Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism - a real example from Zürich

2011-02-02 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 01/27/2011 07:20 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote: On 01/26/2011 08:40 PM, Michał Borsuk wrote: The bus service number 10 in Wintherthur is the most simple case you can have. Absolutely no exceptions. See timetables of the two terminal stations: So there is yet another line 10 mixed at the

Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism - a real example from Zürich

2011-02-02 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 01/27/2011 06:56 PM, ant wrote: Hi, On 27.01.2011 10:49, Richard Mann wrote: Thanks, Richard. I think we've got three broad decisions: 1) Whether the use of stop area / group relations should be a) widespread b) exceptional b b, ideally with a definition to what cases those

Re: [Talk-transit] NEW Proposed Feature

2011-02-02 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 01/28/2011 02:45 PM, Jo wrote: Yes that's one option. I'm a bit reluctant to put in separate relations for each direction unless someone actually gives me a compelling reason to do so. I already have some ways with more than 20 relations, and I don't really want to double that

Re: [Talk-transit] NEW Proposed Feature

2011-02-02 Thread Richard Mann
Potlatch 2 includes a display of the ways/nodes in order, and you can move them about, but it doesn't currently tell you anything about the member, except the id and the role (so it's pretty much a list of random numbers). I've raised a ticket requesting at least the member's name to be

Re: [Talk-transit] NEW Proposed Feature

2011-02-02 Thread Jo
2011/2/2 Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com: On 01/28/2011 02:45 PM, Jo wrote:    Yes that's one option. I'm a bit reluctant to put in separate    relations for each direction unless someone actually gives me a    compelling reason to do so. I already have some ways with more than 20    

Re: [Talk-transit] NEW Proposed Feature

2011-02-02 Thread Richard Mann
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to add a way to a relation twice with Potlatch? And is it possible to show that 1 way is part of a relation multiple times? Yes. Oxford Bus route 9 now has a certain section of the Green Road roundabout twice. Richard

Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism - a real example from Zürich

2011-02-02 Thread Dominik Mahrer (Teddy)
On 02.02.2011 13:04, Michał Borsuk wrote: Let's just get down to differences, I say your proposal is too difficult. I've already spoken well about its data integrity, but new users don't care about it. We need something that is as good as yours in data integrity, and as easy to grasp as my

Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism - a real example from Zürich

2011-02-02 Thread Dominik Mahrer (Teddy)
On 02/03/2011 12:40 AM, Richard Mann wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Michael von Glasow mich...@vonglasow.com wrote: Hence, in most cases the extra node on the way is what I call courtesy tagging - it makes things easier for the renderer (less preprocessing) but can be automated. I

Re: [talk-ph] QC Scout Area Mapping Party on February 12!

2011-02-02 Thread maning sambale
I propose we dedicate time/session for a bing tracing tutorial (how to calibrate/re-align imagery, etc.) On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Trace away! We can always correct things with data from on the ground. :-) On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:58 PM,

Re: [talk-ph] QC Scout Area Mapping Party on February 12!

2011-02-02 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
Sound good to me. I say we do it during the afternoon meetup. :-) Anyway, here are my proposed meet-up places: Morning: McDo Timog http://osm.org/go/4zhTAkYwJ-?m Afternoon: Baang Coffee (free Wi-Fi!) http://osm.org/go/4zhSV_EQN--?m On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, maning sambale

Re: [talk-ph] QC Scout Area Mapping Party on February 12!

