On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
But OSM does not require copyright assignment, so it is not *directly*
relevant.
What OSMF requires in the current draft is for you to effectively give up
your copyright altogether. OSMF then copyrights the database as a
On 01/01/10 17:40, Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
But OSM does not require copyright assignment, so it is not *directly*
relevant.
What OSMF requires in the current draft is for you to effectively give up
your copyright
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 01/01/10 17:40, Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
But OSM does not require copyright assignment, so it is not *directly*
relevant.
What OSMF requires in the
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com
wrote:
This document implies UNICEF doesn't even know OSM exists, which is just as
worring as them funding Google's map making
Well, has anyone from OSM spoken to them? Is there any kind of outreach
program?
Steve
Hi
Thanks for your offer and sorry for waiting that long.
The problem is that i'm also not native english speaker. The most
relevant thing is to be kind of course and as native portuguese speaker
your words would get automatically more kind than my english text.
The most relevant part to ask
I've just noticed that AlexanderF is changing all the maxheight=2.0 to
maxheight=2. In fact he's changing anything ending with 0 after the
decimal point to drop the zero. This is not good, he is lowering the
accuracy of the tag, which is why they are displayed with a trailing
zero on signs.
I've got a trace from today which is significantly out of sync with a path I
traced from Nearmap:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=-37.880138lon=145.193417zoom=19gpx=594988
The trace looks like I was wandering through the grassy paddock, but I was
actually following exactly that northern
Chris Hill wrote:
I've just noticed that AlexanderF is changing all the maxheight=2.0 to
maxheight=2. In fact he's changing anything ending with 0 after the
decimal point to drop the zero. This is not good, he is lowering the
accuracy of the tag, which is why they are displayed with a
2010/1/1 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Chris Hill wrote:
I've just noticed that AlexanderF is changing all the maxheight=2.0 to
maxheight=2. In fact he's changing anything ending with 0 after the
decimal point to drop the zero. This is not good, he is lowering the
accuracy of the tag,
Dave F. wrote:
I don't why he feels the need to do this, it seems a pointless task, but
why do you think it reduces accuracy to remove trailing zeros?
2m =2.0m
Mathematically, you may be right. But having 2.0 actually means that it
is 2.0 m with +- 0.1 m accuracy. Putting it as 2 means
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I don't why he feels the need to do this, it seems a pointless task, but
why do you think it reduces accuracy to remove trailing zeros?
2m =2.0m
It reduces *indication of accuracy*.
There's a difference between I
2010/1/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I don't why he feels the need to do this, it seems a pointless task, but
why do you think it reduces accuracy to remove trailing zeros?
2m =2.0m
It reduces *indication of
Steve Bennett wrote:
The trace looks like I was wandering through the grassy paddock, but I
was actually following exactly that northern most highway=path in
the bush. So it looks like the trace is incorrectly recorded something
like 50m north of where I actually was. Now, since the
On 1 Jan 2010, at 13:07, Steve Bennett wrote:
I've got a trace from today which is significantly out of sync with a path I
traced from Nearmap:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=-37.880138lon=145.193417zoom=19gpx=594988
The trace looks like I was wandering through the grassy
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.ukwrote:
It is very common for GPSs to give errors for whatever reason. Interference
is very common from things like buildings. Newer units are less likely to
have an issue. You simply need to go along that track again a
Hi!
Am 31.12.2009 14:29, schrieb Anthony:
Maybe, but while the supply of people willing to become mappers is
limited, it isn't fixed. I took a quick look at GMM, and it looks to me
like it's not a bad introductory class for potential OSM contributors.
GMM doesn't offer anywhere near as many
Hi,
Nop wrote:
I can see how many people would prefer the simple way offered by Google.
I can see that too, and I think it is perfectly ok. We do not have to be
*the* world-wide collaborative mapping platform.
Offering service to those who like it simple is costly, and I am not
convinced
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
I believe that GMM can be a serious competition to OSM if it is simpler
to use, easier to learn and thus more inviting to the casual newcomer.
