Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Jo
For the record: I prefer to have one relation for each direction of the bus route, as this allows to indicate 'exactly' where the buses pass. We are not mapping merely for the ability to draw a map of the bus routes, but also to allow PT routing eventually. Jo 2011/1/11 Michał Borsuk

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread André Joost
Am 11.01.11 10:42, schrieb Sander Deryckere: Before this becomes standard, could someone please make a script to transform one tagging scheme in an other? Not for uploading, just because apps have difficulties to support all the different tagging schemes. And after all, we want the data to be

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread André Joost
Am 11.01.11 08:33, schrieb Michał Borsuk: Is there anybody else using it? I'd like to see more examples out of Germany or Switzerland, bitte. You will find a lot of well-mapped routes here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AVV Greetings, André Joost

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread André Joost
Am 11.01.11 12:15, schrieb Michał Borsuk: So I vote for a simple solution to the existing problem. Simple already eliminates anything that resembles oxomoa. And what Teddych proposed is even more complicated. Ok, put every highway=bus_stop a specific bus service is serving in a relation

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Christian
On 11.01.2011 12:15, Michał Borsuk wrote: Am 11.01.2011 10:34, schrieb Claudius Henrichs: Arguments for relations in each direction: - easier to check correctness and completeness (simply select each direction's relation in JOSM) - easier to manage routes where the vehicle takes different

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Michał Borsuk
Am 11.01.2011 13:14, schrieb Vincent Privat: 2011/1/11 Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com mailto:michal.bor...@gmail.com Am 11.01.2011 10:34, schrieb Claudius Henrichs: Arguments for relations in each direction: - easier to check correctness and completeness (simply select

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Michał Borsuk
Am 11.01.2011 10:40, schrieb Jo: For the record: I prefer to have one relation for each direction of the bus route, as this allows to indicate 'exactly' where the buses pass. Has OpenStreetMap turned into a timetable, or is it still intended to be a map? We are not mapping merely for the

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Michał Borsuk
Am 11.01.2011 11:55, schrieb André Joost: Am 11.01.11 08:33, schrieb Michał Borsuk: Is there anybody else using it? I'd like to see more examples out of Germany or Switzerland, bitte. You will find a lot of well-mapped routes here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AVV I have opened line

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread André Joost
Am 11.01.11 15:00, schrieb Michał Borsuk: I have opened line 24 that I seem to remember (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/304105), and there are two for each direction, seemingly following the same path. Line 24 has only one relation for each direction. Questions: * What has

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Vincent Pottier
Le 11/01/2011 12:15, Michał Borsuk a écrit : Am 11.01.2011 10:34, schrieb Claudius Henrichs: Arguments for relations in each direction: - easier to check correctness and completeness (simply select each direction's relation in JOSM) - easier to manage routes where the vehicle takes different

[Talk-transit] Mapping standard: how to make a standard that is easy to learn, use and fast to implement

2011-01-11 Thread Michał Borsuk
Hello everybody. I would like to open another discussion about the dreaded learning curve, and other principles that a standard should meet. Let me list out what I think are the most important points that ANY mapping standard should meet: 1. Data consistency Data consistency (not having a

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Cartinus
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 17:01:32 Michał Borsuk wrote: This role thing is much more complicated than different relations. Does forward mean the direction of the bus line, or that of the way element in OSM? *That* is what confuses new users. Then all we need is to clear that confusion.

Re: [Talk-transit] Mapping standard: how to make a standard that is easy to learn, use and fast to implement

2011-01-11 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 01/11/2011 08:53 PM, Michał Borsuk wrote: Hello everybody. Now to what I'd change in the proposal: 1. Data consistency Data consistency (not having a myriad of standards) is important, ...but it's not everything. Reaching this point to near 100% will cost us the points below. I

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Vincent Pottier
Le 11/01/2011 20:21, Michał Borsuk a écrit : IMHO it has to be simple and scalable first of all. Scalable in this case would mean that an _average_ Joe can learn some parts of it and start mapping, then he can learn more (e.g. termini, large transfer stations), and proceed from simple to