2011-02-02 Thread maning sambale
OK. So for those who can't attend the full day mapping can participate in the bing session. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Sound good to me. I say we do it during the afternoon meetup. :-) Anyway, here are my proposed meet-up places: Morning:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/2/1 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: I know that at OSM we always used to say: If the layers are separable then you can have different licenses on each; if not, then not. Of course this would result in a map that can *not* be copied under CC-BY-SA because it is virtually impossible to

[OSM-legal-talk] Coloriuris compatibility

2011-02-02 Thread jynus
Hi, I have just left a meeting with representatives of my local concil (Zaragoza, a Spanish city with 700.000 inhabitants). They have the willing to provide transparency and open data to its citizens, however, I have not been able to make a clear agreement to license their data under

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net wrote: On 02/02/11 16:15, Anthony wrote: What is meant by content is unmodified?  Obviously the printed base map is going to be modified from the original database.  So under your interpretation, the part about the content

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Rob Myers
On 02/02/2011 05:13 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: I think that in those examples, there was the concept of interaction and co-dependency - the question of does the overlaid stuff work without the map. So if you carefully place your photo or illustration at a certain point in the map, and your photo

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: On 02/02/11 18:00, Peter Miller wrote: And this one showing the location of the 'Trafford Law Centre' unless the photo was also on a free license or moved so as not to obscure the map.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Jonathan Harley
On 02/02/11 17:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Jonathan Harley wrote: Clearly no rendering of any map is going to be unmodified in the sense of having identical sequences of 0s and 1s to the database, in which case there could be no such thing as a collective work based on a database, ever. For

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net wrote: On 02/02/11 17:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Jonathan Harley wrote: Clearly no rendering of any map is going to be unmodified in the sense of having identical sequences of 0s and 1s to the database, in which case

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Rob Myers
On 02/02/2011 05:49 PM, Jonathan Harley wrote: I don't see what print's got to do with it. Any rendering, whether to paper or to a screen, changes the bits used; if you take that as the Where multiple sources of bits are combined to produce a single new work, that new work is a derivative

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Rob Myers
On 02/02/2011 06:47 PM, Jonathan Harley wrote: I think we may have differing interpretations of the intent of the license. Mine is that the license is supposed to allow people to use the map in a variety of ways, online and in print, so long as any new data is open and OSM is attributed; not

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Rob Myers
On 02/02/2011 06:39 PM, Peter Miller wrote: So... you are suggesting that you believe that no one will ever be able to overlay an osm map, or indeed an ccbya image with any image that not available on an open license even if the context of the two images is completely different? The context

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Peter Miller
On 2 February 2011 19:05, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote: On 02/02/2011 06:39 PM, Peter Miller wrote: So... you are suggesting that you believe that no one will ever be able to overlay an osm map, or indeed an ccbya image with any image that not available on an open license even if the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Francis Davey
On 2 February 2011 20:02, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote: Indeed, I don't believe that there are any lawyers in the house! I do wish that the Foundation would pay for one from time to time to help with general questions like this which matter a lot to potential users of our

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 02/02/11 19:39, Peter Miller wrote: So... you are suggesting that you believe that no one will ever be able to overlay an osm map, or indeed an ccbya image with any image that not available on an open license even if the context of the two images is completely different? Yes, I am not

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 02/02/11 19:47, Jonathan Harley wrote: I think we may have differing interpretations of the intent of the license. Mine is that the license is supposed to allow people to use the map in a variety of ways, online and in print, so long as any new data is open and OSM is attributed; not

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote: On 2 February 2011 19:05, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote: On 02/02/2011 06:39 PM, Peter Miller wrote: Frederik has explained how it can be argued that BY-SA's private use exception allows online mash-ups.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Rob Myers
On 02/02/11 20:02, Peter Miller wrote: I don't believe that a court would see it that way and it is a very Courts have seen it that way in the case of Shepher Fairey, Jeff Koons, Andy Warhol, Richard Prince, The Beastie Boys, and many other artists and musicians. unhelpful view for the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Peter, On 02/02/11 21:02, Peter Miller wrote: I don't believe that a court would see it that way and it is a very unhelpful view for the project to take. The whole attribution-and-share-alike thing is a very unhelpful situation for the project but it doesn't go away simply because it is

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, On 02/02/11 18:49, Jonathan Harley wrote: For print, yes, that's about the size of it. I don't see what print's got to do with it. Any rendering, whether to paper or to a screen, changes the bits used The