I'm still not convinced that competition is the proper term for it.
With GMM you have
Hi!
Am 01.01.2010 15:48, schrieb Anthony:
Only if you care. If you want simple, you click edit on potlatch, you
draw the way, you click on the car until it turns into a bicycle, and
you select cycle track.
Then those of us on the mailing list write 1000 emails about whether or
not you
Hi,
Nop wrote:
Not at first. But you note later, when your edit has been changed into
something that you don't understand or someone sends you a notice to do
it some other way. :-(
But doesn't that happen with GMM a lot as well? Or that your edit is
rejected altogether? Do we really have
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I don't why he feels the need to do this, it seems a pointless task, but
why do you think it reduces accuracy to remove trailing zeros?
2m =2.0m
It reduces *indication of accuracy*.
There's a
On 01/01/2010 14:14, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
It is very common for GPSs to give errors for whatever reason.
Interference is very common from things like buildings. Newer
Craig Wallace schrieb:
You can check the satellite screen on the Garmin. It should show an
estimated position accuracy.
The eTrex often claims 10m accuracy when in fact it is 50m off, so that
doesn't really help. Using two different GPS receivers is a good idea if
you don't want to survey
On 01/01/2010, at 17.40, Craig Wallace wrote:
But I'd still agree with Shaun - a single GPS trace is not really
accurate enough for adding ways to OSM IMO.
I'd say get at least 2, preferably 1 in each direction. If they are
close to each other you can be confident its probably accurate. If
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
But you note later, when your edit has been changed into something that you
don't understand or someone sends you a notice to do it some other way. :-(
1) I really don't think someone who wants simple is going to check back
later to
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Craig Wallace wrote:
You can check the satellite screen on the Garmin. It should show an
estimated position accuracy.
Also, you can look at which satellites its receiving. If its locked on
to a reasonable number of satellites in a decent spread across the sky,
you can
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 01/01/2010 14:14, Steve Bennett wrote:
Well...ok. But in this case I have the aerial photography, so I can just
trace it, once I know more or less where the path goes.
Though yes, this is not really necessary
On the Oregon 550(t) you will find the satellite almanac-screen if you touch
the five-bars satellite reception indicator.
Micha H.
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Craig Wallace wrote:
You can check the satellite screen on the Garmin. It should show an
estimated position accuracy.
Also, you
You can also use Oregon's Waypoint Averaging function to make more accurate
positioning of waypoints. But you need to do this at different times (say on
you next hiking trip when you cross the same waypoint) for this to be really
effective. With couple of accurate waypoints it is easier to detect
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I don't why he feels the need to do this, it seems a pointless task,
but
why do you think it reduces accuracy to remove
The accuracy shown on your GPS unit is not necessary the actual accuracy,
but just a calculated accuracy depending on the signals your unit is
receiving. You can experience athmospheric disturbance, plasma-effects,
signals reflected off tall buildings, canyon or urban canyon effects, bed
satellite
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk wrote:
* But it is documented in
** http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway since a while and is
** about 100 times in osmdoc. The problem with cycleway=lane is that the
**
I recently added some buildings to OSM that have courtyards, thus added a
multipolygon relation to them. I notice now that some of these buildings
are not rendering on OSM. Looking at the history, Ropino removed the
multipolygon tag from the relation on December 8.
2010/1/1 Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com:
I recently added some buildings to OSM that have courtyards, thus added a
multipolygon relation to them. I notice now that some of these buildings
are not rendering on OSM. Looking at the history, Ropino removed the
multipolygon tag from the
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
So, numbers on signs about restrictions (maximum speed, maximum height,
maximum length, maximum weight...): trailing zeros have no value, as those
numbers are exact.
Not necessarily. Perhaps the number on the sign came from
Hi,
Katie Filbert wrote:
Did I do something wrong with tagging buildings how I did? I think I
tagged them correctly and undid these two.
Your version was ok. (The role is optional and meant to make things
easier for human editors.)