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread Vincent Pottier
Le 11/01/2011 18:25, Michał Borsuk a écrit : On 11 January 2011 18:06, Albin Michlmayr alm...@gmx.at mailto:alm...@gmx.at wrote: Am Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:15:27 +0100 schrieb André Joost andre+jo...@nurfuerspam.de mailto:andre%2bjo...@nurfuerspam.de: Am 11.01.11 15:00,

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-11 Thread André Joost
Am 11.01.11 17:01, schrieb Michał Borsuk: Am 11.01.2011 15:15, schrieb André Joost: Furthermore. The Platforms are different for the two directions. If you take this node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/428573541 you see that busses to Weststraße, Kelmis Bruch and Uniklinik are

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Steve Chilton
Serious about changing highway=unsurfaced? In response to Richard's suggestion I have rendered where they occur in England: http://steve8.dev.openstreetmap.org/unsurfacedENG.png I am currently rendering a tile set (down to about z10) to help identify exact locations. These will be uploaded to a

[OSM-talk] Address in nominatim and is_in tag

2011-01-11 Thread Raphaël Pinson
Hello, I have tagged the following suburb: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1038274011 Nominatim doesn't restrict it to the admin_level 8 in which the node is situated: http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/details.php?place_id=127750725 To fix this, I have tried adding an is_in tag

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread David Murn
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:47 +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 10/01/11 19:00, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very high-quality road. I take it that, in Britain, there are certain minimum standards for being called a road? Nothing

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Richard Fairhurst
David Murn wrote: Crikey, dont let them see the Old Eyre Highway across southern Australia, or the Outback Highway[1] across Central Australia. Together over 3000km of highly travelled road, connecting the western coast of the country to the central/eastern regions. Just goes to show the

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Tom Hughes
On 11/01/11 11:05, David Murn wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:47 +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 10/01/11 19:00, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very high-quality road. I take it that, in Britain, there are certain minimum standards

[OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread Asztalos Attila
Hi all As far as I can tell neither the mapnik nor the osmarender basemap displays surface information/modifiers (ie. if a tag like surface=unpaved or similar is present). Now I can definitely see how this is not an issue in large parts of the world, urban roads just being paved (as they are

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: On 11/01/11 11:05, David Murn wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:47 +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 10/01/11 19:00, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very high-quality road.  

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread Asztalos Attila
On 11-Jan-2011 15:51, Richard Mann wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Asztalos Attila attila.aszta...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I can tell neither the mapnik nor the osmarender basemap displays surface information/modifiers (ie. if a tag like surface=unpaved or similar is present). Is

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
On 11 January 2011 23:51, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote: Is it public access, or is it owned privately? I ask because there is a strong correlation between public roads and decent maintenance where I come from. And as it happens, Mapnik does show access=private. (the

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/11 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: There is a lot of public unsurfaced roads in Australia, some are graveled, some are black soil and you don't both using them in the wet without a 4wd etc. These usually show on maps as dashed lines, rather than solid lines, rather than messing

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Asztalos Attila wrote: On 11-Jan-2011 15:51, Richard Mann wrote: Which is not to say that knowing which roads are cobbled wouldn't be handy sometimes (but I probably think of this as something you need to render for yourself (cue ad for Maperitive...)) I certainly see the merit of the

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
On 12 January 2011 03:04, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: yes, I agree that it would be nice to have a different rendering for roads based on their surface. This is not completely trivial though: there is also another tag regarding the surface: smoothness. Somehow Except you

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread john
This convention of using a dotted line to indicate an unsurfaced road is also standard practice in the USA. ---Original Email--- Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved From :mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com Date :Tue Jan 11 10:40:49 America/Chicago 2011 On 11 January 2011 23:51,

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-11 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/11 Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com: 2011/1/10 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com: I used hamlet for my block as pop limit of 1000 is given = satisfied The problem here is that population is only part of the definition of a hamlet. Less than 1000 people is correct, but it also has

