[Talk-it] R: [talk-it] Falsi guadi

Ciao Volker, li segnala anche OSMOSE. Solo che in pianura qualche immagine la trovi e puoi stabilire che c’è un ponte (di solito è così), in montagna… bisogna andarci per sapere se è intubato o se è un guado davvero. So cosa fare quest’estate… J saluti da Ferruccio Da: Volker Schmidt

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove is_in:continent in USA

On 3/20/19 02:03, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > is_in:continent=* is subjective as both division Earth landmass into > continents[1] and boundaries between continents[2] are mostly > subjective. There are many competing ways to split world into continents > and OSM is not proper place to record all

Re: [talk-au] [OSGeo Oceania] OSGeo Oceania as a not-for-profit entity? Your feedback, please

Might be back here John although I cant see anything specific https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/aust-nz/2018-August/thread.html#1932 From: John Bryant [mailto:johnwbry...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 22 March 2019 2:36 PM To: Bruce Bannerman Cc: australian-qgis-user-gr...@googlegroups.com;

[talk-au] OSGeo/OSM talk accepted at C3DIS

hey folks I pitched a talk about the growing OSGeo Oceania community at the C3DIS conference (http://www.c3dis.com) and it was accepted as an oral presentation. Why? C3DIS is all about computational and data intensive science - and much of that relies on the geospatial tools and data this

Re: [talk-au] [OSGeo Oceania] OSGeo Oceania as a not-for-profit entity? Your feedback, please

Hi Bruce, we're hoping to wrap up this comment period on the 29th, it would be good to take your comments into account before we embark on a course of action if possible. Can you be a bit more specific about which email you're referring to (or does someone else perhaps know)? Alternatively are

Re: [talk-au] Platform names

On 22/03/19 10:37, Ewen Hill wrote: Re vision impaired users. Is this where https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dplatform_edge could be useful and whilst there is no route,  ot may assist... or hinder as it may not be rendered. They do have those ripple strips/buttons that you

Re: [talk-au] Platform names

Re vision impaired users. Is this where https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dplatform_edge could be useful and whilst there is no route, ot may assist... or hinder as it may not be rendered. On Fri, 22 Mar 2019, 9:43 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21/03/19 22:30,

Re: [Talk-GB] Milton Keynes Redways - How to Tag Consistently

On 22/03/19 02:35, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote: Thanks to all for the helpful responses. I have looked (again) at the OSM Tags for Routing at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdom from which it is clear that foot=yes (for example) is

Re: [talk-au] Platform names

On 21/03/19 22:30, Sebastian S. wrote: If you believe Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_railway_station%2C_Sydney The stations name is 'Central railway station' but it goes by many colloquial names. I don't like the way the platforms are named currently. "Platform 8+9 (8;9)" is

Re: [talk-cz] Dnes nefunkční overpass turbo

No jo, pěkný :-) Akorát na rozdíl od vypnuté WP se tohle do médií nedostalo.. H. On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 14:40, majka wrote: > Viz přiložený obrázek, protest zhruba do devíti do večera. Na co já > nemyslím, původně to ve mě evokovalo trochu jinou grafiku ;) > > [image: OT.png] >

Re: [talk-au] Platform names

Across those examples of stations, we see that there is no consistency regarding platform names - half have them as the station name, and the others as either Platform $, or just $. I will split the platforms into 2 parts as that seems to be the preferred option, and leave the names as

Re: [Talk-es] Perdido con Overpass Api

Gracias lo estoy estudiando, muy buena documentación. Saludos. El lun., 18 mar. 2019 a las 18:59, Santiago Higuera (< shigu...@mercatorlab.com>) escribió: > Echa un vistazo a este manual que hice, por si te ayuda. Es el capítulo 8 > > https://iceosm2016.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ > > Un saludo >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Overpass API en grève

