Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Mi., 22. Mai 2019 um 13:12 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > How can i select the entrance on OSRM/openstreetmap website, MAPS.ME, > > OsmAND the entrance? You cant. > > Why would you want to manually select entrance? > because you might want to in order to state

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 22. May 2019, at 12:49, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > You need to have a way to EXPLICITLY define a location > where to navigate to. this is “entrance”/barrier=gate, or not? Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 22. May 2019, at 12:42, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > If navigation is simply doing nearest road point on matching then it requires > change to both > - properly use footway data > - use your proposed relation > > I see no reason for preferring second solution. check

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread marc marc
Le 22.05.19 à 12:06, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >> you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273023376 ? >> it's a good example of missing datas. >> no entrance, no way between the entrance and the public network. >> I feel that the relation type=navaids should be called type=missingway > > Again

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Colin Smale
Navigation software needs to move on. Instead of mapping a destination POI to a single point in every case, it needs to handle a list of points. Each point may have filters or qualifiers, such as opening hours or mode of transport; this can lead to some of the points being disqualified. The

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 13:03 by f...@zz.de: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> > - Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany >> > It does not have a connection to Baumstraße but to >> > Hermann-Vogelsang-Straße. >> > >> > It still will be routed through Baumstraße and

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 13:00 by f...@zz.de: > > Hi > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:42:45PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> 22 May 2019, 09:53 by f...@zz.de: >> > Hi Marc, >> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:38:23PM +, marc marc wrote: >> >> > What is the expectation to get navigated to when

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > 22 May 2019, 12:49 by f...@zz.de: > > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:37:21PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > >> > Again a footway between the house and a road will NOT help for > >> > car navigation because for cars a

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > - Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany > > It does not have a connection to Baumstraße but to > > Hermann-Vogelsang-Straße. > > > > It still will be routed through Baumstraße and the driveway to > > Baumstraße 45a > > > >

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 12:49 by f...@zz.de: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:37:21PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> > Again a footway between the house and a road will NOT help for >> > car navigation because for cars a footway is NOT a routable >> > part of the graph. >> > >> Car navigation may use

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:42:45PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > 22 May 2019, 09:53 by f...@zz.de: > > Hi Marc, > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:38:23PM +, marc marc wrote: > >> > What is the expectation to get navigated to when selecting a park? > >> there is no such thing as "a single

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 09:43 by f...@zz.de: > > Hola Mateusz, > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:26:01AM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> 21 May 2019, 23:46 by f...@zz.de: >> >> > - Houses which are routeable by road a but are near road b or vice >> > versa. >> > >> > Adding more roads aka

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:37:21PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Again a footway between the house and a road will NOT help for > > car navigation because for cars a footway is NOT a routable > > part of the graph. > > > Car navigation may use footway data to select best dropoff point. > >

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 09:53 by f...@zz.de: > > Hi Marc, > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:38:23PM +, marc marc wrote: > >> > What is the expectation to get navigated to when selecting a park? >> >> there is no such thing as "a single point that makes everyone agree" >> > > Yes there is - there has to

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 12:06 by f...@zz.de: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 09:13:14AM +, marc marc wrote: > >> Le 22.05.19 à 09:43, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >> >> Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, >> >> footways and obstacles where well written router will fail? >> >

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 09:13:14AM +, marc marc wrote: > Le 22.05.19 à 09:43, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > >> Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, > >> footways and obstacles where well written router will fail? > > > > - Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany > >

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread marc marc
Le 22.05.19 à 09:43, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >> Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, >> footways and obstacles where well written router will fail? > > - Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273023376 ? it's a good

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread marc marc
Le 22.05.19 à 10:36, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > type navaid > source (Multiple ones sharing the same transport > destination) > car > bicyle > foot this info, for well mapped objet, already exist polygon have several nodes with entrance=yes and car/bicyle/foot=designated

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi Peter, On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:15:57AM +0200, Peter Elderson wrote: > > Id imaging a relation which says > > object A -> car -> Node B (on routable graph) > > So whenever i tell my nav software to bring me to object A the node > > selected on the routable graph as a destination will be

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 09:43:31AM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, > > footways > > and obstacles where well written router will fail? > > - Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany > It does not have a connection to

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Peter Elderson
> Id imaging a relation which says > object A -> car -> Node B (on routable graph) > So whenever i tell my nav software to bring me to object A the node > selected on the routable graph as a destination will be Node B. One relation per mode of transport then? So a complex obejct a could have

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 08:31:03AM +1000, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 07:47, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > - Houses which are routeable by road a but are near road b or vice > > versa. > > That could be a "problem" due to GPS (?) system being so accurate? And map data

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi Marc, On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:38:23PM +, marc marc wrote: > > What is the expectation to get navigated to when selecting a park? > > there is no such thing as "a single point that makes everyone agree" Yes there is - there has to be an explicit location you will ne navigated to for a

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hola Mateusz, On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:26:01AM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > 21 May 2019, 23:46 by f...@zz.de: > > > - Houses which are routeable by road a but are near road b or vice > > versa. > > > > Adding more roads aka service/driveway does not necessary make it more > >

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-22 Thread Jan S
Am 22. Mai 2019 00:44:51 MESZ schrieb Mateusz Konieczny : > >22 May 2019, 00:38 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > >> Le 22.05.19 à 00:16, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >> >>> >>> Hi marc, >>> >>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +, marc marc wrote: >>> Hello, Le 21.05.19 à 23:46,

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 00:38 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > Le 22.05.19 à 00:16, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > >> >> Hi marc, >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +, marc marc wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >>> Currently all Routing/Navigation

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread marc marc
Le 22.05.19 à 00:16, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > > Hi marc, > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +, marc marc wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >>> Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find >>> the nearest or best point on the routeable

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 00:16 by f...@zz.de: > Doesnt work - You are navigating by car but you only have a footway up > to hour house - Still the house is near road b - thus you get navigated > to the wrong street. > In this case router should be improved to route toward  house, not to road segment

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 07:47, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > - Houses which are routeable by road a but are near road b or vice > versa. > That could be a "problem" due to GPS (?) system being so accurate? For instance, where I am sitting now at the back of my house, various GPS / location /

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
21 May 2019, 23:46 by f...@zz.de: > - Houses which are routeable by road a but are near road b or vice > versa. > > Adding more roads aka service/driveway does not necessary make it more > deterministic. > Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, footways and

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi marc, On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > > Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find > > the nearest or best point on the routeable network for a given > > destination lat/lon or object.

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread marc marc
Hello, Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find > the nearest or best point on the routeable network for a given > destination lat/lon or object. with best, you mean : only one ? that look like wrong a destination can have

[Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi, is there any Navaid relation to map an object to a point on the routeable network? Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find the nearest or best point on the routeable network for a given destination lat/lon or object. I have seen this fail for multiple occurences over