Rickles wrote:
Joe32065 wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:55:39 -0400, Joe32065 wrote:
When I use Seamonkey to read newsgroups, I lean back in my chair and
put
my feet on the desk. So I can't use the keyboard at all. The Mark
button has an arrow next to it. When you click on
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:47:32 +0100, Rickles wrote:
Joe32065 wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Have you considered using a wireless/bluetooth mouse? If you have a
iPhone there's probably an app for that.
I have a wireless mouse. What I want to do is eliminate the need to use
the keyboard. It would
When I use Seamonkey to read newsgroups, I lean back in my chair and put
my feet on the desk. So I can't use the keyboard at all. The Mark
button has an arrow next to it. When you click on the arrow, you can
scroll down to Thread as read. There is plenty of empty space next to
the mark
Rufus schrieb:
make sure the final
release maintains previous content, please!
As explained elsewhere, it does - but the opposite isn't true, the old
release doesn't maintain newer content due to SQLite file/library
compatibility limitations.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 23/04/2011 02:57, Rufus told the world:
I found a Terminal command line to change my 'Book and now it boots 64
bit by default. It felt snappier at first, but now that it's settling
in I'm not really sure what all the fuss is about...or maybe I've just
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 23/04/2011 02:57, Rufus told the world:
I found a Terminal command line to change my 'Book and now it boots 64
bit by default. It felt snappier at first, but now that it's settling
in I'm not really sure what all the fuss is about...or maybe I've just
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 23/04/2011 02:57, Rufus told the world:
I found a Terminal command line to change my 'Book and now it boots 64
bit by default. It felt snappier at first, but now that it's settling
in I'm not really sure what all the fuss is about...or maybe
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 23/04/2011 02:57, Rufus told the world:
I found a Terminal command line to change my 'Book and now it boots 64
bit by default. It felt snappier at first, but now that it's settling
in I'm not really sure what all the fuss
On 4/23/2011 4:19 PM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/20/2011 8:28 PM, Rufus wrote:
...and I guess that's my real question - even though it's no longer UB,
it's still 32/64 bit bilingual?
Well Universal Binary does not in fact mean exclusively |PPC+Intel| it
means |Mixed
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/23/2011 4:19 PM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/20/2011 8:28 PM, Rufus wrote:
...and I guess that's my real question - even though it's no longer UB,
it's still 32/64 bit bilingual?
Well Universal Binary does not in fact mean exclusively
NoOp wrote:
On 04/22/2011 05:16 PM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 22/04/2011 17:58, Robert Kaiser told the world:
Interesting, as AFAIK all Core architecture chips support EM64T - could
be that it's only Core2 though and Apple shipped some of the older
crap that was called Core but
Rufus schrieb:
I'm sure the average user with an older 64 bit boot capable Mac
doesn't even know or care...
Right, that's why the universal images we also deliver always select
the appropriate mode to run in automatically - users should not need to
care. For 2.0.*, that means they always
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I'm sure the average user with an older 64 bit boot capable Mac
doesn't even know or care...
Right, that's why the universal images we also deliver always select
the appropriate mode to run in automatically - users should not need to
care. For 2.0.*, that
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/20/2011 8:28 PM, Rufus wrote:
...and I guess that's my real question - even though it's no longer UB,
it's still 32/64 bit bilingual?
Well Universal Binary does not in fact mean exclusively |PPC+Intel| it
means |Mixed architetchure binary| which this is, just
Interviewed by CNN on 23/04/2011 02:57, Rufus told the world:
I found a Terminal command line to change my 'Book and now it boots 64
bit by default. It felt snappier at first, but now that it's settling
in I'm not really sure what all the fuss is about...or maybe I've just
gotten used to
Interviewed by CNN on 22/04/2011 17:58, Robert Kaiser told the world:
Interesting, as AFAIK all Core architecture chips support EM64T - could
be that it's only Core2 though and Apple shipped some of the older
crap that was called Core but wasn't actually a new architecture at
all (and I
On 04/22/2011 05:16 PM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 22/04/2011 17:58, Robert Kaiser told the world:
Interesting, as AFAIK all Core architecture chips support EM64T - could
be that it's only Core2 though and Apple shipped some of the older
crap that was called Core but wasn't
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
That was my real point, as far as testing requirements go - there are
*lots* of Intel Macs out there that will be running 10.6.x in 32 bit
mode by default, and/or because they can't boot in 64 bit mode.