Merci à toi Roland pour tout ton travail et ton annonce sur la liste talk-fr ! Benoît On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 21:06, Roland Olbricht wrote: > Bonjour, > > l'Overpass API a returnée à operation normale. > > Je veux remercier l'association OpenStreetMap France pour la traduction > de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Overpass API en grève

Bonjour, l'Overpass API a returnée à operation normale. Je veux remercier l'association OpenStreetMap France pour la traduction de l'information sur la problème a https://www.openstreetmap.fr/copyright-article-13/ Roland ___ Talk-fr mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass API turned off due to Upload Filter thread

Hello everybody, Overpass API is now back to normal operations. Thank you for your understanding. To ensure that OpenStreetMap will have a place in the future, it still makes sense to phone (yes, phone) your member of the EP. Platforms that assist on that are: https://pledge2019.eu/en

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass API wegen Upload-Filtern temporär aus

Hallo zusammen, danke für das Verständnis und die positive Rückmeldung. Die Overpass API ist jetzt wieder im Normalbetrieb. Es ergibt natürlich trotzdem Sinn, weiterhin die EU-Abgeordneten anzurufen, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.de/uf/ Viele Grüße, Roland

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Looking how tagging "ijskelder"

Not being doesn't mean it is badly tagged, it just mean that the map on the website (which is only one map out of many) doesn't show this kind of details. OpenStreetMap is still a database first, and not a map. Try to not "map for the renderer" but rather stay with correct tagging. And if you want

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

> On Mar 21, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Mark Wagner wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 21:46:59 -0600 > Martijn van Exel mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: > >>> On Mar 20, 2019, at 9:01 AM, Mateusz Konieczny >>> wrote: >>> >>> I plan to run an automated edit that will revert part of the GNIS >>> import

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass API wegen Upload-Filtern temporär aus

Hallo Roland, hallo OSM-Gemeinde ich verzichte gerne für einige Zeit auf mein Lieblingswerkzeug overpass, wenn damit gezeigt werden kann, das die Internet-Community und auch Communities wie OpenStreetMap damit aufzeigen, dass sie mit den geplanten Änderungen zum EU-Copyrightgesetz nicht

Re: [Talk-ca] FW: Building Import

I like the idea of building a consensus on a building import. More seriously if we can get any sort of consensus I'll be more than happy. Cheerio John Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-21 2:40 PM: Oups, I still miss the “reply all” button *From:*jfd...@hotmail.com *Sent:* Thursday, March

[Talk-ca] FW: Building Import

Oups, I still miss the "reply all" button From: jfd...@hotmail.com Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 14:36 To: 'Nate Wessel' Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Building Import Hi all, Concerning the pre-processing, let's try/check first the "orthogonalization" component then, if there is a consensus on

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 21:46:59 -0600 Martijn van Exel wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 9:01 AM, Mateusz Konieczny > > wrote: > > > > I plan to run an automated edit that will revert part of the GNIS > > import that added them and delete objects that never had any reason > > to appear in the OSM

[OSM-talk-be] save-the-internet - manifestaties nu zaterdag 23 maart

Met enige verbazing zag ik de aankondiging van manifestaties overmorgen zaterdag, tegen een wetgevend initiatief op Europees niveau. Nog verbazender dat ik er nog niet van hoorde langs enige andere weg, bv. alhier. https://savetheinternet.info/demos Drie mogelijkheden: * dit is niet ernstig

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

Mar 21, 2019, 6:18 PM by kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com: > I, too, would appreciate seeing some sample data, let's say, some > reasonable radius around 42.8257, -73.8790. That's more to make sure > that the technology is working right and not wetting on stuff that's > already fixed, but of course,

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

Mar 21, 2019, 6:23 PM by cliff...@snowandsnow.us: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:52 AM Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > >> Good idea, independent check would be welcomed! >> >> Something from Seattle region would be OK, right? >> >>

[Talk-it] [talk-it] Falsi guadi

Per caso mi sono imbattuto (e sono sicuro che non sono il primo) nel problema dei "passaggi a livello" di highway e waterway. Ci ne sono sicuramente decine di migliaia solo in Italia. Cercate con keepright.at: > intersections without junctions > highway.- waterway Buon divertimento Volker

