Neither client or server has to be ssl aware.
Markus
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ahh, okay. As long as it doesn't need the clients to be ssl aware.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Hi
I'm also running a node on my private serverfarm and accessing it from home.
I succesfully created ssl tunnel with stunnel from my Linux router to my
Linux server for surfing freenet with my browser. My problem is that I'm
having trouble to create working stunnel between Fuqid (running on
don't worry, your node will automatically tell you when a newer version i=
s available (by noticing new build numbers within the network)
Usually :). Check the web site from time to time, or read this list or
devl, in case there's a reset.
This is not necessarily so. 99% of the time this
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download anything
through stunnel, logs say Fatal error in download thread: EFCPError: recv
failed: 10054.
Markus
Hi
I'm also running a node on my private
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:31:01 +0300
Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download anything
through stunnel, logs say Fatal error in download thread: EFCPError: recv
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download
anything
through stunnel, logs say Fatal error in download thread: EFCPError:
recv
failed: 10054.
10054 is the Winsock error code for Connection
Don't use stunnel, use ssh, and forward the ports. Stunnel just creates
an HTTPS connection, right?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:31:01AM +0300, Markus wrote:
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download
Don't use stunnel, use ssh, and forward the ports. Stunnel just creates
an HTTPS connection, right?
From Stunnel's man page
(http://www.stunnel.org/faq/stunnel.html#description):
The stunnel program is designed to work as SSL encryption wrapper between
remote clients and local (inetd-startable)
Ahh, okay. As long as it doesn't need the clients to be ssl aware.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:48:44PM +0300, Markus wrote:
Don't use stunnel, use ssh, and forward the ports. Stunnel just creates
an HTTPS connection, right?
From Stunnel's man page
Hello,
I control a unix (linux enterprise) server for my web sites. Can I run a node on
this and access it from home? Obviously typing http://127.0.0.1: will not pull
it up since it is at a server farm in another state.
(USA).
by default the only host which is allowed to connect to the
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:16:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I control a unix (linux enterprise) server for my web sites. Can I run a node on
this and access it from home? Obviously typing http://127.0.0.1: will not pull
it up since it is at a server farm in another
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:59:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unstable is the testfield but has all the fixes first.
stable is more pleasant and is updated quite regulary, too.
if you choose to run an unstable node you ought to update the node every single day
as the unstable branch
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
With the above resources how do I get the most out of it? (configuration).
My BIGGEST thing is speed. I hate not finding what I am looking for and I
hate file not founds.
uhm, transfer speed of a splitfile is great and is able to easily max out
13 matches
Mail list logo
