sjecam se da je netko spominjao zracne snimke , tj. njihovo dobivanje.
naletio sam na ovaj link http://brooxes.com/ zracne snimke pomocu zmaja :D
___
Talk-hr mailing list
Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
2009/11/25 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
Maybe ~= 100km, but == 60 nm.
Am I the only one who has read that as 60 nanometers?
No, a certain Martin K. has already reported the same. I'd say
Was mapping a few hiking trails with foot-only bridges on the trail and
could not figure out a way to mark these bridge since the only bridge
waypoint needs the same parameters as a highway.
Any pointers on how to do this best?
Regards,
Shalabh
___
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's diary entry last week (http://j.mp/8ESP8o)
stired my interest. Using a few examples, he showed how mapping
everything as an area - or as a volume - makes ultimate sense. Should we
go for it now ?
Mapping the crossing of two roads, four cycleways and four sidewalks all
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:11:29 +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org
wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's diary entry last week (http://j.mp/8ESP8o)
stired my interest. Using a few examples, he showed how mapping
everything as an area - or as a volume - makes ultimate sense. Should we
go for
On 25 Nov 2009, at 11:45, Shalabh wrote:
Was mapping a few hiking trails with foot-only bridges on the trail and could
not figure out a way to mark these bridge since the only bridge waypoint
needs the same parameters as a highway.
Any pointers on how to do this best?
on the way use
2009/11/25 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's diary entry last week (http://j.mp/8ESP8o)
stired my interest. Using a few examples, he showed how mapping
everything as an area - or as a volume - makes ultimate sense. Should we
go for it now ?
Mapping the crossing of
Shalabh writes:
Was mapping a few hiking trails with foot-only bridges on the trail and
could not figure out a way to mark these bridge since the only bridge
waypoint needs the same parameters as a highway.
Any pointers on how to do this best?
Sure. Any bridgey thing can be tagged
Dont think my question was specific enough. I am using JOSM for this and
using highway tag means giving speed limits.
I am using the path=hiking trail for the trail and would ideally need a
bridge attribute 'yes' within the hiking trail.
Regards,
Shalabh
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Russ
JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail, atleast
not while using the presets. If I use the highway tag with a bridge,
consider this. I have a hiking trail marked as an 'demanding alpine hiking'
50 km from any humanity and then I have a bridge tagged as highway in the
Shalabh wrote:
using highway tag means giving speed limits.
You don't have to - it is optional.
I am using the path=hiking trail for the trail and would ideally need a
bridge attribute 'yes' within the hiking trail.
Add the bridge=yes tag - it works just fine for that.
Shalabh wrote:
JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail,
atleast not while using the presets. If I use the highway tag with a
bridge, consider this. I have a hiking trail marked as an 'demanding
alpine hiking' 50 km from any humanity and then I have a bridge tagged
as
Shalabh shalabh.w at gmail.com writes:
JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail, atleast not
while using the presets.
Forget the presets, you can tag how ever you want in OSM. Split your trail from
both ends of the bridge, select that part and add tag bridge=yes with
On 25/11/2009 14:45, Shalabh wrote:
JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail,
atleast not while using the presets. If I use the highway tag with a
bridge, consider this. I have a hiking trail marked as an 'demanding
alpine hiking' 50 km from any humanity and then I
Hi,
Has anybody written a tool like osm2pgsql for importing OSM data directly into
SpatiaLite database? Alternatively, are there plans to make an OSM driver for
ogr2ogr?
-Jukka Rahkonen-
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 13:11, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's diary entry last week (http://j.mp/8ESP8o)
stired my interest. Using a few examples, he showed how mapping
everything as an area - or as a volume - makes ultimate sense. Should we
go for it now ?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
Mapping the crossing of two roads, four cycleways and four sidewalks all
as surfaces requires about twenty times as many nodes as mapping the
crossing of two linear roads. That is a hefty increase in complexity,
You don't have to fill in *anything* in a preset. If you don't, then
all of the optional stuff is left out and you only get the
bridge=yes tag, which is useful if you've forgotten.
Otherwise, you can just add it as an attribute. The typing completion
makes it very easy. Click on Add, type b
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:16 +, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody written a tool like osm2pgsql for importing OSM data directly into
SpatiaLite database?