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
On 12 January 2011 03:25, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: Is there a tag for marking a section of road as deteriorated, rutted or washed out? There needs to be a range of values, as the severity can range from merely requiring you to slow down, to rendering the road completely impassable (as

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-11 Thread john
A common settlement pattern in the USA, in rural communities that have mostly or entirely developed since the invention of the automobile, is to have houses and small businesses strung out along a highway. You end up with a community that can be several miles long, and yet only a hundred feet

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread DavidD
On 11 January 2011 17:06, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Try playing with Maperitive, or Osmarender, or Mapnik, or Halcyon, or whatever, to have a go at rendering it yourself. Keep playing until you've got something that looks simple, intuitive and neat. When you've got this

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread Craig Wallace
On 11/01/2011 17:57, DavidD wrote: The mapnik layer already renders highway=track;surfaced=paved as a solid line and highway=track;surface=unpaved as a dashed line. An example http://osm.org/go/eutNf8ah-- That is rendering the different tracktype tags (grade1/grade2 etc), not the surface

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Craig Wallace
On 10/01/2011 18:52, Richard Fairhurst wrote: A cursory glance suggests Britain appears to have more highway=unsurfaced than other places, and even then there aren't that many. I will happily fix 200 of them _properly_ (i.e. with what the track actually is, not the cop-out of highway=road) if

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/floodrelief/gallery-fn7ik2te-1225983067381?page=90 Here's another example: http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/floodrelief/gallery-fn7ik2te-1225983067381?page=117 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread john
Nashville, Tennessee, USA, where I live, was hit by severe flooding on May 1 and May 2, 2010, and not only had roads wash out, but some railway tracks as well. The flood was later classified as a thousand-year flood (meaning, not likely to occur more than once in a thousand years).

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread Milo van der Linden
My home address is at a highway=track going to access=private a little further on: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.633745lon=5.301177zoom=18layers=M On Aruba, my other area of mapping, I also use tracktype=grade1 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=12.48251lon=-69.9788zoom=16layers=M (See

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
On 12 January 2011 05:46, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: Nashville, Tennessee, USA, where I live, was hit by severe flooding on May 1 and May 2, 2010, and not only had roads wash out, but some railway tracks as well. The flood was later classified as a thousand-year flood (meaning, not likely

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Richard Bullock
FWIW I've now replaced several occurrences of highway=unsurfaced in the UK (thanks to Steve's very timely rendering), starting in areas I know personally (West Oxfordshire and Rutland), and not a single one would be described as a road in the UK. I added some several years ago. I've changed some

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread David Murn
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 10:13 -0500, Anthony wrote: Sure, but if you read you will notice that I was specifically answering a question about what that would be called in the UK, not what it would be called in Australia. The more important question is what the tag means. Or is highway=road

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, David Murn wrote: Now, maybe Im off the mark here, but it sounds like that is *EXACTLY* the outcome we want when mass changing tags, We are not going to mass-change tags. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
On 12 January 2011 08:01, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, David Murn wrote: Now, maybe Im off the mark here, but it sounds like that is *EXACTLY* the outcome we want when mass changing tags, We are not going to mass-change tags. If the reason is good enough, eg the flow

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread David Murn
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 23:01 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, David Murn wrote: Now, maybe Im off the mark here, but it sounds like that is *EXACTLY* the outcome we want when mass changing tags, We are not going to mass-change tags. 'we' being who? Are you speaking on behalf of a

Re: [OSM-talk] surface=unpaved

2011-01-11 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/11 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:04 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: will be unpaved: there is cobblestone, surface=asphalt, Excuse the stupidity of my question, but what is the difference between 'paved' and 'asphalt' ? it's different

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/11 Anthony o...@inbox.org: The more important question is what the tag means.  Or is highway=road a tag which has a different definition in every state? highway=road is a way that seemed to be OK for travelling in an aerial photo, it can be all kinds of OSM-highways. cheers, Martin

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-11 Thread Nathan Edgars II
It seems to be having the same problem again. Is there a better place to report it than spamming this list? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:54 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote: Well, I dunno/care about what the definition is in every state, but the definition of highway=road in the OSM wiki (since I believe we're all talking about OSM here, and not some other localised schema): From

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread David Murn
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:39 -0500, Anthony wrote: So, while 'road' may mean a tarred bit of bitumen in the UK, and it means something passable by a vehicle in Australia, in the OSM context it means an unknown classification, temporarily tagged until the required re-survey is complete.

