I upgraded from Seamonkey 1.1.8 via Seamonkey 2.0 to Seamonkey 2.26.1.
Now I can not drag names to an existing address book or add a new
contact in that address book. I have about one dozen different address
books.
Howard Epstein
___
support
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
toolbar is simply hidden, and can be brought up momentarily by using
ALT-F11, but as soon as you use it, its hidden again. The Bookmarks Tool
Bar at
Well, I uninstalled it, shut it down, and after 5 minutes brought it
back up, before reinstalling it. Still no Toolbars!!
Neil Marcus wrote:
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
Neil Marcus pounded out :
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
toolbar is simply hidden, and can be brought up momentarily by using
ALT-F11, but as soon as you use it, its hidden again. The
Neil Marcus wrote:
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
toolbar is simply hidden, and can be brought up momentarily by using
ALT-F11, but as soon as you use it, its hidden again. The
On 19/08/14 16:15, Neil Marcus wrote:
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
toolbar is simply hidden, and can be brought up momentarily by using
ALT-F11, but as soon as you use it, its hidden
Thank You, Thank You, Thank You!!
That Worked!
Neil
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
toolbar is simply hidden, and can be
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Neil Marcus wrote:
Hi all! Everything was going along fine, when all of a sudden, all of my
toolbars, other than the Navigation Toolbar is missing/gone. The Menu
toolbar is simply hidden, and can be brought up momentarily by using
ALT-F11, but as soon as you use it,
For me SM 2.26.1 crashes every time I read mail and 'next'
from one ACCOUNT to another ACCOUNT.
Mozilla Crash Reports
Search
Product:
Select Version:
Report:
Advanced Search - Super Search
SeaMonkey 2.26.1 Crash Report [@ nsHtml5StreamParser::WriteStreamBytes(unsigned
char const
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
Then I am guessing it's related to something else, maybe one of your
add-ons. Does it crash on any site in particular?
It's pruning time.
Jus' sayin'...
Dis thread is an argument for top posting, mon.
To the suggestion that
Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
Then I am guessing it's related to something else, maybe one of your
add-ons. Does it crash on any site in particular?
It's pruning time.
Jus' sayin'...
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
, Jayakumar Sadhasivam wrote:
Hi, I started using SeaMonkey recently.
When i QUIT the seamonkey and reopen it, its in offline.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 ID:20140612182257 CSet: 0dae859587b0
Thanks
-Jay
Jay, do you go offline
, Jayakumar Sadhasivam wrote:
Hi, I started using SeaMonkey recently.
When i QUIT the seamonkey and reopen it, its in offline.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 ID:20140612182257 CSet: 0dae859587b0
Thanks
-Jay
Jay, do you go offline
/14 16:14, Daniel wrote:
On 07/08/14 13:03, Jayakumar Sadhasivam wrote:
Hi, I started using SeaMonkey recently.
When i QUIT the seamonkey and reopen it, its in offline.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 ID:20140612182257 CSet
Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1.
WOW64 is a (sort of) 32bit OS, isn't it?? So is limited to 4GB RAM with
file size limited to 2GB, isn't it??
So, if SM is using 2.0GB or 2.5GB, it should be shutting down
shouldn't it??
No, why would it? Modern operating systems use virtual memory. In the
case
On 07/08/14 11:02, Big Jim wrote:
Snip
I know my profile is very old. It dates back to the old
Mozilla/Netscape days (ancient history) but I haven't had any problems
until now. It's been a long time since I have contacted this forum
Thanx.
Jim
Jim, if your profile is old/ancient, how long
On 07/08/14 13:03, Jayakumar Sadhasivam wrote:
Hi, I started using SeaMonkey recently.
When i QUIT the seamonkey and reopen it, its in offline.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 ID:20140612182257 CSet: 0dae859587b0
Thanks
-Jay
SeaMonkey/2.26.1 )
Have a look at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1048055
comment #1 - David E. Ross say:
However, spoofing Firefox without SeaMonkey in the UA string allows
the page to be viewed.
So you sentence should be:
If SeaMonkey spoofs itself as Firefox,*without* SeaMonkey
Daniel wrote, On 05/08/14 10.40:
[snip]
Ed, I'm not worried about what the http://schema.org/ site does, just that I
see the link as part of the coding for the Google Fonts page, which is not
displaying if SeaMonkey names itself as SeaMonkey.
If SeaMonkey spoofs itself as Firefox, the Google
This has been driving me crazy for weeks. I apparently have the same
problem as Ben has. SM crashes several times a day without warning.