All Intels that
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
That was my real point, as far as testing requirements go - there are
*lots* of Intel Macs out there that will be running 10.6.x in 32 bit
mode by default, and/or because they can't boot in 64 bit mode.
All Intels that have ever been shipped by Apple were
PhillipJones schrieb:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/19/2011 6:50 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
as of this year all Mac Computers with Intel chips are 64 bit only X.6.5
and up are 64 bit.
And as of [upcoming] 2.1 all SeaMonkey Mac builds are Intel Universal
Binaries of 32 bit and 64 bit builds.
Robert Kaiser wrote:
PhillipJones schrieb:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/19/2011 6:50 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
as of this year all Mac Computers with Intel chips are 64 bit only
X.6.5
and up are 64 bit.
And as of [upcoming] 2.1 all SeaMonkey Mac builds are Intel Universal
Binaries of 32
Rufus schrieb:
Both machines are running 10.6.7 - you can't really say that 10.6 is 64
bit boot by default without knowing a bit more about what machine it's
being run on.
Oh, well. Still, AFAIK, when a universal binary is 32bit+64bit, like
SeaMonkey 2.1* versions are, then 64bit is used by
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
Both machines are running 10.6.7 - you can't really say that 10.6 is 64
bit boot by default without knowing a bit more about what machine it's
being run on.
Oh, well. Still, AFAIK, when a universal binary is 32bit+64bit, like
SeaMonkey 2.1* versions are,
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
Both machines are running 10.6.7 - you can't really say that 10.6 is 64
bit boot by default without knowing a bit more about what machine it's
being run on.
Oh, well. Still, AFAIK, when a universal binary is 32bit+64bit, like
SeaMonkey 2.1*
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
Both machines are running 10.6.7 - you can't really say that 10.6 is
64
bit boot by default without knowing a bit more about what machine it's
being run on.
Oh, well. Still, AFAIK, when a universal binary is 32bit+64bit,
On 4/20/2011 8:28 PM, Rufus wrote:
...and I guess that's my real question - even though it's no longer UB,
it's still 32/64 bit bilingual?
Well Universal Binary does not in fact mean exclusively |PPC+Intel| it
means |Mixed architetchure binary| which this is, just in this case a
32bit+64bit.
Hi everyone,
All the builds for SeaMonkey 2.0.14 have been created (updates are
available on the betatest channel soon), so it's time for starting
tests on them to ensure we get an update out there that is worth
shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac
there that is worth
shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and
Linux packages, all available in 24 languages including US English.
The packages are available in the linux-i686, mac, and win32
sub-directories of
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org
On 4/19/2011 11:08 AM, upscope wrote:
As a fairly new user of SeaMonkey can I as why x86_64 is not supported.
I have been running SeaMonkey(2.0.13) on my openSUSE 11.4 Linux system
and have not really experience many problems. Main problem I've seen is
distribution lists do not always import csv
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/19/2011 11:08 AM, upscope wrote:
As a fairly new user of SeaMonkey can I as why x86_64 is not supported.
I have been running SeaMonkey(2.0.13) on my openSUSE 11.4 Linux system
and have not really experience many problems. Main problem I've seen is
distribution
PhillipJones wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/19/2011 11:08 AM, upscope wrote:
As a fairly new user of SeaMonkey can I as why x86_64 is not supported.
I have been running SeaMonkey(2.0.13) on my openSUSE 11.4 Linux system
and have not really experience many problems. Main problem I've
On 4/19/2011 6:50 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
as of this year all Mac Computers with Intel chips are 64 bit only X.6.5
and up are 64 bit.
