, you saved me from some boring reference reading.
>
> Still think, logically speaking, the construct s
ay, June 16, 2009 12:23 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Datatypes (D. Richard Hipp)
On 16 Jun 2009, at 5:32pm, Fred Williams wrote:
> Still think, logically speaking, the construct should throw an error
> message, rather than make stealth changes to the e
For overall performance and efficiency, I recommend you keep the "pretty" in
the GUI where such things are traditionally implemented. Pick two of three:
"COOL, Fast, Tight."
Fred
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of
Reminds me of the old days BTW (Before The Web) when the News Net's main
recreation was "C" language curly brackets formatting flame wars :-)
I was kind'a wondering what on earth is so complicated in SQLite that would
take an entire book to cover? Is it a thin book? How 'bout big print for
us ol
Ahhh! The price of using the company e-mail :-)
"Mustang Vineyards" is willing to let the world receive and store for all
posterity edification and benefit, the sage ramblings in every message!
Read on you lucky masses! :-)
Fred
No company disclaimer attached.
-Original Message-
From: s
I think you guys are most likely feeding a Troll, or the original poster
might ought to contact his IS support department, or enroll in some
introductory basic home computer continuing education courses in his local
area.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sql
That might be an option to consider. But, I think there might be a rather
small number of potential SQLite users interested. I would think the group
with the greatest benefit of that kind of package would be students and
serious rookies.
Most users I feel either pre possess the required expertis
Paul,
If you wish I can send yoou a SQLite3.lib file I just generated using my old
Borland C++ Builder 5 Lib utility. Can't attach it here so contact me:
fwillia...@gmail.com
And I'll attach it to a reply.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-u
.lib (or, for that matter, .obj) files created by Borland
compilers are not compatible with the Microsoft toolchain, and
vice-versa. Borland uses a variant of the OMF object format, and
Microsoft uses a variant of COFF.
On 07/25/2009 08:09 PM, Fred Williams wrote:
> Paul,
>
> If you wish I ca
e-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Fred
> Williams
> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 4:44 PM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] .lib file?
>
> Hum. So Mickeysoft does not supply a lib converter/creator utility? I
even
> have a "Make&quo
Hummm... Guess there is a reason there are no implementations of C# external
to the Mickeysoft world :-)
Guess if I had a lot of time to kill I could port it to Delphi...
BTW, what's the memory footprint?
Fred
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-user
he metal. I would expect the C version
to be faster.
I don't know the background of why this programmer did a port directly
to C# instead of binding C# to the existing C library, but I assume he
had his reasons.
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Williams"
To: "Gene
ster.
>
> I don't know the background of why this programmer did a port directly
> to C# instead of binding C# to the existing C library, but I assume he
> had his reasons.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Fred Williams"
> To: "General Discussion
Thank you for your understanding. And best of luck with XXLite?
I know you have a large captive audience out there. It is the only reason I
swallow my pride and admit knowledge of the most pervasive OS currently on
the planet. Not the "best" technically, but best "marketed."
Fred
-Origina
Having had the unfortunate opportunity to use a couple of language
translators as well as spending about six fruitless months developing one
which in the end was no better, I say there is no known translation that
would allow the three SQLite, "Small, Fast, Reliable" adjectives to
translate into an
Of Roger Binns
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:09 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLJet - pure Java implementation of SQLite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Williams wrote:
> I say there is no known translation that
> would allow the
d be better to translate the object code.
It's also possible to translate bytecode (for example, from Java to
.NET).
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Williams"
To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database"
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: [sqlite
That's all you are suppose to get when querying the Master table for table
names.
You ask how to get a list of tables. That is what you got.
What you are asking for now is more complex.
Try:
Select Name, SQL from "SQLite_master";
for even more fun try:
Select * from "SQLite_master"
Fred
--
he origibal code with the comments still meaningful.
Fred Williams wrote:
> Having had the unfortunate opportunity to use a couple of language
> translators as well as spending about six fruitless months developing one
> which in the end was no better, I say there is no known translation that
>
Just began coming back to speed on MySQL after many years. (Thanks to
SQLite) Boy does it SUCK!
I've already eaten up the better part of 150MB of disk space, run
installation repair once, (of many?) and still trying to find the
"admin" logon and password. Damn! It has been too long!
Please, is
ODBC?
-Jeff
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Fred Williams
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 4:24 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: [sqlite] MySQL makes me wish for SQLite
Just began coming back t
eral Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] MySQL makes me wish for SQLite
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:24:09PM -0500, Fred Williams scratched on the
wall:
> Please, is someone working on a good straight forward .PHP SQLite
> interface? I might even pay for it!
