Original Message
Interviewed by CNN on 28/08/2013 11:25, Roger Fink told the world:
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my own computing
Interviewed by CNN on 28/08/2013 11:25, Roger Fink told the world:
> I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
> state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
> need to do to gain control over my own computing decisions?
>
By &
Original Message
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my own computing decisions?
Note that one solution that used to work for this
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my own computing decisions?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support
Original Message
Roger Fink wrote:
For those who have had to disable the blocklist
(extensions.blocklist.enabled) in about:config to get java to work: the
latest java version (1.7.0.21) seems to work with the default setting
(true). At least that is the situation for me in
Roger Fink wrote:
For those who have had to disable the blocklist
(extensions.blocklist.enabled) in about:config to get java to work: the
latest java version (1.7.0.21) seems to work with the default setting
(true). At least that is the situation for me in SeaMonkey 2.15.2.
Others may
For those who have had to disable the blocklist
(extensions.blocklist.enabled) in about:config to get java to work: the
latest java version (1.7.0.21) seems to work with the default setting
(true). At least that is the situation for me in SeaMonkey 2.15.2.
Others may experience a different
Craig McCluskey wrote:
I clicked on the "upgrade to the latest version" link and was taken to
http://java.com/en/download/index.jsp . There I clicked on the red "Free
Java Download" button and ended up at
http://java.com/en/download/linux_manual.jsp?locale=en, which was "
GerardJan:
>Dear Hartmut,
>why don't you use a 64bit version of seamonkey?
I do. *g*
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 04/08/2013 07:26 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Craig McCluskey:
As I said before in my threads about not getting notifications of
updates, my OS is x86_64, BUT MY BROWSER is i686.
Sorry that i did not read those threads.
Hartmut
Dear Hartmut,
why don't you use a 64bit version of seamonkey?
Craig McCluskey:
>As I said before in my threads about not getting notifications of
>updates, my OS is x86_64, BUT MY BROWSER is i686.
Sorry that i did not read those threads.
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Craig McCluskey:
cd /usr/local/seamonkey
mkdir plugins
cd plugins
ln -s /usr/java/latest/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so .
You are using x86_64. Is the plugin in i386 the right one?
As I said before in my threads about not getting notifications of
updates, my OS is x86_64, BUT
Craig McCluskey:
>cd /usr/local/seamonkey
>mkdir plugins
>cd plugins
>ln -s /usr/java/latest/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so .
You are using x86_64. Is the plugin in i386 the right one?
>I restarted SeaMonkey, went to Tools -> Add-ons Manager and again saw
>that Java was missing.
I saw some information about Java working, so I went to Tools -> Add-ons
Manager and checked to see if I had Java running. I did not, so I
clicked on the link "Check to see if your plugins are up to date"
I did that and a new tab opened up which took me to
https://www.mozi
latest Java version 7 update 13 and Seamonkey does
not recognize the java upgrade.
When I click on "Help" and then go to "About plugins" it takes me to the
Mozilla Firefox website. The website says
"For your safety, Firefox has disabled your outdated version of Java.
Ple
Original Message
I just noticed that even though I have Java update 17 installed,
about:plugins says that I only have version 15 installed (this is true
for Firefox as well). Is this a glitch in the java release or do I
really have to bird-dog this?
Did a full uninstall of
I just noticed that even though I have Java update 17 installed,
about:plugins says that I only have version 15 installed (this is true
for Firefox as well). Is this a glitch in the java release or do I
really have to bird-dog this?
___
support
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 13:53, PhillipJones told the world:
> MCBastos wrote:
>> Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:43, PhillipJones told the world:
>>
>>> had a reading of 98/100 on SM 2.0.14
>>> failed miserably on Firefox 20.
>>
>> Seamonkey 2.0.14 is a bit old. It's not surprising tha
Roger Fink wrote:
> I understand that the "relationship" between the two is just an accident
> of language, or careless use of language, but the sequence of events was
> hard to miss and Win7 system restore did what it was supposed to do.