Ropino has made a mistake. His changeset comment
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
The accuracy shown on your GPS unit is not necessary the actual accuracy,
but just a calculated accuracy depending on the signals your unit is
receiving. You can experience athmospheric disturbance, plasma-effects,
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Claus Hindsgaul
claus.hindsg...@gmail.comwrote:
The outcome of the discussion was by default to represent bicycle
tracks/lanes with cycleway=track/lane tags in the accompagning road
instead of separate cycleway=highway. The following expressed exceptions
were
Hi,
I'm breaking this out of talk-gb and into talk.
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Sadly [the openmtbmap author]
refuses to open-source his code
(http://openmtbmap.org/faq/#i-would-like-to-have-a-look-into-the-style-file-for-mkgmap),
which is entirely his prerogative but a shame
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Andrzej Zaborowski
andrew.zaborow...@intel.com wrote
This is likely because the members of these two multipolygons didn't
have roles assigned in the relation and instead had tags role=inner
and role=outer -- may that be the editor's fault? That said I believe
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Your version was ok. (The role is optional and meant to make things
easier for human editors.)
I think it might have been okay, but I didn't tag it in the best way.
Ropino has made a mistake. His changeset comment
2010/1/2 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
So, numbers on signs about restrictions (maximum speed, maximum height,
maximum length, maximum weight...): trailing zeros have no value, as those
numbers are exact.
Not
2010/1/2 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
When I looked up WAAS on wikipedia a while ago, it appeared that we do have
an equivalent system in Australia (although the term WAAS is american), but
I'm not sure how to tell whether it's functioning in a given area. I
switched the WAAS capability
2010/1/2 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
Even if you have access to good arial photography, remember that it might be
out of alignment, it can be a good advise to gather some good fixes to check
the alignment of your photos, this can be several GPS tracks along your
trail.
I'm pretty sure
2010/1/2 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Maybe it is time for us at OSM to make a distinction between
(a) open projects in the sense and spirit of OSM, where scripts, style
files, and everything else is open and license-wise available for
everyone to look at and build upon, and
(b)
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
I'm breaking this out of talk-gb and into talk.
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Sadly [the openmtbmap author]
refuses to open-source his code
(http://openmtbmap.org/faq/#i-would-like-to-have-a-look-into-the-style-file-for-mkgmap),
which is entirely his
Colin Marquardt wrote:
As a proud member of the (a) category[1], I'm all for it :)
Cheers
Colin
1 - http://mapnik-utils.googlecode.com/svn/sandbox/cascadenik/hike_n_bike/,
http://gitorious.org/alpha-hillshading/alpha-hillshading/trees/master
Err.. Sorry Colin, I read the readme other
2010/1/2 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
When I looked up WAAS on wikipedia a while ago, it appeared that we do
have
an equivalent system in Australia (although the term WAAS is american),
but
I'm not sure how to tell whether it's functioning in a given area. I
switched the WAAS
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:49 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/2 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
Even if you have access to good arial photography, remember that it might
be
out of alignment, it can be a good advise to gather some good fixes to
check
the alignment
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/2 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
Even if you have access to good arial photography, remember that it might
be
out of alignment, it can be a good advise to gather some good fixes to
check
the alignment
2010/1/2 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
I think it's high time this was done. IMO, OCM should be removed from
the main map options asked persuasively to rename themselves as they're
not really open, are they?
What do you suggest they rename to?
FreeCycleMap? :)
2010/1/2 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Where are you getting that sub-metre accuracy claim from? This thread
(http://www.mail-archive.com/talk...@openstreetmap.org/msg03414.html), which
you contributed to, throws out 3-5 meters, 1-4 meters, and 5 meters or
so.
They claim the imagery should be
2010/1/2 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
Than they have done a hell of a job on aligning the fotos, cudos to them. I
know that Yahoo imagery varies from less then 1 meter to at least 30 meters
on the hi-res, havn't seen nearmap, and as I understand its only for
Australia, so I would not
Frederik Ramm wrote:
We cannot, and do not want to, trademark the words open, free and
the like, but I think we could be a little bit more assertive about whom
we consider to be a kindred spirit and who is doing his own thing, and
apply the tiniest amount of pressure for people to upgrade from
Sorry about the formatting on the quoted part. I'm writing from my BlackBerry.
