)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
the data in OSM.
Some councils seem to have a more permissive attitude. Mike Harris
mentions two councils that have no restriction on the definitive map
(as long as the underlying OS map not covered) [1]. Mike, which
council's are these, and are they willing to make a public statement?
(An FOI can
Original Message
Subject:Re: Re: [Talk-GB] Fwd: Re: Other Routes with Public Access
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:30:56 +0100
From: Mike Harris m...@delco.idps.co.uk
To: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
CC: talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Dave
Some
public access.
Thank you for asking before taking any destructive action!
Mike Harris
On 23/03/2011 12:00, talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Send Talk-GB mailing list submissions to
talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http
Original Message
Subject:Re: Other Routes with Public Access
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:10:19 +
From: Mike Harris m...@delco.idps.co.uk
To: Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu
CC: Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com, talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
I would assume
the specific tag.
The ways still have access tags such as foot, horse etc..
On 24/03/2011 10:11, Mike Harris wrote:
I would assume that information that is, for example, based on
personal local knowledge or on personal conversations with people
On 24/03/2011 15:51, Mike Harris wrote:
Good advice, Andy. I need to make more use of that
source:designation key!
Mike
On 19:59, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 24/03/2011 10:11, Mike Harris wrote:
I am not insensitive to the need for OSM to remain free of any
copyright or similar restrictions
)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
specifically
waymarked (and named) route, I feel is a good candidate to record in
OSM. So shout if you think I'm wrong on that one, too.
Cheers
David (davespod)
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Whoops - resending as I used the wrong account at my end and got bumped
by the lists moderator - silly me!
Original Message
Subject:Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 15:44:31 +0100
From: Mike Harris m...@delco.idps.co.uk
write-up
of the arrangements as we know them.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Mike Harris
Sent: 13 May 2010 9:06 AM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44
: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Mike Harris
Sent: 13 May 2010 9:06 AM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19
Hi
My understanding of PRoW law
render it, but someone else might want the info; may
as well record it while you're there.
Richard
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
there is a definite
right to walk along (legal or permissive) are clearly separated from those
which are not.
Nick
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Gregory
o...@livingwithdragons.com mailto:o...@livingwithdragons.com
http://www.livingwithdragons.com
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
discussion about highway=path+designation=*
vs highway=footway/cycleway/bridleway.
Pieren
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ever to be able to match OS on field boundaries
(although admittedly even auntie OS is often years out of date on these).
Cheers
On 11/04/2010 02:51, Dave F. wrote:
Mike Harris wrote:
The lack of public right of way information is disappointing - but
it is within OSM's capabilities to walk
reflect the
opinions of the Department of Transport and Main Roads,
Maritime Safety Queensland or endorsed organisations utilising
the same infrastructure.
***
--
*/Mike Harris
to get into
that (already)?
--
*/Mike Harris/*
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
... and free. The link page also gives the author's ideas of
alternatives that he considers better - so plenty to research from there.
Have fun 8-) 8-)
Mike Harris
On 21/02/2010 13:28, talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Send talk mailing list submissions to
talk@openstreetmap.org
GPS Utility
This is multifunctional - conversions, editing and more - the freeware
version is a bit limited but the shareware version is imho well worth the
small fee.
http://www.gpsu.co.uk/index.html
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Craig Wallace [mailto:craig...@fastmail.fm
(;) ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: David Paleino [mailto:da...@debian.org]
Sent: 05 January 2010 19:48
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Public notary (Map feature POI proposal)
John Smith wrote:
2010/1/6 Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com:
Yet the same
://www.gpsu.co.uk/index.html
Mike Harris
_
From: Steve Bennett [mailto:stevag...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 December 2009 21:26
To: Open Street Map mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] How to manage GPX files?
What software do people use to manage their GPX files? Mainly I want to be
able
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Paul Johnson
Sent: 20 December 2009 22:31
To: tagg...@openstreetmap.org
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] tagging Greenways
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Greg Troxel
Sent: 18 December 2009 13:48
To: Paul Johnson
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org; tagg...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk
is at the same general level
even though it flows between banks and the surface of the water is actually
below the land (most of the time anyway - not last month!).
Mike Harris
_
From: Anthony [mailto:o...@inbox.org]
Sent: 15 December 2009 02:31
To: openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk
+1
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 December 2009 03:36
To: Steve Bennett
Cc: openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Ditches
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Anthony o
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett [mailto:stevag...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 December 2009 03:38
To: John Smith
Cc: openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Ditches
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:36 PM, John Smith
deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I tend to mark
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett [mailto:stevag...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 December 2009 02:43
To: Anthony
Cc: openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Ditches
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
In a park is a ditch. There is a very
Fair points ... If it really doesn't matter to routers and other mappers and
doesn't interfere with anything else then I am happy to accept that there is
no fully logical solution and that it shouldn't matter to me either!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett
Kylla .. tosi on ...