> Everything is fine now except that I'm back to the old
Original Message
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 09:47, MCBastos told the world:
By the way, there's a new Java out. Again. It seems Oracle never runs
out of holes to patch...
Addendum: they even updated Java 6, AFTER they said they wouldn't do
that anymore... must be a pretty em
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:43, PhillipJones told the world:
had a reading of 98/100 on SM 2.0.14
failed miserably on Firefox 20.
Seamonkey 2.0.14 is a bit old. It's not surprising that it didn't get a 100.
here's what it looked like on FireFox 20.05 (Think that's
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:43, PhillipJones told the world:
had a reading of 98/100 on SM 2.0.14
failed miserably on Firefox 20.
Seamonkey 2.0.14 is a bit old. It's not surprising that it didn't get a 100.
here's what it looked like on FireFox 20.05 (Think that's
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:43, PhillipJones told the world:
> had a reading of 98/100 on SM 2.0.14
> failed miserably on Firefox 20.
Seamonkey 2.0.14 is a bit old. It's not surprising that it didn't get a 100.
>
> here's what it looked like on FireFox 20.05 (Think that's the latest
>
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
I reverted back to 1.7.0.15
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
I reverted back to 1.7.0.15
Original Message
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
I
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 12:04, Roger Fink told the world:
> FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
> also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
> experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
>
> I reverted back to
FWIW, while the latest java update, 1.7.0.17 appears to work well, it
also knocks out javascript in SeaMonkey 2.15.2, at least that was my
experience (Firefox 18.0.1 was unaffected).
I reverted back to 1.7.0.15.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Interviewed by CNN on 05/03/2013 09:47, MCBastos told the world:
> By the way, there's a new Java out. Again. It seems Oracle never runs
> out of holes to patch...
>
Addendum: they even updated Java 6, AFTER they said they wouldn't do
that anymore... must be a pret
By the way, there's a new Java out. Again. It seems Oracle never runs
out of holes to patch...
--
MCBastos
This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my Barbie Dream Computer.
* Added by TagZilla
Rickles wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/3/13 12:23 PM, Rickles wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 02/03/2013 15:51, question told the world:
My wife has not used her computer this week.. So this explains why
Java works on hers this morning..on pogo
Block list has not been
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/3/13 12:23 PM, Rickles wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 02/03/2013 15:51, question told the world:
My wife has not used her computer this week.. So this explains why
Java works on hers this morning..on pogo
Block list has not been updated more in
Original Message
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/3/13 12:23 PM, Rickles wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 02/03/2013 15:51, question told the world:
My wife has not used her computer this week.. So this explains why
Java works on hers this morning..on pogo
question wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/3/13 12:23 PM, Rickles wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 02/03/2013 15:51, question told the world:
My wife has not used her computer this week.. So this explains why
Java works on hers this morning..on pogo
Block list has not
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/3/13 12:23 PM, Rickles wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 02/03/2013 15:51, question told the world:
My wife has not used her computer this week.. So this explains why
Java works on hers this morning..on pogo
Block list has not been updated more in
On 3/3/13 12:23 PM, Rickles wrote:
> MCBastos wrote:
>> Interviewed by CNN on 02/03/2013 15:51, question told the world:
>>
>>>My wife has not used her computer this week.. So this explains why
>>> Java works on hers this morning..on pogo
>>>Bloc
It's possible that -- beyond the default "click-to-run" imposed by the
block list -- you have your Java plugin manually set to "disabled" in
the Add-Ons Manager. Why it got that way, I have no idea. But do check
that. I saw a computer like that a few days ago -- after m
Interviewed by CNN on 03/03/2013 17:23, Rickles told the world:
> You raise a point I'd appreciate clarification on: explicit OK from the
> user. The problem several of us have is that, when visiting a site
> which uses Java, we are not ASKED if it's OK to run Java, the s
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 02/03/2013 15:51, question told the world:
My wife has not used her computer this week.. So this explains why
Java works on hers this morning..on pogo
Block list has not been updated more in likely.
