> Oh what version was it running? I'm fairly sure this has
> been fixed
> recently.
Yep, it was still Build #1185. Like I (probably) said, it'd been a few
weeks... (there was some exquisite classical music on 0.5, and my
resources can't run both versions at the same time for too long...).
Here's the relevant part of the wrapper.log (at least I think it's the
right part, as it's the one that's different from old entries when the
node was running fine):
INFO | jvm 1| 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: Error
in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NumberFormatExce
> Oh what version was it running? I'm fairly sure this has
> been fixed
> recently.
Yep, it was still Build #1185. Like I (probably) said, it'd been a few
weeks... (there was some exquisite classical music on 0.5, and my
resources can't run both versions at the same time for too long...).
I'm having problems with starting my Freenet 0.7 node. This is the
output of the start-up console window:
###
Starting Freenet
The Freenet 0.7 darknet- service is starting
.
The Freenet 0.7 darknet- service could not be started.
A system erro
Here's the relevant part of the wrapper.log (at least I think it's the
right part, as it's the one that's different from old entries when the
node was running fine):
INFO | jvm 1| 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: Error
in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NumberFormatExce
I'm having problems with starting my Freenet 0.7 node. This is the
output of the start-up console window:
###
Starting Freenet
The Freenet 0.7 darknet- service is starting
.
The Freenet 0.7 darknet- service could not be started.
A system erro
I've installed 0.7 yesterday (finally :) but I'm not getting rid of
0.5 just yet). I like the fact that it's not eating that much of the
computer resources as 0.5 (but then again, I've pretty much kept the
restrictive default settings about the memory and such).
Now, to my questions... After one d
I've installed 0.7 yesterday (finally :) but I'm not getting rid of
0.5 just yet). I like the fact that it's not eating that much of the
computer resources as 0.5 (but then again, I've pretty much kept the
restrictive default settings about the memory and such).
Now, to my questions... After one d
Is it enough to portforward listen-port and opennet-listen-port on
your NAT router in order for a 0.7 node to work properly (so two ports
here as opposed to one port in 0.5)? How about the dyndns hostname,
where do you have to put it (that is, if this function is still the
same as it was on 0.5, so
Is it enough to portforward listen-port and opennet-listen-port on
your NAT router in order for a 0.7 node to work properly (so two ports
here as opposed to one port in 0.5)? How about the dyndns hostname,
where do you have to put it (that is, if this function is still the
same as it was on 0.5, so
Is there a short how-to for Freenet 0.7 installation for those who are
switching from 0.5? Especially I'm looking for info about:
-how to change the default ports (which are already taken by other
services on my server, and are not to be used at all), for local
access as well as the one visible on
Is there a short how-to for Freenet 0.7 installation for those who are
switching from 0.5? Especially I'm looking for info about:
-how to change the default ports (which are already taken by other
services on my server, and are not to be used at all), for local
access as well as the one visible on
Would it be possible/feasible to run both 0.5 and 0.7 versions on the
same computer (for a while)? Or could there be some conflicts between
the two (and probably significant strain on system resources)?
Would it be possible/feasible to run both 0.5 and 0.7 versions on the
same computer (for a while)? Or could there be some conflicts between
the two (and probably significant strain on system resources)?
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
My node (version 0.5) is supposed to allow 90 concurrent open
connections. However, in the last week or so I've only seen 40 listed
connections in the Open Connections segment of node's control panel,
e.g.
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 40 (0/40/90)
The only thing that was change
My node (version 0.5) is supposed to allow 90 concurrent open
connections. However, in the last week or so I've only seen 40 listed
connections in the Open Connections segment of node's control panel,
e.g.
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 40 (0/40/90)
The only thing that was change
Forgive my ignorance, but where do I change the allotted memory for
Freenet? Couldn't find it under Configure in the menu, and neither in
freenet.ini.