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Nate are you requesting something specific on the Canadian task manager for Toronto at this time or would you prefer to look through Daniel's work first? Thanks Cheerio John Nate Wessel wrote on 2019-03-21 1:49 PM: Daniel, This is exciting news! After much talk on this list, it seems we

Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass API turned off due to Upload Filter thread

Yes, achavi fails with an error because the result is not in the expected Augmented Diff format. Norbert ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:52 AM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Good idea, independent check would be welcomed! > > Something from Seattle region would be OK, right? > > If my googling went right the you are probably interested > in data around >

Re: [Talk-us] Gated communities

I think there should be a new access tag for the "with permission only, but you are likely to get it" case. Years ago OsmAnd tried to send me on a "shortcut" through a military base while I was cycling. It turned out that I could've used the road in question *if* I had contacted the base in

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:31 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > The benefit is that it gives mappers a reason to examine places - not just > the disappeared feature itself but also the area around it - that would > otherwise go unexamined. Since we have so much unexamined space in the U.S., > any

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

Good idea, independent check would be welcomed! Something from Seattle region would be OK, right? If my googling went right the you are probably interested in data around https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Glassman/history#map=8/47.780/-122.388 Mar 21, 2019, 5:43 PM by cliff...@snowandsnow.us:

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

I'm in favor of the bot but I'd like to review a sample of the data being removed in my area. The purpose is to test the assumption that the data is of no use. Best, Clifford On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:32 AM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Mar 21, 2019, 3:56 PM by m...@rtijn.org: > > Re-reading this

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

Mar 21, 2019, 3:56 PM by m...@rtijn.org: > Re-reading this I phrased this with more hyperbole than I intended, sorry. > I see no problem here, after all lack of control over automated edit is how we ended in this situation. ___ Talk-us mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] Gated communities

Mar 21, 2019, 4:11 PM by kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 3:01 AM Mateusz Konieczny > <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > wrote: > >> For start, "residents only" gate is for me clearly access=private. >> >> "manned main gate" - is access strongly

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

Mar 21, 2019, 3:29 PM by m...@rtijn.org: > The benefit is that it gives mappers a reason to examine places - not just > the disappeared feature itself but also the area around it - that would > otherwise go unexamined. Since we have so much unexamined space in the U.S., > any opportunity to

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

Le 21/03/2019 à 12:38, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : Le 21/03/2019 à 10:24, Bernard Lefrançois a écrit : //>/> Le 20.03.19 à 14:58, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : />/>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/L3mp1ck4 />>//>//>/>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dupuiche />//>//>/je penche pour une

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Looking how tagging "ijskelder"

Op 21/03/19 om 13:08 schreef Marc Gemis: There is a proposal for cellar entries that mentions icehouse: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:man_made%3Dcellar_entrance I tried that for a ice cellar in Heverlee, but it was not rendered on the map. Sincerely, Hubert --

Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass API turned off due to Upload Filter thread

Hi Steve, Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 16:46, Steve Doerr a écrit : > On 21/03/2019 05:21, Roland Olbricht wrote: > > the Overpass API shows only an informative > > result today. This will last until about 20:00 UTC. > > Could this be affecting nrenner.github.io/achavi, does anybody know? > Yes it

[OSM-talk-fr] Article 13, directive droit d'auteur

Bonjour la communauté OpenStreetMap France, Suite à des discussions récentes et anciennes [1,2,3,4], l'association OpenStreetMap France a décidé d'afficher sa protestation contre le projet de directive européenne sur le droit d'auteur 'copyright' et en particulier les intentions de l'article 13.