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: Nonsense.  The person visiting the website doesn't give the instructions to the machine.  The person providing the website does. If you wrote a website which intentionally caused the computer of the person visiting it to overheat,

Re: [OSM-talk] New tool in Potlatch 2 for areas that share a way

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 02/02/11 11:24, Steve Bennett wrote: Certainly that information is of use to someone, but I don't think OSM should try and be all things to all people. For starters, we simply don't have the manpower. In the Australian context, it looks like we might be able to do better than Google

Re: [OSM-talk] New tool in Potlatch 2 for areas that share a way

2011-02-02 Thread Steve Bennett
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: These things need not be, and have never been, global in OSM. If one local community happens to have the manpower locally then it's great if they manage to record all that detail, and we should be very careful not to make

[OSM-talk] help from people with first-hand knowledge

2011-02-02 Thread Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
dear list, is there a website similar to this: http://toolserver.org/~flacus/OSM/checkcrossing/spain/C03-spain-20110128.htm where people with first-hand knowledge can provide names for streets and buildings without using an editor? for example, with a textbox and a submit button which updates

Re: [OSM-talk] New tool in Potlatch 2 for areas that share a way

2011-02-02 Thread David Fawcett
I believe that if one is tagging an area to imply that there is contamination, one should cite an authoritative source. Having your property tagged as potentially contaminated could lead to difficulties in selling or refinancing the property. Even if a property was contaminated, it could be

Re: [OSM-talk] Creative Commons: Use CC for databases

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: It is not, as you imply, a reason for not agreeing to the Contributor Terms (these would still allow us to go for CC 4.0 licenses) It's not in itself a reason to not agree to the CT, but it does fairly well eliminate most

Re: [OSM-talk] help from people with first-hand knowledge

2011-02-02 Thread Matthias Meißer
Hi there Juan, well you can simply use www.walking-papers.org to add informations by penpaper. Another way would be to use www.osmbugs.org to add markers with hints online. There are a few other services that offer direct tagging for dedicated feature sets (www.wheelmap.org,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Jonathan Harley
On 02/02/11 13:21, Rob Myers wrote: On 02/01/2011 06:17 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Peter says that I would consider the proposed resulting work to be 'two or more distinct, separate and independent works selected and arranged into a collective whole with the ccbysa content being used in an

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net wrote: I think Peter is right - as long as the CC-BY[-SA] content is unmodified, it can be assembled with other things to form a collective work. The CC-BY[-SA] licenses do not say that they still have to be separate and

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Rob Myers
On 02/02/11 15:59, Jonathan Harley wrote: By referring to a collective whole, it seems to me that the license is asserting that such a thing can exist. I think Peter is right - as long Oh I see, I didn't realise that's the wording of the licence. That's an unfortunate turn of phrase then.

Re: [OSM-talk] help from people with first-hand knowledge

2011-02-02 Thread Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
thanks, osmbugs.org is exactly what I was looking for. regards --- On Wed, 2/2/11, Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de wrote: From: Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] help from people with first-hand knowledge To: talk@openstreetmap.org Date: Wednesday, February 2, 2011,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Jonathan Harley
On 02/02/11 16:15, Anthony wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Harleyj...@spiffymap.net wrote: I think Peter is right - as long as the CC-BY[-SA] content is unmodified, it can be assembled with other things to form a collective work. The CC-BY[-SA] licenses do not say that they

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Peter Miller
I have been following the discussion but have been in meetings today so haven't been able to contribute. I agree we can discuss at lenght what 'separable' and 'unmodified' mean as abstract concepts but, as usual with legal contracts, the words will be interpreted in a particular context. It is

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Jonathan Harley wrote: Clearly no rendering of any map is going to be unmodified in the sense of having identical sequences of 0s and 1s to the database, in which case there could be no such thing as a collective work based on a database, ever. For print, yes, that's about the size of it.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 02/02/11 18:00, Peter Miller wrote: The strict view expressed above by Frederick and others would mean that it would be impossible to use osm mapping as a bacground for this crime data as in the chart, 'Violent crime in the USA' unless the overlaid data was also on an open licence or the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote: The strict view expressed above by Frederick and others would mean that it would be impossible to use osm mapping as a bacground for this crime data as in the chart, 'Violent crime in the USA' unless the overlaid