IIRC all of the correction stations (WAAS / EGNOS / etc...) are listed at or
above satellite number 45 on your satellite / accuracy screen.
An easy test is to go to an area with a clear view of the sky and take a
2010/1/2 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
This seems like somewhere that the wisdom of crowds actually applies. I
think I'd trust the average of a bunch of independent GPS traces to a single
orthorectified aerial - especially in an area which isn't extremely flat.
But I guess I might be convinced
Thanks for the comments, everyone. In all my playing with nearmap, I have
little reason to doubt their accuracy. There are a couple of little seams
here and there, but nothing more than a couple of metres. Giving the way
this trace here meanders all over the place, I'm pretty confident that the
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Michael Hufer wrote:
On the Oregon 550(t) you will find the satellite almanac-screen if you
touch the five-bars satellite reception indicator.
Thanks, will try it.
Later I might read the instructions.
___
talk mailing list
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Claus Hindsgaul
claus.hindsg...@gmail.com mailto:claus.hindsg...@gmail.com wrote:
The outcome of the discussion was by default to represent bicycle
tracks/lanes with cycleway=track/lane tags in the accompanying
road instead
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au wrote:
By contrast, in my suburb of Ruse, NSW (not far from Harrington Park - look
it up) there is a major road (Junction Road) through the middle of it,
rendered as tertiary, and always coloured yellow in street directories.
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:13 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
As long as they are tagged properly it's up to the render style sheet
as to what renders.
Perhaps you could add this comment to your signature and avoid the spam? No
offence, but you really don't need to repeat
2010/1/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:13 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
As long as they are tagged properly it's up to the render style sheet
as to what renders.
Perhaps you could add this comment to your signature and avoid the spam? No
2010/1/1 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2010/1/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:13 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
As long as they are tagged properly it's up to the render style sheet
as to what renders.
Perhaps you could add this
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:31 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
You asked a question, I replied if you don't like the answer that's
your problem,
No, if you constantly repeat yourself on a mailing list, it's *everybody*'s
problem. Everyone here understands that renderers can filter
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Craig Feuerherdt
craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
I know Bendigo has an 'alcohol free zone' which would be useful to capture.
Initial thoughts are that it is best represented as a relation, made up of
the ways (roads etc) that form the outer boundary. Just
2010/1/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
No, if you constantly repeat yourself on a mailing list, it's *everybody*'s
problem. Everyone here understands that renderers can filter out
information. Just like I could reply to every message and say Different
people tag in different ways, and
2010/1/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Craig Feuerherdt
craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
I know Bendigo has an 'alcohol free zone' which would be useful to
capture.
Initial thoughts are that it is best represented as a relation, made up of
the ways
Ok, John, I'm adding you to my killfile. I'm not getting anything out of
corresponding with you other than frustration, and I'm finding your messages
consist mostly of unhelpful stubborn posturing, and too little useful
content. I'm sure our bickering is only pissing everyone else off as well.
2010/1/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Ok, John, I'm adding you to my killfile. I'm not getting anything out of
corresponding with you other than frustration, and I'm finding your messages
consist mostly of unhelpful stubborn posturing, and too little useful
My answers are perfectly
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem with this scheme is you can't do, first sunday of the
month for example.
Surely someone in some field has already come across this problem
before - i.e. surely someone's already developed a formal
2010/1/1 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem with this scheme is you can't do, first sunday of the
month for example.
Surely someone in some field has already come across this problem
before - i.e.
iso 8601: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
jim
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem with this scheme is you can't do, first sunday of the
month for example.
