I have not been able to follow the large number of posts on this group in
recent weeks - but I can confirm that stopareas are an important part of
NaPTAN data in the UK, and are an important aspect of the way that stops
data are used in journey planning applications. It would be a pity if OSM
On 01/22/2011 11:04 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
IMHO not related to the proposal:
- potlatch can not handle the proposal/nested relations correctly:
The latest version of Potlatch (Potlatch 2) handles nested relations
excellently. About 10 seconds' research
Am 24.01.2011 10:00, schrieb Dominik Mahrer (Teddy):
On 01/22/2011 11:04 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
IMHO not related to the proposal:
- potlatch can not handle the proposal/nested relations correctly:
The latest version of Potlatch (Potlatch 2) handles nested
On 01/22/2011 08:38 PM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
On 01/22/2011 09:32 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
- stop_area is not needed/too complicated:
[...]And it does not seam to be too complicated,
And as for not needed: can we have a *separate discussion* on how
routing works? There had already
On 01/24/2011 10:10 AM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
As far as I understand the issue, stop areas are used to tie different
stops into one transferring area.
No, you did not understand correct. stop_area_group is (was?) for that.
Teddych
___
Talk-transit
Am 24.01.2011 10:39, schrieb Dominik Mahrer (Teddy):
On 01/24/2011 10:10 AM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
As far as I understand the issue, stop areas are used to tie different
stops into one transferring area.
No, you did not understand correct. stop_area_group is (was?) for that.
Then what is the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.comwrote:
Am 24.01.2011 09:39, schrieb Roger Slevin:
I have not been able to follow the large number of posts on this group in
recent weeks - but I can confirm that stopareas are an important part of
NaPTAN data in the UK,
On 01/24/2011 11:00 AM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
Am 24.01.2011 10:39, schrieb Dominik Mahrer (Teddy):
On 01/24/2011 10:10 AM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
As far as I understand the issue, stop areas are used to tie different
stops into one transferring area.
No, you did not understand correct.
Frankie, I think you have mentioned some good examples.
For simple pairs or even small clusters of stops then a stoparea often can be
defined by rules – and indeed the systems I am working with in the UK uses such
rules to define an “implicit” stoparea – the rules we use are that the
On 23.01.2011 13:18, Michał Borsuk wrote:
On 01/23/2011 12:57 PM, Vincent Privat wrote:
2011/1/23 Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com
mailto:michal.bor...@gmail.com
Could you please explain what you mean, because I'm not sure. The
links provided show bus routes with nothing
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Christian christ...@balticfinance.com wrote:
but it also includes people ... who would like to map also
physical path a bus takes on the street.
I think there's a logic in encouraging the use of ordered relations to
show the paths of bus/etc routes - because
Michał Borsuk michal.borsuk at gmail.com writes:
Continuing on How routing software works (and why OSM as-is is not
ready for routing):
Hello,
makes perfect sense, assuming OSM is mapping, not routing project and some other
layer will be needed for the routing.
Just a small set of
On 01/24/2011 12:40 PM, Christian wrote:
On 23.01.2011 13:18, Michał Borsuk wrote:
No, this can't be done in such detail, but it's not necessary as of
2011. All you need to know is where is the bus stop for the direction
you're interested in, or whether the bus stop you found serves you
On 01/24/2011 02:09 PM, Richard Mann wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Christianchrist...@balticfinance.com wrote:
but it also includes people ... who would like to map also
physical path a bus takes on the street.
I think there's a logic in encouraging the use of ordered relations to
On 01/24/2011 03:04 PM, Oleksandr Vlasov wrote:
Michał Borsukmichal.borsukat gmail.com writes:
Just a small set of questions:
1. As I can see, currently stop-on-a-way is the preferred approach for mapping
tram stops. Do you propose to map tram stops like bus ones, i.e. beside the way?
I'd
On 01/24/2011 12:40 PM, Christian wrote:
On 23.01.2011 13:18, Michał Borsuk wrote:
No, this can't be done in such detail, but it's not
necessary as of
2011. All you need to know is where is the bus stop for
the direction
you're interested in, or whether the bus stop you found serves
On 01/24/2011 07:24 PM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
On 01/24/2011 03:04 PM, Oleksandr Vlasov wrote:
3. bus_stop already defines `ref' tag, will proposed `stop_id' be
something
different?
ref= on a bus stop? That's news to me (sadly). I used stop_id=, but the
mess probably comes from the fact that
On 01/24/2011 10:16 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
On 01/22/2011 08:38 PM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
On 01/22/2011 09:32 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
The more exact the OSM map is, the
more likely it is that the two directions do not share the same way for
the both directions (the lines
On 01/25/2011 12:19 AM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
On 01/24/2011 11:38 PM, Christian Krützfeldt wrote:
If disagree then please attack my arguments with
counter-arguments. I stand by what I wrote.