Re: [OSM-talk] help from people with first-hand knowledge

2011-02-02 Thread malenki
Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio wrote: is there a website similar to this: http://toolserver.org/~flacus/OSM/checkcrossing/spain/C03-spain-20110128.htm where people with first-hand knowledge can provide names for streets and buildings without using an editor? There is the Amenity Editor at

Re: [OSM-talk] help from people with first-hand knowledge

2011-02-02 Thread Graham Jones
One of last year's Google Summer of Code projects was a simple web based editor targeted at new users - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2010/AcceptedProjects/SimpleMapEditor . It still needs some development, but it would be a good start for something that has very

Re: [OSM-talk] New tool in Potlatch 2 for areas that share a way

2011-02-02 Thread nicholas . g . lawrence
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au wrote: Risk assessment and hazards are also relevant. The grassy area next to a steel mill might not be plain old grass, who knows what has been stored there and what kind of hazards, from chemicals to rusty nails are

[OSM-talk-nl] Gemeentes naar Duitsland en België verhuisd?

2011-02-02 Thread Martien Scheepens
Hallo mappers, Ik probeerde net de routeplanner van open.mapquest.com en toen viel mij op dat mijn thuishaven *Briljantstraat, Groningen, Grafschaft Bentheim, Aurich, Groningen, Germany* ( http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/details.php?place_id=14356098) heet. Oorspronkelijk dacht ik aan

[talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread Peter Watson
Hi Everyone, I have noticed that all the Gold Coast canals are taged with waterway=coastline. I understand that the coastline should connect around the coastline in an unbroken line. ie. should connect across the river where it meets the sea. I understand the canals should be done with tag

Re: [talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread John Smith
On 2 February 2011 20:40, Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I have noticed that all the Gold Coast canals are taged with waterway=coastline. I understand that the coastline should connect around the coastline in an unbroken line. ie. should connect across the river

Re: [talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread Steve Bennett
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I have noticed that all the Gold Coast canals are taged with waterway=coastline. I understand that the coastline should connect around the coastline in an unbroken line. ie. should connect across the

Re: [talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread John Smith
On 2 February 2011 21:28, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean by canal? I thought they were saltwater...hence, waterway=coastline is ok? Should we tag salt lakes as coastline too using that logic? ___ Talk-au mailing list

Re: [talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread Peter Watson
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I have noticed that all the Gold Coast canals are taged with waterway=coastline. I understand that the coastline should connect around the coastline in an unbroken line. ie. should connect across

Re: [talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread Steve Bennett
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:36 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 February 2011 21:28, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean by canal? I thought they were saltwater...hence, waterway=coastline is ok? Should we tag salt lakes as coastline too using that

Re: [talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread Steve Bennett
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com wrote: Yes all canals are tidal saltwater, however I understood from the Wiki that the coastline tag was to be used for the actual coast line only and should be connected across river outlets etc. to determine the edge of

Re: [talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread John Smith
On 2 February 2011 22:05, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:36 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 February 2011 21:28, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean by canal? I thought they were saltwater...hence,

Re: [talk-au] waterway=coastline

2011-02-02 Thread Steve Bennett
Just pointing out the flaws in your logic Please refrain from doing so. It's not helpful, and just contributes to the snarky atmosphere this list suffers from. Thanks, Steve ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

[talk-au] Fwd: HOT for Cyclone Yasi

2011-02-02 Thread John Smith
-- Forwarded message -- From: Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com Date: 3 February 2011 06:44 Subject: HOT for Cyclone Yasi To: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com, Shoaib Burq sho...@nomad-labs.com, Kashif Rasul kashif.ra...@gmail.com Cc: hot...@gmail.com Are you all, or others

