Re: POLITICO coming up blank in SM 1.1.18

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: cmcadams wrote: flyguy wrote: cmcadams wrote: But not in IE. For the first time in my experience. Anyone else? http://www.politico.com/ It comes up blank in 1.1.18, until I expand the window to full screen, then a 2" x 3" box with pages flipping over in it shows. Cl

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 2:01 PM, John wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 10:49 AM, John wrote: Apparently migration from 1.18 to 2.0 is not supported either and it (2.0 install) wiped out my iTunes files. What!? Migration from 1.1.18 (I assume that is the release you meant) to 2.

Re: SM active

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 10:57 AM, JD wrote: Norvin wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Norvin wrote: Just updated to SM 2.0 and now when I am doing work other than mail/internet (SM not on) SM will start by itself. I remember having this problem some years ago with SM 1.x.x and was able to chang

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

John Boyle wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 2:01 PM, John wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 10:49 AM, John wrote: Apparently migration from 1.18 to 2.0 is not supported either and it (2.0 install) wiped out my iTunes files. What!? Migration from 1.1.18 (I

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 5:38 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 2:01 PM, John wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 10:49 AM, John wrote: Apparently migration from 1.18 to 2.0 is not supported either and it (2.0 install) wiped out my iTunes files. What

Re: SM active

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 5:53 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: Am I missing something? Doesn't this only do something when the application is running? It doesn't cause the application to launch when it's not already running. Or are you suggesting it does? IF

Re: 1.18 Stops Working in Win 7

Robert Kaiser wrote: Tom Pamin wrote: 2.0 is not an option for me, like many others, until the Form Manager is returned. And 1.1.x isn't really supported on Vista or Win7. Go figure. Perhaps you should at least give the 2.0 form management a try? Robert Kaiser There isn't none to speak of,

Re: OT question

Leonidas Jones wrote: Norvin wrote: Since I installed SM 2, my newsgroup keeps asking me for my user name and password. The user name I know, but the password was never a part of the sign in procedure. Below is the newsgroup and I was wondering if anybody had any suggestions. Thanks news.eterna

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import> choose import. Phillip, I see nothing like this in the tools menu item in SM 2. Lee Its not cal

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 7:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 5:38 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 2:01 PM, John wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 10:49 AM, John wrote: Apparently migration from 1.18 to 2.0 is not supported

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

Tobias Fischer wrote: On 08.12.2009 04:55, Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import> choose import. Phillip, I see nothing like this in the to

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

Leonidas Jones wrote: Tobias Fischer wrote: On 08.12.2009 04:55, Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import> choose import. Phillip, I see noth

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

John wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: John Boyle wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/7/2009 5:06 PM, John wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: John wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: John wrote: /snip/ So if no one can suggest an alternative, that means it was SM's fault? Sir, once again, your logic escap

Re: How do I transfer my spell checker in netscap eto Seamonkey

Jens Hatlak wrote: Acharya Swami Rudra Kali Das wrote: I found that the netscape file is "custom.dic" I can't figure out how to tfansfer this data to the persdict.dat file? I don't know the format of custom.dic but persdict.dat is a simple UTF-8 ASCII file where each word is on its own line an

Re: 1.18 Stops Working in Win 7

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Perhaps you should at least give the 2.0 form management a try? There isn't none to speak of, without the aid of an extension. Wrong. There is form *management*, even if there isn't an explicit window for it. The fun

Re: Default browser

Martin Freitag wrote: starrin schrieb: Have both 1.18 and 2.0 installed on Vista PC, along with FF. I want 1.18 to be my default browser, but when I select it that way, 2.0 becomes the default browser. Am wrestling with display sizes on 2.0, and am getting tired of clicking CTRL - to reduce eac

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Robert Kaiser wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Everyone suggested to bring the regular buttons back, as everyone agrees that that is better than tiny round buttons stashed to the right. Wrong. EOM. Robert Kaiser EOM ??? Please speak like a user instead of an Engineer or Developer. -- Phillip M.