If you want to have a go yourself you could look at:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/1371
This copied the postgres code and
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's diary entry last week (http://j.mp/8ESP8o)
stired my interest. Using a few examples, he showed how mapping
everything as an area - or as a volume - makes ultimate sense. Should we
go for it now ?
Imo, area mapping is too advanced for now.
Shaun McDonald wrote:
on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1.
I didn't think the layer=1 was necessary when there's only one bridge -
it defaults to display above other objects.
I only use in there a multiple bridges crossing each other.
Dave F.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Isn't it better in most situations to have both (ways and areas)
rather than just one or the other?
At an intersection, yes, there is one squarish section of road that I
am capable of traveling on in any spot in any direction.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not convinced that, say, a road should be mapped as *both* a way
and an area - I don't see any need for that.
If the road doesn't have a constant width you basically need an area.
Now, how are you going to indicate a
2009/11/25 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's diary entry last week (http://j.mp/8ESP8o)
stired my interest. Using a few examples, he showed how mapping
everything as an area - or as a volume - makes ultimate sense. Should we
go for it
2009/11/25 Anthony o...@inbox.org
I didn't know that was up for debate. I thought the consensus was
that they should not only share nodes, but they should share ways as
well.
no, I don't think that's a good idea as the resulting multipolygons make the
situation unnecessarily complicated.
2009/11/25 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
Shaun McDonald wrote:
on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1.
I didn't think the layer=1 was necessary when there's only one bridge -
it defaults to display above other objects.
I only use in there a multiple bridges crossing each
Dave F. schrieb:
on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1.
I didn't think the layer=1 was necessary when there's only one bridge -
it defaults to display above other objects.
I only use in there a multiple bridges crossing each other.
I don't trust any more on defaults:
I think I may understand your confusion here. You may think of highway to
mean a high-speed paved road on which motor vehicles travel. But within the
context of OSM, the highway tag is much more general purpose. Virtually
all formal and informal roads and paths should be tagged highway,
I'm currently doing mapping for the island of Maui in Hawai'i. The leeward
side of this island has a large number of streams that are dry nearly all
the time, only containing water during periods of heavy rain. On maps,
these streams are often depicted as dashed or dotted blue lines.
Is there
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/25 Anthony o...@inbox.org
I didn't know that was up for debate. I thought the consensus was
that they should not only share nodes, but they should share ways as
well.
no, I don't think that's a good
See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Hydrography_Dataset
http://www.mail-archive.com/newb...@openstreetmap.org/msg03521.html
It sems 'obvious' :-) that this should be
waterway=stream
stream=intermittent
pgpvyQUE20BJu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/11/25 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's diary entry last week (http://j.mp/8ESP8o)
stired my interest. Using a few examples, he showed how mapping
everything as an area - or as a volume - makes ultimate
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Scott Atwood scott.roy.atw...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm currently doing mapping for the island of Maui in Hawai'i. The leeward
side of this island has a large number of streams that are dry nearly all
the time, only containing water during periods of heavy rain. On
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
Wow. I hope you're in the minority on that one, because now that I
discovered multipolygon relations there's no way I'm going back to
mapping the exact same line three times (e.g. to represent a park
adjacent to a residential area separated by a fence).
That's certainly
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/25 Anthony o...@inbox.org
I didn't know that was up for debate. I thought the consensus was
that they should not only share nodes, but they should share ways as
well.
no, I don't think that's
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
There have been several discussions whether area borders - such as
landuse areas - should use the same nodes as streets they are adjacent
to. Iirc, some participants complained that sharing nodes causes editing
problems
2009/11/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org
losing method into the winning method. By that time we'll have every
single area of the globe (except maybe the oceans) covered by an area,
right? :)
or even by several areas and inside even more boundaries... ;-)
cheers,
Martin
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/26 Anthony o...@inbox.org
losing method into the winning method. By that time we'll have every
single area of the globe (except maybe the oceans) covered by an area,
right? :)
or even by several
2009/11/26 Dan Homerick danhomer...@gmail.com:
I used an 'intermittent=yes' tag for a county-wide import I did.
FWIW, I also use intermittent=yes.
Cheers
Colin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Now, how are you going to indicate a direction of travel on an area?
I guess you could come up with some way to do it, but you'd basically
be defining a way.
Good point. Anyone got ideas on this? Maybe it is indeed necessary to
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:40:53 +0200, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Now, how are you going to indicate a direction of travel on an area?