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-11 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:39 -0500, Anthony wrote: So, while 'road' may mean a tarred bit of bitumen in the UK, and it means something passable by a vehicle in Australia, in the OSM context it means an unknown

[OSM-talk] paths and roads and approval, oh my

2011-01-11 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: The wiki is confusing, though.  It puts highway=residential, highway=track, highway=service, and highway=pedestrian under the subcategory of roads, but it puts highway=cycleway, highway=footway, and highway=bridleway under the

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my

2011-01-11 Thread Sam Vekemans
It's a monthly thing ...in OSM land lol .. smooth :) On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: The wiki is confusing, though. It puts highway=residential, highway=track, highway=service, and

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-11 Thread 80n
It's running fine. There are a large volume of requests, the server is fully loaded, your requests may timeout. More hardware would help. On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote: It seems to be having the same problem again. Is there a better place to

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] ondergrondse parkeergarages

2011-01-11 Thread Jeroen Muris
Dank allen, voor de reacties. Ik heb de tags gelaten voor wat ze zijn. Wel heb ik een node met building=entrance toegevoegd. J-. Op 5 jan. 2011 om 21:57 heeft rethna o...@rethna.nl het volgende geschreven: Ik werk in deze gevallen volgens de beschrijving op deze pagina

[talk-au] Massive flooding

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
Not sure how useful it'd be in Australia, but the massive floods all over Australia, except for the bush fires near Perth of course, might do well to map a lot of effected areas from Bing where coverage exists. It might be worth while trying to get additional coverage for areas effected for

Re: [talk-au] Massive flooding

2011-01-11 Thread David Murn
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:02 +1000, John Smith wrote: It might be worth while trying to get additional coverage for areas effected for humanitarian reasons, after all they're searching for bodies in Toowoomba not just people. Anyone have any ideas who could be approached for such imagery? Not

Re: [talk-au] Massive flooding

2011-01-11 Thread Stephen Hope
I heard that they were planning to do flights up north a few days ago, but couldn't get flight permissions, what with the state of emergency. And in the southeast (actually, pretty much everywhere, today), you'd get lovely grey clouds right now. In fact, if you look at Brisbane, it hasn't been

Re: [talk-au] Massive flooding

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
On 11 January 2011 20:44, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:02 +1000, John Smith wrote: It might be worth while trying to get additional coverage for areas effected for humanitarian reasons, after all they're searching for bodies in Toowoomba not just people.

[talk-au] Fwd: [Tagging] tagging world heritage (UNESCO) and other protected areas/features

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
Martin, for your information there was a bit of work done on this sort of thing in the past for Aussie parks covered by this, based on data from http://data.australia.gov.au I think. -- Forwarded message -- From: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com Date: 11 January 2011

Re: [talk-au] Massive flooding

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
Main water supply dam for Brisbane (Wivenhoe) was under 40% a few years ago, it hit 170% today because of all the flash flooding in and around Toowoomba. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Massive flooding

2011-01-11 Thread John Smith
On 12 January 2011 03:51, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: Main water supply dam for Brisbane (Wivenhoe) was under 40% a few years ago, it hit 170% today because of all the flash flooding in and around Toowoomba. For those in Brisbane, power is being cut to some suburbs at 7 am

Re: [talk-au] Massive flooding

2011-01-11 Thread Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:44 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:02 +1000, John Smith wrote: It might be worth while trying to get additional coverage for areas effected for humanitarian reasons, after all they're searching for bodies in Toowoomba not just

Re: [talk-au] Massive flooding

2011-01-11 Thread Ben Last
Cloudbase was at 1600' last time James looked at it, which is a bit too low; I just spoke to him and whilst we can fly at 1000' if we want (for a 1cm survey), the buildings in Brisbane are a bit higher than in Perth :) Last time (Wagga) we managed to go from takeoff to images online in 8 days.

