>> I was referring to Freenet's custom congestion control. There is no
>> resending of UDP packets, unless Freenet pro-actively resends it.
>
> Right, and what we do is we resend packets if they are not acknowledged after
> a few round trips. Which is pretty much what TCP does.
I'm not entirely
> So, the question then becomes, when the node is clearly receiving more
> packets than it's supposed to, why is it taking so long (many minutes
> -- I never actually waited to see if the flood, which consumed my
> entire connection's 80KiB/sec capacity, would eventually subside) for
> the rate to
On 22/01/2011, at 8:04 AM, Ray Jones wrote:
> On 01/21/2011 11:59 AM, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
>> On 22/01/2011, at 7:55 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:51:35 -0700, Ray Jones wrote:
>>>> If I understand correctly
>>>>
On 22/01/2011, at 7:55 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:51:35 -0700, Ray Jones wrote:
>>
>> If I understand correctly
>>
>> UDP has no such thing as flow control. So even though your machine
>> reads only X packets per second, the sending machine is still sending
>> and you'
On 22/01/2011, at 7:51 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:37:54 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
>>
>> On 22/01/2011, at 7:34 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:26:56 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
>>>>
>>
On 22/01/2011, at 7:34 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:26:56 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
>>
>> On 22/01/2011, at 7:21 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
>>>> a “simple t
On 22/01/2011, at 7:21 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
>> a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting
>
> Can someone explain why bandwidth limiting might not be such a simple
> thing? Volodya tried, with his massive-incoming-packet theory
>
I'm having the same issue with the rubyfreenet list, and it looks like the spam
filter has broken as well :/
On 5/02/2010, at 7:23 AM, bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Guys, is none interested in helping me with this password problem?
>
> Whoever migrated the list to
> http://osprey.vm.bytemark.
I'm having the same issue on the rubyfreenet list. It also looks like someone's
turned off the spam filter :/
On 5/02/2010, at 7:23 AM, bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Guys, is none interested in helping me with this password problem?
>
> Whoever migrated the list to
> http://osprey.vm.bytemark
I'm having the same issue with the rubyfreenet list, and it looks like the spam
filter has broken as well :/
On 5/02/2010, at 7:23 AM, bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Guys, is none interested in helping me with this password problem?
>
> Whoever migrated the list to
> http://osprey.vm.bytemark.
't running, or hasn't
finished starting up yet. Unfortunately there isn't a real OS X GUI
yet. Try this:
Open Terminal, type these commands:
cd path/to/freenet
./run.sh stop
./run.sh start
--
Phillip Hutchings
http://www.sitharus.com/
't running, or hasn't
finished starting up yet. Unfortunately there isn't a real OS X GUI
yet. Try this:
Open Terminal, type these commands:
cd path/to/freenet
./run.sh stop
./run.sh start
--
Phillip Hutchings
http://www.sitharus.com/
_
mails.
Sorry, being pedantic, but it really annoys me when people start using
the wrong name.
--
Phillip Hutchings
http://www.sitharus.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gm
ng to connect from has a
stupidly low MTU, AND a stupid firewall that blocks incoming ICMP then
the user really deserves what they're getting. I've been known to be
particularly unpleasent to individuals who think blocking an essential
control protcol is a good idea.
--
Phillip Hutchi
minutes. I'm having some connectivity
issues from here to my server at the moment though.
If freenet wasn't such a resource hog I'd run another instance in a
UML parition on that server just to see how quickly it can integrate.
I would estimate 3-5 days based on the last tim
x27;s just the way it is.
I know the feeling. I'm a web developer, and all the time I spend
speeding up the code in certain conditions is basically moot as far as
the boss is concerned. He's a marketer.
I actually started running a node in the 0.3 days, but I was on
dialup. Now that w
goals of the project in to consideration, and
waiting 2-3 minutes for a text document to download isn't that bad.
Now, if only Java was less resource intensive... If I could run
Freenet in 128MB of RAM sucessfully the other users of the machine
would be happy. As it is, it takes 160MB, which isn&#x
outbound.) I'm aiming for
1GB/day of outbound at the moment. Haven't worked out the rate for that
yet, but I will.
I support freedom of speach. And while there's precious little speach on
Freenet as compared to movies and pictures, I thin
ile for a
node to integrate itself in to the freenet network, just be patient.
Leave the node running overnight and you'll get better results. The
longer you have the node the faster it'll be.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Descript
d.net/ if you're interested. The
company will be non-profit.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.o
RAM - it won't have free reign
over the box. 128MB max, closer to 50MB in reality - not ideal.
If only Java worked in less RAM, or Freenet worked with less data
transfer. I can only allow ~1GB/Month on my connection. Roll on NZWired
(nzwired.net)
--
Toad wrote:
Please CC the original poster if at all possible in future. Mostly they
aren't subscribers. Thanks.
Sorry, different email client to the one I normally use. Serves me right for posting
to the list at work :P
Anyway, noted, I'll remember hopefully.
__
Joachim Scharfetter wrote:
Hi, I have got a "fair use" DSL account with limited download volume.