I guess you could come up with some way to do it, but you'd basically
be defining
On Nov 25, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Now, how are you going to indicate a direction of travel on an area?
I guess you could come up with some way to do it, but you'd basically
be defining a way.
Good point. Anyone
2009/11/25 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's diary entry last week (http://j.mp/8ESP8o)
stired my interest. Using a few examples, he showed how mapping
everything as an area - or as a volume - makes ultimate sense. Should we
go for it now ?
The main usage for this
Jon Burgess jburgess777 at googlemail.com writes:
Alternatively, are there plans to make an OSM driver for
ogr2ogr?
Not that I know of. I'm sure you could fallback to some path like:
osm - postgres - shapefile - spatialite
I am doing it as osm - postgres - spatialite by using
2009/11/25 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1.
I didn't think the layer=1 was necessary when there's only one bridge -
it defaults to display above other objects.
I only use in there a multiple bridges crossing each
Hi,
I've implemented importing of OSM data into SpatiaLite DB and integrated it
successfully with Kosmos map rendering code. SpatiaLite OSM database can be
quite fast, but I had to learn a trick or two to reach good performance. I
even managed to import the latest UK data into it and it didn't
2009/11/26 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
I assume layer is 0 if I don't add the layer tag.
Yes, which is usually anything at ground level.
Hopefully this is the correct thing to assume because otherwise things
will break if I have a bridge with no layer tag and a another bridge
No
Michal Migurski wrote:
I think it will be necessary to retain both lines and areas [..]
Maybe lines and areas each serve a different purpose : areas describe
the physical layout of the world whereas lines describe navigation
paths. So maybe the debate should be re-framed as whether OpenStreetMap
Hi,
That's great news. I am sure that you will make an easy-to-use configuration
system for selecting which features and tags will be imported into database. I
am awaiting the next release.
-Jukka-
Lähettäjä: Igor Brejc
Howdy!,
Sinds gisteren middag is de nieuwe dev server in de lucht. De nieuwe dev staat
bij oxilion en daarvoor (wederom) onze dank!
Het nieuwe (virtuele) beestje draait geen CentOS meer maar Gentoo. Dit omdat
we nu iets recentere software kunnen draaien en omdat de productie server ook
op
Ich finde das Plugin sehr wichtig!
Gut das du dran arbeitest!
Gruß Sven
Am Samstag, 21. November 2009 12:46:38 schrieb Nils Heuermann:
Hallo zusammen,
hatte dieses Thema zuvor im Thread Relationen besser als Tags [1]
angesprochen; da es inhaltlich aber doch auf etwas anderes abzielt,
Hallo zusammen,
gestern kam auf BR-alpha die Planet Wissen-Sendung Die Geheimnisse
der Landkarten, in der auch OpenStreetMap vorgestellt wurde.
Kai Behnke und Frederik Ramm wirken auch mit.
http://www.planet-wissen.de/sendungen/2009/11/24_landkarten.jsp
In den dritten Programmen wird die Sendung
Moin !
ich beschäftige mich gerade ausgiebig mit den Bedarfsumleitungen [1] und
da ist die Richtung ziemlich wichtig.
Irgendwie habe ich nicht richtig etwas darüber gefunden - kann mir einer
weiterhelfen? Ist es tatsächlich die Reihenfolge der Way-Abschnitte??
Gruß Jan :-)
[1]
Andre Hinrichs schrieb:
delivery:opening_hours=*
delivery:min_cost=*
Es gibt an jedem Ort in Deutschland ein sogenanntes Wassertaxi,
welches rund um die Uhr open ist und die Anfahrt nur dann in Rechnung
stellt, wenn man keine Ware abnimmt. Der Telefonische Sammelruf ist
übrigens 112
-jha-
Hallo,
ich habe zwar die Sendung aufgezeichnet, die Qualität ist aber nicht
besonders gut.
Stefan
Tirkon schrieb:
Leider war gemäß meinem
http://tvbrowser.org/de/ueber-mainmenu-16.html
die letzte Wiederholung schon zum Zweitpunkt des Postings im Gange.
Carsten Gerlach schrieb:
Am Mittwoch 25. November 2009 21:28:00 schrieb Rainer Knaepper:
Es gibt hier in der Nähe einen Radweg, der auf einem ehemaligen *Bahndamm*
verläuft.
Das wäre dann doch eher was für
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embankment, oder?
Korrigiert mich (und das
Hello.
