Here's a post from Bing's blog on the latest September updates and
also a screenshot of the coverage.
http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2012/09/18/global-ortho-amp-17-million-sqkm-of-new-satellite-imagery.aspx
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8299/8001662032_c8f5a4ceb4_b.jpg
On
Hello,
here I found back a discussion about an app...
http://activityworkshop.net/software/timetabler/index.html
Of course, this guy makes interesting soft too:
http://activityworkshop.net/software/gpsprune/index.html
3D view of gpx ...
On 18/09/12 06:26, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
On 17.09.2012 23:30, wrote Ed Loach:
Looks like it has been done.
http://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Osm:Export.start.export_detai
ls/dediff=4223004oldid=1509470rcid=curid=1065143
Short: http://is.gd/vzKO8e
I still get the old attribution = I'm
Only for English, not even British English...
http://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special:Translationsmessage=Osm:Export.start.export_details
Greets,
Floris
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Looks like it has been done.
On Sept. 15, a french OSM contributor has been blocked because he was
not following the dedicated account for import described in the
Import Guidelines (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/238).
There was nothing armful for the data, community or the whole project
is these changesets.
This
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Christian Quest
cqu...@openstreetmap.fr wrote:
I'd like to have some answers because after searching the wiki, the
OSMF web site and the imports@ mailing-list archives, I could not find
any (public) discussion about the newly required
dedicated account.
Hi, I
2012/9/18 Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr:
My questions are:
- Who decided this change (recommendation - requirement) ?
- What has been the process that lead to this major change ?
not sure about this, but I definitely support the decision, because it
was a real problem in the past
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
not sure about this, but I definitely support the decision, because it
was a real problem in the past when imports could not easily be
distinguished from individual and original contributions.
Excepted that in
2012/9/18 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
not sure about this, but I definitely support the decision, because it
was a real problem in the past when imports could not easily be
distinguished from individual and
On 9/18/2012 7:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
well, not sure where this comes from and if it makes sense: I don't
see a real obstacle as email addresses are not a scarse ressource (you
get as many as you like for free), but I agree that it seems to be
better to allow the same email address
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
How does it help for distinguishing imports from original
contributions to have many small areas or small feature sets or many
small changesets? What might help is a uniform changeset comment or
component.
Hi,
I welcome a discussion about rules - which ones we need, who makes
them, who executes them. It is clear that we need *some* rules, but
until now there's no formal community process to create or amend such rules.
I'm happy to hear any suggestions that people might have. How can the
2012/9/18 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
I'd put it like this: someone who didn't respect the import guidelines
valid for almost one year was temporarily blocked. What's the
problem? That's what the DWG is for.
Really ? According to [1]:
The *Data Working Group*
I'm passing this onto the dev@ mailing list.
I don't think translation is a topic suitable for that list, but I think
those who know about the JOSM translation system are more likely to be
there and not aware of what's happening in talk@
It terms of the actual tag in the OSM data...
Although
On 18/09/2012 13:42, Vincent Privat wrote:
What happened on 15th september looks like an abuse of authority to me,
as this largely exceeds the limits of the mandate given to the DWG. I
expect a clarification from the OSMF board on this point.
OK, if we're playing WikiLawyer pissing games, the
Le 18/09/2012 13:51, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
I'd put it like this: someone who didn't respect the import guidelines
valid for almost one year was temporarily blocked. What's the
problem? That's what the DWG is for.
how many have spoken up against it? I'd expect from every mapper who
Ah they are great videos Alex.
So can you confirm what source map they used?
Greg.
On 18 September 2012 00:52, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Cool!
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Alexrk alex...@yahoo.de wrote:
I did a short movie clip that shows how the map makers are working on
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jonathan Bennett
openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
On 18/09/2012 13:42, Vincent Privat wrote:
OK, if we're playing WikiLawyer pissing games, the statement about DWG's
power says authorised, not limited to. Part of DWG's remit is to
deal with disputes, and
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that I (and not only me) know that the guidelines are subjects of
arbitrary changes without a wide announce, I would read this page each time
before i'm importing a postbox from opendata ?
But look, you found the
There are a whole range of resources online from the ICA Neocartography
workshop and the Society of Cartographers conf.
A report on the ICA Neocartography Commission workshop is on the ICA website
at: http://icaci.org/first-meeting-of-the-commission-on-neocartography/
Videos of all 6
I was hoping to see a recursive map of Berlin here
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.517521lon=13.402168zoom=18layers=M :-)
From: Gregory [mailto:nomoregra...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 18 September 2012 14:05
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Huge Berlin map - OSM?