Re: [Talk-br] Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread Johan Dahlin
2011/2/2 David Kurka david.ku...@gmail.com: Alexandre, 2011/2/1 Alexandre da Costa Medeiros ale...@gmail.com Pessoal, Estou fazendo alguns inputs de trechos que tenho de Campinas/SP através de um app para iPhone chamado OSMTrack. Parece que funciona bem, os uploads foram aceitos pelo

Re: [Talk-br] Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread Rodrigo de Avila
Em 2 de fevereiro de 2011 01:08, David Kurka david.ku...@gmail.comescreveu: Tendo imagens de alta resolução do Bing disponíveis, vale a pena investir em traces gps? (pessoas além do Alexandre podem me responder isso também! :)) Vale sim. Esses traces serão úteis para fazer o alinhamento

Re: [Talk-br] Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread Leandro Motta Barros
2011/2/2 David Kurka david.ku...@gmail.com: [...] Tendo imagens de alta resolução do Bing disponíveis, vale a pena investir em traces gps? (pessoas além do Alexandre podem me responder isso também! :)) Se eu não sonhei, eu li em lugar (Wiki do OSM, provavelmente) que esses traces são bons até

Re: [Talk-br] Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread Claudomiro Nascimento Junior
Oi Kurka, Eu e o usuário pablotc (ele está na lista?) também estavamos traçando Campinas pelas novas imagens na virada do ano... Temos que retomar as atividades por lá... Fiz até alguns screenshoots do nosso progresso: http://www.flickr.com/photos/claudomiro/sets/72157625835769191/ 2011/2/2

Re: [Talk-br] Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread Johan Dahlin
2011/2/2 Claudomiro Nascimento Junior claudom...@claudomiro.com: Oi Kurka, Eu e o usuário pablotc (ele está na lista?) também estavamos traçando Campinas pelas novas imagens na virada do ano... Temos que retomar as atividades por lá... Fiz até alguns screenshoots do nosso progresso:

Re: [Talk-br] Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread David Kurka
2011/2/2 Leandro Motta Barros lmbar...@gmail.com 2011/2/2 David Kurka david.ku...@gmail.com: [...] Tendo imagens de alta resolução do Bing disponíveis, vale a pena investir em traces gps? (pessoas além do Alexandre podem me responder isso também! :)) Se eu não sonhei, eu li em lugar

Re: [Talk-br] Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread David Kurka
2011/2/2 Claudomiro Nascimento Junior claudom...@claudomiro.com Oi Kurka, Eu e o usuário pablotc (ele está na lista?) também estavamos traçando Campinas pelas novas imagens na virada do ano... Temos que retomar as atividades por lá... Fiz até alguns screenshoots do nosso progresso:

[Talk-br] Re-2: Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread cs
usar source=survey. a melhor forma de identificar isso, é através da tag source, certo? logo, ruas com tag source=gps devem ter prioridade à source=gps? ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br

Re: [Talk-br] Re-2: Duvida Public GPS traces

2011-02-02 Thread Diogo W
Complementando: Se você *coletou os dados pessoalmente* andando na rua, de carro, bicicleta, moto, a pé, etc, *source=survey* outros valores podem ser: *source=Bing*, *source=Yahoo*, *source=IBGE*, etc http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:source 2011/2/2 c...@geobahia.net.br usar

Re: [Talk-br] [OpenStreetMap] Fwd: Re: CBERS 2B image over Bom Jardim

2011-02-02 Thread Arlete Meneguette
Hi, there ! Tks ever so much for your warm welcome. Cheers, my new friends. Arlete 2011/2/2 Jean-Guilhem Cailton j...@arkemie.com: Arlete, I transmitted your request to our contact at Spot Image earlier today, just after receiving it. But, from my understanding of how the Disaster Charter