The only symptom that I can see is that, according to Task Manager with
about 20 tabs open, memory use steadily increases even if the computer
is idle. At
On 06/08/14 18:19, Gabriel wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/08/14 10.40:
[snip]
Ed, I'm not worried about what the http://schema.org/ site does,
just that I
see the link as part of the coding for the Google Fonts page, which is
not
displaying if SeaMonkey names itself as SeaMonkey.
If SeaMonkey
this
release of SM even with several dozen tabs open.
Big Jim, I notice you are running Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1.
WOW64 is a (sort of) 32bit OS, isn't it?? So is limited to 4GB RAM with
file size limited to 2GB, isn't it??
So
not be a problem. I never had a problem before this
release of SM even with several dozen tabs open.
Big Jim, I notice you are running Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1.
WOW64 is a (sort of) 32bit OS, isn't it?? So is limited to 4GB RAM with
file size
memory, so
memory use should not be a problem. I never had a problem before this
release of SM even with several dozen tabs open.
Big Jim, I notice you are running Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1.
WOW64 is a (sort of) 32bit OS, isn't
.
- Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP]
HERE ARE THE RESULTS OF about:crashes (The latest)
Mozilla Crash Reports
Search
Product:
Select Version:
Report:
Advanced Search - Super Search
SeaMonkey 2.26.1 Crash Report [@ js::RemapWrapper(JSContext*, JSObject*,
JSObject*) ]
Search Mozilla Support
64bit and have 16 gig of installed memory, so
memory use should not be a problem. I never had a problem before this
release of SM even with several dozen tabs open.
Big Jim, I notice you are running Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1.
WOW64
Hi, I started using SeaMonkey recently.
When i QUIT the seamonkey and reopen it, its in offline.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 ID:20140612182257 CSet: 0dae859587b0
Thanks
-Jay
-
Jayakumar
On 05/08/14 01:17, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel pounded out :
On 04/08/14 01:34, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/3/2014 2:14 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the
, which is not displaying if SeaMonkey names itself as SeaMonkey.
If SeaMonkey spoofs itself as Firefox, the Google Fonts page is
displaying!
Not really, my SM spoof as Firefox but the page is blank.( Mozilla/5.0
(Windows NT 6.1; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 )
Have
On 04/08/14 01:34, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/3/2014 2:14 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Daniel pounded out :
On 04/08/14 01:34, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/3/2014 2:14 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;htmlhead(head content
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/14 11.49:
[snip]
If the schema page is not supposed to be displayed, why is
/script/headbody itemscope
itemtype=http://schema.org/CollectionPage;/body/html
it in the coding at all??
To make it better indexed. This is the only reason for a Rich Snippet link or
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek
Geoff Welsh pounded out :
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey
Daniel pounded out :
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 16:25:
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor
On 08/03/2014 10:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 16:25:
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel
On 8/3/2014 2:14 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote on 08/03/2014 05:22 AM:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM
2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0
WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 17:12:
On 08/03/2014 10:45 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
WaltS48 wrote, On 03/08/2014 16:25:
On 08/03/2014 09:47 AM, Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/3/14 6:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 03/08/14 19:25, Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 03/08/2014 11:14:
On 03/08/14 00:42, David E. Ross
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;htmlhead(head content
omitted)/headbody itemscope
On 8/2/2014 4:02 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/08/14 00:48, Philip Taylor wrote:
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;htmlhead(head content
omitted)/headbody itemscope
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier
On 8/2/2014 2:22 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 2:22 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko
On 8/2/2014 7:09 PM, Mark Berger wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/2/2014 2:22 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0
Geoff Welsh wrote on 08/03/2014 05:22 AM:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM
2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier: 20140612182257)
I get a blank page with this content only
On 01/08/14 19:47, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier: 20140612182257)
I get a blank page with this content
On 8/1/14 8:39 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 01/08/14 19:47, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier: 20140612182257)
I get
Trane Francks wrote on 08/01/2014 07:48 PM:
On 8/1/14 8:39 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 01/08/14 19:47, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey
2.17.1 : also blank. A peek behind the scenes reveals ---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;htmlhead(head content
omitted)/headbody itemscope
itemtype=http://schema.org/CollectionPage;/body/html
Since body is empty, nothing can
Gabriel wrote, On 01/08/2014 11:47:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier: 20140612182257)
I get a blank page with this content
;/body/html
Since body is empty, nothing can be rendered unless it is populated by
scripting or content added by CSS.
Philip Taylor
I did not think to investigate the source when trying the link with my
SeaMonkey 2.26.1 on Linux, but the page is also blank for me, and I do
have Advertise Firefox
Gabriel pounded out :
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier: 20140612182257)
I get a blank page with this content only:
Same
Ed Mullen pounded out :
Gabriel pounded out :
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier: 20140612182257)
I get a blank page
Ed Mullen wrote:
The page content is supplied via javascript. I turned off js in Firefox
and it produces the same blank page as SM. Now the question is: Why
can't SM's javascript render the page and FF's can?