Well, I could agree with you that your proposal is fine for most usage
cases. But below you say it
On 01/24/2011 11:22 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
By the way, I have removed stop_area_group from the proposal.
In essence this is good. I tried to implement this concept in OSM, but
could not find (come up with) a sensible standard.
Then what is the exact difference between
On 01/24/2011 11:06 AM, Frankie Roberto wrote:
[...] I don't think you'd consider Embankment and
Charing Cross stations to be part of the same stop area, even though
they're very close to each other? On the other hand, some stop areas
(Waterloo perhaps) may be huge, even though it may take you
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 00:23 CET,
Michal Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/25/2011 12:19 AM, Michal Borsuk wrote:
Graphically lost, so no arrows (that didn't work anyway, because
there are streets in which bus A runs one-way north, bus B runs
one-way south, and
A zašto se u tu poruku ne stavi nešto tipa ako ne prihvatite novu
licencu do x.x. podaci koje ste vi unijeli biti će obrisani iz OSM
baze ?
To bi ih ipak jače ponukalo da prouče cijelu stvar. Moram priznati da
bih ja osobno donju poruku pročitao, ali linkove nebih otvarao jer me
ne zanimaju
(2b) vizualno po mjestima kako to izgleda mozete vidjeti na recimo:
http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=13lat=45.81326lon=16.05037layers=B0
Legenda: Zeleno: podaci koji ce biti zadrzani, crveno i narancasto:
podaci ce biti potpuno izgubljeni, zuto: dio podataka ce
Karta je stara, mislim da je datirana prije Binga jer sam ja odmah poceo
po bingu crtati a nema niti jedne te promjene.
Sto se tice licence, prihvatio sam ju, i crtati cu dalje, i zaboli me
koja ce licenca biti, ja samo zelim moci crtati i moci koristiti, ako i
ostali mogu koristiti nek
Hi all,
Planning a trip to Lake Caliraya in Feb. Will turn my GPS on of course, but the
main idea is to do some trail running with some friends, rather than mapping.
Anyway, we're leaving Makati at around 10am on Saturday morning. Do any of you
seasoned drivers have any opinions as to whether
Hi Jim,
if you're from the north i.e. QC, it's faster via Rizal route. around 2.5
hours from Trinoma
From Trinoma via Calamba, it's 3.5 hrs. SM Calamba is already open and even
the bypass road that will pass the new Calamba City hall has heavy traffic.
The trikes on Manila East Road are such
Hi,
Thanks for the input, I thought there might be someone with local knowledge on
the list!
tutubi wrote, On Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 10:37 AM:
if you're from the north i.e. QC, it's faster via Rizal route. around 2.5
hours from Trinoma
From Trinoma via Calamba, it's 3.5 hrs. SM Calamba
tutubi wrote, On Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 10:37 AM:
total distance from trinoma via rizal is about 90 kms while via calamba is
probably 110 kms. 10am is quite late so expect heavy traffic too from Calamba
to Los Banos
How about, for example, going past the Calumba turn and coming off at San
Hi Jim,
your suggested alternate is via Makban? I have yet to take it so I can't
comment. only the recently opened toll road from SLEX to sto tomas makes
this a little easier but i doubt if it will shorten your travel time than
braving calamba traffic
how about c5 then ortigas or eastbank road
Jamaar Klaas jij doet dat toch perfect.