[Talk-br] Plugin 'Turn restrictions' do JOSM

2011-02-02 Thread Flávio Henrique
Olá pessoal. Gostaria de confirmar algo: se eu utilizar o plugin 'Turn Restrictions' do JOSM para indicar as proibições de sentidos em um cruzamento, por exemplo, é suficiente para que os dados sejam corretamente tratados pelos aparelhos gps? Se for vai ser uma mão na roda, pois ficar desenhando

Re: [Talk-de] Dauer von Datenänderung bis diese gerendert ist

2011-02-02 Thread Markus
Hallo Frederik, Claudius, Fabian, danke für die ausführliche Erklärung und die Links. Ganz schön komplex, was da alles im Hintergrund geschieht! Erstaunlich wie schnell OSM ist! Das beeindruckt Kursteilnehmer immer wieder. Formulierungen wie keine 10 Minuten oder in wenigen Minuten passen

[Talk-de] Open Windrad Map

2011-02-02 Thread Fabian Schmidt
Hi, gibt es schon irgendwo eine Karte, auf der man Windräder in niedrigeren Zoomstufen zu sehen bekommt? Gruß, Fabian. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Open Windrad Map

2011-02-02 Thread Fred Jelk
Mir sind zwei Karten bekannt, auf denen man die Windräder schon in niedriger Zoomstufe sieht: http://energy.freelayer.net/ http://www.tappenbeck.net/osm/maps/deu/index.php?id=1019 (leider sind beide Karten aber nur für DE) Am 02.02.2011 10:36, schrieb Fabian Schmidt: Hi, gibt es schon

[Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hallo, ich aegere mich ziemlich ueber die TMC-Daten in der OSM-Datenbank. Ich habe nicht die Uebersicht, wer da alles dran arbeitet und dran gearbeitet hat, also es besteht die Gefahr, dass ich jetzt einigen ehrbaren Mappern auf die Fuesse trete, aber wenn's nach mir geht, muss das Zeug

Re: [Talk-de] Open Windrad Map

2011-02-02 Thread Stephan Wolff
Am 02.02.2011 10:36, schrieb Fabian Schmidt: Hi, gibt es schon irgendwo eine Karte, auf der man Windräder in niedrigeren Zoomstufen zu sehen bekommt? Ich arbeite an einer Karte zu Kraftwerken und Stromnetzen. Es gibt noch technische Probleme (siehe Thread Performanceprobleme bei Mapnik/SQL)

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Fred Jelk
Hallo Frederik, ich selber finde die TMC-Daten ganz ok. - auch wenn diese kryptisch sind und für Menschen nicht verständlich... Unten sind noch ergänzende Worte... Am 02.02.2011 11:10, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hallo, Mir erschliesst sich der Nutzen dieser Tags nicht - kann mir jemand mal

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hallo, On 02/02/11 11:34, Fred Jelk wrote: Mir sieht das nach einem grossangelegten Designfehler aus. Da haette man von vornherein ein OSM-externes Mapping TMC-OSM bauen muessen, statt praktisch die ganze TMC-Datenbank auf OSM aufzupropfen. Da sehe ich dann das Problem, wenn man ein

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread André Joost
Am 02.02.11 11:10, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hallo, ich aegere mich ziemlich ueber die TMC-Daten in der OSM-Datenbank. Ich habe nicht die Uebersicht, wer da alles dran arbeitet und dran gearbeitet hat, also es besteht die Gefahr, dass ich jetzt einigen ehrbaren Mappern auf die Fuesse trete, aber

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Henning Scholland
Hallo Solche kryptischen Dinge gibt es bei Importen recht häufig. Die Hausnummern in Dänemark haben zich Tags, die man in OSM nicht bräuchte. In Italien schwirren auch einige herum. Ich verstehe, dass man irgendsowas braucht, um bspw. später Updates zu fahren. Aber meiner Meinung nach gehört

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Wolfgang
Hallo, Am Mittwoch 02 Februar 2011 11:10:25 schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hallo, [ ] Vielleicht kann mir mal einer den folgenden Vorgang erklaeren. Da ist also eine harmlose Ampel in Dortmund, Node-ID 270090818, getaggt als highway=traffic_signals. Dann kommt am 31, Januar der User ruhri