Re: [Talk-GB] Vector OSM

https://www.klokantech.com/products/ ? Mapbox tiles? On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:19 chilton steve via Talk-GB, < talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > I saw there was a discussion about vector tiles from OSM (…. at the SOTM > 2018 BOF session with Richard Fairhurst?). > > I am giving a talk about OSM

Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass API turned off due to Upload Filter thread

On 21/03/2019 05:21, Roland Olbricht wrote: the Overpass API shows only an informative result today. This will last until about 20:00 UTC. Could this be affecting nrenner.github.io/achavi, does anybody know? -- Steve --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

Re: [Talk-GB] Milton Keynes Redways - How to Tag Consistently

Thanks to all for the helpful responses. I have looked (again) at the OSM Tags for Routing at  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdomfrom which it is clear that foot=yes (for example) is implied by highway=cycleway. However, Andy's question (if

[Talk-GB] Vector OSM

I saw there was a discussion about vector tiles from OSM (…. at the SOTM 2018 BOF session with Richard Fairhurst?). I am giving a talk about OSM in June and wondered what the latest situation is. So, is there any moves to free server space and do the work to generate vector tiles directly.

Re: [Talk-us] Gated communities

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 3:01 AM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > For start, "residents only" gate is for me clearly access=private. > > "manned main gate" - is access strongly restricted? > If nearly everybody, including vehicles, is let in I would tag it access=yes. > It would also mean that

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

Re-reading this I phrased this with more hyperbole than I intended, sorry. I do think we should learn from past mistakes and approach any automated edit, be it an import or a (subsequent) fix, with the proper diligence. Which is what we’re doing here, and I commend you for taking an open-minded

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

C'est déjà décrit C'est un landcover=* Mais peu utilisé en France Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 13:58, Bernard Lefrançois a écrit : > n’est ce pas plus sage cartographier ce paquet d’arbre comme un landuse ? > je n’aurais pas rentré le détail de chaque arbre mais si quelqu’un le > fait, je vois pas

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:31 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > The benefit is that it gives mappers a reason to examine places - not just > the disappeared feature itself but also the area around it - that would > otherwise go unexamined. Since we have so much unexamined space in the > U.S., any

Re: [OSM-co] Venezuela Refugee Crisis

Thanks! En espaniol para la lista: Al parecer el esfuerzo continua y estan buscando solamente maperos que utilicen JOSM. Si hay personas de Barranquilla interesadas en un mapathon en las oficinas de Piensa Labs para dar un taller de JOSM, yo puedo dictarlo. Saludos, Ariel. On Wed, Mar 20, 2019

Re: [Talk-GB] Milton Keynes Redways - How to Tag Consistently

On 21/03/2019 13:35, Ed Loach wrote: How tagging changes over time... RichardF wrote: highway=cycleway, segregated=no achieves all that in two tags rather than seven. :) I remember https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Milton_Keynes_Mapping_Party_2009 where it looks like we (or at least I) only

[talk-cz] Dnes nefunkční overpass turbo

Viz přiložený obrázek, protest zhruba do devíti do večera. Na co já nemyslím, původně to ve mě evokovalo trochu jinou grafiku ;) [image: OT.png] ___ talk-cz mailing list talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-GB] Milton Keynes Redways - How to Tag Consistently

How tagging changes over time... RichardF wrote: > highway=cycleway, segregated=no achieves all that in two tags > rather than > seven. :) I remember https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Milton_Keynes_Mapping_Party_2009 where it looks like we (or at least I) only used highway=cycleway, e.g.

Re: [Talk-GB] Milton Keynes Redways - How to Tag Consistently

Peter Neale wrote: >So how should they be tagged for access? I believe it should be: > highway=path  (but I see several tagged as highway=cycleway and both are > shown in the Wiki > at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway) > foot=designated > motor vehicle=permit (to allow the

[OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

n’est ce pas plus sage cartographier ce paquet d’arbre comme un landuse ? je n’aurais pas rentré le détail de chaque arbre mais si quelqu’un le fait, je vois pas le soucis. Si j'ai émis des doutes, c'est parce que je ne pense pas que c'est dans l'esprit du wiki: "Marquage d'un