Ik ben nu bezig ALLE adressen in Korbeek-lo,Lovenjoel in te voeren. Dat is
IMHO nodig om enigszins op gelijke hoogte te komen met Google. Dit werk houd
in: building tekenen, de eventuele toegangsweg tekenen (als de woning 20 m
van de straat ligt), de
na een lange periode van inactiviteit had ik gisteren toch eindelijk nog
eens een paar straatjes doorgereden, en de daaruitvolgende gpx-bestanden
opgestuurd. Na 24 uur wachten waren ze nog steeds niet zichtbaar - maar
in een gebruikersdagboek vond ik een gelijkaardige jammerklacht, dus nog
#rubbish
--- On Mon, 1/24/11, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Subject: [OSM-talk] Why I don't use JOSM (was Re: Non-map-based OSM editor)
To: Anthony o...@inbox.org
Cc: Open Street Map mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Monday, January 24,
Hi,
On 01/24/2011 09:23 AM, Oscar Orbe wrote:
#rubbish
Come on people. There's enough editors for everyone. There's a ton of
reasons, for *every* editor, why someone would use or not use it.
Personally I am glad that this is so; I think the needs of different
users are much better served
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not quite sure why, but I really don't like JOSM.
4) General preference for online tools (so I don't need to synchronise
environments across different computers)
You may use portable installation of JOSM on flash drive on
In the same way I try to convince long-time JOSM users to once again look
at Potlatch2 you should also have another look at JOSM if you tried
fiddling with it once. It is not that bad at the moment.
But I also use Potlatch2 more often than JOSM now. But mostly for casual
editing...
Groet,
Floris
Hello I agree with Frederik
i was saying that Steve's message was rubbish
As Greta Garbo would say: one of us needs to improve his English
will it be me?
--Oscar
--- On Mon, 1/24/11, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Subject: Re:
Is the GPS upload feature on the OSM site working at the moment? When I try to
upload a track I get the message saying the track has been uploaded and I'll
receive an email on completion - but there isn't the usual PENDING entry in my
list of GPS tracks, and the email never arrives.
--
Ed Avis
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:24:48 +1100, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not quite sure why, but I really don't like JOSM.
In my case I think it boils down to:
1) Complicated, idiosyncratic user interface. My brain just
2011/1/24 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not quite sure why, but I really don't like JOSM.
In my case I think it boils down to:
1) Complicated, idiosyncratic user interface. My brain just doesn't
have space to learn new
On 24/01/11 09:54, Ed Avis wrote:
Is the GPS upload feature on the OSM site working at the moment? When I try
to
upload a track I get the message saying the track has been uploaded and I'll
receive an email on completion - but there isn't the usual PENDING entry in my
list of GPS tracks,
2011/1/24 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Please don't feed the troll ...
C'mon now, if I wanted to troll I would have talked shit about PL1.
But in fact I like Potlatch. PL1 is by far my favorite of the 4.
If it
I think a tool like this would help to maintain consistent tags across
geographically separated objects.
Hi
I have also tinkered on a tool that might do something like you ask for.
The idea is a 'poi multiplexer system' to manage a list of pois.
Each poi might be 'linked' to an osm-object or
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Come on people. There's enough editors for everyone. There's a ton
of reasons, for *every* editor, why someone would use or not use
it. Personally I am glad that this is so
Absolutely.
I'd also add that transferring your expectations of how one editor works
onto
Martin wrote:
I am not sure for newer potlatch, but the few times I was forced to
use it (why the hell there is undelete api available only for Potlatch
and not as XML?)
Hey, calm down. Less of the why the hell, please.
The reason Potlatch 1 can undelete is because I wrote the undelete
On 24 January 2011 02:19, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 24/01/2011 00:25, Anthony a écrit :
I'm not quite sure why, but I really don't like JOSM. Of the four
main editors (others being PL1, PL2, and Merkaartor),
On 24/01/2011 10:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 24/01/11 09:54, Ed Avis wrote:
Is the GPS upload feature on the OSM site working at the moment? When I try to
upload a track I get the message saying the track has been uploaded and I'll
receive an email on completion - but there isn't the usual
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, MP singular...@gmail.com wrote:
But Potlatch is much slower, at least for me, once there are several
thousand primitives in view it will become quite unuseable.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:22 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/24 Steve
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:34 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also honestly thought it was the first editor with non-sucky
relations support :)
I just checked and the relations support is much better than it was
last time I used it, and probably better than PL1 (once I can
On 01/24/2011 04:43 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:34 AM, andrzej zaborowskibalr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also honestly thought it was the first editor with non-sucky
relations support :)
I just checked and the relations support is much better than it was
last time I used it, and
Anthony wrote:
If I take notes of which parts I find least intuitive (the parts I
have to RTFM about, like how to reopen those right-side toolbarish
windows), would anyone be interested in them?
Yes, concrete ideas for improvement would be appreciated.