Re: [Talk-de] Open Windrad Map

2011-02-02 Thread Jan Tappenbeck
Am 02.02.2011 10:53, schrieb Fred Jelk: Mir sind zwei Karten bekannt, auf denen man die Windräder schon in niedriger Zoomstufe sieht: http://energy.freelayer.net/ http://www.tappenbeck.net/osm/maps/deu/index.php?id=1019 (leider sind beide Karten aber nur für DE) Hi ! = werde vielleicht noch

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Pascal Neis
Hi, Fred Jelk schrieb: Am 02.02.2011 11:10, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hallo, Mir erschliesst sich der Nutzen dieser Tags nicht - kann mir jemand mal eine praktische Anwendung zeigen, die diese Tags benutzt? Wenn ich mich nicht irre, werden die TMC-Daten von openrouteservice ausgewertet

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 02.02.2011 11:53, schrieb Henning Scholland: Hallo Solche kryptischen Dinge gibt es bei Importen recht häufig. Die Hausnummern in Dänemark haben zich Tags, die man in OSM nicht bräuchte. In Italien schwirren auch einige herum. Ich verstehe, dass man irgendsowas braucht, um bspw. später

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread André Riedel
Ich bin gegen ein Löschen der TMC-Daten. Richtig ist zwar, dass relativ viele Information zusätzlich gespeichert werden, welche nicht immer notwendig sind, da sie einfach von einem Bot hinzugefügt werden können. Aber ein genereller Abgleich ist nicht fehlerfrei möglich. Marcus Wohlschon (der

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Andreas Labres
On 02.02.11 12:33, Pascal Neis wrote: ich wollte bei der FOSSGIS nach meinem Vortrag auch eine Diskussion diesbzgl. starten, etwas überspitzt: Macht es Sinn, wie (ob) derzeit die TMC Daten in OSM eingearbeitet werden? Ich kenne die Natur dieser TMC Daten/Location Codes nicht, grundsätzlich

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Am 2. Februar 2011 11:10 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: Wir haben fast aussschliesslich menschenlesbare Daten in OSM. Schnapp Dir ein beliebiges Objekt, und Du kannst in aller Regel verstehen, was die Tags daran bedeuten. ich kenne die Details der TMC-Daten nicht, aber durch das

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Wolfgang
Hallo, Am Mittwoch 02 Februar 2011 12:34:46 schrieb Peter Wendorff: Am 02.02.2011 11:53, schrieb Henning Scholland: Hallo Solche kryptischen Dinge gibt es bei Importen recht häufig. Die Hausnummern in Dänemark haben zich Tags, die man in OSM nicht bräuchte. In Italien schwirren auch

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Pascal Neis
Hi, Andreas Labres schrieb: On 02.02.11 12:33, Pascal Neis wrote: ich wollte bei der FOSSGIS nach meinem Vortrag auch eine Diskussion diesbzgl. starten, etwas überspitzt: Macht es Sinn, wie (ob) derzeit die TMC Daten in OSM eingearbeitet werden? Ich kenne die Natur dieser TMC Daten/Location

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hallo, On 02/02/11 13:12, Wolfgang wrote: Ich würde bei 1:1-Zuordnungen nicht einmal eine ID in die OSM-Datenbank einfügen, sondern diese Verknüpfung in der extra-DB oder einer dritten Verknüpfungsinstanz halten. Sobald in OSM ein Node gelöscht wird, ist die Zuordnung für die Katz. Das

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Andreas Labres
On 02.02.11 14:05, Pascal Neis wrote: TMC Staus oder Verkehrsbehinderungen beziehen sich im Normalfall immer auf Straßenstücke. Das wäre auch mein Verständnis/meine praktische Erfahrung mit TMC. Und die gilt es in OSM identifizierbar zu machen (IMO). Wenn dazu die Strategie des Taggens geändert