[talk-au] some contemporary mapping mashup or (map mashupping)

2011-01-11 Thread Jim Croft
http://mapvisage.appspot.com/static/floodmap/map.html jim -- _ Jim Croft ~ jim.cr...@gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~ http://about.me/jrc 'A civilized society is one which tolerates eccentricity to the point of doubtful sanity.'  - Robert Frost, poet (1874-1963) Please send URIs,

[talk-au] Question about source of low-resolution NearMap images

2011-01-11 Thread Mark Pulley
I'm working out whether I am able to accept the new OSM terms. I haven't used the detailed NearMap aerial photos, but what I have used is a low-quality image at zoom 13 and 14. I used these images for the Kiewa River in northern Victoria (this was before the detailed imagery for northern

Re: [talk-au] Question about source of low-resolution NearMap images

2011-01-11 Thread Ben Last
If they're the Landsat/Blue Marble images that we use as the rest of the world layers where we don't have detailed PhotoMaps, then they are NASA data (see http://www.nearmap.com/legal/copyrighthttp://www.hw009i.nearmap.com/legal/copyright). It's pretty easy to spot the difference, as in this

Re: [Talk-br] divulgação de palestra do blog GeoZi ne

2011-01-11 Thread Claudomiro Nascimento Junior
Legal Helton, Onde/Quando foi esse evento? On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Helton Uchoa engenheiro.uc...@gmail.comwrote: Caros, Segue divulgação de palestra do blog GeoZine. OpenStreetMap (OSM) é o tema desta 3a palestra do OpenGEO

Re: [Talk-de] [OT] Garmin etrax vista schaltet sich ab

2011-01-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:29:16PM +0100, Elchtreiber wrote: Meistens im Navigations-Modus von meinem 60CSx. Da wird der Bildschirm auf einmal immer schwächer und dann geht das Gerät aus. Das ist eine interessante Beobachtung. Mir ist nämlich bei dem neuen Gerät aufgefallen, daß es sich hin

Re: [Talk-de] Anmeldung Stand Chemnitzer Linux-Tage 2011

2011-01-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 06:25:54PM +0100, malenki wrote: Sagen wir mal so: Ich habe OSM schon 2003 kennengelernt Wie sind die Modalitäten zum Verleih deiner Zeitmaschine? s/2003/2005/ (leider hab ich meine Zeitmaschine verlegt und weiß nicht mehr wann :-)) Das kann ganz schnell passieren,

Re: [Talk-de] ???Reit- und Wanderkarte - Jahresr ückblick

2011-01-11 Thread Sven Geggus
Johannes Huesing johan...@huesing.name wrote: Sollte nicht G.R. reichen? Wie ist denn das bei Markenzeichen? Sind die zugehörigen Schriften wie auch bei Patenten frei verfügbar? Wenn ja wo findet man die? Sven -- The source code is not comprehensible (found in bug section

Re: [Talk-de] gmapsupp.img abspecken?

2011-01-11 Thread Christian Knorr
Am Montag 10 Januar 2011, um 18:13:52 schrieb fla...@googlemail.com: Theoretisch klappt das mit GMT. Meinst Du das hier [1]? Habe gmt v0.4.2a pod Linuksa geladen und versucht. Habe auch einiges extrahieren können, aber nichts brauchbares. Weißt Du noch wie die Befehlszeile(n) aussah(en)? Mit

[Talk-de] Tirex im Hintergrund rendern lassen

2011-01-11 Thread Karsten
Hallo, hat jemand eine Ahnung, wie ich im Hintergrund veraltete Kacheln neu rendern kann und nicht erst, wenn sie im Browser neu angefordert werden. Ich habe mapnik/Tirex installiert ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-de] Tirex im Hintergrund rendern lassen