Both computers are identical...
But her JAVA is
Interviewed by CNN on 02/03/2013 15:51, question told the world:
> My wife has not used her computer this week.. So this explains why
> Java works on hers this morning..on pogo
> Block list has not been updated more in likely.
> Both computers are identical...
> But h
Original Message
Rickles wrote:
question wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Se 7 u15 seamonkey 2.16
worked this morning ..
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p294
Why was it blocked?
Old versions of the Java plugin are
Rickles wrote:
question wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Se 7 u15 seamonkey 2.16
worked this morning ..
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p294
Why was it blocked?
Old versions of the Java plugin are potentially insecure and
unstable
question wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Se 7 u15 seamonkey 2.16
worked this morning ..
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p294
Why was it blocked?
Old versions of the Java plugin are potentially insecure and
unstable. All users are
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Se 7 u15 seamonkey 2.16
worked this morning ..
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p294
Why was it blocked?
Old versions of the Java plugin are potentially insecure and
unstable. All users are strongly recommended
Original Message
Se 7 u15 seamonkey 2.16
worked this morning ..
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p294
Why was it blocked?
Old versions of the Java plugin are potentially insecure and
unstable. All users are strongly recommended to update on our
Se 7 u15 seamonkey 2.16
worked this morning ..
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p294
Why was it blocked?
Old versions of the Java plugin are potentially insecure and
unstable. All users are strongly recommended to update on our plugin
check page.
Who is affected
Original Message
Hi!
The way our blocklist is generated has been updated. Please help us
test. The latest version of Java should not be blocked.
See Bug 754622 ([linux] Oracle/Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 and later does not
work in SeaMonkey)[1].
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
On 2/22/13 10:40 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 2/22/13 9:02 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> The way our blocklist is generated has been updated. Please help us
>> test. The latest version of Java should not be blocked.
>> See Bug 754622 ([linux] Oracle/Sun Ja
Philip Chee wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The way our blocklist is generated has been updated. Please help us
> test. The latest version of Java should not be blocked.
> See Bug 754622 ([linux] Oracle/Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 and later does not
> work in SeaMonkey)[1].
>
> [1] http
On 2/22/13 9:02 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The way our blocklist is generated has been updated. Please help us
> test. The latest version of Java should not be blocked.
> See Bug 754622 ([linux] Oracle/Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 and later does not
> work in SeaMonkey)[
Hi!
The way our blocklist is generated has been updated. Please help us
test. The latest version of Java should not be blocked.
See Bug 754622 ([linux] Oracle/Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 and later does not
work in SeaMonkey)[1].
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622#c46
Phil
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 14/02/2013 22:21, David E. Ross told the world:
On 2/14/13 3:12 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works
David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/14/13 3:12 PM, WaltS wrote:
I never come across any that require Java.
Try <http://davesfiles.com/HTML/hex_decimal_color_picker.htm>. This
is NOT a game. This is a tool that I use when creating Web pages
when I need a colored background or colored text.
PhillipJones wrote:
Since Mozilla has declared war on Java I would suggest you use chrome
if you want to use Java. I'm getting more frustrated with SeaMonkey
and Fire fox. Jav don't work and they keep messing with JavaScript so
half the websites I go to for JavaScript to work I Hav
Interviewed by CNN on 14/02/2013 22:21, David E. Ross told the world:
> On 2/14/13 3:12 PM, WaltS wrote:
>> On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
>>> Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
>>>
>>>I have the newest and have removed the old ve
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but many sites ..
If i want to take
question wrote:
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 07:31 PM, question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 07:31 PM, question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 07:31 PM, question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the
On 02/14/2013 07:31 PM, question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it
David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/14/13 3:12 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but
WaltS wrote:
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but many sites
David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/14/13 3:12 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but
On 2/14/13 3:12 PM, WaltS wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
>> Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
>>
>>I have the newest and have removed the old version..
>>
>> And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not o
question wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but many sites ..
If i
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but many sites ..