And as of [upcoming] 2.1 all SeaMonkey Mac builds are Intel Universal
Binaries of 32 bit and 64 bit builds.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/19/2011 6:50 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
as of this year all Mac Computers with Intel chips are 64 bit only X.6.5
and up are 64 bit.
And as of [upcoming] 2.1 all SeaMonkey Mac builds are Intel Universal
Binaries of 32 bit and 64 bit builds.
will they be like
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/19/2011 6:50 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
as of this year all Mac Computers with Intel chips are 64 bit only X.6.5
and up are 64 bit.
And as of [upcoming] 2.1 all SeaMonkey Mac builds are Intel Universal
Binaries of 32 bit and 64 bit builds.
Here is an example:
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/19/2011 11:08 AM, upscope wrote:
As a fairly new user of SeaMonkey can I as why x86_64 is not
supported.
I have been running SeaMonkey(2.0.13) on my openSUSE 11.4 Linux system
and have not really experience
On 4/19/2011 10:25 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 4/19/2011 6:50 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
as of this year all Mac Computers with Intel chips are 64 bit only X.6.5
and up are 64 bit.
And as of [upcoming] 2.1 all SeaMonkey Mac builds are Intel Universal
Binaries of 32
DoctorBill wrote:
I finally loaded SM 2.0.12.
I need help.
Can I use the theme I had on SM 1.1 ?
If so, where is it.
Where is the new 2.0.12 profile located ?
I know where the 1.1's profile is and manipulate it.
I can't get tabbed browsing to open a new tab when I click
on something
DoctorBill wrote:
How do I make ANY click on anything open a new tab ?
Not sure you can.
I wish this tab thing had the old x in the upper right corner of each
tab to delete it instead of right clicking each one to choose close tab.
You must have missed that the SeaTab X extension provides
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:29:29 +0100, Jens Hatlak wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
The Tabbedbrowser thing was from this guy
http://piro.sakura.ne.jp/
Does it work in 2.0.12 ?
AFAIK Tabbrowser Extensions (TBE) has been discontinued a long time ago.
For the ability to always open tabs for links,
DoctorBill wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I finally loaded SM 2.0.12.
I need help.
Can I use the theme I had on SM 1.1 ?
If so, where is it.
Where is the new 2.0.12 profile located ?
I know where the 1.1's profile is and manipulate it.
I can't get tabbed browsing to open a new
DoctorBill wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I finally loaded SM 2.0.12.
I need help.
Can I use the theme I had on SM 1.1 ?
If so, where is it.
Where is the new 2.0.12 profile located ?
I know where the 1.1's profile is and manipulate it.
I can't get tabbed browsing to open a new
DoctorBill wrote:
The Tabbedbrowser thing was from this guy
http://piro.sakura.ne.jp/
Does it work in 2.0.12 ?
AFAIK Tabbrowser Extensions (TBE) has been discontinued a long time ago.
For the ability to always open tabs for links, I'm not sure there's an
extension for just that but you may
I finally loaded SM 2.0.12.
I need help.
Can I use the theme I had on SM 1.1 ?
If so, where is it.
Where is the new 2.0.12 profile located ?
I know where the 1.1's profile is and manipulate it.
I can't get tabbed browsing to open a new tab when I click
on something (bookmark or link) like I
DoctorBill wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I finally loaded SM 2.0.12.
I need help.
Can I use the theme I had on SM 1.1 ?
If so, where is it.
Where is the new 2.0.12 profile located ?
I know where the 1.1's profile is and manipulate it.
I can't get tabbed browsing to open a new tab when I click
Terry R. a écrit :
On 3/1/2011 2:22 PM On a whim, Palikari ATL pounded out on the keyboard
I recently bought a new hard drive and installed it on my computer. I
forgot to back up my SeaMonkey profile on my old hard drive with
MozBackup. The profile is still there on my old drive, is there a
I recently bought a new hard drive and installed it on my computer. I
forgot to back up my SeaMonkey profile on my old hard drive with
MozBackup. The profile is still there on my old drive, is there a way
to import the old profile to my new hard drive/new SeaMonkey
program?