Certain things I'm aware of, e.g. there
On 24/01/2011 13:34, monxton wrote:
On 24/01/2011 10:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 24/01/11 09:54, Ed Avis wrote:
Is the GPS upload feature on the OSM site working at the moment? When
I try to
upload a track I get the message saying the track has been uploaded
and I'll
receive an email on
On lundi 24 janvier 2011 at 11:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote :
I wonder if the issue might be that I use Windows. Do most JOSMers
use Windows, or some other OS? I'm sure Java is especially sucky on
Windows.
did you try to give it more memory? As soon as you offer it say
600MB-1 GB it
monxton gmane at jordan-maynard.org writes:
there isn't the usual PENDING entry in my
list of GPS tracks, and the email never arrives.
It's the same for me - although I can see that some traces are getting
through, mine are going to the same place as Ed's ...
Now healed - new traces are
Hi,
Would like to announce an update to OpenTrailView (OTV; now at
http://www.opentrailview.org/), which I introduced at Girona last year and
which aims to collect linked 360 degree panoramas of walking / hiking routes a
la Google StreetView.
A longer post will appear in due course on the
You have some javascript errors. Missing ; or )
Please go to http://www.jslint.com/ and paste the content of site.js there.
-
The biggest problems are:
Problem at line 31 character 3: Mixed spaces and tabs. $('map').style.bottom
= ;
Problem at line 41
On 25 January 2011 09:57, Milo van der Linden m...@dogodigi.net wrote:
You have some javascript errors. Missing ; or )
Please go to http://www.jslint.com/ and paste the content of site.js there.
-
The biggest problems are:
Problem at line 31 character 3:
2011/1/24 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I assume there's no way to do load on demand in JOSM?
well, you load what you want, but you have to do it manually. Loading
is blocking in JOSM, which has a big advantage: you know that all data
was loaded before you edit.
cheers,
Martin
2011/1/24 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com:
Anthony wrote:
If I take notes of which parts I find least intuitive (the parts I
have to RTFM about, like how to reopen those right-side toolbarish
windows), would anyone be interested in them?
Yes, concrete ideas for improvement would be
Anthony-6 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Yes, if you try
and use Potlatch to show several thousand objects you are certifiably
insane. If you want to work in a JOSM-like manner, use JOSM!
Good points. I think that's a big part of
I thought these got reverted? I just noticed a bunch of (bad) nodes from
changeset 3352521 still exist. I'm going to delete all the nodes from this
changset and the other 12 epa hazard site changsets if they are still at
version 1 unless there's a strong objection. These nodes were all imported
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/24 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com:
Anthony wrote:
If I take notes of which parts I find least intuitive (the parts I
have to RTFM about, like how to reopen those right-side toolbarish
windows),
Am 25.01.2011 02:44, schrieb Nathan Edgars II:
One issue I have is this: I often import selected ways (such as railways) in
an area from xapi and then edit them, adding new ones and deleting bad ones.
(On upload if I deleted something that's referenced by a non-downloaded
object I get a
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:22 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are annoyed by plugins that break everything (does indeed
happen, but rarely), simply don't install them. Stuff that has proven
generally useful and stable will usually get integrated in the main
code
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Sebastian Klein
basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, concrete ideas for improvement would be appreciated.
One thing I found very offputting was the conceptual model required
that map data itself is an object you have to process. In Potlatch,
there is minimal
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:25 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
But in JOSM you have to explicitly download data,
manipulate it, then explicitly upload it again. (And, if my memory
serves, you get slapped on the wrist for trying to download too
much.)
yes - precisely why I use josm
--
regards
KG
colliar-3 wrote:
Am 25.01.2011 02:44, schrieb Nathan Edgars II:
One issue I have is this: I often import selected ways (such as railways)
in
an area from xapi and then edit them, adding new ones and deleting bad
ones.
(On upload if I deleted something that's referenced by a
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:25:00 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
(And, if my memory
serves, you get slapped on the wrist for trying to download too much.)
based on a formula which is related to the number of square kilometres
involved, and which has no relation to the amount of data
Hi,
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
(And, if my memory
serves, you get slapped on the wrist for trying to download too much.)
based on a formula which is related to the number of square kilometres
involved, and which has no relation to the amount of data involved.