I wouldn't normally put in a culvert anyway ... it was just an example ...
The only trouble with letting the way and the waterway cross with no layers
is that some of the validators object ... not sure how important that is ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message
differences
where 'locals' may wish to add data to the database that might be of use for
'local' purposes ... Or where the use of the same word in one language (e.g.
in British English) may have different meanings in different locations in
order to assist with disambiguation.
Mike Harris
-Original
Excellent start to a useful bit of disambiguation. Thanks.
Mike Harris
_
From: Steve Bennett [mailto:stevag...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 December 2009 01:10
To: Open Street Map mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] Vegetation page
I think I might write up some cross-cutting wiki pages like
project I am so sorry but 'we
cannot take you to our leader'.
My wife is only foreign when she is in England ... And I am only foreign
when I am not ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Peter Körner [mailto:osm-li...@mazdermind.de]
Sent: 02 December 2009 18:41
To: talk
- usually in urban / suburban /near urban areas. Sometimes they
coincide with a public right of way but they are usually additional.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Sam Vekemans [mailto:acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 December 2009 18:41
To: Steve Bennett
Cc: talk
to
named long-distance routes and to omit the segments would create unnecessary
and misleading breaks in the continuity of a 'route' relationship.
Just my thoughts for what they are worth ..
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Roy Wallace [mailto:waldo000...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30
Broadly agree but why is 'meadow' not a land use? I believe that it is - in
rural England at least ... See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meadow
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Anthony [mailto:o...@inbox.org]
Sent: 01 December 2009 00:12
To: Roy Wallace
Cc: talk
. By definition a meadow is not used for grazing (or there
wouldn't be any hay) and only informally for recreation (lovers in the
grass).
Note the same wikipedia link defines 'pasture' where the land use is
grazing.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Liz [mailto:ed...@billiau.net]
Sent: 01
of the designated= tag has 'solved' a number
of related problems - at least for me.
But long live chaos, anarchy and OSM ... (:)
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Cartinus [mailto:carti...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 30 November 2009 00:31
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk
and
reference numbers to the relation.
Again, I stress, this is just what I do - in the interest of transparency -
and not in any way to suggest that it is better or worse than what Lesi or
anyone else has adopted. This is OSM - the ultimate popular democracy!
Have fun mapping!
Mike Harris
Btw - no need for highway=grass, why not use highway=path (or =footway, see
previous message) + surface=grass (which seems well-established).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Anthony [mailto:o...@inbox.org]
Sent: 29 November 2009 04:30
To: Roy Wallace
Cc: talk
=permissive is at least fairly explicit.
Before I get flamed - these are only my ideas and others may well differ -
but I've tried to keep it general as to practice and geography ...
Give my regards to Melbourne!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett [mailto:stevag
!).
The problems with placing the barrier on the vehicular highway or at the
intersection node are clear!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Lennard [mailto:l...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 15 November 2009 16:30
To: Talk OSM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] positioning of barrier = stile
David
layering.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 25 November 2009 21:58
Cc: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Bridge on Hiking Trails
Shaun McDonald wrote:
on the way use highway=footway; bridge=yes; layer=1.
I didn't think the layer=1
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_bodies
Mike Harris
_
From: Dan Homerick [mailto:danhomer...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 November 2009 23:16
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging for Seasonal/Dry Streams
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Scott
to context - into the British English avenue, the
American English avenue or the English alley!
Not quite sure about Chinese or Arabic (:)
I don't especially like tree-lined - but at least it says what it means and
avoids the linguistic mess!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From
Why not (a) convert the GPX layer to a data layer and then (b) use the
simplify way tool from the JOSM plugin?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 November 2009 06:57
To: Shalabh
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM
Power line with pylons.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 11 October 2009 14:57
To: OSM Talk
Subject: [OSM-talk] NPE Maps Key
Hi
I suppose this FAO of Richard F.
Do you have a key for these maps?
I've a continuous line
) that cross large numbers of ways.
It is a minor irritant and I didn't want to do the work - or mess with other
people's mapping - without a bit of a 'reality check' with more experienced
folk in the community.
Thanks again
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
everything else in OSM, it all a question of judgement!
I asked the original question from a neutral standpoint but - in the light of
the responses have now developed a preference for option (b) - with exceptions.
Of course, nothing is ever final ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message
lanes - and to
the best of my knowledge he is still the landowner of these between the
fences/hedges that separate them on either side from the adjacent farmland.]