If i want to take my
WaltS wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but many sites ..
If i want to take my
On 02/14/2013 06:01 PM, question wrote:
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but many sites ..
If i want to take my Chances on JAVA
Why do the seamonkey people keep messing with JAVA .
I have the newest and have removed the old version..
And Still JAVA works one Day but not the next DAy and it is not on just
one SITE but many sites ..
If i want to take my Chances on JAVA, Then So be it..and Quit stopping
me
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:55:57 -0200
MCBastos wrote:
> Interviewed by CNN on 07/02/2013 03:58, Philip Chee told the world:
> > On 07/02/2013 06:05, MCBastos wrote:
> >> Actually, Phil, the Permissions Manager UI in Firefox 18
> >> (reachable by about:permissions) does allow you to override
> >> pre
Interviewed by CNN on 07/02/2013 03:58, Philip Chee told the world:
> On 07/02/2013 06:05, MCBastos wrote:
>> Actually, Phil, the Permissions Manager UI in Firefox 18 (reachable by
>> about:permissions) does allow you to override preferences for Store
>> Passwords, Share Location, Set Cookies, Open
On 07/02/2013 06:05, MCBastos wrote:
> Interviewed by CNN on 06/02/2013 03:31, Philip Chee told the world:
>
>> but you asked for the equivalent of Firefox about:permissions which only
>> allows you to enable/disable plugins globally. Please make up your mind
>> which you want.
>
> Actually, Phil
Interviewed by CNN on 06/02/2013 03:31, Philip Chee told the world:
> but you asked for the equivalent of Firefox about:permissions which only
> allows you to enable/disable plugins globally. Please make up your mind
> which you want.
Actually, Phil, the Permissions Manager UI in Firefox 18 (reac
NoOp wrote:
On 02/01/2013 08:15 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
That said, I'd still turn on Java *only* if it is absolutely necessary &
then *turn it off* when no longer necessary.
Interesting...
The site you linked reported my speeds in SE Pennsylvania based on the
t;> changes to which plugins were enabled. This does not exist in
>>> SeaMonkey. Will SeaMonkey get this?
>> Edit->Preferences->Advanced->Scripts & Plugins.
>> Enable Plugins for
>> [ ] Suite.
>>
>> Phil
> Not quite what I want. I
On 02/01/2013 08:15 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
...
>> That said, I'd still turn on Java *only* if it is absolutely necessary &
>> then *turn it off* when no longer necessary.
>
> Interesting...
>
> The site you linked reported my speeds in SE P
Well for reasons I don't understand Java 7u11 didn't work in my
Seamonkey build of 2.12.1 and 7u13 does.
I know I'm running an older version (to many scary issues since 2.12 for
me to be comfortable updating yet) so YMMV.
On 2/1/2013 9:50 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Does the bro
On 2/5/13 8:44 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 00:31, David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 2/1/13 6:50 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
>>> Does the broad blocklisting of Java extend to this new version 7u13?
>>>
>>> Having enabled Java 7u11 for two specific Web sites,
On 05/02/2013 00:31, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 2/1/13 6:50 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
>> Does the broad blocklisting of Java extend to this new version 7u13?
>>
>> Having enabled Java 7u11 for two specific Web sites, how do I clear that?
>>
>> Yes, I posted this b
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
I wonder... I visit <http://myspeed.visualware.com/index.php> where I
need both flash an java. I find that I have to turn on both individually
to get the speed test to work correctly: flash to select the region, and
java to p
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
I wonder... I visit <http://myspeed.visualware.com/index.php> where I
need both flash an java. I find that I have to turn on both individually
to get the speed test to work correctly: flash to select the region, and
java to perform the speed test
On 2/1/13 6:50 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
> Does the broad blocklisting of Java extend to this new version 7u13?
>
> Having enabled Java 7u11 for two specific Web sites, how do I clear that?