We recently had a very good experience getting involved in the OpenStreetMap
project through a mapping party. The event was really interesting. As a part
of the promotion of OpenStreetMap in and around Kerala, we are planning to
organize a series of mapping parties. From the above party,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.orgwrote:
On Wednesday 25 Nov 2009 8:50:15 pm Sajjad Anwar wrote:
We recently had a very good experience getting involved in the
OpenStreetMap project through a mapping party. The event was really
interesting. As a part of
On Tuesday 24 Nov 2009 2:30:41 pm PlaneMad wrote:
how about this with a green indicator.
so green=prepaid, no problems
blue=meter
red=non metered, prepare to fight :)
kenneth can you post a link if it shows up on the map, id like to know how
it looks
it did not show up on the map -
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.orgwrote:
On Wednesday 25 Nov 2009 11:09:51 pm Sajjad Anwar wrote:
On Wednesday 25 Nov 2009 8:50:15 pm Sajjad Anwar wrote:
We recently had a very good experience getting involved in the
OpenStreetMap project through a
On Thursday 26 Nov 2009 9:59:56 am Sajjad Anwar wrote:
get an instrument you can correct it. For the last few months you have
been talking about your party - and how you are going to hold parties in
all the engineering colleges in Kerala. Please stop talking and writing
documents - and
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
and can anyone see an auto here:
http://xlquest.net/?zoom=20lat=13.08205lon=80.27449layers=B
I do not know if it is not displaying - or the cache is interfering.
I can see the auto.
Kushal
--
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Guillaume Audirac
guillaume.audi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Sajjad,
where is the map you created?
The map is here
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=11.32007lon=75.93383zoom=17
But this is the first attempt, hence the map is incomplete, the quality of
On Thursday 26 Nov 2009 11:52:02 am H.S.Rai wrote:
and can anyone see an auto here:
http://xlquest.net/?zoom=20amp;lat=13.08205amp;lon=80.27449amp;layers=
B
Yes, here is screen shot:
http://gndec.ac.in/~hsrai/tmp/osmAuto.png
your site is not loading for me.
--
regards
Kenneth
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.orgwrote:
On Thursday 26 Nov 2009 10:08:56 am Srikanth Lakshmanan wrote:
Even when you have instrument, it is ideal to actually map with the gps
data collected *on the same day* to get a better map.Something we
experienced
On Thursday 26 Nov 2009 12:43:19 pm Srikanth Lakshmanan wrote:
that is true - but the point I am trying to emphasise is that mapping is
a daily activity. Every time you look at the map you can add something -
a dustbin, a lamp post, a speed breaker on the road.
Agree. Evolving the wiki
ordunque, si possono caricare le icone su:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/applications/share/map-icons ?
e se si, come?
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
2009/11/25 Fabri erfab...@gmail.com
ordunque, si possono caricare le icone su:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/applications/share/map-icons ?
e se si, come?
chiedere a qualcuno chi ha permesso di uploadare o richiedere te permesso di
accesso al SVN.
2009/11/25 andrea giacomelli pibi...@gmail.com:
[scusandomi per i cross posting]
ciao -
ricordo che vidi il primo netbook dal vivo al mapping party di
Arezzo, nelle mani del Prof. Niccolò Rigacci..bei tempi.. era il primo
modello EEE PC.
in un anno e mezzo mi pare che ci sia stata la
Il giorno 25 novembre 2009 08.58, brunetto brunetto.zi...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
vi sembrerà impossibile ma la salita inizia con le rotonde... se può
essere utile posso buttar su un paio di foto.. in lista o sulla mappa
(cosa che però non so bene come fare..)
Sì, qualche foto è utile. Puoi
Sarebbe quindi:
amenity=canteen
+ i vari tag di restrizione da mettere a punto
quindi in definitiva come taggo? devo mettere qualcosa nel wiki?
brunetto
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Sì, qualche foto è utile. Puoi metterle su un servizio di hosting tipo
http://imageshack.us/ per non intasare le caselle degli utenti che non sono
interessati (o non hanno la banda larga), e limitarti a passare qui il link.
appena riesco provvedo
brunetto
2009/11/25 brunetto brunetto.zi...@gmail.com:
mi viene un dubbio ora: bridge va messo a tutto il ponte o solo alla
parte senza terra sotto, quindi escludendo le rampe di salita e
discesa che sono inclinate ma hanno ancora la terra sotto? nel senso:
la salita e la discesa da un ponte fanno
In pratica e` bridge solo la parte sospesa. Tutto quello che ha terra
sotto NON e` bridge.