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:04:13 +0100 (CET) From: Mateusz Konieczny Cc: Talk Us Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them Mar 21, 2019, 4:46 AM by m...@rtijn.org: On Mar 20, 2019, at

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass API wegen Upload-Filtern temporär aus

Hallo zusammen, Super, dass eine weiterhin funktionstüchtige Alternative eingerichtet wurde -- leider erhalte ich dort aber nur einen 403-Fehler. Ist da eventuell ein Konfigurationsfehler drin? Der Zugriff z.B. mit der URL https://overpass-api.de/no_art11art13/interpreter?data=out; sollte

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Looking how tagging "ijskelder"

There is a proposal for cellar entries that mentions icehouse: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:man_made%3Dcellar_entrance Just as with caves, it's easy to map the entrance, but harder to map the inside. m On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:05 PM Jakka wrote: > >

[OSM-talk-be] Looking how tagging "ijskelder"

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/IJskelder de ijskelder (m)the icehouse ijskelder ice cellar ; snow cellar Nothing on tag info ? ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

On 21/03/2019 07:13, Paul Norman via Talk-us wrote: As a maintainer of some of the projects listed, I find that you're misrepresenting the situation. On 2019-03-08 11:25 a.m., Kevin Kenny wrote: I've sounded out the maintainers of various of the OSM software, and get different assessments.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

Le 21/03/2019 à 10:24, Bernard Lefrançois a écrit : //>/> Le 20.03.19 à 14:58, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : />/>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/L3mp1ck4 />>//>//>/>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dupuiche />//>//>/je penche pour une agence d'archi, le fait que les 2 se retrouve sur

Re: [talk-au] Platform names

If you believe Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_railway_station%2C_Sydney The stations name is 'Central railway station' but it goes by many colloquial names. I don't like the way the platforms are named currently. "Platform 8+9 (8;9)" is surely not the name on the signboards. I

[OSM-talk-fr] Attribution... Rire ou pleurer ?

Bonjour, https://i.postimg.cc/WpDxMbxP/Screenshot-2019-03-21-11-56-25-796-com-twitter-android.jpg Ici pour leur expliquer : https://twitter.com/centre_presse/status/1108324286647943173 J. -- GnuPg : C8F5B1E3 Because privacy matters. ___ Talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

> > en voyant la distribution non régulière des arbres, > je n'ai pas l'impression que c'est une exploitation forestière. > généralement les arbres sont en rangée ultra alignée-artificielle > afin de faciliter leur futur abatage L'exploitation forestière c'est l’ensemble des processus qui vont

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

Le 21.03.19 à 11:12, Leroy Olivier a écrit : > l'information de leur hauteur est de source compatible avec osm > alors je vois pas pq elles n'ont pas leur place dans osm > et encore moins comment est-ce que la hauteur d'un arbre pourrait être > transformé en un landuse > > La

Re: [Talk-de] Overpass API wegen Upload-Filtern temporär aus

Super, dass eine weiterhin funktionstüchtige Alternative eingerichtet wurde -- leider erhalte ich dort aber nur einen 403-Fehler. Ist da eventuell ein Konfigurationsfehler drin? Am 21.03.2019 um 05:26 schrieb Roland Olbricht: Hallo zusammen, am 26. März soll das EU-Parlament über eine

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

On 3/21/2019 3:04 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: What is the benefit, during survey, of mapped places that are not existing anymore? I encounter many during surveys (usually result of data getting outdated) and for me it was always time sink (as I needed to check is it actually gone) and never

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

> > l'information de leur hauteur est de source compatible avec osm > alors je vois pas pq elles n'ont pas leur place dans osm > et encore moins comment est-ce que la hauteur d'un arbre pourrait être > transformé en un landuse La hauteur a tout a fait sa place pour un arbre isolé, la question