It is presented as a restriction from
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
a) Allow you to edit multiple objects at once (perhaps:
http://rawedit.openstreetmap.fr/edit/relation/1317525057716530)
b) Only show tags
c) Show it in table form
d) Allow you to populate the
Er is komende zomer ook een SOTM in Europa, naast de wereldwijde SOTM
in Denver in September.
Ik ben begonnen met het vertalen van de Wiki in het Nederlands, maar
kan nog wel hulp gebruiken. De div. subpagina's zijn nog niet vertaald
en er zitten vast nog fouten in en onvolkomendheden.
On 24/01/11 07:10, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Ian Sergeantinas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
Having a separate layer may be appropriate for data we are considering
importing to OSM that will never need to be user modified. Data in
this category is better combined with OSM
On 24 January 2011 06:06, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced
restaurants?
Not all restaurants are licensed...
amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo
___
Talk-au
seems sensible as the tag can be applied generally
cheers
On 25/01/2011 10:08 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 January 2011 06:06, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced
restaurants?
Not all
On 24/01/2011 23:08, John Smith wrote:
Not all restaurants are licensed...
amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo
Sounds good to me - thanks.
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:08 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo
Yeah, but they're not mutually exclusive. All four combinations exist,
including licensed *and* byo (with corkage, usually), and licensed
*and not* byo.
licensed=yes/no
Hi !
ich wollte auch einige Fehler bei der Aktion 13 beheben und klicke auf
lokal Josm um die betreffenden Elemente zu laden.
Es passiert aber nicht !
Kann mir einer weiterhelfen ? in der Pluginliste kann ich RemoteControll
nicht mehr finden und auch mit der neusten Version klappt es
Hi,
muttu aktivieren.
Einstellungen-Fernsteuerung
Chris
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am 24.01.2011 16:59, schrieb Chris66:
Hi,
muttu aktivieren.
Einstellungen-Fernsteuerung
Chris
danke !
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
das ist ganz einfach, wenn man das Problem selber mal hatte und dann
nach Stunden drauf gekommen ist ;)
manche sql-system-tabellen (hier schema_info) und einige andere
postgis-tabellen dürfen bei einer neuinstallation nicht von alle sql-usern
(hier osm) gelesen werden!!!
Danke! Hab es
Thomas-15 wrote:
Ich habe gerade gesehen
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.42631lon=7.82265zoom=16layers=M),
dass offenbar die Darstellung militärischer Gebiete in der Mapnik-Karte
geändert wurde (rot schraffiert). Dadurch heben sich diese Flächen
extrem von der Umgebung ab, was
Alexander Matheisen wrote:
... aber so hab ich es dann doch hingekriegt:
echo ALTER TABLE geography_columns OWNER TO osm; | psql -d osm
jeweils für jede Tabelle.
hi alex,
gib doch mal einfach psql -d osm ein :)
raus kommst du mit \q
gruss
walter
-
33,33% aller Statistiken
Chris66 schrieb:
der Trend geht weg von den Relationen.
Woher hast du dieses Indiz und was ist der vermutete Grund dafür?
Entweder die Software beherrscht Relationen (und das tun Potlatch und
JOSM) oder sie beherrscht sie nicht (Beispiele?).
LG, S.
Am 23. Januar 2011 12:47 schrieb Chris66
Hallo,
Stefan Keller wrote:
der Trend geht weg von den Relationen.
Woher hast du dieses Indiz und was ist der vermutete Grund dafür?
Entweder die Software beherrscht Relationen (und das tun Potlatch und
JOSM) oder sie beherrscht sie nicht (Beispiele?).
Der Trend geht nicht *allgemein* weg
Am 24.01.2011 21:07, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Es gibt eine Reihe von Gruenden, die gegen Strassenrelationen zur
Adressierung sprechen:
* weitaus weniger benutzt
* komplizierter einzugeben, komplizieter auszuwerten
* Adressen und Strassen sind unterschiedliche Konzepte (das Haus mit der
Chris66 wrote:
Sieht in my opinion auch schöner als sowas aus :
...
Die Deusche Post hat darum in Marl auch schon andere Einnahmemöglichkeiten
in Angriff genommen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.651838lon=7.08914zoom=18layers=M
Gruss
Walter
-
33,33% aller Statistiken beruhen auf
Am 23.01.2011 22:20, schrieb ben:
Hallo,
wenn wir einmal dabei sind:
Ich war mir nie sicher wie ich das hier taggen soll:
Hi.