Thanks
On 3/1/2011 2:22 PM On a whim, Palikari ATL pounded out on the keyboard
I recently bought a new hard drive and installed it on my computer. I
forgot to back up my SeaMonkey profile on my old hard drive with
MozBackup. The profile is still there on my old drive, is there a way
to import the
. Everything appears to be working perfectly under Local Folders.
Thanks for all help and suggestions.
- Ken (in Oz)
-
sean bean wrote:
On 2/24/2011 10:48 AM, Ken previously wrote the following...::
sean bean wrote:
sounds like you still leave all your mail in the inbox and sent
folders
old (Netscape 4.79) In and Sent folders
into my SM 2.0.11 Mail folder (via an intermediary folder where we
renamed the In and Sent folders 'inscape' and 'sentscape') went smoothly
and easily. Everything appears to be working perfectly under Local Folders.
Thanks for all help and suggestions.
- Ken
to ensure we get an update out there that is worth
shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and Linux
packages, all available in 25 languages including US English.
The packages are available in the linux-i686, mac, and win32
subdirectories of
http
Ken a écrit :
For example, I don't really understand cybercitizen's reference to
locating 'local folders' under Netscape [or SeaMonkey] hierarchy and
then suppressing the .msf files, if any.
local folders are located in the profile, under mail folder
you can view it with the explorer. None SM
Ken wrote:
Interim response from Ken (in Oz) to the posts here so far.
Guys, your thoughts have been very welcome. I'm not a tech whiz, so I
may have to wait to do much until the middle of next week when a friend
can come and help out.
For example, I don't really understand cybercitizen's
Paul B. Gallagher a écrit :
Ken wrote:
Interim response from Ken (in Oz) to the posts here so far.
Guys, your thoughts have been very welcome. I'm not a tech whiz, so I
may have to wait to do much until the middle of next week when a friend
can come and help out.
For example, I don't really
cyberzen a écrit :
Paul B. Gallagher a écrit :
Ken wrote:
Interim response from Ken (in Oz) to the posts here so far.
Guys, your thoughts have been very welcome. I'm not a tech whiz, so I
may have to wait to do much until the middle of next week when a friend
can come and help out
sean bean wrote:
sounds like you still leave all your mail in the inbox and sent
folders... rather than using local folders as an archive
and/or file drawer...
please clarify...
Clarifying. You are not mistaken, sean.
make a backup copy of the Netscape mail folder... or two or three for
On 2/24/2011 10:48 AM, Ken previously wrote the following...::
sean bean wrote:
sounds like you still leave all your mail in the inbox and sent
folders... rather than using local folders as an archive
and/or file drawer...
please clarify...
Clarifying. You are not mistaken, sean.
make a
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years' of valuable emails stored in Netscape. For reasons connected
with how Windows 7 on my new computer won't run Netscape, I have
installed Netscape 4.79 on another computer (a Hewlett Packard) having
Windows XP
Ken a écrit :
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years' of valuable emails stored in Netscape. For reasons connected with
how Windows 7 on my new computer won't run Netscape, I have installed
Netscape 4.79 on another computer (a Hewlett Packard) having Windows
On 2/23/2011 9:08 AM, Ken previously wrote the following...::
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years' of valuable emails stored in Netscape. For reasons connected with
how Windows 7 on my new computer won't run Netscape, I have installed
Netscape 4.79
machine.
If that doesn't work use MozBackup (google it) to make an archive of the
Netscape files then use Mozbackup to import that archive into Seamonkey
on the new machine.
Hawker
On 2/23/2011 11:08 AM, Ken wrote:
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years
. There is not much
documentation on how this will work to move profiles from one
application into another.
Michael
Hawker
On 2/23/2011 11:08 AM, Ken wrote:
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years' of valuable emails stored in Netscape. For reasons connected
Ken a écrit :
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years' of valuable emails stored in Netscape. For reasons connected with
how Windows 7 on my new computer won't run Netscape, I have installed
Netscape 4.79 on another computer (a Hewlett Packard) having Windows
been a few
revisions since I have done this though.