Tools / web development / error console ?
Philip Taylor
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier: 20140612182257)
[snipped]
I do see
Philip Taylor pounded out :
Ed Mullen wrote:
The page content is supplied via javascript. I turned off js in Firefox
and it produces the same blank page as SM. Now the question is: Why
can't SM's javascript render the page and FF's can?
Tools / web development / error console ?
Philip
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Build identifier: 20140612182257
Ed Mullen wrote on 08/02/2014 09:13 AM:
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 8/1/2014 2:47 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
I cannot see the content of https://www.google.com/fonts with SM 2.26.1
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
Appearance (also indicated by an artist's paint
palette). You might see more than one theme. Which one is NOT disabled?
I'm pretty sure you meant 2.26.1, David. Just sayin'.
--
/
// Trane Francks tr...@tranefrancks.com Tokyo, Japan
]. On the left side of the Add-ons Manager
window or tab, select Appearance (also indicated by an artist's paint
palette). You might see more than one theme. Which one is NOT disabled?
I'm pretty sure you meant 2.26.1, David. Just sayin'.
Very loud SIGH!! Yes, I removed the wrong period
WaltS48 wrote, On 15/07/2014 03:46:
On 07/14/2014 04:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not comaptible
with SM 2.26.1
I just upgraded to SM 2.26.1 and i cannot use the FireBug addon - so
what ? :-)
So I just used this nifty new Add-on Converter
On 07/15/2014 02:27 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
WaltS48 wrote, On 15/07/2014 03:46:
On 07/14/2014 04:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not comaptible
with SM 2.26.1
I just upgraded to SM 2.26.1 and i cannot use the FireBug addon - so
what ? :-)
So I just
WaltS48 wrote, On 15/07/2014 14:37:
On 07/15/2014 02:27 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
WaltS48 wrote, On 15/07/2014 03:46:
On 07/14/2014 04:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not
comaptible
with SM 2.26.1
I just upgraded to SM 2.26.1 and i cannot use
firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not comaptible
with SM 2.26.1
I just upgraded to SM 2.26.1 and i cannot use the FireBug addon - so
what ? :-)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
Ray_Net wrote, On 14/07/2014 10:48:
firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not
comaptible with SM 2.26.1
I just upgraded to SM 2.26.1 and i cannot use the FireBug addon - so
what ? :-)
FireBug downloaded from
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/firebug/
So
On 07/14/2014 04:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not comaptible
with SM 2.26.1
I just upgraded to SM 2.26.1 and i cannot use the FireBug addon - so
what ? :-)
So I just used this nifty new Add-on Converter tool;
http
Hello!
On 07/06/2014 10:29 PM, *jameskn...@gmail.com* wrote, and I quote (in
part):
I have been using Google Calendar on Seamonkey with Lighting and
Provider for Google Calendar for years. However, after a recent
Seamonkey update, it no longer syncs. Has anyone else noticed this?
I have been using Google Calendar on Seamonkey with Lighting and
Provider for Google Calendar for years. However, after a recent
Seamonkey update, it no longer syncs. Has anyone else noticed this?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
with the ugrade to 2.26.1prior to that all was fine .
Same here, but I still get through by clicking 'Retry' as many times as
necessary.
I assumed this was just SBC/Yahoo being annoying (yet again!)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey
On 05/07/14 02:15, David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/4/2014 7:24 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel pounded out :
On 04/07/14 15:26, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
EE wrote on 07/04/2014 07:42 AM:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 05/07/14 04:34, EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Snip
As I noted, above, Barry, I've moved an old version of userChrome.css
into the appropriate location and had no effect, so I don't think your
files will help, but thanks for trying.
Did you put a namespace line at the beginning of the file?
On 03/07/14 18:12, Daniel wrote:
On 02/07/14 22:50, Daniel wrote:
On 02/07/14 21:40, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Snip
It should be difficult not to notice the effect. :)
To get rid of the example, rename the userChrome.css or delete it and
restart SM again.
Hartmut
userChrome.css
On 04/07/14 23:36, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel:
On 04/07/14 01:56, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Several possible reasons for that. From your UA i am assuming you are
using Linux.
