On Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 12:57:41 PM UTC-6, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:
> On 17/02/2021 03:28, AK wrote:
> > When I post a question here, the box for "post your question" disappears
> > when I hover my mouse over it.
> >
> > https://askubuntu.com/
&
On 17/02/2021 03:28, AK wrote:
When I post a question here, the box for "post your question" disappears when I
hover my mouse over it.
https://askubuntu.com/
It acts normally with Firefox.
Any idea what is causing it?
The button has this CSS background-color from its class s-bt
When I post a question here, the box for "post your question" disappears when I
hover my mouse over it.
https://askubuntu.com/
It acts normally with Firefox.
Any idea what is causing it?
Thanks
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support
I was foolish enough to upgrade to Big Sur when Apple asked me to!!
Now I can't get SeaMonkey Composer to create a link. When it tries to add the
link dialog box it freezes. I upgraded to the latest standard release (2.53.4
en) and it is still true. The browser also hangs on a dialog
Hello everybody,
Whenever I try to open a Teams event from within Seamonkey (Windows 64bit
2.49.5) the browser starts opening empty tabs one after the other at an amazing
speed. I mean in 5 seconds at least 30 and unless I kill the process it will
keep going indefinitely. Killing it from the Ta
On 5/9/2020 2:36 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
...
Also, when did SM start using this list? I have never seen and heard
of this one before. :)
I don't know exactly. Searching my email archives (not every message on
this list, only threads I had an interest in) I
On 5/9/2020 4:49 PM, Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-05-08, Ant wrote:
[...]
However, you said HSTS earlier which I saw a few in
https://badssl.com's list. I tried its red
https://subdomain.preloaded-hsts.badssl.com which was probably the
closest to the one I ran into last night, but it also let me a
On 2020-05-08, Ant wrote:
[...]
> However, you said HSTS earlier which I saw a few in
> https://badssl.com's list. I tried its red
> https://subdomain.preloaded-hsts.badssl.com which was probably the
> closest to the one I ran into last night, but it also let me add an
> exception. It didn't show
say they'd fixed their certificate now anyway?
If that's the case, there's no point deleting the entries, since they'll
probably be added back next time you visit the site.
Also, when did SM start using this list? I have never seen and heard of this
one before. :)
I don&
ow anyway? If that's the case, there's no point
deleting the entries, since they'll probably be added back next time you
visit the site.
Also, when did SM start using this list? I have never seen and heard of
this one before. :)
I don't know exactly. Searching my email
securely. As a result, it is not
possible to add an exception for this certificate.
When you've visited the site before, it's indicated that it uses
HSTS, so SeaMonkey won't allow insecure connections in future.
You probably haven't visited the site before in Firefox, so th
certificate.
When you've visited the site before, it's indicated that it uses HSTS,
so SeaMonkey won't allow insecure connections in future.
You probably haven't visited the site before in Firefox, so that doesn't
know the site uses HSTS and allows the exception.
this certificate.
When you've visited the site before, it's indicated that it uses HSTS,
so SeaMonkey won't allow insecure connections in future.
You probably haven't visited the site before in Firefox, so that
doesn't know the site uses HSTS and allows the exception.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present trusted
identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this
website's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to this website without problems, this error could
Ant wrote:
Hello.
https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:
"This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely
On 5/8/2020 2:47 PM, rmpbklyn wrote:
try another webbrowser or phone to isolate.
check that an adblocker is not conflicting eg, in terminal type ping
eg, ping google.com
see if you get response, if not might be the firewall
you can also clear the dns cache,depends on the os and brower
try a d
showed the one I was looking for:
"This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to expired.badssl.com, but
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present
trusted identification to prov
urrently says:
>
> "This Connection is Untrusted
>
> You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but
> we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
>
> Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present
> trusted
ey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place.
However, this website's identity can't be ve
ey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place.
However, this website's identity can't be ve
nnect securely to
videos.antville.org, but we can't confirm that your connection is
secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right
place. However, this website's identity can't be verified.
W
On 5/8/2020 2:03 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:
"This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to
videos.antville.org, but we can't confirm that your connection is
secure.
Nor
;t confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present trusted
identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However,
this website's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to
;t confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right
place. However, this website's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to
that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites will present
trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right
place. However, this website's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to this website wi
Daniel a écrit :
Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:
Hello.
https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:
"This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org,
but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Norm
Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 2:46 PM:
Hello.
https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:
"This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try
Hello.
https://videos.antville.org web site (not mine) currently says:
"This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to videos.antville.org, but
we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, websites wi
Can You correct the URL, please.