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

Le 21.03.19 à 10:49, Leroy Olivier a écrit : > (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/43.73203/7.27437=N), les > hauteurs varient et on a pas l’espèce ce qui en fait un cas plus étrange > : les hauteurs ne semblent pas mauvaises donc est ce que c'est pas "un > projet étudiant" ou un teste de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

Merci pour les partages, J'ai mis de coté le deux cas avec des arbres isolés. Dans le premier (celui près d’Orléans : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/47.9524/1.8608) tous les arbres font 6 m de hauteur, cela ressemble plus à un import d'un logiciel d'archi qui a besoin de la hauteur pour un

[OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

//>/> Le 20.03.19 à 14:58, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : />/>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/L3mp1ck4 />>//>//>/>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dupuiche />//>//>/je penche pour une agence d'archi, le fait que les 2 se retrouve sur une />/même zone ! /On peut rajouter à la liste:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Doubles adressages (entrée de rue, bâtiment)

Le 21.03.19 à 09:34, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : > consensus hélas non > Sur le bâti j'en vois pas vraiment l'intérêt... cfr la discussion précédente :) ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] Platform names

Yes there is a tag for short name. Don't know at the moment but is listed in the wiki under the names site. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. On 21 March 2019 6:40:25 pm AEDT, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 21/03/19 15:42, Andrew Davidson wrote:

[OSM-talk-fr] Doubles adressages (entrée de rue, bâtiment)

Bonjour, Je ressors encore le sujet pour savoir si je peux faire du ménage. A-t-on revu les règles pour l'adressage afin d'améliorer les choix. Définir un consensus pour éviter la saisie de double adresses? Entrée, batiment, résidence ... Par défaut je met à l'entrée du portail et sinon à

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Validator of Wikipedia and Wikidata links in Ireland

Mar 20, 2019, 1:24 PM by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 18:12, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > >> Mar 19, 2019, 5:04 PM by >> a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk >> >> : >> >> > Can you

Re: [talk-au] Platform names

On 21/03/19 15:42, Andrew Davidson wrote: On 21/3/19 11:26, Thomas Manson wrote: 1) First of all, is my understanding correct? It should be the station name. Depends on which version you'd like to believe. The original proposal for public_transport=platform

Re: [Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

As a maintainer of some of the projects listed, I find that you're misrepresenting the situation. On 2019-03-08 11:25 a.m., Kevin Kenny wrote: I've sounded out the maintainers of various of the OSM software, and get different assessments. osm2pgsql - Actively hostile to supporting what I need,

Re: [Talk-us] Gated communities

access=destination for inner ways for community may be also a good idea to give data to routers that transit traffic is not allowed (or access=private if there is limited or no public access at all). Though routers will use that only if there is more than one gate. As usual - additional

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed mechanical edit - remove objects that are not existing according to source of GNIS import that added them

Mar 21, 2019, 4:46 AM by m...@rtijn.org: > > >> On Mar 20, 2019, at 9:01 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <>> matkoni...@tutanota.com >> >> > wrote: >> >> I plan to run an automated edit that will revert part of the GNIS >> import that added them and delete objects that

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

Le 21/03/2019 à 00:22, Sébastien Dinot a écrit : J'ai eu par ailleurs un problème similaire en septembre 2017 avec un autre contributeur, qui avait tracé des routes et des passages souterrains qui, à cette heure, n'existent toujours pas. Il leur avait même affecté un nom (probablement celui

Re: [Talk-us] Gated communities

Mar 20, 2019, 11:38 PM by frede...@remote.org: > Hi, > > DWG have been contacted by a resident of a gated community in Florida. > They were unhappy about our routing which apparently leads people > through an unmanned "residents only" gate where they won't get in, > instead of to the manned

[OSM-talk-fr] Overpass API en grève

Bonjour, le Parlement européen va voter la Proposition de directive sur le droit d'auteur dans le marché unique numérique. Cette proposition menace l'existence d'OpenStreetMap par des affaires juridiques tres cheres. Les articles problematiques sont article 11 et article 13. Un loi comme