Given these two things I suspect it will work.
Hawker
Hawker
On 2/23/2011 11:08 AM, Ken wrote:
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years' of valuable emails stored in Netscape. For reasons connected
Ken wrote:
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years' of valuable emails stored in Netscape. For reasons connected
with how Windows 7 on my new computer won't run Netscape, I have
installed Netscape 4.79 on another computer (a Hewlett Packard) having
. Admittedly it has been a few
revisions since I have done this though.
Given these two things I suspect it will work.
Hawker
Hawker
On 2/23/2011 11:08 AM, Ken wrote:
Hi guys. I need help with a Netscape matter. Briefly, I have several
years' of valuable emails stored in Netscape. For reasons
Interim response from Ken (in Oz) to the posts here so far.
Guys, your thoughts have been very welcome. I'm not a tech whiz, so I
may have to wait to do much until the middle of next week when a friend
can come and help out.
For example, I don't really understand cybercitizen's reference
Ken wrote:
Interim response from Ken (in Oz) to the posts here so far.
Guys, your thoughts have been very welcome. I'm not a tech whiz, so I
may have to wait to do much until the middle of next week when a friend
can come and help out.
For example, I don't really understand cybercitizen's
of them important ones.
How do I fix this? I never thought I would have a problem with
SeaMonkey - I have recommended it to so many people as being very
stable, so what has happened?
Please help!
*
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey
Rosemary Nayler wrote:
*Since downloading the upgrade to **SeaMonkey 2.0.11, I get constant
messages asking me to Download Now. To make matters worse, I have
somehow reverted back to SeaMonkey 1.1.18 where I was actually running
2.0.0.
I have lost most of my bookmarks and have lost a heap of
. by searching
C:\Program Files for seamonkey.exe (or directly navigate to where
you installed it if you chose a different location), start seamonkey.exe
from any one you find and check the version from Help/About SeaMonkey.
HTH
Jens
--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker
channel soon, going to beta as soon as I have
a few reports of the builds not being busted), so it's time for starting
tests on them to ensure we get an update out there that is worth
shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and Linux
packages, all
help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and Linux
packages, all available in 25 languages including US English.
The packages are available in the linux-i686, mac, and win32
subdirectories of
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0.12-candidates/build1/
Once
shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and Linux
packages, all available in 25 languages including US English.
The packages are available in the linux-i686, mac, and win32
subdirectories of
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly
Jonah Whale wrote:
user@domain.invalid schreef:
... anyone got a gud, free usenet news server
k
fb1.euro.net
Albasani.net
eternal-September.org
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it
http://www.phillipmjones.net/ mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
... anyone got a gud, free usenet news server
k
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
... anyone got a gud, free usenet news server
Use google ... you will find a lot but don't expect binaries groups.
Another thing is the quality .. some did not permit you to post, some
did not catch all posts, some have a small retention time, etc ...
You have to
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
... anyone got a gud, free usenet news server
k
Here is the server I use, but they only offer text newsgroups... no binary.
http://www.eternal-september.org/
bj
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Philip Chee wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:41:47 -0500, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 11/26/2010 10:02 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb:
snip
Detective Steve McGarrett won't be too happy.
Book 'em, Danno
Phil
Steve was Danno's boss, so was he a Detective Sargent
Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb:
p.s. It is looking like we'll need a build_2 to match what Firefox is
doing. They claim the change won't need additional QA time and is
extremely minor. But I haven't read too much on the issue yet.
The only change expected in there is one to satisfy Hawaii
On 11/26/2010 10:02 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb:
p.s. It is looking like we'll need a build_2 to match what Firefox is
doing. They claim the change won't need additional QA time and is
extremely minor. But I haven't read too much on the issue yet.
The only change
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:41:47 -0500, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 11/26/2010 10:02 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb:
p.s. It is looking like we'll need a build_2 to match what Firefox is
doing. They claim the change won't need additional QA time and is
extremely minor.