Hartmut, I Dual boot Win7 and Linux and use the one set of profile files
which, as Linux can see Windows files but
Ed Mullen wrote:
cyberzen pounded out :
Le 04/07/2014 01:44, NoOp a écrit :
I've found this addon to be quite handy for easily checking, modifying,
adding passwords:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/saved-password-editor/
Not available for SeaMonkey 2.26.1?
unfortunately
Daniel:
You're right, Hartmut, It should be difficult not to notice the
effect., now that I've moved the .css file into the chrome directory,
which didn't exist until I made it!!
The word Ugly springs to mind maybe a different colour!! :-)
*g* I am using #F7FFF9 for the folder pane
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 10:28 PM:
On 7/3/2014 10:26 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
To expand on Hartmut's answer yesterday, they are no longer in the
profile folder, but kept in the
Le 04/07/2014 01:44, NoOp a écrit :
I've found this addon to be quite handy for easily checking, modifying,
adding passwords:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/saved-password-editor/
Not available for SeaMonkey 2.26.1?
unfortunately
--
cyberzen
On 7/4/14 4:36 PM +0900, cyberzen wrote:
Le 04/07/2014 01:44, NoOp a écrit :
I've found this addon to be quite handy for easily checking, modifying,
adding passwords:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/saved-password-editor/
Not available for SeaMonkey 2.26.1?
unfortunately
On 04/07/14 15:26, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
EE wrote on 07/04/2014 07:42 AM:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/3/2014 1:12 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/07/14 22:50, Daniel wrote:
Searching for userChrome.css
On 04/07/14 01:56, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Apologies to those who do not use Linux.
Daniel:
Well!! I'm not seeing any green anywhere, so I must have screwed it up!!
Time to try a different/lower level in the directory chain.
Several possible reasons for that. From your UA i am assuming you are
Daniel:
On 04/07/14 01:56, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Several possible reasons for that. From your UA i am assuming you are
using Linux.
Hartmut, I Dual boot Win7 and Linux and use the one set of profile files
which, as Linux can see Windows files but Windows cannot see Linux
files, I have my
Barry Edwin Gilmour pounded out :
EE wrote on 07/04/2014 07:42 AM:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/3/2014 1:12 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/07/14 22:50, Daniel wrote:
Searching for userChrome.css as I type.
Well!! I'm not seeing any green anywhere, so I must have screwed it
up!!
Time to try a
Daniel pounded out :
On 04/07/14 15:26, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
EE wrote on 07/04/2014 07:42 AM:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/3/2014 1:12 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/07/14 22:50, Daniel wrote:
On 7/3/2014 10:26 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
To expand on Hartmut's answer yesterday, they are no longer in the
profile folder, but kept in the application-folder's omni.ja java
archive folder (For
cyberzen pounded out :
Le 04/07/2014 01:44, NoOp a écrit :
I've found this addon to be quite handy for easily checking, modifying,
adding passwords:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/saved-password-editor/
Not available for SeaMonkey 2.26.1?
unfortunately
I'm using
David E. Ross pounded out :
On 7/3/2014 10:26 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
To expand on Hartmut's answer yesterday, they are no longer in the
profile folder, but kept in the application-folder's
David E. Ross:
Why were userChrome.css, userContent.css, userChrome-example.css, and
userContent-example.css hidden in omni.ja?
userChrome.css and userContent.css are created by the user. They do not
exist by default. How could they be hidden? ;)
But for the example files your question is
On 07/04/2014 12:36 AM, cyberzen wrote:
Le 04/07/2014 01:44, NoOp a écrit :
I've found this addon to be quite handy for easily checking, modifying,
adding passwords:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/saved-password-editor/
Not available for SeaMonkey 2.26.1?
unfortunately
On 7/4/2014 7:24 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel pounded out :
On 04/07/14 15:26, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
EE wrote on 07/04/2014 07:42 AM:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/3/2014 1:12 AM, Daniel wrote:
On
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Barry Edwin Gilmour:
[userChrome-example.css userContent-example.css]
To expand on Hartmut's answer yesterday, they are no longer in the
profile folder, but kept in the application-folder's omni.ja java
archive folder (For Linux, that's at /seamonkey/omni.ja
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
EE wrote on 07/04/2014 07:42 AM:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/3/2014 1:12 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/07/14 22:50, Daniel wrote:
Searching for userChrome.css as I type.
Well!! I'm not seeing any green anywhere, so I must have
Daniel wrote:
On 04/07/14 15:26, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
EE wrote on 07/04/2014 07:42 AM:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/3/2014 1:12 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 02/07/14 22:50, Daniel wrote:
Searching for
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/3/2014 10:26 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote on 07/04/2014 12:53 PM:
On 7/3/2014 7:52 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
To expand on Hartmut's answer yesterday, they are no longer in the
profile folder, but kept in the application-folder's omni.ja
101 - 200 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