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: Do NOT kill the progress windows! I agree, even if I personally don't use them, I see why some people like them and really want to give those an experience that is functional, useful and well-designed at the same time. I just miss ideas on how to achieve that.

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Graham wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: Just bring back what was - that was a good design. In fact it was probably the worst piece of crap I've ever seen in my life, design-wise. So what? It worked! Here is some suggested icons: http://www.phillipmjones.net/Browser.png http://www.

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Phillip Jones wrote: Graham wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: Just bring back what was - that was a good design. In fact it was probably the worst piece of crap I've ever seen in my life, design-wise. So what? It worked! Here is some suggested icons: http://www.phillipmjone

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

S. Beaulieu wrote: Phillip Jones a écrit : At least they don't look so cartoonish looking To me, they do. Plus, the stamp is very US-centric. S. Don't have to use the us stamp jum could put a solid block in place of the stamp. at least they don't exactly look li

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

S. Beaulieu wrote: Phillip Jones a écrit : At least they don't look so cartoonish looking To me, they do. Plus, the stamp is very US-centric. S. changed the stamp to just a Green block with no markings. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don&#

Re: Default browser

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: /snip/ Mac's Regardless of how you set anything SM 2 will take over whether you have other applications to open in SM1. Same with FireFox 2 and 3 before ff 2 you could have both and what ever you had set to open FF sa

Re: Default browser

Leonidas Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Leonidas Jones schrieb: Phillip Jones wrote: /snip/ I wonder why all those MAC explanations occur. The OP uses Windows Vista o_0 (at least he asked for that one) Martin Phillip feels, with some justification, that with so many lurkers here, Mac

Re: Default browser

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: /snip/ /snip/ What I am referring to, say I open Graphic Converter and it ask whether I want to download an update. (I have set in Safari - yes you set default Browser in Safari - to

Re: Found reason Dowload Manager doesn't come up right.

Rufus wrote: S. Beaulieu wrote: Rufus a écrit : ...what's wrong with nicely shaped, user and hardware accessible, generic buttons? It's a browser suite, not a floor show... That's absolutely my point! I fund the current ones fit all those criteria. Others don't. It doesn't mean I'm right, j

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

Samuel S wrote: ... please... I have gone through help and have not yet found info pertaining to the "Apply filter when:" drop box. Can anyone direct me to the help on this? The reason is, I need to figure out the reason that when I click on "Run Filters on Folder" nothing happens and I believ

Re: Print icon in mail/newsgroup reader

S. Beaulieu wrote: Ant a écrit : Why was it not shown by default? As far as I know, it never was. I specifically remember having always had to do that in SM. And also in TB before that. S. To my knowledge you couldn't customize SeaMonkey 1, it was FireFox and and Thunderbird was the only

Re: Print icon in mail/newsgroup reader

stango wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: S. Beaulieu wrote: Ant a écrit : Why was it not shown by default? As far as I know, it never was. I specifically remember having always had to do that in SM. And also in TB before that. S. To my knowledge you couldn't customize SeaMonkey 1, i

Re: Blocked Downloaded File..

JD wrote: I've downloaded a .pdf of my electric bill but my Adobe Reader nor my Adobe Acrobat Full version will open the file. I'm using SM2. When I check the file properties it states "This file came from another computer and might be blocked to help protect this computer." How to I turn this o

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

Samuel S wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Samuel S wrote: ... please... I have gone through help and have not yet found info pertaining to the "Apply filter when:" drop box. Can anyone direct me to the help on this? The reason is, I need to figure out the reason that when I click on &q

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 12:27 PM, S. Beaulieu wrote: Samuel S a écrit : I Am finding that for messages already in folders, even in the main folder, when I click on "Tools -> Run Filters on Folder" nothing happens, even if I open Message Filter and run individual filters, that does not

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 3:21 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Samuel S wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Samuel S wrote: ... please... I have gone through help and have not yet found info pertaining to the "Apply filter when:" drop box. Can anyone direct me to the help on this? The