Ho ritrovato questa convenzione anche su uno stradario di Milano,
quindi magari ha diffusa in ambito cartografico.
Si, certo. Il ponte in cartografia e` la parte sospesa, segnata con
questo simbolo:
se le convenzioni son queste non si discute!:-P
allora tolgo bridge dalle rotonde (appena ho due secondi le fotografo
pure) e magari e taggo come massicciata, solo che embankmen me lo dà
per la ferrovia... va bene uguale?
brunetto
Il 25 novembre 2009 15.16, Alessandro Rubini
Il 25/11/2009 14:00, brunetto ha scritto:
Sarebbe quindi:
amenity=canteen
+ i vari tag di restrizione da mettere a punto
quindi in definitiva come taggo? devo mettere qualcosa nel wiki?
Per ora puoi accontentarti di mettere amenity=canteen. Ovviamente però
non sarà renderizzato.
2009/11/25 Carlo Stemberger carlo.stember...@gmail.com
Il 25/11/2009 14:00, brunetto ha scritto:
Sarebbe quindi:
amenity=canteen
+ i vari tag di restrizione da mettere a punto
quindi in definitiva come taggo? devo mettere qualcosa nel wiki?
Per ora puoi accontentarti di mettere
Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
2009/11/25 Fabri erfab...@gmail.com
ordunque, si possono caricare le icone su:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/applications/share/map-icons ?
e se si, come?
chiedere a qualcuno chi ha permesso di uploadare o richiedere te permesso di
2009/11/26 Fabri erfab...@gmail.com
si, fatte da me e rilasciate con licenza Public Domain.
hai trovato qualcuno? Se no chiedo nella lista tedesca, si trova sempre
qualcuno chi te lo fa...
(Certo, se vuoi contribuire più spesso vale anche la pena di richiedere
accesso diretto)
Ciao,
Martin
On 24/11/2009, at 23.50, Freek wrote:
First of all I don't like to bump over kantsten with my citybike, so
I don't
see them as passible.
Heh, jeg bryder mig heller ikke om at køre over kantsten... men
kommunens folk laver dog ofte nedkørsler af afsalt som jeg gerne
benytter.
Den 25. nov. 2009 09.45 skrev Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.dk:
On 24/11/2009, at 23.50, Freek wrote:
First of all I don't like to bump over kantsten with my citybike, so
I don't
see them as passible.
Heh, jeg bryder mig heller ikke om at køre over kantsten... men
kommunens folk
Hej.
Vores kortlægning handler i bund og grund om at givecyklisten et praj om hvad han skal forvente, når han cykler ad en vej. Et kort skal ikke dokumentere alle detaljer i virkeligheden, kun de detaljer, der er nødvendige for at orientere sig.
Hvis vi markerer en cykelsti som et track
On 25/11/2009, at 10.46, Erik Klausen wrote:
Et par detaljer: Cyclewayen bør hedde curbed, ikke curb. En curb
er selve kanten.
Hmm. Jeg kan godt se pointen, idet man jo ikke cykler på selve
kantstenen. Derimod cykler man på selve lane'n og track'en.
Imidlertid kan jeg ikke finde
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 10:11:33 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
Den 25. nov. 2009 09.45 skrev Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.dk:
On 24/11/2009, at 23.50, Freek wrote:
First of all I don't like to bump over kantsten with my citybike, so
I don't
see them as passible.
Heh, jeg bryder
Jesper Henriksen wrote:
Det kunne blive mere præcist ved at vælge curb_delimited (kantsten
afgrænset), eller man kunne vælge blot delimited, som også kunne
benyttes til at definere andre former for afgrænsninger som vi ikke i
øjeblikket kender til. Endelig kunne man forestille sig det
Hej!
Jamen jeg har så med glæde fulgt den livlige debat om de forskellige
muligheder og problemer der ligger i markeringen af oplysninger vedrørende
cykelstier! Det var nu ikke for at starte den debat jeg oprindeligt lagde
ud, noget drastisk som een skrev på dette sted!
Men jeg vil faktisk gerne
Claus Hindsgaul skrev:
Hvad synes I da selv, der bør gælde specielt for græsstriber, og
hvorfor giver det et bedre kortmateriale?