Ah they are great
The changes to the guidelines should be seen in the light of the original text
being very OSMish, trying to leave some wiggle room and trying not to come over
as an absolute law, but I believe the intention was always that seperate
accounts would be the norm.
In reality a large number of
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The user had been contacted by DWG
beforehand because he had imported several millions of objects under his
account,
Sounds as a mass, uncontrolled import but is not. This user is very
active and well known in the
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
The licence change process in particular turned up a large number of
(problematic and others) imports where the importers washed their hands of
their responsibility and left the clean up work to others.
The imports during the
thank you for informing dev@ml :)
Il 18/09/2012 14:49, Gregory ha scritto:
I'm passing this onto the dev@ mailing list.
I don't think translation is a topic suitable for that list, but I think
those who know about the JOSM translation system are more likely to be
there and not aware of what's
2012/9/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Just to clarify this one point: The user had been contacted by DWG
beforehand because he had imported several millions of objects under his
account, and asked to continue his work in accordance with the import
guidelines, using a separate import
Pieren wrote:
DWG does also not usually require people to use a separete import account if
they are doing small imports (even though the policy does not mention an
exception for small imports). This, however, was orders of magnitude above
small.
What is the difference between one small import
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Now if there is a substantial set of data available which we are allowed to
import then that data should be available ... as an overlay or some other
way ... such as the OS data is available as overlays we can trace from.
Pieren wrote:
Now if there is a substantial set of data available which we are allowed to
import then that data should be available ... as an overlay or some other
way ... such as the OS data is available as overlays we can trace from.
Seriously, if OS opens the shapefiles of all detailed
2012-09-18 Lester Caine
Having to clean up some of the mess made by imports that were not as
well sanitised as they should have been, personally I get irritated at
any 'import' is loaded.
Lester,
I have often seen such arguments agains imports. In Canada also, there are
contributors
2012-09-8 Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
DWG does not usually block people without talking to them first, unless
they are in the process of breaking things.
Frederik,
Governance and role of local communities should be looked in a context of
multinational, multicultural organization.
Am 18.09.2012 15:55, schrieb Pieren:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
The licence change process in particular turned up a large number of
(problematic and others) imports where the importers washed their hands of
their responsibility and left the clean up
We've drifted from a question about governance to a talk about usefulness
of some kind of data in OSM which is something completely relative and
personal.
As far as I know, DWG doesn't exist to deal with usefulness of data nor
quality of contributions, but copyright infringement, vandalism and
Pierre Béland wrote:
I have often seen such arguments against imports. In Canada also, there are
contributors talking agains Canvec imports and saying we should have more fun
tracing from GPS.
We have to analyze the problems more seriously and find solutions to them. A
great work is done in
2012-09-18 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
The question of (for example of an operational problem) communication to
active mappers is a technical problem that we will have to address
at
one point in time. Either by assuring that the e-mail address remains
valid or by other technical means.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr wrote:
There are more then 500,000 contributors. How many do you think know about
the DWG group and follow his guidelines?
Those who aren't aware, and are contacted by DWG, generally switch to
an import account when they
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
The French cadastre imports are, as you know, a rather controversial
subject. In my opinion it is a dataset that doesn't actually increase the
usefulness of the OSM dataset for most users (building outlines without
addresses
2012-09-18 Lester Caine lester at lsces.co.uk
Pierre - I'm not arguing against imports. Only unmanaged ones and ones
we do not have easy access to the source data.
As I understand it you
can view the canvec data, but is it available as an overlay in an
editor? That is the part of the jigsaw
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
The French cadastre imports are, as you know, a rather controversial
subject. In my opinion it is a dataset that doesn't actually increase the
usefulness of the OSM dataset for most users (building outlines without
addresses
Hello,
I don't know anything about the particular import that originated this
question, and so I don't know if the following arguments specifically apply,
but I do want to comment on the issue of requiring a separate account for
imports.
IMHO, the issue is about licensing.
The contributor terms
Blocking a very respected contributor without prior discussion is a major fail
in the governance of the OSMF.
I assume that the thing was not really foreseen and a loose lead was put on the
DWG group.
Everyone understands that the Board is overbooked and it could have be seen
more easy
Pierre Béland wrote:
Pierre - I'm not arguing against imports. Only unmanaged ones and ones we do
not have easy access to the source data.