--
Julia Bolton Holloway, Mediatheca 'Fioretta Mazzei', 'English' Cemetery,
Piazzale Donatello, 38,
I-50132 Firenze, Italy
http://www.umilta.net http://www.florin.ms http://www.ringofgold.eu
http://piazzaledonatello.blogspot.com
_
Frank-Rainer Grahl writes:
>
> It will not work. You need 5.1.9 as indicated in the release notes. Why do you
> think we explicity wrote this when the latest would work too?
Because I am such a fool, and I forget half of what I
Thanks!
I tried to install the latest version of noscript anyway by installing
from a file. It successfully installed, but it didn't seem to work. No
icons appeared. Maybe there is a simple fix like you indicate for
session manager. I think not though as it did not seem to stop any
scripts by defa
stop any
scripts by default.
It will not work. You need 5.1.9 as indicated in the release notes. Why do you
think we explicity wrote this when the latest would work too? The same for
uBlock. web extensions is a mess and will only made to work in 2.57 (or no
2.57). It does currently not work
On 3/10/2020 3:45 PM, NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
Your version of uBlock Origin is out of date. The current legacy
version is 1.16.4.19. There is a new site just for the legacy
versions now.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/releases
I hadn't seen that update number. A
EE wrote:
Your version of uBlock Origin is out of date. The current legacy
version is 1.16.4.19. There is a new site just for the legacy versions
now.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/releases
I hadn't seen that update number. Although I'm inclined to blame my VM
ins
then re-insert into the .XPI file), and when I
reinstalled the extension with this fix, Session Manager is working as I
expect.
Smith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 3/10/2020 12:51 PM, EE wrote:
...
Your version of uBlock Origin is out of date. The current legacy
version is 1.16.4.19. There is a new site just for the legacy versions
now.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/releases
How do you manage to scroll with the spacebar? Why n
EE:
>Your version of uBlock Origin is out of date. The current legacy
>version is 1.16.4.19. There is a new site just for the legacy versions now.
>https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/releases
Thanks. I have now updated from 4.11 to 4.19 and saved the link.
Hartmut
__
hat, I had
problems in the mail client, especially with using the space bar as a
trigger for scrolling text in mail windows (but not web pages). When I
downgraded back to 1.7.0 and that problem went away.
I just checked my 2.53.2 installation (I haven't yet upgraded my main
machine from
On 3/6/2020 2:37 PM, Steve Dunn wrote:
> There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that work in
> 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been posting here.
> I can't say I'm surprised, given that the developers have to try to
> maintain compatibility with an ob
ing
Seamonkey, Palemoon and Waterfox.
With Seamonkey, I believe that 2.53.1 is based on Firefox 56 (rather
than 50.9esr) . For 2.57, I believe that it's based on Firefox 60esr,
and my understanding is that 2.57 will support both WebExtensions and
XUL, in the way that Thunderbird does,
So SM is based on FF 60, that is not pre-gecko 57 is it? unless the
versions of ff and gecko are not the same.
I was told SM v2.53.1 was based on FF v57. 60 is just an UA string.
--
"Not to engage in the pursuit of ideas is to live like ants instead of
men." --Mortimer J. Adler
Note: A fixed wi
NFN Smith wrote:
> * NoScript 5.1.9
I am curious to know why it is necessary to use 5.1.9 and not the latest
version, given what it says on the noscript website "You can still
download NoScript "Classic" (5.1.9) (SHA256) for Palemoon, Seamonkey,
Waterfox and possibly other "vintage" (pre-Gecko 57
Daniel wrote on 9/03/2020 4:01 PM:
Steve Dunn wrote on 9/03/2020 1:39 AM:
On 2020-03-08 04:43, Daniel wrote:
If "I mostly use SeaMonkey for email and newsgroups" why not use
Thunderbird in place of SeaMonkey?? That would save using resources
on the unused Browser portion of SM!
Eventual
s in the mail client, especially with using the space bar as a
trigger for scrolling text in mail windows (but not web pages). When I
downgraded back to 1.7.0 and that problem went away.
I just checked my 2.53.2 installation (I haven't yet upgraded my main
machine from 2.49.5 yet), and w
Steve Dunn wrote on 9/03/2020 1:39 AM:
On 2020-03-08 04:43, Daniel wrote:
If "I mostly use SeaMonkey for email and newsgroups" why not use
Thunderbird in place of SeaMonkey?? That would save using resources on
the unused Browser portion of SM!
Eventually that will probably be necessary,
On 2020-03-08 04:43, Daniel wrote:
If "I mostly use SeaMonkey for email and newsgroups" why not use
Thunderbird in place of SeaMonkey?? That would save using resources on
the unused Browser portion of SM!
Eventually that will probably be necessary, but as long as SeaMonkey
works, there's not
Steve Dunn wrote on 8/03/2020 2:49 AM:
On 2020-03-06 18:09, Ant wrote:
You could share what extensions you have and we can tell you. Here's
mine:
The most important ones for me are:
* JunQuilla 1.0.4
* Adblock Plus 2.9.1 (which the 2.53.1 release notes say is problematic,
but someone el
On 3/7/2020 4:17 AM, 🐴 Mr. Ed 🐴 wrote:
...
No ad blocker, horsey? :/
Yeh, done by the usage of the Windows 'hosts' file:
http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
Ah. Does using hosts mostly work? I have to use all! Hosts, web
browsers' ad blockers, etc.
--
"If I find one beer can in that car, it's
On 3/7/2020 11:47 AM, EE wrote:
Steve Dunn wrote:
There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that
work in 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been
posting here. I can't say I'm surprised, given that the developers
have to try to maintain compatibility with a
On 3/7/2020 7:49 AM, Steve Dunn wrote:
On 2020-03-06 18:09, Ant wrote:
You could share what extensions you have and we can tell you. Here's
mine:
The most important ones for me are:
* JunQuilla 1.0.4
* Adblock Plus 2.9.1 (which the 2.53.1 release notes say is problematic,
but someone el
Ant wrote:
On 3/6/2020 2:37 PM, Steve Dunn wrote:
There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that
work in 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been
posting here. I can't say I'm surprised, given that the developers
have to try to maintain compatibility with a
Steve Dunn wrote:
There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that work
in 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been posting
here. I can't say I'm surprised, given that the developers have to try
to maintain compatibility with an obsolete extension system while
On 2020-03-06 18:09, Ant wrote:
You could share what extensions you have and we can tell you. Here's mine:
The most important ones for me are:
* JunQuilla 1.0.4
* Adblock Plus 2.9.1 (which the 2.53.1 release notes say is problematic,
but someone else in this thread is also using)
* H
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Extensions were not a issue, it was *plugins* where the real winnowing
> occurred. I had to add "PDF Viewer" to replace my lost Nitro PDF viewer
> plugin.
Oh and now Netflix does not work now, (Silverlight plugin maybe?),
except this is ONLY on my Windows 10 desktop. It
🐴 Mr. Ed 🐴 wrote:
> On 3/6/2020 6:09 PM, Ant wrote:
>> On 3/6/2020 2:37 PM, Steve Dunn wrote:
>>> There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that
>>> work in 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been
>>> posting here. I can't say I'm surprised, given that the deve
On 3/7/2020 12:21 AM, Ant wrote:
On
3/6/2020 6:22 PM, 🐴 Mr. Ed 🐴 wrote:
On 3/6/2020 6:09 PM, Ant wrote:
On 3/6/2020 2:37 PM, Steve Dunn wrote:
There seems to be a fair bit of
potential for extensions that
On 3/6/2020 6:22 PM, 🐴 Mr. Ed 🐴 wrote:
On 3/6/2020 6:09 PM, Ant wrote:
On 3/6/2020 2:37 PM, Steve Dunn wrote:
There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that work in
2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been posting here. I
can't say I'm surprised, given that
On 3/6/2020 6:09 PM, Ant wrote:
On
3/6/2020 2:37 PM, Steve Dunn wrote:
There seems to be a fair bit of
potential for extensions that work in 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1,
based on what people have been posting here. I can't say I'm
su
On 3/6/2020 2:37 PM, Steve Dunn wrote:
There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that work
in 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been posting
here. I can't say I'm surprised, given that the developers have to try
to maintain compatibility with an obsolete e
There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that work in
2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been posting here.
I can't say I'm surprised, given that the developers have to try to
maintain compatibility with an obsolete extension system while grafting
in component
Hi,
I have some strange dataloss effects when I do multiple edits in a
Crabgrass-Wiki. More Details at
<https://we.riseup.net/hilfe/hilfeseiten-sammlung#post_2190169_body>.
Any ideas?
CU
Rainer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-sea
Hello ,
Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03668292 and it is being
processed by our Support team.
To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.