>
> Yes, I posted this before. But I never saw it appear more than an hour
> later, so
On 2/1/13, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>
>> I wonder... I visit <http://myspeed.visualware.com/index.php> where I
>> need both flash an java. I find that I have to turn on both individually
>> to get the speed test to work correctly: flash to select the
>>>> After some more testing (the new profile that worked yesterday has again
>>>> ceased to do so today) it seems that pluginreg.dat might be the culprit,
>>>> which doesn't even sound far-fetched with hindsight...
>>>>
>>>
>>
On 2/1/13 8:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 06:50 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
>> Does the broad blocklisting of Java extend to this new version 7u13?
>>
>> Having enabled Java 7u11 for two specific Web sites, how do I clear that?
>>
>> Yes, I posted this before
On 02/01/2013 06:50 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
> Does the broad blocklisting of Java extend to this new version 7u13?
>
> Having enabled Java 7u11 for two specific Web sites, how do I clear that?
>
> Yes, I posted this before. But I never saw it appear more than an hour
> lat
NoOp wrote:
I wonder... I visit <http://myspeed.visualware.com/index.php> where I
need both flash an java. I find that I have to turn on both individually
to get the speed test to work correctly: flash to select the region, and
java to perform the speed test. If I bypass the flash requi
ceased to do so today) it seems that pluginreg.dat might be the culprit,
>>> which doesn't even sound far-fetched with hindsight...
>>>
>>
>> https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-to-use-java-if-its-been-blocked
>>
>>
> Just a comment, The "always
Does the broad blocklisting of Java extend to this new version 7u13?
Having enabled Java 7u11 for two specific Web sites, how do I clear that?
Yes, I posted this before. But I never saw it appear more than an hour
later, so I posted it again.
--
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>
David E. Ross wrote:
Does the broad blocklisting of Java extend to this new version?
WFM, not disabled.
Don't know if that's because Mozilla has approved it or failed to notice it.
Having enabled Java 7u11 for two specific Web sites, how do I remove that?
Are the sites lis
Does the broad blocklisting of Java extend to this new version?
Having enabled Java 7u11 for two specific Web sites, how do I remove that?
--
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>
Are taxes too high in the U.S.? Check the bar graph
at <http://www.rossde.com/taxes/trickling.htm
someone might know the
solution.
After some more testing (the new profile that worked yesterday has again
ceased to do so today) it seems that pluginreg.dat might be the culprit,
which doesn't even sound far-fetched with hindsight...
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-to-use-java-if-its
Matthias Kahlert wrote:
Am 31.01.2013 17:30, schrieb Roger Fink:
Here's something simple that I think is worth trying, and I would be very
interested in the results you come up with. We both have sites where java
won't launch. But here is a site where it works for me:
http://www.tim
;> which doesn't even sound far-fetched with hindsight...
>>
>
> https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-to-use-java-if-its-been-blocked
Where it does work I do get the grey "lego-brick", but in some cases I
don't get anything (just an empty space).
I now
Am 31.01.2013 17:30, schrieb Roger Fink:
> Here's something simple that I think is worth trying, and I would be very
> interested in the results you come up with. We both have sites where java
> won't launch. But here is a site where it works for me:
> http://www.time.gov
task, so I hoped someone might know the
> solution.
>
> After some more testing (the new profile that worked yesterday has again
> ceased to do so today) it seems that pluginreg.dat might be the culprit,
> which doesn't even sound far-fetched with hindsight...
>
https://supp
Matthias Kahlert wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 17:11, schrieb Roger Fink:
>> Matthias Kahlert wrote:
>
>
>>> On other user-profiles on the same pc everything is fine (and it
>>> also used to work with older versions of jre), so I rule out the
>>> seamonkey and
Am 31.01.2013 10:43, schrieb Rob:
> Matthias Kahlert
>
> wrote:
>> Am 30.01.2013 17:11, schrieb Roger Fink:
>>> Matthias Kahlert wrote:
>> It must be in some way profile related. If I delete the old profile and
>> create a new one from scratch it works again, even if I copy the old
>> prefs.js
101 - 200 of 570 matches
Mail list logo