This suggests that the area tag might even be landuse=highway!
Mike Harris
_
From: Anthony [mailto:o...@inbox.org]
Sent
Why not - it seems as good as any other idea - of course someone is going to
object (;) but ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: dipie...@gmail.com [mailto:dipie...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Anthony
Sent: 06 October 2009 19:03
To: Mike Harris
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
as it avoids superimposed ways and potential editing errors?
Views?
Mike Harris
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
generalised convenience stores, they are still very much present in the more
cultured countries of the European continent (e.g. France - épicerie, and I'm
glad to learn that CZ is another of them!).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: MP [mailto:singular...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 October
inspection and are
authoritative - whatever the landowner may say! (again - even if nuts!).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[mailto:ajrli...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 30 September 2009 09:52
To: 'Dave F.'
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re
... Are you sure about the spelling of ... fork off American ... - doesn't
sound quite right but perhaps it's just my mid-Atlantic accent?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 September 2009 02:16
To: Russ Nelson
Cc: talk
of:
Landuse=agricultural vs. Landuse=grassland
And for the former:
Agriculture=arable / pastoral / orchard / plantation
Maybe a fairly limited number of tags would cope - or am I being too limited
geographically to be useful?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Peter Childs
... Except from definitive maps based on OS mapping that is more than 50
years old (see my earlier message) - and I suspect that quite a lot of it
is.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Nick Whitelegg [mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk]
Sent: 28 September 2009 14:23
To: talk
exaggeration to indicate which side of the hedge is going to work! (Straight
ahead is not much use if it points along the hedge!).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Nick Whitelegg [mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk]
Sent: 25 September 2009 10:43
To: Dave F.
Cc: talk
as the phrase data of the paths means their status, numbering
etc. but not their position or shape on the ground then we should be in the
clear according to my contacts (some of whom are HA lawyers).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 25
of way.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 September 2009 13:29
To: Dave F.
Cc: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?
2009/9/25 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Is this a breach of copyright?
I've
time walking a 1000 km a year along rights of way with a GPS in my sticky
little hand!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 25 September 2009 14:30
To: Tom Hughes
Cc: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?
Tom Hughes
producing definitive maps - just amending them
from time to time in respect of a particular path.
Mike Harris
_
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 25 September 2009 15:16
Cc: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 14:30
resources, you are unlikely to see more than a few dozen (at most)
per year per county.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Jon Stockill [mailto:li...@stockill.net]
Sent: 25 September 2009 15:54
To: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09
(in this case
footpaths 6 and 26 in the parish of Dullingham). The DS is likely to be
decades old - a DMMO is current.
The second issue is that the text uses OS GRs throughout - so what is the
status as a derivative work?
Mike Harris
_
From: Barnett, Phillip [mailto:phillip.barn
Still the Council's budget though - so don't hold your breath - my lot can
only afford a couple of cheap units although they are trying to get the
funds for a top-of-the-range ±1m jobby!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 25 September
of fence/hedge boundary to explain an obstruction or similar - as well as
'designation' (legal status) and 'ref' (path number) where known. I also add
key farmhouses where the name is visible and they are useful for
orientation.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Nick Whitelegg
with OS mapping!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 24 September 2009 13:18
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Mike Harris; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great
other than
open-source aerial/satellite photography.
OS one-inch (or 1:50k) mapping does not show field boundaries. But is anyone
working on out-of-copyright 1:25k (or larger scale) mapping?
Mike Harris
_
From: Jack Stringer [mailto:jack.ix...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 23 September
this import.
Mike Harris
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
been done stationary at the stop.
Kind regards and thanks for the good information
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Ed Loach [mailto:e...@loach.me.uk]
Sent: 21 September 2009 10:30
To: 'Mike Harris'; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] NaPTAN bus stop import
consecutive
bridges. This is basically only a rendering problem but I wonder whether
anyone has any thoughts?
Mike Harris
_
From: d f [mailto:fac63te...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 19 September 2009 13:30
To: Talk OSM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent of their ways?
Hi
I have
Claudius - I think you may have answered the question I just asked - thanks
- I must admit that I hadn't seen this proposal before. Once again,
relations prove powerful!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Claudius [mailto:claudiu...@gmx.de]
Sent: 19 September 2009 14:12
To: talk
Agree that service roads are not usually public highways - although they may
have public access (e.g. car parking aisles). Tracks may be public highways -
e.g. bridleway, restricted byway etc. - but are not usually confused with
streets.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Martin
aspect).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Valent Turkovic [mailto:valent.turko...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 September 2009 13:26
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] highway=residential for rural ways?
Hi,
should highway=residential be used only in cities or also
+1
(short answer for long debate?)