Best,
TheFork team
TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company
___
support-seamonkey m
On 11/11/2019 9:09 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 9/26/2019 12:00 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:
What specifically works for you on the Chase.com website? I can logon
to their website with UA of Firefox 52, which is what 2.49.5 derives
from, but using the default UA loops. I
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
> On 9/26/2019 12:00 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:
>>
>> What specifically works for you on the Chase.com website? I can logon
>> to their website with UA of Firefox 52, which is what 2.49.5 derives
>> from, but using the default UA loops. I can logon with later Firefox UA
>> s
I just read
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2019-09-29. It says
"... There seems to be a bug in masOS 10.15. bug 1578075 which provides
a workaround has been fixed for 2.53. We might need to do a 2.49.6
release if the final macOS version still causes problems with 2.49.5."
ht
It's always a good idea NOT to upgrade to the newest major versions
right away like iOS v13 and other softwares. Things can break like this.
Always wait until they work out the bugs.
If you really must upgrade and can't wait, then be warned of possible
issues and make back ups before doing it
There is a high chance that 2.49.5 will not work reliably with 10.15. I am
already seeing crashes from people using the macOS Beta.
There are still bugs open even for latest Firefox and it is unclear if they
will be resolved for the general 10.15 release. So please at least wait. We do
not pla
David E. Ross wrote on 09/26/2019 05:07 PM:
On 9/26/2019 1:31 AM, Ant wrote:
On 9/25/2019 12:34 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
[snipped]
I have encountered only one Web site that does not work with SeaMonbkey,
even if I spoof Firefox or Internet Explorer. It is
...
http://web.skype.com i
for confirming this, so this is not something peculiar to me
and possibly my profile. I would be interested to hear from anyone who
is testing 2.53 or 2.57 to see if either of them have a functioning
download on the site. I will be upgrading to 2.53 when it is released,
and it will be interestin
On 9/26/2019 12:00 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:
What specifically works for you on the Chase.com website? I can logon
to their website with UA of Firefox 52, which is what 2.49.5 derives
from, but using the default UA loops. I can logon with later Firefox UA
settings up to and including the curr
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
> On 9/25/2019 10:37 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
>> As of 23 September the Chase website no longer works properly with
>> 2.49.5 here. I find it is impossible to download transactions from a
>> credit card account, the button to do so no longer works.
>>
>> I complained to Cha
On 9/26/2019 8:07 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 9/26/2019 1:31 AM, Ant wrote:
On 9/25/2019 12:34 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
[snipped]
I have encountered only one Web site that does not work with SeaMonbkey,
even if I spoof Firefox or Internet Explorer. It is
...
http://web.skype.com is
On 9/25/2019 10:37 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
As of 23 September the Chase website no longer works properly with
2.49.5 here. I find it is impossible to download transactions from a
credit card account, the button to do so no longer works.
I complained to Chase about it, but was told simply to
On 9/26/2019 1:31 AM, Ant wrote:
> On 9/25/2019 12:34 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
[snipped]
>> I have encountered only one Web site that does not work with SeaMonbkey,
>> even if I spoof Firefox or Internet Explorer. It is
> ...
> http://web.skype.com is another. https://www.mlb.com is a li
rmitory towns. These people call themselves
human, but, by a pressure they do not feel, are forced to do their work
like ants. With what do they fill their time when they are free of work
on their silly little Sundays?" --Antoine de saint-Exupéry, 'Wind, Sand,
and Stars,' 193
On 9/25/2019 8:37 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
> As of 23 September the Chase website no longer works properly with
> 2.49.5 here. I find it is impossible to download transactions from a
> credit card account, the button to do so no longer works.
>
> I complained to Chase about it, but was told sim
David H. Durgee wrote:
As of 23 September the Chase website no longer works properly with
2.49.5 here. I find it is impossible to download transactions from a
credit card account, the button to do so no longer works.
I complained to Chase about it, but was told simply to use a newer
browser wit
As of 23 September the Chase website no longer works properly with
2.49.5 here. I find it is impossible to download transactions from a
credit card account, the button to do so no longer works.
I complained to Chase about it, but was told simply to use a newer
browser with their website.
This ap
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 19-09-19 08:56:
Ant wrote:
On 9/18/2019 8:13 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 9/18/19 2:48 AM, Ant wrote:
... it doesn't ask to do it once for this site. It's either "Always
for This Site", "Never for This Site", and "Not fo
Ant wrote:
On 9/18/2019 8:13 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 9/18/19 2:48 AM, Ant wrote:
... it doesn't ask to do it once for this site. It's either "Always
for This Site", "Never for This Site", and "Not for This Request". Is
there a hidden option to
On 9/18/2019 8:13 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 9/18/19 2:48 AM, Ant wrote:
... it doesn't ask to do it once for this site. It's either "Always
for This Site", "Never for This Site", and "Not for This Request". Is
there a hidden option to do once for th
On 9/18/2019 6:35 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 9/18/19 2:48 AM, Ant wrote:
... it doesn't ask to do it once for this site. It's either "Always
for This Site", "Never for This Site", and "Not for This Request". Is
there a hidden option to do once for this site? I don't see it
mentioned in https://www.
David H. Durgee wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 9/18/19 2:48 AM, Ant wrote:
... it doesn't ask to do it once for this site. It's either "Always
for This Site", "Never for This Site", and "Not for This Request". Is
there a hidden option to do once for this site? I don't see it
mentioned in https://www.
WaltS48 wrote:
> On 9/18/19 2:48 AM, Ant wrote:
>> ... it doesn't ask to do it once for this site. It's either "Always
>> for This Site", "Never for This Site", and "Not for This Request". Is
>> there a hidden option to do once for this site? I don't see it
>> mentioned in https://www.seamonkey-pro
On 9/18/19 2:48 AM, Ant wrote:
... it doesn't ask to do it once for this site. It's either "Always for
This Site", "Never for This Site", and "Not for This Request". Is there
a hidden option to do once for this site? I don't see it mentioned in
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/geolocat
... it doesn't ask to do it once for this site. It's either "Always for
This Site", "Never for This Site", and "Not for This Request". Is there
a hidden option to do once for this site? I don't see it mentioned in
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/geolocation. I don't want to
have to go
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/23/2019 03:35 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/23/2019 08:07 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Recently there are also a ton of bugs with website x does not work with
SeaMonkey y while Firefox z works fine. I generally gave up commenting in
On 08/23/2019 03:35 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/23/2019 08:07 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
That's a reading assignment that should occupy my time while I wait
for 64 bit Debian 10 DVDs. [I've a data cap that discourages using
netinst.
Should be workable for dow
Richard Owlett wrote on 24/08/2019 5:49 AM:
[I've a data cap that discourages using netinst.
On my 3GB/mth account, I can certainly relate so having a sister,
who has just had her 100GB/mth account upgraded to 200GB/mth at no extra
cost, very local is real handy!! ;-P
--
Daniel
User
Frank-Rainer Grahl:
>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Build_Instructions/Simple_Thunderbird_build
That one I had discovered yesterday via Ixquick and it was very useful
because it mentioned and linked to Mercurial bundles. I was desperate
because determining the re
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/23/2019 08:07 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
That's a reading assignment that should occupy my time while I wait for 64 bit
Debian 10 DVDs. [I've a data cap that discourages using netinst.
Should be workable for downloading SeaMonkey source(s) for help system.]
I di
On 08/23/2019 08:07 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/23/2019 07:03 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/22/2019 05:23 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
... We are working
on getting them signed but there we are again with not enough
people around.
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/23/2019 07:03 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/22/2019 05:23 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
... We are working
on getting them signed but there we are again with not enough people
around. Needed for macOS soon anyway.
Is there a descript
On 08/23/2019 07:03 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/22/2019 05:23 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
... We are working
on getting them signed but there we are again with not enough people
around. Needed for macOS soon anyway.
Is there a description of skills and hardwa
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/22/2019 05:23 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
... We are working
on getting them signed but there we are again with not enough people around.
Needed for macOS soon anyway.
Is there a description of skills and hardware needed to be useful.
I've been a computer _user_
On 08/22/2019 05:23 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
... We are working
on getting them signed but there we are again with not enough people
around. Needed for macOS soon anyway.
Is there a description of skills and hardware needed to be useful.
I've been a computer _user_ for decades but have v
On 8/22/2019 3:23 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> Wait. Why are there unsigned Windows ports? Shouldn't they be signed? :/
No. Has been unsigned for ages and was just copied. If you look at the
checksums in the older rcs you notice they are the same. We are working
on getting them signed but
On 8/21/2019 10:52 PM, Ronnie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering when the next version of seamonkey might be out as I want
> to be prepared for any gotcha's before I release LXLE with seamonkey as
> the default browser as usual. I don't want to release the OS in a week
> Wait. Why are there unsigned Windows ports? Shouldn't they be signed? :/
No. Has been unsigned for ages and was just copied. If you look at the
checksums in the older rcs you notice they are the same. We are working on
getting them signed but there we are again with not enough people around.
On 8/21/2019 10:52 PM, Ronnie wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering when the next version of seamonkey might be out as I want
to be prepared for any gotcha's before I release LXLE with seamonkey as
the default browser as usual. I don't want to release the OS in a week
or so only to have an
1 - 100 of 1193 matches
Mail list logo