How much download traffic will a permanent freenet node approximately
cause?
As much as your bandwidth allows. On a capped 256/128 connection Freenet
managed to use 1.5GB in a day. Now I have a 10GB ca
Dynamo wrote:
HI,
I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured freenet
correctly and forwarded the right ports I although createt an
dyndns.org account only for freenet
To get the node running well (ip in dydns.org database is up to date)
! But when I try to open a site I got the m
Toad wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I installed
number, and never get
further.
This meant that the configuration file was never written.
It isn't frozen! It's doing something in the background that takes
forever (~5mins last time I ran it) to complete. I can't remember what
it is actually doing, but it was something that looked
has your node been online? It typically takes 2-3 days of
constant running before a node will start getting data at any decent
frequency.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
LWAYS points to whatever machine the application is running on, no
exceptions. Actually, 127.anything should, so long as I'm correctly
remembering that it's 127.0.0.0/8...
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptogr
itely not full.
On 17/06/2004, at 10:28 AM, Toad wrote:
Is the store full? If not, this is probably a bug...
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:33:53PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
I've just started running a freenet node again, it's been up for a few
hours (and is getting bombarded by incoming
2004 at 01:33:53PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
I've just started running a freenet node again, it's been up for a few
hours (and is getting bombarded by incoming connections :P). However,
I'm trying to download FUQID from freenet so I can see the source. The
node has actually comp
.Main -p
/etc/freenet.conf
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscri
x27;s only been up for 30 minutes its unlikely to
know enough about the network to route efficiently. After 12 hours or
so it'll have more success.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
firewall settings? Make sure you're allowing
connections to the appropriate port. Just telnet in to it from a remote
host, it'll close the connection pretty quickly, but you'll prove you
can access it.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
ng list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description:
On 28/05/2004, at 4:40 AM, Toad wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:49:30PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP
or dns server ?
Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the
external IP so no way to
enet has routines to check for IP changes (I've
disabled them - static IP), so it should work pretty well once it's
established, but before that it needs to announce an IP and port to
connect to over the network so people start connecting to it.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROT
only have one version! It makes maintainability far easier than
#ifdef'd code, which is problematic at best. If one code base runs on
all platforms, and even better if the same executable does, then why
not use it?
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
D
y from my place at
the moment, dialup :/ I'm accessing my node through an SSH tunnel) I'll
grab the freenet source from CVS and look at it, see if I can figure it
out ;)
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIM
ly have two telcos, and one of them
only operates two small areas, we have monopoly problems :/
Maybe if I can get funds up and push for NZWired to get working...
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:25:33PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
[bigger snip]
Yeah, I'm looking at it, but there's no decent way to detect freenet
packets.
That's a feature :).
Yeah, even on localhost :P IPTABLE's OWNER match target only works in
the OUTPUT chain. I can
On 24/05/2004, at 11:32 PM, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Phillip Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
One thing that I can think of is limiting the size of incoming files
not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going
through. I'm more interested in the information,
he size of incoming files
not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going
through. I'm more interested in the information, not movies, but I
can't think of a tidy way to implement this in a few minutes. I know
it's not really in line with the freenet idea
Unsubscribe at
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
ng. I knew Java knowledge would come in handy :P
So for now my node is offline. I've lowered my rate limiting to 500
bytes/sec to keep things under control, but I'm waiting for my ISPs
traffic information to come back online...
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED
rowser
timeout too low :/), but it still has to download it from other nodes.
Is this normal? I have a 4GB store, so I would have thought it would
have been stored by now...
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptogr
elay through my server for posting to the
freenet list only, but that would take more time to implement than I have
free at the moment.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
ion, the uplink will be the harder
problem.
I don't care about rate limiting, but I do care about bandwidth usage
monitoring. I'm going to poke in the freenet source at the weekend and
see if I can put the code in...
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 5/05/2004, at 6:56 AM, Ole Tange wrote:
On Wed, 05 May 2004 00:00:40 +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
Since I'm unfortunate enough to be on a bandwidth cap I like to
monitor
where my bandwidth is going so I can shut down anything that's
guzzling
loads of bandwidth. I do this thro
27;s possible it would be nice to
have. If I could figure out where in the source this is done I may be
able to submit a patch or something...
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
end a message via the
network to open a connection to them.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.free
currently
have freenet on my Gentoo machine, but I'll look at the ebuild to see
if I can remember where the problem is.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
, any setuid binaries etc are not allowed. Any
untrusted code should be run in such an account, so it can't screw up
your system.
Java itself runs in a sandbox of sorts. Especially applets.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cry
with an interface that normal users
could use. Sure, there's things such as fiw, but it's not the easiest
of things to use. Having the whole feature set in one application would
make it a lot nicer.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sitharus.com/
smime.p7s
Description:
to start from. I guess that's what
you get with pre-release software.
Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or
WebKit (for OS X) embedded in to a freenet thing, with privacy options
auto set.
--
Phillip Hutchings
[EMAIL PROTEC
54 matches
Mail list logo