Kunne man alternativt skelne mellem, om der er indlagt en væsentlig
afstand mellem vej og cykelsti (f.eks. over 3 meter?), selvom den er
passabel?
Jeg har svært
Hej Niels,
Det vil være godt at have dig med på holdet igen.
Du har været inde og lave et stort antal forbindelser og knudepunkter, og
jeg tror umiddelbart det vil være det sikreste at tage dine ændringer ud af
databasen frem for manuelt at slette ways og knudepunkter. Er du enig i
dette?
Claus
Hi everyone
Andrew has had great difficulty in finding a venue ( events have just
conspired against him) so the mapping intro party is OFF. Anyone who'd
planned to go - you can go and have fun mapping elsewhere. Sandwell anyone
:-) ? Andrew wants to focus on smaller residents groups led by
A las buenas noches,
Es muy tarde y las neuronas no me dan para mucho, así que seré breve:
Quien estuviera buscando una herramienta para convertir datos vectoriales a
formato OSM y además hacer relaciones de los polígonos complejos o de
polígonos que compartan algunos de sus lados (el mítico
Andreas M. wrote:
mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass die ÖPNV-Ansicht von Wien in der Best
of OSM gelandet ist,
Ja, es gab auf der SOTM'09 sogar ein Plakat, wo das drauf war... :)
Servus, Andreas
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:36:19 +0100, Boris Cornet
bo...@psion2.org wrote:
Das Prinzip von Karten - speziell Wanderkarten - ist es,
Orientierungspunkte zu schaffen. Also erscheint es mir nur logisch und
richtig, Bergkreuze, die sich nicht nahe des Gipfels befinden, auch
einzuzeichnen.
Das war
Hello World ;-)
Heute (25. November) um 19:15 hat Helge getippt:
Was muss man tun, damit das (geoland-WMS) standardmäßig im Poltlatch
zur Verfügung steht (zb. im Map-Background-Dropdown)?
Tests mit Custom haben nicht funktioniert, Test in Merkaartor
angeblich schon.
Angeblich?? Hast wer
Helge Fahrnberger wrote:
Was muss man tun, damit das standardmäßig im Poltlatch zur Verfügung
steht (zb. im Map-Background-Dropdown)?
Potlatch braucht Tiles. Ich bin in Kontakt mit Sven Geggus, der so ein
WMS-to-Tile-Gateway schon mal (soweit ich weiß für die Oberpfalz)
implementiert hat.
Today (Wednesday, November 25, 2009) at 21:10 Andreas commented:
Das Prinzip von Karten - speziell Wanderkarten - ist es,
Orientierungspunkte zu schaffen. Also erscheint es mir nur logisch und
richtig, Bergkreuze, die sich nicht nahe des Gipfels befinden, auch
einzuzeichnen.
Das war auch
Cool,
Thanks, i'll try it out :)
and all the features you see on it are available via. CanVec2osm
maybe a bit more.
I think that this is handy for local area mappers for sure.
The tracing wont be the same as actually copying the geometry directly
(the geometry is identical to whats available
Thanks John for finding this news,
Hi Daniel,
My guess is that Bernie Connors is in contact with your office about
implimenting more data from New Brunswick then?
I'm also on the talk-au (austrailia) list where reciently their govnt
relieced the land parcel data (property boundaries), this was
To není pravda. Pokud jsou dva ploty přes sebe, tak je čára o něco tlustší
(málo ale je to znát) - v [1] je blok s šipkou kreslen se zdvojenými
ploty, kdežto blok napravo je kreslen s jednoduchými ploty, a zahrada je
udělaná jen kolem dokola. To je taky důvod, proč jsem v předchozím
Tak toho jsem si doteď nevšiml, každopádně to nic nemění na faktu, že
fence je plot a pokud je tam jeden, tak má být jen jeden. Zajímalo by
mne, jak je to tam ve skutečnosti, pravděpodobně tam jen jeden je.
Přijde mi, že jste si z fence udělali definici zahrady jako pozemku, ale
to není. Viz
Je tam jen jeden, a udělal jsem to já. Nevěděl jsem, jak to dělat, a dělal
jsem pokusy. Teď už to vím, akorát jsem to ještě nepředělal.
Dvoubaráky jsou správně vyřešené například na [1].
Jak jsem napsal - sémanticky správně je, myslím, udělat multipolygon pro
každou zahradu, a pokud se s tím
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