2009/12/29 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Actually, in addition to this, it would be great if you could allow
the date to be specified in the path, i.e. allow us to make requests
in the form of http://www.nearmap.com/maps/nmd/z/x/y.jpg
(where nmd is the date)
The problem is the slippymap
2010/1/2 Jim Croft jim.cr...@gmail.com:
iso 8601: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
I'm still trying to figure out if that would cover things like first
sunday, third saturday of a month, do you know how to write this in
iso8601 format?
___
think it might have to be derived, e.g.
http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/vb-date2.htm#Month
http://code.google.com/p/datejs/
jim
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 3:46 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/2 Jim Croft jim.cr...@gmail.com:
iso 8601: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Jim Croft jim.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
think it might have to be derived, e.g.
http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/vb-date2.htm#Month
http://code.google.com/p/datejs/
That's a shame. But iso 8601 is probably still a good starting point.
2010/1/2 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2009/12/29 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Actually, in addition to this, it would be great if you could allow
the date to be specified in the path, i.e. allow us to make requests
in the form of http://www.nearmap.com/maps/nmd/z/x/y.jpg
(where
2010/1/1 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2010/1/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Ok, John, I'm adding you to my killfile. I'm not getting anything out of
corresponding with you other than frustration, and I'm finding your messages
consist mostly of unhelpful stubborn posturing, and
Olá pessoal, estou começando a me familiarizar com o Osm, no começo
estava um pouco complicado, mas pouco a pouco vou me aprofundando
mais.
Recentemente encontrei um site com alguns arquivos GPS em formato GTM
que pode ser muito interessante. Eu converti um dos arquivos e
utilizei para corrigir a
Eu realmente discordo. Se uma pessoa usa o mapa para fazer rota,
certamente ele ficará mais frustrado em saber que a maioria dos dados
estão errados do que não existir dados suficientes.
Ter várias informações erradas, é como fingir ter um mapa completo. Eu
acredito que em relação as estradas é
Ég kom loksins einhverju á openstreetmap.is í dag:
http://openstreetmap.is (einnig á http://osm.is)
Þetta er ekki mikið en ábendingar um texta og jafnvel einhver tilbúin
skrif væru vel þegin. Einnig er ég mjög lélegur í útlitshönnun og fæ
þetta CSS menu ekki til að líta vel út
Erstmal ein gutes Neues zusammen!
Ich war letztes Jahr mal in ein paar Diskussionen dabei, in
denen es um spurgenaue Abbildung von Autobahnkreuzen, etc.
ging. Ueber die Feiertage hatte ich Zeit, ein wenig
damit zu spielen und das ist dabei rausgekommen:
qbert biker schrieb:
Erstmal ein gutes Neues zusammen!
Ich war letztes Jahr mal in ein paar Diskussionen dabei, in
denen es um spurgenaue Abbildung von Autobahnkreuzen, etc.
ging. Ueber die Feiertage hatte ich Zeit, ein wenig
damit zu spielen und das ist dabei rausgekommen:
...
Ich bin
Am Freitag 01 Januar 2010 11:35:32 schrieb SLXViper:
Für sowas wäre eine Sandkasten-Datenbank nicht schlecht, in die man
einen Ausschnitt an Daten importieren kann und dann dadrauf ein bisschen
rumspielen kann, um neue Vorschläge zu entwickeln und zu testen...
sehr gute idee!
koennte man sowas
qbert biker schrieb:
Ich bin dabei komplett ohne Relations ausgekommen und habe
als Eingangsdaten nur 'lanes', '*.link', 'oneway' und
'highway' verwendet (ohne Gewähr auf Vollständigkeit). Bei
einer angenommenen Spurbreite von 5m sieht das ganze
relativ realistisch aus.
So eine
Hallo,
SLXViper wrote:
Für sowas wäre eine Sandkasten-Datenbank nicht schlecht, in die man
einen Ausschnitt an Daten importieren kann und dann dadrauf ein bisschen
rumspielen kann,
Es gibt ein paar solcher Sandkaesten bei osm.org, darunter
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
kann man sich
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
Am Freitag 01 Januar 2010 11:35:32 schrieb SLXViper:
Für sowas wäre eine Sandkasten-Datenbank nicht schlecht, in die man
einen Ausschnitt an Daten importieren kann und dann dadrauf ein bisschen
rumspielen kann, um neue Vorschläge zu entwickeln und zu testen...