*Confused*
SQL
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of Darren Duncan
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:49 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] MySQL makes me wish for SQLite
Fred Williams wrote
We don't really need that "SQLite." We already have it. It is commonly
called MySQL. It take well over 150MB of disk space and major management
efforts to maintain any level of performance. Just what the client/server
guys love to play with.
SQLite is way too small and Bring to catch their
Can you say Oracle? :-)
Along this same line, and based on a few years of using SQLite and following
the messages on this list, here's my two cents worth.
First a disclaimer: I have no knowledge of the detailed implementation and
architecture of SQLite, other than by inference from discussions on
Can you say Oracle? :-)
Along this same line, and based on a few years of using SQLite and
following the messages on this list, here's my two cents worth.
First a disclaimer: I have no knowledge of the detailed implementation
and architecture of SQLite, other than by inference from discussions on
to:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of Alexey Pechnikov
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:54 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Most wanted features of SQLite ?
Hello!
On Monday 21 September 2009 01:45:07 Fred Williams wrote:
> With the background of th
ussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Most wanted features of SQLite ?
On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Fred Williams wrote:
>
> Fine for me. It seems to be everybody else that wants their favorite
> feature imbedded in the core :-)
>
> Fine grained locking would be a g
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of Simon Slavin
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:05 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Most wanted features of SQLite ?
On 21 Sep 2009, at 6:53pm,
Try this:
http://sqliteadmin.orbmu2k.de/
Works great for me.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of J Glassy
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:16 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sql
Since SLQite was never intended for multi user databases in the initial
design i.e. the name "SQLite" I would say the design is the reason.
Now can the design be reengineered to allow finer grain locking as an option
without derailing the original design intent? That is for those that do all
the
, at 1:13 PM, CityDev wrote:
>
>
> Fred Williams-5 wrote:
>>
>> no further need to ask and answer, "Will SQLite support
>> multi users?
>>
> Maybe it should be covered a bit more specifically on the SQLite site,
http://www.sqlite.org/whentouse.html
> bea
If you have a file that conforms fully to the RFC, I honestly don't see the
problem. Your examples do not meet the RFC rules. If the rule does not
address leading spaces outside the quoted text, then the input file should
not contain spaces there as they will be ignored.
Over the years I have wr
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Phillips"
To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database"
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:40 AM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] low-level view of data values?
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Robert Simpson
> wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure I do store them as strings
The best (safest?) way I have found to handle non scientific math is to
work strictly with integers and multiply and divide using ROUND/TRUNC as
required to gain the precision required. This includes way more than
SQLite situations as well. Borland (Code Gear) seem to be the only
developer to
That has always been my most effective last resort when attempting to do
business math with many databases and development environments.
> Thanks for all the advice on this. Just to be clear, I wasn't
> referring to the accuracy of calculations when I compared the sqlite
> date/time formatti
For what reason would "non-technical" types need to look on the SQLite
website? :-)
I kind'a like it the way it is. Plain and simple, with no over wrought
graphics and other worthless fluff.
It is a website for a very bare bones, plain and simple database. Those
who access it are not looking for
Great idea! Why don't we give them little printable chits for free
chips and beer as well?!
Just the facts m'am. -- Jack Webb
> -Original Message-
> From: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 5:51 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite
Actually the first looks like Pascal and the second COBOL (Well, it
should be all upper case)...
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Tandetnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:47 PM
> To: SQLite
> Subject: [sqlite] Re: Different between BEGIN, END and "begin
If you suspect "Group By" also may be broken, why not to an interim "bug
fix" release and then do the version number change when both "Order By"
and "Group By" are fixed? I seem to remember instances where both Order
BY and Group By have given me "unexpected" results. But then again, my
logical t
This discussion reminds me of another long, long ago in a galaxy far,
far away. (When I worked on "Mainframes" with 32 K or less "core"
memory.)
Discussing the then lopsided world with my non-IBM salesman, in a local
watering hole, after a particularly trying day of dealing with
"management." The
A hundred or so Visual Basic programmers are cheaper to replace and
"maintain" than one good Delphi/C++ programmer. ;-) That is the reason
management likes "Visual ." Been there, learned that. Hire the
staff from the largest pool, not the most effective. Besides it's damn
hard to be a prima
lacing myself :)
>
> --
> Eric Pankoke
> Founder / Lead Developer
> Point Of Light Software
> http://www.polsoftware.com/
>
> -- Original message --
> From: "Fred Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > A hundred or so Visu
ECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:16 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard
> ofDeviceSQL?
>
>
> James Steward wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 15:30 -0600, Fred Williams wrote:
> >
> >>
It's the ones who never figure out how little they know that do all the
damage...
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: John Elrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:22 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone
nding...I mean - right off the
> forklift. I'm sure
> > anyone with the proper motivation can learn to program, but
> it took me
> > 25 years to realize how little I really knew.
>
> I didn't write the original about forklift operators. It was Fred
> Williams,
Answers in line.
> -Original Message-
> From: arbalest06 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 9:23 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: [sqlite] database column attributes
>
>
>
> good day!
>
> i want to create a database with a table that has a column which i
> -Original Message-
> From: Zbigniew Baniewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:08 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] "always-trim" - feature suggestion
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:25:01AM -0500, Rob Sciuk wrote:
>
> > You know,
> -Original Message-
> From: Aristotle Pagaltzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 1:27 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: [sqlite] Re: "always-trim" - feature suggestion
>
>
> * Zbigniew Baniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-09 18:15]:
> > On Wed,
I like the idea of keeping SQLite strictly SQL Standard compliant. With
strict compliance one has a very strong and highly transportable
development platform to migrate a finished application to any SQL
Standard compliant database. If all those vendor specific SQL Standard
"extensions" are really
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolas Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:29 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Next Version of SQLite
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 08:46:03PM -0600, Rick Langschultz wrote:
> > I was wondering what w
I agree very much with your suggestion. Although all those vendor
specific "extensions" generally make the designers and coders lives
easier, the wheels tend to come off in onerous ways when a heavily
extended project migration is attempted.
Even when using a given vendor's product I have, based
You might want to test a little further with Aducom's stuff. I'm using
Aducom and have the following working code in at least one app:
begin
AList.Fields.FieldByName(FldName[j+1]).Value :=
Trim(ExtractData(RS));
if RP >= Length(RS) then
break;
end;
F
Might want to download the free source for the Delphi VCL set for Sqlite DB
access componenets provided at Aducom.com and review the releven source
code. Sorry, it is written that highly "inelegant" Object Pascal. But I'm
an old "C" coder from way back and do read and write Object Pascal more so
t
Try this:
http://www.aducom.com/sqlite/
You can dump DBExpress completely.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of LacaK
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 2:15 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [sqlite] Delphi dbExpress driver for SQLite3 ?
Don't think that will happen. "Dot" notation is used as in
"databasename.tablename" and is therefore a restricted use notation.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aladdin Lampe
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:57 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
That's why I continue to monitor SQLite messages even when I'm not actively
developing with SQLite. There is an inherent entertainment value that
appears built in.
Over time I'm certain I have been guilty of posting some shall we say
"entertaining" messages myself.
Sometimes I think SQLite is so
If all the collum contents are identical why should it matter wich one is
modified? Just do a select ... Limit 1 subquery in the update.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of c.panel
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:57 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlit
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
I would suggest as a beginning:
www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/whentouse.html
www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/lockingv3.html
www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/faq.html#q7
www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/faq.html#q8
www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=MultiThreading
AND
www.hwaci.com
Not sure why you are trying to do something like that. One technique
which seems to be quite common, and that I use extensively, is to
present a scrollable read only grid of pertinent data fields. with a
"VCR" button set for control. The user can press the buttons for
Insert, Delete, or Edit for
Then again only 10,000,000 hits for SQLite (Less information to wade through)
and NO book to buy! (zero out of pocket expense!)
Good luck! You are most likely headed the right direction.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lenster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:59
It would appear the first responder gave you your answer. So where's
the beef?
If you don't like the answer, don't complain to us about service :-)
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Sprenkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:20 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite
t waiting for other people to reply also to
> confirm this, I do not have any beef with anyone. Sorry if
> it came accross
> this way.
>
> Aaron
>
> On 13/04/06, Fred Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It would appear the first responder gave you yo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:23 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] How can I get the type of a column?
>
>
> sqlite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Eric Scouten wrote:
> > > SQLite derives
> -Original Message-
> From: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:37 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] How can I get the type of a column?
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > sqlite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Eric Scouten w
How about some form of automated(?) sequence where:
New subscriber submits subscription request.
System sends "query" message to subscriber address.
New subscriber sends "confirmation" message within reasonable time
period.
List access granted on receipt of confi
ED]&Ke
y=bf3y9e9txka
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 9:07 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: RE: [sqlite] Purging the mailing list roles. Was: Please
> Restore Your Account Acc
BUT, the spammers ARE posting...