2011-01-11 Thread Stephan Knauss
On 11.01.2011 10:24, Karsten wrote: hat jemand eine Ahnung, wie ich im Hintergrund veraltete Kacheln neu rendern kann und nicht erst, wenn sie im Browser neu angefordert werden. Ich habe mapnik/Tirex installiert tirex-batch. Im tirex-paket ist ein script dabei das basierend auf den ältesten x

Re: [Talk-de] Aktion 11 - Verbindungsprobleme in Afrika

2011-01-11 Thread Gary68
hi, das mit der sortierung habe ich für checktouch schon mal gemacht. warum fehler doppelt auftauchen, ist mir noch nicht klar. die meldungen im gpx file sind redundant, aber nur solange man es nicht mit anderen gpx files zusammenführt. was ich mit allbugs.gpx tue... ciao gerhard On Sun,

Re: [Talk-de] Tirex im Hintergrund rendern lassen

2011-01-11 Thread Karsten
Stephan Knauss osm at stephans-server.de writes: On 11.01.2011 10:24, Karsten wrote: hat jemand eine Ahnung, wie ich im Hintergrund veraltete Kacheln neu rendern kann und nicht erst, wenn sie im Browser neu angefordert werden. Ich habe mapnik/Tirex installiert tirex-batch. Im

Re: [Talk-de] Status Aktion 11

2011-01-11 Thread Gary68
sortierung wird gemacht! On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 11:58 +0100, Rainer Kluge wrote: Hallo Gary, Am 08.01.2011 20:30, schrieb Gary68: Nach 24h sind 17 von 36 Paketen abgearbeitet Inzwischen sind alle Pakete abgearbeitet! SUPER und vielen Dank allen Helfern schon mal soweit!!! Die

Re: [Talk-de] Status Aktion 11

2011-01-11 Thread Gary68
hi. man kann - und soll. wie ich im wiki schreibe. du könntest es organisieren, ich stelle daten bereit. steht als angebot immer noch. ciao gerhard On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 18:23 +0100, Tom Müller wrote: Kann man so ein Projekt auch mal für den Vietnam anstoßen? Mir sind da in Hanoi einige

[Talk-de] cloudmade extrakte und incomplete entities

2011-01-11 Thread Gary68
hi, ich glaube, die cloudmade osm extrakte werden (zumindest teilweise) ohne die option -clipincompleteentities grechnet. kann man diese operation nachträglich durch osmosis ausführen lassen? ciao und danke! gerhard ___ Talk-de mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] Tirex im Hintergrund rendern lassen

2011-01-11 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hallo, On 01/11/2011 10:24 AM, Karsten wrote: hat jemand eine Ahnung, wie ich im Hintergrund veraltete Kacheln neu rendern kann und nicht erst, wenn sie im Browser neu angefordert werden. Ich habe mapnik/Tirex installiert Schau Dir mal utils/tirex-create-stats-and-update-tiles.sh an, das kann

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-11 Thread Chris66
Am 09.01.2011 13:23, schrieb Tobias Knerr: Was mir direkt einfällt, ist highway=path + xyz=designated. In dieser Kombination wird das designated zumindest hierzulande anscheinend oft als exklusiv und daher als äquivalent zu access=no + xyz=designated verstanden. Das designated wurde ja

[Talk-de] Adresssuche beim Oregon

2011-01-11 Thread Christian Knorr
Hallo zusammen, gibt es eigentlich Neuigkeiten bezüglich der Adresssuche beim Garmin Oregon? Bei Landesteil eingeben kommt man ja nicht weiter. Oder ist das Kartenabhängig? Ich verwende die AiO Europa. Weil die Datei aber zu groß ist teste ich jetzt mal nur die basemap vom 05.01.2011. Danke