[Talk-de] Kraftwerks-Karte (war: Open Windrad Map)

2011-02-02 Thread Claudius
Eine leichte Thread-Entführung: Am 02.02.2011 11:28, Stephan Wolff: Am 02.02.2011 10:36, schrieb Fabian Schmidt: gibt es schon irgendwo eine Karte, auf der man Windräder in niedrigeren Zoomstufen zu sehen bekommt? Ich arbeite an einer Karte zu Kraftwerken und Stromnetzen. Wäre toll, wenn

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Wed, 2011-02-02 14:19:50 +0100, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote: On 02.02.11 14:05, Pascal Neis wrote: TMC Staus oder Verkehrsbehinderungen beziehen sich im Normalfall immer auf Straßenstücke. Das wäre auch mein Verständnis/meine praktische Erfahrung mit TMC. Und die gilt es in OSM

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Wed, 2011-02-02 14:22:50 +0100, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: On 02/02/11 12:34, Peter Wendorff wrote: Das Wiki dokumentiert eigentlich insgesamt recht gut, was da gemacht wird und welches Tagging-Schema verwendet wird. Also offensichtlich gibt es da eine TMC-Datenbank mit

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Martin Simon
Am 2. Februar 2011 14:07 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: Sobald in OSM ein Node gelöscht wird, ist die Zuordnung für die Katz. Das funktioniert nicht, zumal man dann in OSM gar nicht erkennen kann, dass am Node etwas dranhängt. Wenn ich einen Node in einem Straßenverlauf lösche,

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Wolfgang
Hallo, Am Mittwoch 02 Februar 2011 14:07:53 schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hallo, Natuerlich kann man das Problem umgehen, indem man aus OSM heraus auf die externe Datenbank linkt - aber das skaliert nicht, oder im Volksmund: Wenn das jeder machen wuerde ;) Das sehe ich in diesem Fall komplett

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Bernd Wurst
Hallo. Am Mittwoch 02 Februar 2011, 15:56:03 schrieb Wolfgang: DIe TMC-Geschichte gehört zu den zentralen Daten, die zumindest mit OSM eng vermascht werden müssen. Routing mit Verkehrsinfo ist einfach Stand der Technik. Aber ist nicht einerseits die Datenübertragung des TMC und auch die

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Wed, 2011-02-02 16:19:59 +0100, Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org wrote: Am Mittwoch 02 Februar 2011, 15:56:03 schrieb Wolfgang: DIe TMC-Geschichte gehört zu den zentralen Daten, die zumindest mit OSM eng vermascht werden müssen. Routing mit Verkehrsinfo ist einfach Stand der Technik.

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Frank Gruender
Moin, Am 02.02.2011 15:56, schrieb Wolfgang: Hallo, Am Mittwoch 02 Februar 2011 14:07:53 schrieb Frederik Ramm: Natuerlich kann man das Problem umgehen, indem man aus OSM heraus auf die externe Datenbank linkt - aber das skaliert nicht, oder im Volksmund: Wenn das jeder machen wuerde ;)

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Bernd Wurst
Hallo. Am Mittwoch 02 Februar 2011, 16:35:38 schrieb Jan-Benedict Glaw: Aber ist nicht einerseits die Datenübertragung des TMC und auch die Herangehensweise wie die TMC-Codes definiert sind stark veraltete Technik und wird das nicht in Zukunft sowieso anders laufen? Veraltet? Naja, Das

Re: [Talk-de] Koennen wir die TMC-Daten rauswerfen?

2011-02-02 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hallo, On 02/02/11 16:52, Frank Gruender wrote: TMC ist funktional direkt auf Navigationssysteme ausgelegt und nicht für Mikrowellen und Waschmaschinen. Die Aktualität dürfte in der Regel größer als bei Telefonnummern irgendwelcher Restaurants sein. OSM ist gerade für Navigationssyteme und für

  1   2   3   >