DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18269] New: - Another Struts tutorial to add

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18269. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18270] New: - [PATCH] Fixed a broken link in helping.xml

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18270. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18270] - [PATCH] Fixed a broken link in helping.xml

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18270. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18269] - [PATCH] Another Struts tutorial to add

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18269. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18227] - ConfigRuleSet should use Digester's class loader

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17977] - nested:iterate loses index with jsp:include

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17977. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Tiles beans package?

2003-03-24 Thread David Graham
The reason I asked is because a package with 2 classes isn't too useful unless there are plans to add more beans. Thanks for the info on the item tag. David From: Cedric Dumoulin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL

Re: Close to RC2?

2003-03-24 Thread David M. Karr
Ted == Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ted A frequent comment about RC1 is that it did not use the released versions of Ted the Commons packages. Ted I think for RC2 to be a likely release candidate and enable us to go from Ted there to a final release, we will need to lock

Re: Tiles beans package?

2003-03-24 Thread Cedric Dumoulin
David Graham wrote: The reason I asked is because a package with 2 classes isn't too useful unless there are plans to add more beans. There were plans to add more kind of beans related to the definitions. For now, there is only one kind of interface and its implementation ;-(. Cedric

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17502] - tiles:insert in jsp called from DefinitionDispatcherAction not working

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17502. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17502] - tiles:insert in jsp called from DefinitionDispatcherAction not working

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17502. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Bug 16108 - Why is ActionForm a base class rather than aninterface?

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Ted Husted wrote: Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:49:36 -0500 From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug 16108 - Why is ActionForm a base class rather than an

Re: Bug 16108 - Why is ActionForm a base class rather than aninterface?

2003-03-24 Thread James Mitchell
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:20, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Ted Husted wrote: Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:49:36 -0500 From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18289] New: - Dynamic Message Resources

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18289. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Close to RC2?

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, David Graham wrote: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 07:41:18 -0700 From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Close to RC2? I was thinking that 1.1 final would come after RC2 with the final

digester

2003-03-24 Thread Edgar Dollin
I am looking into the various methods of processing xml files and was wondering why digester was used as opposed to jaxb. Thanks in advance. Edgar

Re: Close to RC2?

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, David Graham wrote: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:38:01 -0700 From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Close to RC2? The commons-pool dependency is indeed inherited from commons-dbcp. We

Re: digester

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Edgar Dollin wrote: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:46:53 -0500 From: Edgar Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: digester I am looking into the various methods of processing xml files

Re: Close to RC2?

2003-03-24 Thread David Graham
Actually, my original thought was to get rid of DBCP because it's a problem child dependency and not everyone needs it. We could leave the data-sources element because it's useful to those who need it but they would have to provide the implementation class (change the type attribute to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18293] New: - Loading language files does not use Resource Bundle

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18293. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

forms tag ? serialaizable

2003-03-24 Thread Vic Cekvenich
AFAIK we can't specify the type of class that the form bean is in, in struts config. (not formbean, but form-beans ) For example, form-beans type= myserilazableformbeanbase This would allow me to implement session fail over of session beans. AFAIK, this was depercated in 1.1. Yes, this can be

RE: forms tag ? serialaizable

2003-03-24 Thread Edgar P. Dollin
Your form beans should be serializable if you are keeping them in session scope. I am not familiar with scaffoldingLib but AFAIK the straight struts ActionForm and derivatives all serialize OK. Obviously, everything you throw in an ActionForm must be serializable as well. There are a few classes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18299] New: - html:rewrite should include attribute for action

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18299. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18299] - html:rewrite should include action attribute

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18299. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: forms tag ? serialaizable

2003-03-24 Thread Vic Cekvenich
SNIP If your UserBean class declares implements Serializable, this means that UserBean also takes responsibility for saving and restoring the instance variables of the base class as well. If it doesn't, then your UserBean class is broken. The only thing the container should need to do is an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18293] - Loading language files does not use Resource Bundle

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18293. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18299] - html:rewrite should include action attribute

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18299. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16296] - Add action Attribute to html:rewrite Tag

2003-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16296. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: forms tag ? serialaizable

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:55:00 -0500 From: Vic Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: forms tag ? serialaizable SNIP If your UserBean class declares implements

Re: forms tag ? serialaizable

2003-03-24 Thread Chetan Sahasrabudhe
Craig: I am using struts and am pretty impressed with the way you good ppl have comeup with such a generic and helpful framework. I will like to contribute in the development efforts, can any one tell me how can I contribute in this great work. Regards Chetan - Original Message -

Re: forms tag ? serialaizable

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Chetan Sahasrabudhe wrote: Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:00:06 +0530 From: Chetan Sahasrabudhe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: forms tag ? serialaizable Craig: I am using

Re: forms tag ? serialaizable

2003-03-24 Thread David Graham
I will like to contribute in the development efforts, can any one tell me how can I contribute in this great work. We really need people to work on the commons packages we're dependent on, specifically DBCP and Logging. We finally got Struts itself down to 0 bugs (for now) and are now working

Thanks for Information.

2003-03-24 Thread Chetan Sahasrabudhe
Thanks Craig, and sorry for breaking the thread. will go through mentioned information. Regards Chetan - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:18 AM Subject: Re: forms tag ?

Re: Bug 16108 - Why is ActionForm a base class rather than an interface?

2003-03-24 Thread I-Shen Leong
And you're really going to have to break both of my arms and/or kick me out of Struts development if you want ActionForm *ever* changed to an interface again -- in *any* future Struts release. I think it's an absolutely horrible idea, for reasons that have been documented way too many times