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Sprenkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:46 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Purging the mailing list roles. Was: Please
> Restore Your Account Access
>
>
> On 5/29/06, [EMAI
Yet another mailing list weakness: One must be able to spell to
unsubscribe! :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Dankert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:43 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: RE: [sqlite] unsuscribe
>
>
> Especially considering they ar
Now here's a "class" of messages it would be nice to "trash." It ain't
spam, but it looks like it, smells like it, and is as useful. Even if it
is unintentional.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sankara Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 6:33 PM
> To: sqlite-u
I suggest we don't pick Access/Jet MDB as our shining example of
SQLite's future
Borland's old, dead, and gone Paradox was Access' main reason to come
into existence. Inspire of outliving Paradox, only because of marketing
reasons, Access has never been able to leapfrog or even measure up to
old
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Tandetnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 10:19 AM
> To: SQLite
> Subject: [sqlite] Re: problem with creating a table
>
>
> Bijan Farhoudi
> wrote:
> > A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> >> SELECT [order] FROM foo
> >>
> > But how would yo
I would guess from the drift of things, you really should be working at
learning the database language "SQL" and not "learning" SQLite. SQLite
is only one of a multitude of modern relational databases which use SQL
as their language of choice for their user interface.
Actually using SQLite once y
Then how 'bout letting me know the next time you see a market "bubble"
coming? :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:53 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] i have a few Qs - sqlite3
>
>
> ??? I am in hea
I think with that last one you best witch to some other database. I
fear you will get no help here. Your lack of command of the English
language does not excuse your extremely misaligned mind.
No one on the face of this planet would place me in the "politically
correct" crowd, but this last post
What language are you using? Can't you do a dynamic array?
> -Original Message-
> From: John Newby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:37 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] How do you find out the names of the
> fields within
> a table?
>
>
Did not realize he was using VB when I sent my last message. I'd bet VB
still can't do anything dynamic. That's only one of the reasons I
walked away from VB's "Daddy" (Quick Basic) years ago.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 13
Good Grief! Everybody knows CRUD is what you clean off on US Navy ships
at least once a week.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:32 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] locked implies exception?
>
>
> I
Using an SQL engine to drive a relatively small database is not really
very simple, IMHO. But you will notice I am a member of the SQLite fan
club for some time now.
My largest dataset is somewhere just over 10K rows. I justify using
SQLite by noting the advantage of using a well maintained, wid
Kind'a like chucking your Pentium 5 and going back to scratching on the
cave wall with a rock, Eh?
I'd export the tables to a CVS files using something like
SQLiteAdmin.exe. Open the CVS files with Excel and save the resulting
spreadsheets as .DBF files (My Excel has a choice of DBASE II through
Damn acronyms anyhow! Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Sprenkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 6:47 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] converting a sqlite table to dbf
>
>
> On 8/29/06, Fred Williams &
>From experience. Most "free form" output routines I have used utilizes
the content of the first row to establish the width of "columns." (i.e.
Reflected in the result per your "Administrative Assistant")
If you can "throw away" your first row of output, you could insert a
first row in your table
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Tandetnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 10:27 AM
> To: SQLite
> Subject: [sqlite] Re: Re: Re: Which API to use to get
> resultant of query
>
>
> sandhya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But where as when i am executing the sam
Unless you have a very funny shaped disk drive all the files are "Flat"
:-)
I tend to agree stating SQLite is a "Flat file" somewhat oversimplifies
things to me as my definition of a "flat file" is a simple sequential
set of data written in no particular order and retrievable only by
opening the f
Win'ders don't recognize no stenk'en .gz files!
Besides, Linux groupies don't have time to write Windows evil doer
programs. There is no challenge there :-)
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Cote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:43 AM
> To: sqlite-
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Cote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 9:26 AM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] import syntax and null values
>
>
> Rich Shepard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Eric Matthew Finnin wrote:
> >
> >> Could someone
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerry Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 12:42 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] import syntax and null values
>
>
> Fred Williams wrote:
> > Would it not be more logical to m
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Cote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 1:44 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] import syntax and null values
>
>
> Fred Williams wrote:
> >
> >
> > Don
Well there's always XBase. Old, solid, widespread. But, I doubt XBase
will be that much different overhead, and complexity wise.
SQLite is really hard to beat for its intended purpose. And as far as
superior implementation, I have never seen an XBase implementation that
can even come close to S
What'ch got it running on, a 286? Tried three different times and got
tired waiting all three times :-(
Not going to stir much interest with response times like that!
> -Original Message-
> From: Günter Greschenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:04 PM
> To:
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo