Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 1:35 PM, Bush wrote: But seriously... Your post were the only post that Were Blank in the message area . post from others were Fine . All the posts look fine here. SeaMonkey 1.1.X on Windows/XP SP3. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE
On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote: ... Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . This might be of interest suggests that the problem may have been (what else?) the ATT U-Verse servers: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23373360-ATT-YAhoo-Email-Customers-servers-are-down Note the dates. And also note this post from an ATT tech: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23376409?hilite=ssl You might want to hang out here for awhile: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . Sounds like you may have other issues besides ATT - here is the post from the previous: On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote: ... Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . This might be of interest suggests that the problem may have been (what else?) the ATT U-Verse servers: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23373360-ATT-YAhoo-Email-Customers-servers-are-down Note the dates. And also note this post from an ATT tech: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23376409?hilite=ssl You might want to hang out here for awhile: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . Sounds like you may have other issues besides ATT - here is the post from the previous: On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote: ... Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . This might be of interest suggests that the problem may have been (what else?) the ATT U-Verse servers: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23373360-ATT-YAhoo-Email-Customers-servers-are-down Note the dates. And also note this post from an ATT tech: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23376409?hilite=ssl You might want to hang out here for awhile: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse But seriously... Your post were the only post that Were Blank in the message area . post from others were Fine . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . Sounds like you may have other issues besides ATT - here is the post from the previous: On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote: ... Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . This might be of interest suggests that the problem may have been (what else?) the ATT U-Verse servers: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23373360-ATT-YAhoo-Email-Customers-servers-are-down Note the dates. And also note this post from an ATT tech: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23376409?hilite=ssl You might want to hang out here for awhile: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse Great response links.. Too bad I could not read this Today. Been looking at all post all morning . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. -- Lee (in Florida)US Army Retired Georgie Boy Cruise Master Logitech Vid Skype lee.g.bray ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . Forgot to Add .. Tech Support Said it Was a Thunderbird / Seamonkey Problem... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 01:45 PM, Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . You're joking... right? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 01:35 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: ... You might want to hang out here for awhile: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse But seriously... Your post were the only post that Were Blank in the message area . post from others were Fine . Wouldn't be the first time that I shot blanks :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . Probably like mine who did not know what in the heck was going on much less of any help. -- Lee (in Florida)US Army Retired Georgie Boy Cruise Master Logitech Vid Skype lee.g.bray ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Bush wrote: My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . Probably like mine who did not know what in the heck was going on much less of any help. Took me to Web mail... and it Worked so they Said it was not their problem since Webmail worked .. pop.att.yahoo.com ... This could have been a Yahoo problem ??? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. More likely, they didn't know what they were talking about when they said SM couldn't do it, and when they fixed their issue, SM was satisfied and resumed working. Mostly when they say they don't support a Mozilla product, what they mean is they don't know enough about how it works to give advice. It doesn't mean it doesn't work. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen when you try to load a msg the news server isn't responding or your connection to the news server times out. I've noticed this on more than a few instances w/2.0 haven't figured out what the issue is. More often than not, if you close the newsgroup reopen and/or restart the msgs will fetch and appear properly. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen when you try to load a msg the news server isn't responding or your connection to the news server times out. That is not necessary. It can happen when you have checked the box 'Don't delete any messages', which can lead to an increased load while looking for new postings. Can last several seconds. If you try to read a posting in that interval, the body will be empty. I've noticed this on more than a few instances w/2.0 haven't figured out what the issue is. The issue is gone since i use 'Delete messages more than 60 days old'. Infuriating, though, that this setting is needed. The behavior was caused by https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774. More often than not, if you close the newsgroup reopen and/or restart the msgs will fetch and appear properly. Clearing the cache should suffice. At least it was so for me. Hartmut the previous mess from Noop was blank here ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: This post was Blank ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 04:14 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen when you try to load a msg the news server isn't responding or your connection to the news server times out. That is not necessary. It can happen when you have checked the box 'Don't delete any messages', which can lead to an increased load while looking for new postings. Can last several seconds. If you try to read a posting in that interval, the body will be empty. I've noticed this on more than a few instances w/2.0 haven't figured out what the issue is. The issue is gone since i use 'Delete messages more than 60 days old'. Infuriating, though, that this setting is needed. The behavior was caused by https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774. More often than not, if you close the newsgroup reopen and/or restart the msgs will fetch and appear properly. Clearing the cache should suffice. At least it was so for me. Hartmut Interesting... thanks! something else shows up in the headers of your posts subject : re:att/seamonkey/ssl From: NoOp glgxg#sbcglobal.net.invalied Date 8:08 PM Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Reference 1, 2 ,3, 4, 5 Sorry for the non caps, But I have only one Hand it it gets tired of typing . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 04:14 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen when you try to load a msg the news server isn't responding or your connection to the news server times out. That is not necessary. It can happen when you have checked the box 'Don't delete any messages', which can lead to an increased load while looking for new postings. Can last several seconds. If you try to read a posting in that interval, the body will be empty. I've noticed this on more than a few instances w/2.0 haven't figured out what the issue is. The issue is gone since i use 'Delete messages more than 60 days old'. Infuriating, though, that this setting is needed. The behavior was caused by https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774. More often than not, if you close the newsgroup reopen and/or restart the msgs will fetch and appear properly. Clearing the cache should suffice. At least it was so for me. Hartmut Interesting... thanks! something else shows up in the headers of your posts subject : re:att/seamonkey/ssl From: NoOp glgxg#sbcglobal.net.invalied Date 8:08 PM Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Reference 1, 2 ,3, 4, 5 Sorry for the non caps, But I have only one Hand it it gets tired of typing . ignor,, I see 1 2 3 4 5 6 on mine also ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 05:04 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: This post was Blank What post? Your headers show no reference header: Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:04:19 -0600 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:04:29 -0500 From: Bush e...@elmie.uk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Subject: Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: sludnzwbspsoqptwnz2dnuvz_sji4...@mozilla.org Lines: 8 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.204.66.91 X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-eCS5uOiw1Tq3o/VPWkIZZLrFfhF2BlM5cmSk+0hIbxOdvnmOB/yxDoKY5xzUxuNhcxvR85iFnageE1U!MVg15ewpmrn6j12abc187TXz3wST9IbYwrYVDdu/Y66umsJizjQM0xqdHC+w+pLNHdbaCUP0n3yC!q8I1aKLCR4g= X-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 1215 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com mozilla.support.seamonkey:45018 NoOp wrote: This post was Blank ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 05:04 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: This post was Blank What post? Your headers show no reference header: Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:04:19 -0600 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:04:29 -0500 From: Bushe...@elmie.uk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Subject: Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID:sludnzwbspsoqptwnz2dnuvz_sji4...@mozilla.org Lines: 8 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.204.66.91 X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-eCS5uOiw1Tq3o/VPWkIZZLrFfhF2BlM5cmSk+0hIbxOdvnmOB/yxDoKY5xzUxuNhcxvR85iFnageE1U!MVg15ewpmrn6j12abc187TXz3wST9IbYwrYVDdu/Y66umsJizjQM0xqdHC+w+pLNHdbaCUP0n3yC!q8I1aKLCR4g= X-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 1215 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com mozilla.support.seamonkey:45018 NoOp wrote: This post was Blank Sorry But I am not sending the Blank post from NoOp only some post from you are Blank.. all other post from others in this newsgroup has Text in the message box . Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 05:49 PM, Bush wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. I see we Both are on ATT And that matters how? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 05:47 PM, Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/84ed3b9207cb82ec/77ba408f1014409d?hl=enlnk=gstq=Att%2FSeamonkey%2Fssl++-+UPDATE#77ba408f1014409d http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/84ed3b9207cb82ec/77ba408f1014409d?hl=enlnk=gstq=Att%2FSeamonkey%2Fssl++-+UPDATE#77ba408f1014409d http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/84ed3b9207cb82ec/b7d08466f5b6e52d?hl=enq=Seamonkey+%2BAtt/Seamonkey/ssl#b7d08466f5b6e52d ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp: On 11/22/2009 05:49 PM, Bush wrote: Bush wrote: I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. I see we Both are on ATT And that matters how? I am writing this in case he cannot read your posting. :) Hm. Interesting problem. In such a case i would probably first try Folder Properties-Rebuild Summery File and if that does not help, close SM and delete the .msf of this NG. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/84ed3b9207cb82ec/77ba408f1014409d?hl=enlnk=gstq=Att%2FSeamonkey%2Fssl++-+UPDATE#77ba408f1014409d Using ' instead of helps. http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/84ed3b9207cb82ec/77ba408f1014409d?hl=enlnk=gstq='Att%2FSeamonkey%2Fssl++-+UPDATE'#77ba408f1014409d Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Sorry But I am not sending the Blank post from NoOp only some post from you are Blank.. all other post from others in this newsgroup has Text in the message box . Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? I see no blank posts from NoOp or anyone else, in this thread or elsewhere. All messages have content (some more than others, but none blank). The problem is at your end, not his. The post to which you appear to be replying reads as follows: On 11/20/2009 06:25 PM, Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . No issues with standard ATT DSL here; still 995 w/pop.att.yahoo.com and 465 w/smtp.att.yahoo.com many email accounts via ATT. [end quote] -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. If Harmut's suggestion does not help, try closing SeaMonkey and reopening. Can you view the message now? Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. If Harmut's suggestion does not help, try closing SeaMonkey and reopening. Can you view the message now? Lee I have the group set to Delete Read messages .so they are Gone.. Very weird that only some of his or her posts are Blank . my computer is win7 and seamonkey 2.0 my wifes computer is Winxp Seamonkey 1.1.18 I am going to use my wifes computer in the morning to View this Group and See if I can see his post that were Blank. except for NoOp said and this area would be blank ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bush wrote: Sorry But I am not sending the Blank post from NoOp only some post from you are Blank.. all other post from others in this newsgroup has Text in the message box . Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? I see no blank posts from NoOp or anyone else, in this thread or elsewhere. All messages have content (some more than others, but none blank). The problem is at your end, not his. The post to which you appear to be replying reads as follows: On 11/20/2009 06:25 PM, Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . No issues with standard ATT DSL here; still 995 w/pop.att.yahoo.com and 465 w/smtp.att.yahoo.com many email accounts via ATT. [end quote] Have to say I was wrong .. I just unsubscribed to this Group, Then re subscribed and Now I can see his all the post From him. No Blank posts . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. If Harmut's suggestion does not help, try closing SeaMonkey and reopening. Can you view the message now? Lee I fixed it By Unsubscribing to this Group. Then Re subscribing Without closing and restarting Seamonkey . But why the blank post picked on him only will not be known. Thanks for Helping me verify that it was on my Seamonkeys End . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush: I just unsubscribed to this Group, Then re subscribed and Now I can see his all the post From him. No Blank posts . Hm. Then the .msf wasn't guilty. Must have been the newsrc for the NG. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. -- Lee (in Florida)US Army Retired Georgie Boy Cruise Master Logitech Vid Skype lee.g.bray ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . Which ATT version are using? I have Worldnet as do others replying here and it works fine. My daughter just went from ATT DSL to ATT Uverse in TX and they wanted her to change to att yahoo but she insisted on staying with Worldnet. Worldnet users will have a POP3 of imailhost.worldnet.att.net port 995 whereas Yahoo ATT will have a POP3 of pop.att.yahoo.com port 995 or something similar. Which do you have or is it something else? In the near future ATT will be turning Worldnet off and replacing it with something called ATT Internet Service which I suspect to be ATT Yahoo. Thus, while I don't have your problem now, I may have it in the future which would mean using port 110 and no SSL in order to use Seamonkey. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. AMEN!!! The same happened to me , But With 4 computers thru the gatway and ONE wireless. Had to turn off SSL as I stated . About a year ago Att sent emails telling us to Change to port 995 or we would not be able to Get e-mail after a Certain Date, Now they Tell us to Use port 110 with NO SSL . Server is POP.ATT.YAHOO.COM . The Outgoing Server is Still ssl port 465 . Smtp.Att.yahoo.com. Computer #1 Seamonkey 2.0 #2 Seamonkey 1.1.18 #3 seamonkey 1.1.17 #4 Seamonkey 2.0 #5 Wireless Seamonkey 2.0 And as posted above All e-mails Worked Fine till Yesterday . Tech Support Guy ( Thru Supervisor) Said No Support Except for OUTLOOK . Then asked me if he could help me with Anything Else .. i Said Yes ... Then told him HOW DO I DISCONNECT FROM ATT and setup a New ISP ... He Hung up the phone . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. It cannot be a Seamonkey problem , Since we have been using SSL since 2.0 Was released . And Then BANG it quits working with No 2.0 updates . Wonder if any Thunderbirds users Have the Same problem ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. Change the port to 110 No SSL looks as if Microsoft is up to Something Dominating Browers ... How much is Yahoo and Att making on this Deal ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. don't you Remember The E-mail you got From ATT that Said You MUST use port 995 Before a certain Date ? Only Big $$ from Microsoft who Void that E-mail . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. Problem solved. When I changed my ATT account p/w and ATT updated the modem, I forgot to change the smtp p/w. Outgoing Port 465, SSL =ON, smtp.att.yahoo.com, works again. Incoming Port 995, SSL =ON, pop.att.yahoo.com, works. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. AMEN!!! The same happened to me , But With 4 computers thru the gatway and ONE wireless. Had to turn off SSL as I stated . About a year ago Att sent emails telling us to Change to port 995 or we would not be able to Get e-mail after a Certain Date, Now they Tell us to Use port 110 with NO SSL . Server is POP.ATT.YAHOO.COM . The Outgoing Server is Still ssl port 465 . Smtp.Att.yahoo.com. Computer #1 Seamonkey 2.0 #2 Seamonkey 1.1.18 #3 seamonkey 1.1.17 #4 Seamonkey 2.0 #5 Wireless Seamonkey 2.0 And as posted above All e-mails Worked Fine till Yesterday . Tech Support Guy ( Thru Supervisor) Said No Support Except for OUTLOOK . Then asked me if he could help me with Anything Else .. i Said Yes ... Then told him HOW DO I DISCONNECT FROM ATT and setup a New ISP ... He Hung up the phone . I am having the same issue with firefox on linux. Changing to port 110 allows connection. Stupid. -- norm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
norm wrote: Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. AMEN!!! The same happened to me , But With 4 computers thru the gatway and ONE wireless. Had to turn off SSL as I stated . About a year ago Att sent emails telling us to Change to port 995 or we would not be able to Get e-mail after a Certain Date, Now they Tell us to Use port 110 with NO SSL . Server is POP.ATT.YAHOO.COM . The Outgoing Server is Still ssl port 465 . Smtp.Att.yahoo.com. Computer #1 Seamonkey 2.0 #2 Seamonkey 1.1.18 #3 seamonkey 1.1.17 #4 Seamonkey 2.0 #5 Wireless Seamonkey 2.0 And as posted above All e-mails Worked Fine till Yesterday . Tech Support Guy ( Thru Supervisor) Said No Support Except for OUTLOOK . Then asked me if he could help me with Anything Else .. i Said Yes ... Then told him HOW DO I DISCONNECT FROM ATT and setup a New ISP ... He Hung up the phone . I am having the same issue with firefox on linux. Changing to port 110 allows connection. Stupid. Meant thunderbird, not firefox, when posting earlier about my issue. -- norm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE
Paul wrote: Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. Problem solved. When I changed my ATT account p/w and ATT updated the modem, I forgot to change the smtp p/w. Outgoing Port 465, SSL =ON, smtp.att.yahoo.com, works again. Incoming Port 995, SSL =ON, pop.att.yahoo.com, works. Glad you got it Going I just Tried again with 995 No luck Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. FWIW. I've got the ATT Worldnet iservers setup on SM 2.0. no problems noted. If port 995 is going to work on Outlook, its hard to imagine that it will not work in another mail client, such as Seamonkey or Thunderbird. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/20/2009 06:25 PM, Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . No issues with standard ATT DSL here; still 995 w/pop.att.yahoo.com and 465 w/smtp.att.yahoo.com many email accounts via ATT. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