> > As for the memory - I haven't changed any settings about memory. The
> > "Memory Allocation" (in Environment section of web interface) says:
>
Forgive my ignorance, but where do I change the allotted memory for
Freenet? Couldn't find it under Configure in the menu, and neither in
freenet.ini.
> > As for the memory - I haven't changed any settings about memory. The
> > "Memory Allocation" (in Environment section of web interface) says:
>
> You tell me. We wouldn't do it deliberately!
I know, I was merely joking. :)
> What is the node doing at the time? Do you have any queued
> requests and/or
> inserts? Have you tried giving the node more memory? How much is it using
> now?
>
> If it IS a memory problem then it's worrying, vinyl
> You tell me. We wouldn't do it deliberately!
I know, I was merely joking. :)
> What is the node doing at the time? Do you have any queued
> requests and/or
> inserts? Have you tried giving the node more memory? How much is it using
> now?
>
> If it IS a memory problem then it's worrying, vinyl
Some time ago, I had to restart my node once every two weeks or so,
because its CPU consumption would grow over time -- and after reaching
90 % or more rendering the computer useless.
However, lately these things occur very often. The node starts
consuming more and more CPU resources, pushing it to
Some time ago, I had to restart my node once every two weeks or so,
because its CPU consumption would grow over time -- and after reaching
90 % or more rendering the computer useless.
However, lately these things occur very often. The node starts
consuming more and more CPU resources, pushing it to
Well, I've deleted my Freenet store completely. Didn't help.
Tried to run UpdateSnapshot.exe. It downloaded something and maybe
updated it (no errors). Didn't help.
Downloaded freenet-webinstall.exe, tried to run it (for a reinstall, I
suppose), but I only received: "I could not find a compatible J
Well, I've deleted my Freenet store completely. Didn't help.
Tried to run UpdateSnapshot.exe. It downloaded something and maybe
updated it (no errors). Didn't help.
Downloaded freenet-webinstall.exe, tried to run it (for a reinstall, I
suppose), but I only received: "I could not find a compatible J
Is there really no one out there who could advise me what to do? My
node has been down for some time now. Should I try deleting all files
and directories in my freenet store directory?
---
Author: Level 13
Date:
To: support
Subject: [freenet-support] My node won't start anymore afte
Is there really no one out there who could advise me what to do? My
node has been down for some time now. Should I try deleting all files
and directories in my freenet store directory?
---
Author: Level 13
Date:
To: support
Subject: [freenet-support] My node won't start anymore afte
My computer crashed last night (or it was an unexpected shutdown).
Now my Freenet node won't start anymore - i.e. the animated icon
(starting...) remains running. I even left it like this for a couple
of hours (in case there was reindexing or something to be performed).
What should I do?
The log i
My computer crashed last night (or it was an unexpected shutdown).
Now my Freenet node won't start anymore - i.e. the animated icon
(starting...) remains running. I even left it like this for a couple
of hours (in case there was reindexing or something to be performed).
What should I do?
The log i
A while ago I increased the resources for my freenet node (from 40 to
90 connections, and datastore from 1 GB to 5 GB). It used to take a
few seconds to start my node, now it's like 1-2 minutes before it's up
(that is, until the animated tray icon becomes blue after you start
the node). Why is that
A while ago I increased the resources for my freenet node (from 40 to
90 connections, and datastore from 1 GB to 5 GB). It used to take a
few seconds to start my node, now it's like 1-2 minutes before it's up
(that is, until the animated tray icon becomes blue after you start
the node). Why is that
Today I've noticed that on my node's status page it says:
Build 5107 ... Load: ... 137%
It never went over 100 % before, so what does it mean? I did keep
Frost running overnight...
Today I've noticed that on my node's status page it says:
Build 5107 ... Load: ... 137%
It never went over 100 % before, so what does it mean? I did keep
Frost running overnight...
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.or
Never mind - I completely overlooked the fact that there's another
.ini file (FLaunch.ini) where you can change this. :)
All fine now.
Never mind - I completely overlooked the fact that there's another
.ini file (FLaunch.ini) where you can change this. :)
All fine now.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at h
I've recently updated from JRE1.4.2 to JRE1.5.0. However, if I check
the Environment section of Freenet web interface, the line "JVM
Version" still claims my node is using 1.4.2_10-b03.
How come it didn't acquire 1.5.0 - did I miss to change something?
I've recently updated from JRE1.4.2 to JRE1.5.0. However, if I check
the Environment section of Freenet web interface, the line "JVM
Version" still claims my node is using 1.4.2_10-b03.
How come it didn't acquire 1.5.0 - did I miss to change something?
_
About JVM update - I saw that there are some security issues with my
current version, so I thought it might be wise to update.
> Yes, 5107 was the final release in the .5 version of Freenet.
> I don't see any reason to update the Java release if your .5 server is
> working OK. A later release sho
About JVM update - I saw that there are some security issues with my
current version, so I thought it might be wise to update.
> Yes, 5107 was the final release in the .5 version of Freenet.
> I don't see any reason to update the Java release if your .5 server is
> working OK. A later release sho
How can I tell if I have the latest version of 0.5 branch installed?
The information I get in the web interface is as follows:
Node Version0.5
Protocol VersionSTABLE-1.51
Build Number5107
CVS Revision1.90.2.50.2.134
How about the version of JVM? I'm currently using 1.4.2_10-b
How can I tell if I have the latest version of 0.5 branch installed?
The information I get in the web interface is as follows:
Node Version0.5
Protocol VersionSTABLE-1.51
Build Number5107
CVS Revision1.90.2.50.2.134
How about the version of JVM? I'm currently using 1.4.2_10-b
It happened before, and it happened again tonight. I got woken up by
alarms indicating 100 % CPU usage, and found out it was being caused
by Freenet, so I restarted it.
Obviously it has problems when summer/winter time transitions occur.
It's only twice a year, but thought I should mention it.
It happened before, and it happened again tonight. I got woken up by
alarms indicating 100 % CPU usage, and found out it was being caused
by Freenet, so I restarted it.
Obviously it has problems when summer/winter time transitions occur.
It's only twice a year, but thought I should mention it.
___
What's the best plan for upgrading from 0.5 to 0.7?
Is it still so that in order to use 0.7 you have to know a node that's
already in the network? If so, can I simply pick any node from "open
connections" on my node's control panel?
Is the content under 0.7 the same or completely different?
What's the best plan for upgrading from 0.5 to 0.7?
Is it still so that in order to use 0.7 you have to know a node that's
already in the network? If so, can I simply pick any node from "open
connections" on my node's control panel?
Is the content under 0.7 the same or completely different?
_
That's not very encouraging. Perhaps there should be some flag
available to let other nodes know that one of them is just
"temporarily unavailable". Or maybe an option for a "3rd party" server
where the traffic requests would be rerouted - and the "temporarily
unavailable" answer given out (the "3r
That's not very encouraging. Perhaps there should be some flag
available to let other nodes know that one of them is just
"temporarily unavailable". Or maybe an option for a "3rd party" server
where the traffic requests would be rerouted - and the "temporarily
unavailable" answer given out (the "3
I was wondering, what are the possible consequences if one switches
their Freenet node off for a while (say when going on vacation etc.)?
I mean, is there a minimum limit as to when a node is considered
"dead"? So if it comes back online in e.g. 1 month, will it be a whole
new "discovery" for it, o
I was wondering, what are the possible consequences if one switches
their Freenet node off for a while (say when going on vacation etc.)?
I mean, is there a minimum limit as to when a node is considered
"dead"? So if it comes back online in e.g. 1 month, will it be a whole
new "discovery" for it,
Upon issuing netstat -s on my server this morning I found out there
were 923 current connections established. After shutting down Fuqid
(1.5) and Freenet (build 5106), the number dropped to 47.
How could have this happened? The maximum connection limit on my
Freenet node is 40, while Fuqid has 30 m
Upon issuing netstat -s on my server this morning I found out there
were 923 current connections established. After shutting down Fuqid
(1.5) and Freenet (build 5106), the number dropped to 47.
How could have this happened? The maximum connection limit on my
Freenet node is 40, while Fuqid has 30
> > One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
> > "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
> > seems pretty "raw", though.
>
> For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...
For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp s
> One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
> "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
> seems pretty "raw", though.
For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...
For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp servers'
In this section of FAQ
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall
it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at
"node.ipAddressOverride" and "node.listenPort". However, I don't have
these entries in configuration file; I only have "ipAddress=..."
(where I used to
In this section of FAQ
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall
it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at
"node.ipAddressOverride" and "node.listenPort". However, I don't have
these entries in configuration file; I only have "ipAddress=..."
(where I used t
> > Freenet. So all I would have to do was put this DynDNS address in
> > "ipAddres=" instead of putting my external IP there?
>
> Yes.
Done. BTW, I still have access to my old line until the end of the
month. Is there anything I can do overthere to somehow "transfer" the
already known connections
> > Freenet. So all I would have to do was put this DynDNS address in
> > "ipAddres=" instead of putting my external IP there?
>
> Yes.
Done. BTW, I still have access to my old line until the end of the
month. Is there anything I can do overthere to somehow "transfer" the
already known connections
Well, I've had my DynDNS address before... but didn't use it with
Freenet. So all I would have to do was put this DynDNS address in
"ipAddres=" instead of putting my external IP there?
If so - if I do this now, will the whole node have to start from scratch again?
Yes, I'm behind a NAT router/fir
Well, I've had my DynDNS address before... but didn't use it with
Freenet. So all I would have to do was put this DynDNS address in
"ipAddres=" instead of putting my external IP there?
If so - if I do this now, will the whole node have to start from scratch again?
Yes, I'm behind a NAT router/fir
I just switched my ISP, hence I have a new IP now. Is there any way to
speed up the process of my node getting to know the others? That is,
it seems like the freenet considers my node a new one (since it's on a
new IP), and I'd like to "inherit" the credentials I had before (for
the lack of a bette
I just switched my ISP, hence I have a new IP now. Is there any way to
speed up the process of my node getting to know the others? That is,
it seems like the freenet considers my node a new one (since it's on a
new IP), and I'd like to "inherit" the credentials I had before (for
the lack of a bette
> Sure, but I strongly recommend you not uninstall ZoneAlarm on a windows
> box. Unless you just install linux instead. :)
No, I am definitely going to leave ZoneAlarm where it is. I guess I'll just
have to restart it every now and then.
Another question about memory allocation. Node information
> Sure, but I strongly recommend you not uninstall ZoneAlarm on a windows
> box. Unless you just install linux instead. :)
No, I am definitely going to leave ZoneAlarm where it is. I guess I'll just
have to restart it every now and then.
Another question about memory allocation. Node information
Then I guess it was either eMule's fault or Zone Alarm's.
> Normally it happens when you are using too many threads. Try to use little
less.
I don't think I'm using too many threads. As for Freenet, I've limited the
connections to 40:
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 37 (11/26/40)
Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 39 (22/17)
Every now and then I notice that FUQID displays the message "Overloaded Or
Node Down" (in place where it's usually written "ACTIVE"). If I deactivate
it, restart Freenet node, and activate Fuqid again, it works again.
Also, issuing netstat -s before and after the restart: before there were
like 24
Then I guess it was either eMule's fault or Zone Alarm's.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMA
> Normally it happens when you are using too many threads. Try to use little
less.
I don't think I'm using too many threads. As for Freenet, I've limited the
connections to 40:
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 37 (11/26/40)
Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 39 (22/17)
Every now and then I notice that FUQID displays the message "Overloaded Or
Node Down" (in place where it's usually written "ACTIVE"). If I deactivate
it, restart Freenet node, and activate Fuqid again, it works again.
Also, issuing netstat -s before and after the restart: before there were
like 24
I've recently upgraded to the latest version of Freenet (5105). The
Java VM I'm using is 1.4.2_07-b05. Should there be any improvement if
I upgraded it to a newer version?
Furthermore... If I want to be more restrictive about allowing
java*.exe to access the internet, do I just copy java.exe and
j
I've recently upgraded to the latest version of Freenet (5105). The
Java VM I'm using is 1.4.2_07-b05. Should there be any improvement if
I upgraded it to a newer version?
Furthermore... If I want to be more restrictive about allowing
java*.exe to access the internet, do I just copy java.exe and
j
I'm using the last version of 5.5 series (freeware version). I'm
somehow reluctant about installing 6 since I've heard so much bad
things about this version.
I've noticed that ever since I started running my Freenet node, the
Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe process is literally eating memory. It goes up
to 700 MB. Whenever the system decides to allocate more memory to
vsmon.exe, the whole system is stuck until the process is finished (I
suppose re-writing the sw
I'm using the last version of 5.5 series (freeware version). I'm
somehow reluctant about installing 6 since I've heard so much bad
things about this version.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.s
I've noticed that ever since I started running my Freenet node, the
Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe process is literally eating memory. It goes up
to 700 MB. Whenever the system decides to allocate more memory to
vsmon.exe, the whole system is stuck until the process is finished (I
suppose re-writing the sw
On the website, it says,
After installing Freenet, Windows users can upgrade to the latest
daily Freenet "snapshot" release by clicking on "Update Snapshot" in
the Freenet section of their Start menu.
However, if I choose "Update Snapshot" on my server, I will get the
following dialog box just pr
On the website, it says,
After installing Freenet, Windows users can upgrade to the latest
daily Freenet "snapshot" release by clicking on "Update Snapshot" in
the Freenet section of their Start menu.
However, if I choose "Update Snapshot" on my server, I will get the
following dialog box just pr
I know it probably sounds silly, but for some time I've been using a
router that doesn't support UDP port forwarding, and I probably won't
change it any time soon... I see the 0.7 is switching from TCP to UDP.
What happens to those unlucky users who can't use UDP? Should we just
stop using Freenet
I know it probably sounds silly, but for some time I've been using a
router that doesn't support UDP port forwarding, and I probably won't
change it any time soon... I see the 0.7 is switching from TCP to UDP.
What happens to those unlucky users who can't use UDP? Should we just
stop using Freenet
Well, the machine is running:
-Freenet
-TorrentStorm
-eMule
-Kiwi SyslogD
-Filezilla FTP server
-VNC server
-and a few other "user" applications (command prompt, Firefox, Zone Alarm etc.)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gma
I started my freenet node again yesterday, and today I got the pop-up
message (also in event log):
***
Event Type: Information
Event Source: Application Popup
Event Category: None
Event ID: 26
Date: 2005-03-10
Time: 09:28:15
Description:
Application popup: Windo
Thanks! Works great now. :)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let's say there are two computers in the local area network:
Computer_A and Computer_B. Computer_B is a freenet node. What
precisely do I have to change if I want to access freesites on
Computer_A as well? Is it only adding A's IP/hostname to config file:
fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,localhost,Computer_A
o
Thanks for all the info, I suppose the maximum number of connections
should do the trick. I'll try the settings you recommend, and let you
know.
As per Freenet messing with P2P apps -- is there any way that it might
somehow "want" to use ports such as 4662, 6881, etc., in a few days,
thus preventin
I shut down my freenet node today after a little less than a week of
its running. The main reasons are low speed and resource hog-geness.
I read the other day that after at least two days, the speed of
freenet gets to normal. However, after almost one week the speed was
still pretty low on my end (
84 matches
Mail list logo