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Es gibt ein paar solcher Sandkaesten bei osm.org, darunter
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
kann man sich ganz normal anmelden, account holen, und hochladen, was
man will (es gibt allerdings keine planet files und keine gerenderten
Kacheln davon, das, was man an
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:07:15 +0100
Von: Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Spurgenaue Abbildung
qbert biker schrieb:
Ich bin dabei komplett ohne Relations
Erstmal ein gutes Neues zusammen!
Dito!
Ich bin dabei komplett ohne Relations ausgekommen
Die Relationen sind dafür gedacht, dass ein Router die
Spuren wieder zu einer Fahrbahn zusammenfassen kann.
Auf Grund der GPS Genauigkeit wird ein Router durch
zu eng zusammenliegende Spuren ja eher
Am Freitag 01 Januar 2010 12:10:30 schrieb SLXViper:
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
Am Freitag 01 Januar 2010 11:35:32 schrieb SLXViper:
Für sowas wäre eine Sandkasten-Datenbank nicht schlecht, in die man
einen Ausschnitt an Daten importieren kann und dann dadrauf ein bisschen
rumspielen kann,
Am Freitag 01 Januar 2010 13:34:50 schrieb Chris-Hein Lunkhusen:
Erstmal ein gutes Neues zusammen!
Dito!
Ich bin dabei komplett ohne Relations ausgekommen
Die Relationen sind dafür gedacht, dass ein Router die
Spuren wieder zu einer Fahrbahn zusammenfassen kann.
Auf Grund der GPS
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:34:50 +0100
Von: Chris-Hein Lunkhusen chris66...@gmx.de
An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Spurgenaue Abbildung
Erstmal ein gutes Neues zusammen!
Dito!
Ich bin dabei komplett ohne Relations ausgekommen
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:53:06 +0100
Von: Guenther Meyer d@sordidmusic.com
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Spurgenaue Abbildung
immer diese vorschnellen und unbewiesenen behauptungen...
man
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
Konstrukts natürlich auch größer, so dass das
Spurenmapping für das Routing vermutlich eher eine
Verschlechterung bringen wird.
immer diese vorschnellen und unbewiesenen behauptungen...
Sorry, so sollte es nicht rüberkommen. Es sind nur meine persönlichen
Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2010 13:53:06 schrieb Guenther Meyer:
Am Freitag 01 Januar 2010 13:34:50 schrieb Chris-Hein Lunkhusen:
Erstmal ein gutes Neues zusammen!
Dito!
Ich bin dabei komplett ohne Relations ausgekommen
Die Relationen sind dafür gedacht, dass ein Router die
Spuren
Am 31. Dezember 2009 17:28 schrieb Mirko Küster webmas...@ts-eastrail.de:
Wenn man das so dehnt dann brauchts keinen Track mehr. Hier mal ein
Bildbeispiel. Oben ein Biketrail wie auch auf der Tagbeschreibung stehend.
Unten ein 3,5 m Weg der vorwiegend für Rad vorgesehen ist, mit Ausnahme aber
Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Nein, das ist nur mit SVN Trunk, nicht mit 0.7.
Jupp hatte das verpeilt. Schaumermal ob das mit boost 1.40 aus Debian
squeeze läuft.
Sven
--
The main thing to note is that when you choose open source you don't
get a Windows operating system.
Kannst du das als .osm-Datei bereitstellen?
http://www.opencarbox.de/osm/test6.osm.bz2
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am Freitag 01 Januar 2010 14:50:16 schrieb Chris-Hein Lunkhusen:
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
Konstrukts natürlich auch größer, so dass das
Spurenmapping für das Routing vermutlich eher eine
Verschlechterung bringen wird.
immer diese vorschnellen und unbewiesenen behauptungen...
Sorry, so
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