On 11/24/2010 01:16 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Hi everyone,
All the builds for SeaMonkey 2.0.11 have been created (updates are
I reckon you'd be better served by putting this in a new thread with the
above subject rather than under:
Testing SeaMonkey 2.0.9 candidates - help wanted!
See
On 11/25/2010 10:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/25/2010 07:13 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/24/2010 01:16 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Hi everyone,
All the builds for SeaMonkey 2.0.11 have been created (updates are
I reckon you'd be better served by putting this in a new thread with the
above subject
shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and Linux
packages, all available in 25 languages including US English.
The packages are available in the linux-i686, mac, and win32
subdirectories of
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly
Does Seamonkey have tools to automate this process?
If not - any suggestions - FREE would be good!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Hotkey wrote:
Does Seamonkey have tools to automate this process?
If not - any suggestions - FREE would be good!
Look at IrfanView.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
installers, Mac disk images and Linux packages of that new
version are now available in the linux-i686, mac, and win32
subdirectories of
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0.10-candidates/build1/
Please help us testing those, we want to know if they work as soon as
possible
oh i am sorry about that. i didnt realize was going to be publicly posted.
still need to work out pop server address so i can send direct via seamonkey -
privacy issues with inbox thats all. received email from dsame address but note
that obviously not - nothing a problem with SM though.
some
- and that page might
not even be fully complete (it's a wiki, help supplementing it if you
know items to add).
This is still new stuff and not a final release, so expect that many
add-ons don't work correctly (some do, though), and don't trust it with
any non-backed-up data (note that it will re-use your
shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and Linux
packages, all available in 24 languages including US English.
The packages are available in the linux-i686, mac, and win32
subdirectories of
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly
where does one get someone to help with sea-monkey? Is the the only/
right way?
How do I specify the exact font by number?
How do I sort the filers I make for mail?
If no filter sorting, what is easy way to find a filer without looking
through all hundreds or so filters
To create filters click on TOOLS then Message Filters.
Follow the steps carefully and you may create all of the
filters you will ever need.
Someone else will have to handle the fonts question as
that can get a lot more complicated.
don wrote: How do I sort the filers I make for mail? If no
On 9/19/10 1:04 PM, don wrote:
where does one get someone to help with sea-monkey? Is the the only/
right way?
How do I specify the exact font by number?
How do I sort the filers I make for mail?
If no filter sorting, what is easy way to find a filer without looking
through all hundreds
Have old tired eyes. Need to enlarge 2.07 bookmarks running in
sidebar on a Vista PC.
Have managed to get a larger font size for text, etc., but am stumped
as to where to look to enlarge bokmarks font size. Can accept doing
away with the icons, boxes, bars that proceed the bookmarks, if that
is
starrin wrote:
Have old tired eyes. Need to enlarge 2.07 bookmarks running in
sidebar on a Vista PC.
Have managed to get a larger font size for text, etc., but am stumped
as to where to look to enlarge bokmarks font size. Can accept doing
away with the icons, boxes, bars that proceed the
-candidates/build1/
Please help us testing those, we want to know if they work as soon as
possible so we can ship this update to our users possibly as early as
tomorrow, hopefully still this week, in any case.
Thanks a lot,
Robert Kaiser
___
support
denewton wrote:
Daniel a écrit :
denewton wrote:
Daniel a écrit :
denewton wrote:
Robert Kaiser a écrit :
snip
Hello A little problem : I rebuilt a profile while it has a bug (with
the download list). This bug is out in the new profile created. to
rebuilt the messages in the inbox ... no
an update out there
that is worth shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and
Linux packages, all available in 24 languages including US
English. The packages are available in the linux-i686, mac, and
win32 subdirectories of
http
for starting tests on them to ensure we get an update out there
that is worth shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and
Linux packages, all available in 24 languages including US
English. The packages are available in the linux-i686, mac, and
win32
it's time
for starting tests on them to ensure we get an update out there
that is worth shipping to all our 2.0.x users.
Please help us testing the Windows installers, Mac disk images and
Linux packages, all available in 24 languages including US
English. The packages are available in the linux
601 - 700 of 941 matches
Mail list logo