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Nick Whitelegg [mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk]
Sent: 16 September 2009 14:34
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential for rural ways?
Hi,
My understanding
- I have
never found one round here and the wiki is nearly dead at the moment so I can't
check!), or (c) a track - bearing in mind that a track with tracktype=grade1
could also be surface=paved.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Valent Turkovic [mailto:valent.turko...@gmail.com
or similar
satellite imagery and see whether you would agree - bearing in mind that I live
only about 25 km from there! (;)
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Valent Turkovic [mailto:valent.turko...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 September 2009 19:56
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject
be good to have this on the wiki.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Peter Miller [mailto:peter.mil...@itoworld.com]
Sent: 03 September 2009 22:58
To: Someoneelse
Cc: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] RR8 - Possible International Vandal
On 3 Sep 2009, at 22:17, Someoneelse wrote
Support addition of motor_vehicle to presets for highway=track ... This
would usefully match a 'restricted byway' in England - as opposed to a
'byway open to all traffic' (BOAT).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Craig Wallace [mailto:craig...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: 30 August 2009
- would create a huge number of new
relations (a lot of bridges in the world!) - is this a problem anywhere in the
software chain?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv-gm...@gerv.net]
Sent: 28 August 2009 09:41
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Peteris Krisjanis [mailto:pec...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 August 2009 12:44
To: Alex Mauer
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New dimension of vandalism
I second option that highway tag isn't used for physical purposes
... Because in England locks almost always have unique (and often
fascinating and historic) names that are nothing to do with the canal name.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: wynnd...@lavabit.com [mailto:wynnd...@lavabit.com]
Sent: 28 August 2009 13:07
To: talk
I agree with Aun ..
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) [mailto:skipp...@gimnechiske.org]
Sent: 27 August 2009 01:05
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org; lulu-...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New dimension of vandalism
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009
Oxford can't be unique ... Surely it is common worldwide to assume that the
decisions of administrators and bureaucrats are just a load of bollards ...
Sorry about any spelling mistakes in the preceding ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich
in the middle of the bridge and then tagging this with the
canal bridge information and reserving the name and ref tags for the highway
segment.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Jack Stringer [mailto:jack.ix...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 27 August 2009 12:14
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM
Thanks Lulu-Ann - I've been a lazy boy, haven't I! (:) Tsk, tsk. Done now.
-Original Message-
From: lulu-...@gmx.de [mailto:lulu-...@gmx.de]
Sent: 27 August 2009 14:35
To: Mike Harris; frede...@remote.org
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: How to get a notification email
- like 'humble abode' - as much as the attitude of the writer! - so
there's no need to take this all too seriously (;)) ... let's stay civil
and objective!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Frederic Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: 26 August 2009 14:10
To: lulu-...@gmx.de
Cc
that - at present
at least - the assumption of an implicit sense is risky.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 August 2009 12:08
To: Roy Wallace
Cc: talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC
,
wheelchairs, etc.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 August 2009 13:22
To: Mike Harris
Cc: talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - incline up down
2009/8/22 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
I'm
Could I ask the architects whether their down-to-up convention applies to
escalators as well (cf. current discussion on 'steps') - given that they are
moving steps - or only to up-escalators (;) ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Peter Childs [mailto:pchi...@bcs.org]
Sent: 22
I'm with Martin on this one - up/down is better than nothing and is useful
in its own right on steps for example.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Morten Kjeldgaard [mailto:m...@bioxray.au.dk]
Sent: 21 August 2009 17:11
To: m...@koppenhoefer.com
Cc: talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk
Can someone out there help Andreas with his issue re confirmation of his
user account (see messages in German below)? He has sent this directly to me
and I don't know how best to help him.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Tille [mailto:andr...@an3as.eu]
Sent: 21 August
Hi
Kein Sprachproblem! Nur dass ich wüsste nicht, wie ich könnte sein Problem
erlösen!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Krückel [mailto:o...@jonas-krueckel.de]
Sent: 21 August 2009 09:06
To: Mike Harris
Cc: newb...@openstreetmap.org; talk@openstreetmap.org; andr
In England and Wales, byways that are either Restricted Byways (RBs) or
Byways Open to all Traffic (BOATs) may be used by cyclists as of right -
i.e. not merely 'available'.
Mike Harris
_
From: Richard Mann [mailto:richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 21 August 2009 08:16
UK - usually black on white.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Erik Johansson [mailto:e...@kth.se]
Sent: 19 August 2009 12:26
To: Tijs Zwinkels
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] GSoC End: signFinder
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Tijs
Zwinkelsopenstreet
1 - 100 von 225 matches
Mail list logo