As I understand it you can view the canvec data, but is it available as an
overlay in an editor? That is the part of the jigsaw
that I'd like to see
On 18 September 2012 18:13, Christian Rogel
christian.ro...@club-internet.fr wrote:
Blocking a very respected contributor without prior discussion is a major
fail in the governance of the OSMF.
The user was messaged on 3 separate occasions between 22 March 2012
and 14 September 2012, asking
DWG != OSMF.
???
Éric
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi,
I'm in the same case of Vincent Pottier
except I has blocked without disscusion, by a very autoritative admin
my fault : I've not create a decated account for importing localized area .
But I've read the french wiki !
But I've read the import guideline ( it's not a massive import) !
But
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 18 September 2012 18:13, Christian Rogel
The initial message on the 22 March 2012 and follow-ups pointed to the
guidelines ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines )
which include that imports
Just guess who controls the servers and domain name ?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Pieren [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 18 september 2012 19:56
Aan: OSM
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines OSMF/DWG governance
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Grant Slater
From: Christian Quest [mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:11 AM
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines OSMF/DWG governance
2012/9/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Just to clarify this one point: The
On 18/09/12 at 18:29 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
OSM is not unique, wikipedia too require a dedicated account for bots.
I don't think calling people robots is going to contribute to
improving the atmosphere.
If the cadastre integration was done with scripts, it would be long
done, wouldn't it?
On 18/09/12 at 17:42 +0200, Simon Poole wrote:
(yes I have
heard all the stories about everything being manually checked etc,
if you believe that, I have a couple of bridges that I would like to
sell to you).
So you are blocking one user because other users working on similar
stuff (cadastre
I have seen enough bad imports (and put significant effort into
cleaning some of them up) that I like the guidelines and wish more
people would follow them. Even if each individual clause may be a
slight inconvenience or not entirely necessary for a particular
import, I think it is worth having
Am 18.09.2012 18:04, schrieb Christian Quest:
We've drifted from a question about governance to a talk about
usefulness of some kind of data in OSM which is something completely
relative and personal.
As I pointed out, usefulness of the data is outside the scope of this
discussion.
As far
Messages were sent on September 14th and 13th about the need to use a
dedicated account. A previous note was sent in March reminding them in
the
context of a note about a broken upload of 50k nodes.
And he didn't listen to Big Big Brother who warned him twice...
Is this a crowd sourced OPEN
Pierre And about governance, if this community cannot manage his
contributors, who
can? We continually have new mappers, some working more or less
intensively. We
should adapt or organization to this Wikipedia like structure and try to
better
structure local communities.
I
certainly
pb == Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr writes:
pb Simon, this discussion was started to discuss about governance. We
pb only see examples of problematic imports. But the question we
pb should look at is how we can better tune or multinational /
pb multicultural organization to
Am 18.09.2012 18:54, schrieb Béland Pierre:
Is it possible to discuss about governance wich is the subject of this
thread?
The reason I even touched on this subject is that each time the cadastre
imports turn up it is somehow claimed that they are different from other
imports and should be
Hi,
On 18.09.2012 20:34, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
So you are blocking one user because other users working on similar
stuff (cadastre integration) did not work correctly?
The user was not blocked because others did not work correctly.
He was blocked - for 24 hours - because he did not adhere to
Pieren wrote:
OSM is not unique, wikipedia too require a dedicated account for bots.
The uploads we are talking are normally done with JOSM after the
integration with the existing data and validation. If it is performed
with a script, then it's a bad import done by one of the black
sheeps
Hi,
On 18.09.2012 18:04, Christian Quest wrote:
Still no answer to my main original questions:
- who decided the import guidelines ?
It is a policy that has grown gradually. Just like other things in OSM
have - you'll not find anything about a vote for highway=motorway on the
Wiki either.
Le 18/09/2012 19:29, Grant Slater a écrit :
On 18 September 2012 18:13, Christian Rogel
christian.ro...@club-internet.fr wrote:
Blocking a very respected contributor without prior discussion is a major fail
in the governance of the OSMF.
The user was messaged on 3 separate occasions between
Frederik Ramm wrote:
But if the work of one person surpasses the million-object mark then is that
still a small-scale import? How much time does it take to review carefully a
million objects? Is it possible that a simple JOSM did not report anything
obvious takes the place of the careful review?
Le 18/09/2012 21:38, Frederik Ramm a écrit :
Hi,
...
But if the work of one person surpasses the million-object mark then
is that still a small-scale import? How much time does it take to
review carefully a million objects? Is it possible that a simple JOSM
did not report anything obvious
Marc Sibert wrote:
I thing the point is not why my account was blocked, but why someone have the
right to block an account and whatfor ?
The road is the place between the buildings... so I need the buildings :
Cadastre data are usefull (fully).
All points of the guideline are wrong : no
On 9/18/2012 1:56 PM, Pieren wrote:
The uploads we are talking are normally done with JOSM after the
integration with the existing data and validation.
How do you recover from a failed JOSM upload when working with large
datasets?
___
talk
2012-09-18 Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
I am sure there are many users in France doing exactly that - a careful,
small-scale, high-quality data integration.
Most of them are probably
way below the OSMF radar.
But if the work of one person surpasses
the million-object mark then is
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
It is a policy that has grown gradually. Just like other things in OSM have
- you'll not find anything about a vote for highway=motorway on the Wiki
either.
Perhaps this policy has reached its limits. And honnestly, you
Le 18/09/2012 22:17, Lester Caine a écrit :
Marc Sibert wrote:
I thing the point is not why my account was blocked, but why someone
have the
right to block an account and whatfor ?
The road is the place between the buildings... so I need the
buildings :
Cadastre data are usefull (fully).
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Marc Sibert m...@sibert.fr wrote:
I'm still not agree with this policy : I do not ignore your messages.
You don't agree? You created your import account, I think?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 09/18/2012 08:36 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 18/09/12 at 18:29 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
OSM is not unique, wikipedia too require a dedicated account for bots.
I don't think calling people robots is going to contribute to
improving the atmosphere.
If the cadastre integration was done
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
You don't agree? You created your import account, I think?
After a block !? Wow, what a victory ! Who is next ?
Marc needed an access to the database because he is uploading surveyed
data collected remotely by another
On 09/18/2012 05:42 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
The French cadastre imports are, as you know, a rather controversial
subject. In my opinion it is a dataset that doesn't actually increase
the usefulness of the OSM dataset for most users (building outlines
without addresses just don't really help
Le 18/09/2012 22:56, Richard Weait a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Marc Sibert m...@sibert.fr wrote:
I'm still not agree with this policy : I do not ignore your messages.
You don't agree? You created your import account, I think?
LOL ! yes I need to continue to contribute (adict
Marc Sibert wrote:
Again, I'm not a vandal : I do not detroy any work (and nobody complains about
that), I just update data (replace), that is not the point why my account was
blocked !
So, what have you done in my case ?
It is your opinion that you have not destroyed any work, but this is
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Eric Marsden eric.mars...@free.fr wrote:
- Openness/transparency. OSMF working groups are notoriously opaque,
though some have improved over the last year by posting open
minutes of meetings (which requires significant effort and which I
Marc,
On 18.09.2012 21:53, Marc Sibert wrote:
I thing the point is not why my account was blocked, but why someone
have the right to block an account and whatfor ?
I think that we need import guidelines, and we need people who can block
those who don't follow the guidelines, otherwise having
Le 18/09/2012 21:13, Simon Poole a écrit :
Am 18.09.2012 18:54, schrieb Béland Pierre:
Is it possible to discuss about governance wich is the subject of
this thread?
The reason I even touched on this subject is that each time the
cadastre imports turn up it is somehow claimed that they are
Le 18/09/2012 23:24, Lester Caine a écrit :
Marc Sibert wrote:
Again, I'm not a vandal : I do not detroy any work (and nobody
complains about
that), I just update data (replace), that is not the point why my
account was
blocked !
So, what have you done in my case ?
It is your opinion that
2012-09-18 Toby Murray toby.murray at gmail.com
- Openness/transparency. OSMF working groups are notoriously opaque,
though some have improved over the last year by posting open
minutes of meetings (which requires significant effort and which I
applaud). Some of the
Marc Sibert wrote:
It is your opinion that you have not destroyed any work, but this is one of
the major complaints about this type of import process.
STOP ! I do not read you after this sentence (I will do it after writing this
answer).
Now that you have read the rest of the message what is
Le 18/09/2012 23:24, Lester Caine a écrit :
Marc Sibert wrote:
Again, I'm not a vandal : I do not detroy any work (and nobody
complains about
that), I just update data (replace), that is not the point why my
account was
blocked !
So, what have you done in my case ?
It is your opinion that
Save the current data to save the id of the objects that have been
sucessfully uploaded.
Then you'll be able to go on without creating objets twice...
I never had any problem even with gigantic uploads.
2012/9/18 Mike N nice...@att.net
On 9/18/2012 1:56 PM, Pieren wrote:
The uploads we are
Le 18/09/2012 23:31, Frederik Ramm a écrit :
Today, France has 50% more data in OSM than Germany. I am not jealous
of that. I would be jealous if France had 50% more mappers and I
sincerely hope that the French community can find ways to engage more
people to help. But for all its data
Le 19/09/2012 00:01, Lester Caine a écrit :
Marc Sibert wrote:
It is your opinion that you have not destroyed any work, but this is
one of
the major complaints about this type of import process.
STOP ! I do not read you after this sentence (I will do it after
writing this
answer).
Now
Le 19/09/2012 00:14, Vincent Pottier a écrit :
Modified nodes
De : ...
Fr: ...
@Frederic,
I was not to play a match againts Germany... but I found a way to tell
that French contributors don't do only importing buildings.
And I hope we would have a wide community, but we already have a
Dear List,
{This is a cross post - please reply to the tagging mailing list or the
proposals [2] talk page. Please forward to local mailing lists as
appropriate }
- - - Announcement - - -
Several attempts have in the past been made to develop a tagging scheme
that is capable of handling the more
2012/9/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Hi,
On 18.09.2012 18:04, Christian Quest wrote:
Still no answer to my main original questions:
- who decided the import guidelines ?
It is a policy that has grown gradually. Just like other things in OSM
have - you'll not find anything about
Marc Sibert wrote:
Le 18/09/2012 23:24, Lester Caine a écrit :
Marc Sibert wrote:
Again, I'm not a vandal : I do not detroy any work (and nobody complains about
that), I just update data (replace), that is not the point why my account was
blocked !
So, what have you done in my case ?
It is
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
This is an area where there HAS NOT been any agreement other than the
history WILL currently be maintained in the database. My question still
remains - what happens when the data is next updated - will you delete
Am 18.09.2012 18:24, schrieb Richard Weait:
The one account
involved started this little thread was asked to use an import account
three times. Then they created their import account.
I just can second Richard and Grant:
if a person is contacted three times by any working group and seems not
On 18/09/12 20:58, Eric Marsden wrote:
- Openness/transparency. OSMF working groups are notoriously opaque,
though some have improved over the last year by posting open
minutes of meetings (which requires significant effort and which I
applaud). Some of the technical
Gregory schrieb am 18.09.2012 15:05:
Ah they are great videos Alex.
So can you confirm what source map they used?
I don't know the source. Don't you have trap streets in OSM? So maybe we
can find out :)
Alex
___
talk mailing list
Le 18/09/2012 23:31, Frederik Ramm a écrit :
Marc,
On 18.09.2012 21:53, Marc Sibert wrote:
I thing the point is not why my account was blocked, but why someone
have the right to block an account and whatfor ?
I think that we need import guidelines, and we need people who can
block those who
On 18.09.2012 15:42, Pieren wrote:
The user had been contacted by DWG
beforehand because he had imported several millions of objects under his
account,
Sounds as a mass, uncontrolled import but is not.
Didn't you read what Frederik and others wrote?
This user is very
active and well known in
On 18.09.2012 20:56, Gert Gremmen wrote:
[...]
Plonk!
Sorry,
Michael. :-(
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 09/19/2012 02:23 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
And: why should the DWG contact the french community at first ?
To gain a better understanding of local practices that look dodgy from
the DWG's point of view but may actually be the result of local
consensus grounded in years of debate and
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
On 09/19/2012 02:23 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
And: why should the DWG contact the french community at first ?
To gain a better understanding of local practices that look dodgy from
the DWG's point of view but may
I really don't like the attitude expressed by several people here in
response to this subject and which is already contained in the subject
itself OSMF/DWG governance.
Governance. There's no governance. DWG is a group and everybody is free to
join it. The job is voluntary and unpaid. Being just a
On 18/09/12 at 20:51 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
I think that one of the problems here is that if a large block of
data is uploaded in one 'commit' it is difficult to know if it IS a
manually edit, or something that has been created automatically
off-line, and is being slipped in to bypass the
Toby Murray wrote:
On 09/19/2012 02:23 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
And: why should the DWG contact the french community at first ?
To gain a better understanding of local practices that look dodgy from
the DWG's point of view but may actually be the result of local
consensus grounded in years
Hi talk-nl,
onderstaande ontving ik als afnemer van de BAG. Misschien interessant
voor wie wat met BAG data wil doen in het kader van OSM? (Ik heb geen
idee of die discussie nog wordt gevoerd.)
Groet,
Martijn
-- Forwarded message --
From: b...@kadaster.nl
Date: 2012/9/18
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