Re: [Talk-de] Post offices near Lünen

2011-01-11 Thread Chris66
Am 09.01.2011 22:57, schrieb Peter Wendorff: Hallo Johann. mit post office near Lünen kriege ich ein Ergebnis; post offices geht offensichtlich tatsächlich nicht. Ticket erstellt. http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3451 Chris ___ Talk-de mailing

Re: [Talk-de] ??Reit- und Wanderkarte - Jahresrück blick

2011-01-11 Thread Andre Joost
Johannes Huesing schrieb: Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de [Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:21:35PM CET]: [...] Am besten ändern wir das Kürzel GR irgendwie auf ein englischsprachiges Pendant LT für Long Distance Trail oder sowas und dokumentieren an prominenter Stelle, dass wir GR nicht

Re: [Talk-de] Per Straßenname den Stadtteil herausfi nden

2011-01-11 Thread Tirkon
M?rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Es gibt m.E. nicht mal überall eine klare und eindeutige Definition was ein Stadtteil überhaupt ist. +1. Ein Stadtteil ist ein Teil einer Stadt mit Namen, das muss nicht mit einer Verwaltungseinheit in Zusammenhang stehen. Ich bin gerade

Re: [Talk-de] Adresssuche beim Oregon

2011-01-11 Thread Henning Scholland
Hallo, ich sag mal so: Es wird dran gearbeitet, dass es funktioniert. Näheres gibts auf der mkgmap-dev ML. Es ist aber ein generelles Problem von Karten, die mit mkgmap erstellt werden. Viele Grüße Henning Am 11.01.2011 15:32, schrieb Christian Knorr: Hallo zusammen, gibt es eigentlich

[Talk-de] SQL: OSM-Tag in Zahl umwandeln

2011-01-11 Thread Stephan Wolff
Moin, eine kurze Frage an die SQL-Kenner: Wie kann man (möglichst einfach) ein OSM-Tag in SQL als Zahl weiterverarbeiten? Auch Tags, die nur Zahlenwerte enthalten sollen, haben manchmal Werte wie 123;456, 123,456, 123XY oder 123456. Mein Versuch to_number(substring( tags-'voltage' from

[Talk-de] GEOFABRIK pbf Downloads nicht aktuell?

2011-01-11 Thread Torsten Leistikow
Moin, ist bei den pbf-Auszuegen von der GEOFABRIK irgendwas kaputt? Gestern Nachmittag hatte ich germany.osm.pbf runtergeladen, da waren anscheinend verschiedene Aenderungen von mir aus den letzten Tagen noch nicht drin. Heute Nachmittag habe ich dann wieder die Datei runtergeladen. Laut

Re: [Talk-de] GPS-Genauigkeit prüfen

2011-01-11 Thread Garry
Am 10.01.2011 16:29, schrieb Markus: Hallo Tirkon, In der Elektrotechnik nutzt man bei schwankenden Messwerten die Durchschnittsbildung über mehrere Messwerte Ich habe mein Gerät mal über Nacht rausgelegt. Ergebnis: 600 Messwerte in 10 Stunden. Das möchte ich gern mit Excel grafisch

Re: [Talk-de] Frage zu ti...@home Windows

2011-01-11 Thread Carsten Moeller
Am 06.01.2011 23:29, schrieb Rainer Knaepper: Moin, nachdem ich nun einen Rechner mit Quadcore habe, dachte ich mir, ich opfere einen davon für ti...@home. Es funktioniert aber nicht. Windows XP SP3, 2GB Ram, Plattenplatz genügend. Installation per

Re: [Talk-de] SQL: OSM-Tag in Zahl umwandeln

2011-01-11 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Stephan Wolff wrote: Wie kann man (möglichst einfach) ein OSM-Tag in SQL als Zahl weiterverarbeiten? Auch Tags, die nur Zahlenwerte enthalten sollen, haben manchmal Werte wie 123;456, 123,456, 123XY oder 123456. Wenn es Dir reicht, solche Tags kommentarlos in eine -1 oder 0 oder so

Re: [Talk-de] GEOFABRIK pbf Downloads nicht aktuell?