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 3:25 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 12:27 PM, S. Beaulieu wrote: Samuel S a écrit : I Am finding that for messages already in folders, even in the main folder, when I click on "Tools -> Run Filters on Folder" nothing

Re: SM2.0.1 and lightning

Martin Freitag wrote: JAS schrieb: I aqm using SM2 and the lightning extension I am using works great-I received a pop up and said SM2.0.1 was available and I checked it out but it states that my Lightning 1.0pre will not work--is there a version that will right now? You could try the latest n

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 5:58 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 3:21 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Samuel S wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Samuel S wrote: ... please... I have gone through help and have not yet found info pertaining to the "Apply filter when:&

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

NoOp wrote: On 12/11/2009 06:04 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 3:25 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 12:27 PM, S. Beaulieu wrote: Samuel S a écrit : I Am finding that for messages already in folders, even in the main folder, when I click

Re: SM2.0.1 and lightning

William Morrison wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: JAS schrieb: I aqm using SM2 and the lightning extension I am using works great-I received a pop up and said SM2.0.1 was available and I checked it out but it states that my Lightning 1.0pre will not work--is there a version

Re: YouTube upgrades leaves SeaMonkey incompatible

Chuck Johnson wrote: YouTube recently upgraded their latest version of Adobe Flash Player, and now it no longer plays video on SeaMonkey, even after I upgraded my version of Flash. It works just fine on Firefox, but loading a video on SeaMonkey leaves me with a message that says I need to turn o

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/12/2009 8:50 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 5:58 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/11/2009 3:21 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Samuel S wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Samuel S wrote: ... please... I have gone through help and

Re: Redbox.com doesn't like SeaMonkey v2?

David E. Ross wrote: On 12/13/2009 2:37 PM, Ant wrote: Hello. Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3? I get an error: "XML Parsing Error: not well-formed Location: http://www.redbox.com/ Line Number 203, Column 89:http://www.re

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

NoOp wrote: On 12/12/2009 08:55 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: ... each account or mailbox has it own set of filters. And? If you you select either one in the filter manager (Tools|Filter Manger|Filters for:) and elect to 'Run selected filter(s) on: xyz what happens? Is tha

Re: Bing as SM2 search engine preference

JAS wrote: Is there a way to add Bing to the search engine preference so it can be set as default? No. If you do a Google search on this exact wording There comes up a bunch of threads. But according to Bing in the first you get to SeaMonkey 2 is not a Mozilla Product and therefore no suppor

Re: Bing as SM2 search engine preference

NoOp wrote: On 12/13/2009 08:53 PM, JAS wrote: Is there a way to add Bing to the search engine preference so it can be set as default? You could modify one of the seamonkey/searchplugins .src files to use bing. Note here is the message you receive in SM 2 when you attempt to load Bing add

Re: Filter Help on SM 2.0

NoOp wrote: On 12/13/2009 05:31 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 12/12/2009 08:55 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: ... each account or mailbox has it own set of filters. And? If you you select either one in the filter manager (Tools|Filter Manger|Filters for:) and elect to

Re: Redbox.com doesn't like SeaMonkey v2?

David E. Ross wrote: On 12/13/2009 5:18 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/13/2009 2:37 PM, Ant wrote: Hello. Is it me or does http://www.redbox.com/ not like SeaMonkey unless I change its UserAgent to Firefox v2/v3? I get an error: "XML Parsing Error: not well-f

Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1

David Wilkinson wrote: Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0? I know about using nighties I used to do that myself to test and comment. When the comments went in one ear and out the other I quit using nighties. I figured my comments did

Re: Bing as SM2 search engine preference

NoOp wrote: On 12/14/2009 01:08 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 12/13/2009 08:53 PM, JAS wrote: Is there a way to add Bing to the search engine preference so it can be set as default? You could modify one of the seamonkey/searchplugins .src files to use bing. Note here is the

Re: SM2 Bugs?

mcewr wrote: I have noticed a couple of things since I upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0: 1. The mail in my POP accounts doesn't seem to automatically download at startup. 2. I can't send large attachments anymore (window stops at 3%). Does anyone know if these are 2.0 bugs? Thanks, Rod item 1 Edit

Re: SeaMonkey web page Composer

LDixon wrote: I'm glad that SeaMonkey has maintained Netscape Composer. But, I was surprised to find that it hasn't been improved at all, that I can see. Here are a few suggestions: * Put a scroll bar in the Format/Font menu, for speed. (I use Ariel and Verdana a lot!) * Put the font option

Re: SM2 Bugs?

Phillip Jones wrote: mcewr wrote: I have noticed a couple of things since I upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0: 1. The mail in my POP accounts doesn't seem to automatically download at startup. 2. I can't send large attachments anymore (window stops at 3%). Does anyone know if these ar

Re: SeaMonkey web page Composer

Phillip Jones wrote: LDixon wrote: I'm glad that SeaMonkey has maintained Netscape Composer. But, I was surprised to find that it hasn't been improved at all, that I can see. Here are a few suggestions: * Put a scroll bar in the Format/Font menu, for speed. (I use Ariel and Ver

Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1

Jens Hatlak wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0? But believe I read either in this forum or perhaps on the SM group, that SM2.0.1 was supposed to come out the same exact time

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Rufus wrote: hawker wrote: So I just got to wondering if most of us Seamonkey people are just Netscape hold ons that are not comfortable with the FireFox/Thunderbird interface for whatever reason? Anyone out there a Seamonkey user who was not a Netscape users? As for me I started on Netscape 1.

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: ...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of. This is surprising since we share the exact same mailnews backend code as Thunde

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Mike C wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:34:11 -0500, hawker wrote: I'm asking all this because I'm currently questing why I am staying on Seamonkey. I like a few things about it over Firefox/Thunderbird but with 2.0 out and many extensions broken or no longer supporting Seamonk

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

hawker wrote: On 12/15/2009 9:15 PM, Martin Freitag wrote: I'm asking all this because I'm currently questing why I am staying on Seamonkey. I like a few things about it over Firefox/Thunderbird but with 2.0 out and many extensions broken or no longer supporting Seamonkey Which ones? Most popu

Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: SM2.0.1 was supposed to come out the same exact time FF3.5.5 was to hit the streets. FF 3.5.5 was a very short-cycle crash-fix-only release and we didn't have the resources to create an update at that time (mostly because our only build and re

Re: Bing as SM2 search engine preference

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: I've read they are supposed to be getting away from src 's and strictly addons . True, but that needs the new format to be supported in SeaMonkey first, and we are not there yet. Robert Kaiser as I said the code it to complex for me to type

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Robert Kaiser wrote: hawker wrote: On 12/15/2009 9:15 PM, Martin Freitag wrote: I'm asking all this because I'm currently questing why I am staying on Seamonkey. I like a few things about it over Firefox/Thunderbird but with 2.0 out and many extensions broken or no longer supporting Seamonkey

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: ...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of. This is surprising since we share the exact same mailnews backend code as Thunde

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: ...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of. This is surprising since we share the exact same mailnews

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: ...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of. This is surprising since we share the exact

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: /snip/ You can for get that tab thingy I turned that off ASAP. I hate tabs worth a Passion. and the are memory wasters also. ...maybe that's

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: hawker wrote: /snip/ There are a few, the biggest one is that Image Zoom 0.4 dropped SM support and 0.3x works on 1.1.x but not 2.x. What does that add-on do differently than the internal zoom functionality in 2.0 that also zooms images now? Robert

Re: SeaMonkey web page Composer

Bill Davidsen wrote: ---snip--- * When inserting images, don't make the the default "Alternate text" (I *never, ever* use that) - or else don't force making a choice. I would just really like to see this as an option. This is more annoying in email. If you

Strange issue with email/newspost

I've noticed an issue and I don't believe it was in SM1. From time to time (and its not every time). I will send a post and in the pop up window that indicate progression of sending. it will end up with message saying copy complete. But the window does not dismiss. it continues to show progres

Re: Strange issue with email/newspost

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/16/2009 2:13 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: I've noticed an issue and I don't believe it was in SM1. From time to time (and its not every time). I will send a post and in the pop up window that indicate progression of sending. it will end up with message s

Re: Strange issue with email/newspost

Andrea Govoni wrote: Il 17/12/09 02:15, rolfp ha scritto: I have seen this, occasionally. Seems more likely when sending a large (MBs) mail, lots of graphics. Have noticed it happened with a small mail soon after a large mail triggered it. Please vote this bug:

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: /snip/ /snip/ No not at all. On both Windows and Macs, tabs actually use far less memory then the

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: ...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of. This is

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Image zoom only affect images making them larger or smaller. Ah, OK, didn't know that. Robert Kaiser Yes its a neat add on. the normal zoom when you zoom text on a website it also affect the images as well. While image zoom add on does just

Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1

Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:53:55 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: You actually have time for vacation?? :-) I needed to make time to avoid burn-out. And I could do so in November, those three weeks were worth every second. ;-) I agree. Since coming back from

Re: OK. What gives with the automatic update?

jim wrote: ---snip--- Does SeaMonkey 2.0 come with automatic updating turned on? I do not recall overtly setting that and would not have since I am not that kind of guy. yes. If so, why did i get the "update available" message yesterday if it was going to do

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.1 and Lightning Update fialed

Rex wrote: Rob Steinmetz wrote: Well I found out that the update failed. It seems to have succeeded but now when I start SeaMonkey it is showing a pending update and when I restart SeaMonkey I get an Update failed message. I stille have 1.1.18 installed and Seamonket 2 is installed in a seperat

Re: SM 2.0.1 Mac Bug?..

Leonidas Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: When I open SM 2.0.1, the app opens and the command bar at the top of the screen switches to SM, but the Browser window is not placed in the foreground - I have to click on the Browser to make it the active window vice just opening the app. Not happening her

Re: Strange issue with email/newspost

Andrea Govoni wrote: Il 17/12/09 05:31, Phillip Jones ha scritto: How do you get to vote page in this new system I have voted for bug previously. In fact I have reported bugs on Bugzilla before. But they recently re did the Bugzilla system. You simply have to click on the "vote" l

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Leonidas Jones wrote: hawker wrote: So I just got to wondering if most of us Seamonkey people are just Netscape hold ons that are not comfortable with the FireFox/Thunderbird interface for whatever reason? Anyone out there a Seamonkey user who was not a Netscape users? As for me I started on Ne

Re: Strange issue with email/newspost

Ray_Net wrote: Andrea Govoni wrote: Il 17/12/09 02:15, rolfp ha scritto: I have seen this, occasionally. Seems more likely when sending a large (MBs) mail, lots of graphics. Have noticed it happened with a small mail soon after a large mail triggered it. Please vote this bug:

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: /snip/ /snip/ No not at all. On both Windows and Macs, tabs

Re: Confused about SM 2.0.1

J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Retirement is no fun after the first year. You're doing it wrong. -JW (retired 10 years and still loving it) The problem is money. If you have money. But living in Social Security, you lucky to just pay your bills. Just like I'd love to

Re: Strange issue with email/newspost

Andrea Govoni wrote: Il 17/12/09 17:21, Phillip Jones ha scritto: Andrea Govoni wrote: [1]<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66861> I think I voted for it I clicked the vote link doesn't seem to show up in vote list though. No, you didn't vote. When you click

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: /snip/ /snip/ No not at all. On both

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Paul Hartman wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: hawker wrote: So I just got to wondering if most of us Seamonkey people are just Netscape hold ons that are not comfortable with the FireFox/Thunderbird interface for whatever reason? Anyone

Re: du you see mw???

beelzib...@comcast.net wrote: ?? -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it" http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Strange issue with email/newspost

Ray_Net wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/17/2009 8:38 AM, Ray_Net wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/16/2009 11:20 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Andrea Govoni wrote: Il 17/12/09 02:15, rolfp ha scritto: I have seen this, occasionally. Seems more likely when sending a large (MBs) mail, lots of graphics.

Re: Indication of Size ( kb's) of posts

Hartmut Figge wrote: u...@domain.invalid: I've been asked to Keep my posts a given size.How can one do same when there's no longer a post size indication.? For most of my newsgroups i use 'lines', for very of them 'size'. You can switch between the two with the Pref - user.js - user_

Re: Indication of Size ( kb's) of posts

Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: I can have a column to the right for the size of a posting. The title of this column can either be lines or size, depending on the Pref. In the second case i get the size in KB. For text groups i prefer the number of lines. Perhaps screenshots can show wha

Re: Indication of Size ( kb's) of posts

Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: I can have a column to the right for the size of a posting. The title of this column can either be lines or size, depending on the Pref. In the second case i get the size in KB. For text groups i prefer the number of lines. Perhaps screenshots can show wha

Re: Indication of Size ( kb's) of posts

Phillip Jones wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: I can have a column to the right for the size of a posting. The title of this column can either be lines or size, depending on the Pref. In the second case i get the size in KB. For text groups i prefer the number of lines. Perhaps

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: I do like the way we had a forms manager as in SM 1.1.x and sad that it removed because they didn't have the time, energy, know-how or desire to do a port of it in the new code. This is correct. (Despite all the protestations otherwise b

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Benoit Renard wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: I'm not seeing any way to get SeaMonkey to zoom just images. From here it appears to either images and text or nothing. I'm pretty sure you can still zoom only text. No SM built in zoom zooms or reduces everything text and images. while image zoom

Re: How do I reduce the header width??

Leonidas Jones wrote: Daniel wrote: Daniel wrote: I'm using the three pane view in (clean install) SM 2.0 on (clean install) Windows 7. When I view a message either in my Mail account and/or my various newsgroups on various servers, the Header portion is extra wide, showing not only the normal

Re: Indication of Size ( kb's) of posts

Hartmut Figge wrote: Phillip Jones: for everyone;see this: http://www.phillipmjones.net/SeaMonkeySubjectbar.png And the row with 'Lines' could be 'Size'. notice the menu I clicked on: everyone of the items if check can be shown in the bar that shows Subject. Why

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Hartmut Figge wrote: Leonidas Jones: Firefox has a zoom text only finction, but View>>Zoom in SeaMonkey 2.0.1 does not seem to have it. Or is it hidden somewhere else? Right side, last row. http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/tx091219.png (36 KB) Hartmut I have set that way. -- Phillip

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/18/2009 3:39 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: I do like the way we had a forms manager as in SM 1.1.x and sad that it removed because they didn't have the time, energy, know-how or desire to do a port of it in the new code. Th

Re: Indication of Size ( kb's) of posts

Hartmut Figge wrote: Phillip Jones: Hartmut Figge wrote: Why do you have checked 'Junk Status' for a newsgroup? Hartmut, curious Whatever you have set for email also shows up in newsgroups as well. Mhm, i can set it for an account or even for a single newsgroup. They

Re: Indication of Size ( kb's) of posts

Hartmut Figge wrote: Phillip Jones: I just tried and If I turn it off in news and if I go to email, it is not there. Yes, so it is without Mnenhy. I have just checked by disabling it. With Mnenhy enabled i have my own setting. Junk-column only for mail and even there not for all folders

Re: SM 2.0.1 personal toolbar )bookmarks)

me2 wrote: How do I NOT show the bookmarks folder in my toolbar? I mean the one SM adds that is named "Bookmarks", this isn't needed any way since "Bookmarks" appears in the top drop downs, and it takes up room that I need for other folders- I don't believe 2.0 did this any word/hope on form m

Re: SM2 - customize toolbar ??

gNeandr wrote: [19.12.2009 15:36]»Martin Freitag« wrote: gNeandr schrieb: Do I miss something or doesn't allow SM2 to customize the toolbars? If customize is able, please direct me the way ... ---snip--- for an answer to the original question. Click an

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >