Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on this?
I have found when I get one of those flickering pages, I simply click
anywhere on the windows task
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users.
Why isn't
Otto Wyss sent me the following::
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users. Why isn't anyone working on this?
Is it always the same page? Your
On 11-10-26 11:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions with
the powers to be here (read that as the list mom) over me
On Oct 27, 2:35 pm, Chris Ilias n...@ilias.ca wrote:
On 11-10-26 11:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions with
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/25/11 6:13 AM, Larry wrote:
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users.
Why isn't
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/25/11 10:19 AM, Larry wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/25/11 6:13 AM, Larry wrote:
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is
visble at all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users
because of this, lots of
NoOp wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is
visble at all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users
because of this,
NoOp wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is
visble at all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users
because of this,
WLS wrote:
76 lines of regurgitated context, followed by
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Is it really, Really, REALLY necessary to recirculate 76 lines
of previously circulated correspondence, nested to a depth of
eight levels, simply in order to adduce this one simple fact ?
Do
WLS wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I'll now install 2.5.3 check the difference.
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Ummm 2.5b3:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111012
Firefox/8.0 SeaMonkey/2.5
___
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
WLS wrote:
76 lines of regurgitated context, followed by
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Is it really, Really, REALLY necessary to recirculate 76 lines
of previously circulated correspondence, nested to a depth of
eight levels, simply in
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
WLS wrote:
76 lines of regurgitated context, followed by
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Is it really, Really, REALLY necessary to recirculate 76 lines
of previously circulated correspondence, nested to a depth of
eight levels, simply in
NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions
with the powers to be here (read that as the list mom) over me
requesting others trim etc. (Archives).
Hard to imagine how
On 10/26/2011 1:55 PM NoOp submitted the following:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
WLS wrote:
76 lines of regurgitated context, followed by
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Is it really, Really, REALLY necessary to recirculate 76 lines
of previously circulated
On 10/26/2011 11:05 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions
with the powers to be here (read that as the list mom)
NoOp wrote:
Please don't send me direct email, or cc me on your replies - unless of
course you purposely intend to take this discussion off group/list. I
read the newsgroup just fine don't need additional copies. Thanks.
Since I /did/ send it to you (you being NoOp, despite this
reply
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Since I /did/ send it to you (you being NoOp, despite this
reply being sent to the list), and did /not/ send it to the list,
it would seem reasonable for you to infer that I /did/ intend to take
the discussion off list.
Apologies, on checking my sent
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Re: SeaMonkey is loosing users -- that would be losing g, loosing means
un-tightening.
No, that's loosening; loosing is the action of
releasing something, as in to loose the dogs of war.
Philip Taylor (who sees
On 10/26/2011 11:45 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Since I /did/ send it to you (you being NoOp, despite this
reply being sent to the list), and did /not/ send it to the list,
it would seem reasonable for you to infer that I /did/
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions with
the powers to be here (read that as the list mom) over me requesting
others trim etc. (Archives).
Do
On 10/26/2011 06:00 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions with
the powers to be here (read that as the list mom) over
On 11-10-26 9:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 10/26/2011 06:00 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions with
the powers to be here
On 10/26/2011 07:56 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-10-26 9:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 10/26/2011 06:00 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on this?
I do not understand this. SM works
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users. Why isn't anyone working on this?
Is it always the same page? Your start page, perhaps? Give a URL
WLS wrote:
How many users have they lost? How many users do you think they have?
As a computer specialist I care for the computers of about 10 people. So far I
always install them SeaMonkey yet lately 3 asked me to replace SeaMonkey with
another browser (Chrome) because of flickering. So my
Otto Wyss wrote:
WLS wrote:
How many users have they lost? How many users do you think they have?
As a computer specialist I care for the computers of about 10 people.
So far I always install them SeaMonkey yet lately 3 asked me to
replace SeaMonkey with another browser (Chrome) because of
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on this?
I do not understand this. SM
Otto Wyss wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users. Why isn't anyone working on this?
Is it always the same page? Your start page,
On 10/25/11 6:13 AM, Larry wrote:
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on
On 10/25/11 5:32 AM, Otto Wyss wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users. Why isn't anyone working on this?
Is it always the same page?
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all. No
question
SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users. Why isn't anyone
working
on this?
i HAVE seen this happen because of the way a PAGE is described. Some pages
setup
background(s)
Otto Wyss wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users. Why isn't anyone working on this?
Is it always the same page? Your start page,
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on this?
I
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/25/11 6:13 AM, Larry wrote:
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Re: SeaMonkey is loosing users -- that would be losing g, loosing means
un-tightening.
No, that's loosening; loosing is the action of
releasing something, as in to loose the dogs of war.
Philip Taylor (who sees flickers).
Interviewed by CNN on 25/10/2011 14:34, NoOp told the world:
As far as I can tell, it's a Windows build issue. See my comments in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664088
Just scrolling up and down that bug report with 2.4.1 on WinXP created
screen flicker. No flicker with 2.5.x.
On 10/25/2011 04:20 PM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 25/10/2011 14:34, NoOp told the world:
As far as I can tell, it's a Windows build issue. See my comments in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664088
Just scrolling up and down that bug report with 2.4.1 on WinXP
On 10/25/11 10:19 AM, Larry wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/25/11 6:13 AM, Larry wrote:
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all. No
question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users. Why isn't
anyone working on this?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users. Why isn't anyone working on this?
Is it always the same page? Your start page, perhaps? Give a URL to a
page where you see this
On 10/24/2011 2:16 AM Otto Wyss submitted the following:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all. No
question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users. Why isn't
anyone working on this?
Problem appears to have been fixed on 2.5
--
Ed, W3BNR
to a
page where you see this flicker.
I've never seen a flicker of any kind, at the rather normal web pages I
and my wife visit. We are using 2.4.1 with Ubuntu/GNOME 11.04.
I'd more suspect your video driver or something else in your OS.
BTS, message header says SeaMonkey flickers horrible when
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:16:45 +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on this?
I did not notice this behavior with SeaMonkey 2.4 when I was
horrible when first
accessing a page so I'm guessing it's a once only effect, or maybe
clearing the cache might display the effect.
That's why I asked Otto for the URL of his start page. :-)
(and I don't remember mention of this problem, but I'm an old guy.)
--
-bts
-This space for rent
On 10/23/11 11:16 PM, Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all. No
question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users. Why isn't
anyone working on this?
There are several bug reports on this.
Bug #662871 specifically addresses
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on this?
I do not understand this. SM works faultlessly for me and I have
limited computer ability and also
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on this?
I do not understand this. SM works faultlessly for me and I
David E. Ross wrote:
Maximize your SeaMoneky window on your monitor. On your menu bar,
select [Tools Data Manager]. Without switching tabs or changing the
window size, move your cursor over the Data Manager display. You should
see flickers as the cursor crosses the edges of panes in the
I do not understand this. SM works faultlessly for me and I have
limited computer ability and also for SWAMBO who has none.
Maximize your SeaMoneky window on your monitor. On your menu bar,
select [Tools Data Manager]. Without switching tabs or changing the
window size, move your cursor
On 10/24/2011 4:00 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users. Why isn't anyone working on this?
Is it always the same page? Your start page,
55 matches
Mail list logo