2011-01-11 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hallo, Torsten Leistikow wrote: ist bei den pbf-Auszuegen von der GEOFABRIK irgendwas kaputt? Es scheint ein Problem mit dem GWDG-Mirror zu geben, der hat sich letzte Nacht keine neuen Daten geholt. Der Geofabrik-Server schickt Dich aber trotzdem dahin (im blinden Vertrauen darauf, dass

[Talk-de] GPX Track in Karte einblenden und schneiden

2011-01-11 Thread Tirkon
Moin, hier warten noch viele GPX Tracks, hochgeladen zu werden. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, einen GPX Track in eine Karte (z.B. OSM oder Google) einzublenden und dann Punkte (z.B. durch Aufziehen eines Rechteckes) geografisch bezogen rauszulöschen oder den Track zu teilen? Hintergrund ist

Re: [Talk-de] GPX Track in Karte einblenden und schneiden

2011-01-11 Thread Henning Scholland
Das kann doch jOSM ;) gpx - osm, nodes löschen, osm-gpx Wenn du eine Karte willst, nutze das imagery-Plugin mit bing oder Mapnik etc. Viele Grüße, Henning Am 11.01.2011 23:11, schrieb Tirkon: Moin, hier warten noch viele GPX Tracks, hochgeladen zu werden. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, einen

Re: [Talk-de] Frage zu ti...@home Windows

2011-01-11 Thread Stephan Knauss
On 11.01.2011 19:52, Carsten Moeller wrote: War jetzt lange nicht mehr am Ball aber schau mal hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:windowscli...@home warum machst du das alles von Hand? Warum nicht einfach einen Doppelklick auf den Installer? Der installiert alle notwendigen Tools und

[Talk-de] OpenRouteService mit direkter Adresseingabe

2011-01-11 Thread Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
Hallo, Gibt es eine Möglichkeit Start und Ziel direkt beim Aufruf anzugeben? Etwa http://openrouteservice.org/such?start=meinort?ziel=deinort Heinz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] OpenRouteService mit direkter Adresseingabe

2011-01-11 Thread Jonas K.
Am 11.01.2011 um 23:38 schrieb Heinz-Jürgen Oertel: Hallo, Gibt es eine Möglichkeit Start und Ziel direkt beim Aufruf anzugeben? Etwa http://openrouteservice.org/such?start=meinort?ziel=deinort Das könnte dir helfen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRouteService#ORS_.22API.22 Sieht

Re: [Talk-de] OpenRouteService mit direkter Adresseingabe

2011-01-11 Thread Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
Am Dienstag 11 Januar 2011 schrieb Jonas K.: Am 11.01.2011 um 23:38 schrieb Heinz-Jürgen Oertel: Hallo, Gibt es eine Möglichkeit Start und Ziel direkt beim Aufruf anzugeben? Etwa http://openrouteservice.org/such?start=meinort?ziel=deinort Das könnte dir helfen:

[Talk-de] Exzessive Einzelrequests an die API

2011-01-11 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hallo, irgendein - pardon - Idiot sendet seit Tagen taeglich ueber 100.000 einzelne /api/0.6/node/123-Requests an die OSM-API. Die Person kommt aus Deutschland, aus dem Arcor/Vodafone-DSL-Dialin-Netz. Die IPs werden immer gesperrt, das haelt dann, bis sie sich das naechste Mal einwaehlt.

Re: [Talk-de] OpenRouteService mit direkter Adresseingabe

2011-01-11 Thread fx99
mit http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/geocoder/ kann man ADressen in Koordinatenumwandeln. -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OpenRouteService-mit-direkter-Adresseingabe-tp5912729p5913531.html Sent from the Germany mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Talk-in] Geospatial world forum's seminar on Open Source Initiatives

2011-01-11 Thread H.S.Rai
Geospatial world forum has seminar on Open Source Initiatives http://www.geospatialworldforum.org/2011/conference/seminar.htm -- H.S.Rai ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in

  1   2   >