Ich gebe Dir recht, schön wird eine Karte durch diese Masse von
Hausnummern nicht unbedingt.
Trotzdem geht es aber nicht (nur) darum, eine schöne Karte zu machen,
sondern darum, sinnvoll nutzbare Geodaten zu haben.
Eine Adress-Interpolation ist aber nur schlecht nutzbar, wenn man
genauere
Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de [Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:47:34PM
CET]:
Hi.
Ich gebe Dir recht, schön wird eine Karte durch diese Masse von
Hausnummern nicht unbedingt.
Trotzdem geht es aber nicht (nur) darum, eine schöne Karte zu
machen, sondern darum, sinnvoll nutzbare Geodaten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo zusammen!
Die Deutsche Presse Agentur hat zum Thema der Explosion auf dem
russischen Flughafen in der Nähe von Moskau eine kleine Grafik
veröffentlicht, die auf der Mapnik-Karte basiert.
U.a. verwendet Tagesschau.de diese:
Moin!
Am 21.01.2011 22:16, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Henning Scholland wrote:
und was nimmt man dann für ein definitives Wohngebiet? ;-)
Das gleiche. Wem es wichtig ist, der kann ja das nicht-definitive mit
einem source oder note verfeinern.
Ich empfinde etwas wie landuse=residential,
Moin,
wenn ein Gelände mehrere verschiedene Nutzungen hat, ist es
schwierig diese als landuse zu erfassen.
Beispiele:
- Militärgelände mit forstwirtschaftlich genutztem Wald
- Wald rund um die Brunnen eines Wasserwerks
- Friedhöfe, Parks, Golfplätze mit Wald
- Küstenschutzdeiche,
Am 25.01.2011 01:20, schrieb Stephan Wolff:
Ich empfinde etwas wie landuse=residential, note=Vereinsgelände,
keine Wohnungen als falsch.
Bis sich etwas besseres ergibt werde ich für bebaute Flächen, die nicht
in die üblichen Kategorien passen, landuse=buildings nehmen.
Es gibt afaik keine
Am Dienstag, 25. Januar 2011 07:28 schrieb Stephan Wolff [s.wo...@web.de]
wenn ein Gelände mehrere verschiedene Nutzungen hat, ist es
schwierig diese als landuse zu erfassen.
Beispiele:
- Militärgelände mit forstwirtschaftlich genutztem Wald
- Wald rund um die Brunnen eines Wasserwerks
-
Am 24.01.11 22:15, schrieb Johannes Huesing:
Peter Wendorffwendo...@uni-paderborn.de [Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:47:34PM
CET]:
Hi.
Ich gebe Dir recht, schön wird eine Karte durch diese Masse von
Hausnummern nicht unbedingt.
Trotzdem geht es aber nicht (nur) darum, eine schöne Karte zu
machen,
André Joost wrote:
Nun, die Marler Adressen sind importiert worden. Leider passt die Lage
der Straßen manchmal nicht zu den Nummern :-(
Normalerweise sollten die Straßen in DE zwischen den gerade und
ungeraden Hausnummern liegen.
Da gibt es ja wohl nur zwei Möglichkeiten:
a) alles auf
Perché se uso le foto Bing in Potlatch riesco a contare le traversine
dei binari, mentre invece in JOSM ho un misero pixel al metro?
--
Giacomo Boschi
http://gwilbor.wordpress.com/
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
2011/1/24 Giacomo Boschi gwil...@email.it:
Perché se uso le foto Bing in Potlatch riesco a contare le traversine dei
binari, mentre invece in JOSM ho un misero pixel al metro?
hai cambiato, in preferences (F12) lo zoom massimo delle immagini,
portandolo al massimo valore?
controlla il valore
Il 24/01/2011 11:41, Simone Cortesi ha scritto:
hai cambiato, in preferences (F12) lo zoom massimo delle immagini,
portandolo al massimo valore?
Dire nelle preferenze di JOSM è un po' come dire nel magazzino
dell'Ikea, comunque, battute a parte, ho trovato il parametro. Grazie!
--
Giacomo
Ed infatti io non l'ho trovato
Mi dite dove è che si imposta la zoom massimo???
Grazie
Morsi
Il 24/01/2011 11:41, Simone Cortesi ha scritto:
hai cambiato, in preferences (F12) lo zoom massimo delle immagini,
portandolo al massimo valore?
Dire nelle preferenze di JOSM è un po'
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
