On 29/05/2015 09:16, David Woolley wrote:
There are ways of reversing changes exactly, but they are difficult to
use if there have been ad hoc attempts to repair in the mean time, as
you have to reverse those repairs first and you need to distinguish
them from legitimate changes that
On 28/05/2015 20:12, Colin Smale wrote:
Querying the history on the website just times out so I can't easily
see when it went pear-shaped and how it used to be
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/287245
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=287245
shows recent changes to
On 27/05/2015 21:29, thomas van der veen wrote:
Hi,
I just did a quick update to a path in Newbury and goes through a
tunnel in a building... but my edit seems to have destroyed the
building and I am not sure how to get it back.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.40251/-1.32458
is the
On 19/05/2015 12:13, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
For the past few weeks I've been getting random blue fill at high zoom
levels. Is this caused by the coastline being broken again?
When it happens, right-click the browser and view image. You'll get a
URL something like:
On 15/05/2015 10:22, Jason Woollacott wrote:
Looks like there has been an issue with changeset 30821940 Which
seems to have added the A30 through the whole of Cornwall on an
incorrect route.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30821940
Didn’t want to back this change out myself, as not
On 12/05/2015 17:28, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Why not
ref:highway_authority
To keep the tags just a little bit organized?
https://xkcd.com/927/
(sorry)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 12/05/2015 11:22, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Maybe the tag unsigned_ref is an outcome?
0 uses in the UK:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/unsigned_ref
There are 86 ref:signed=no (mostly by me, so not a widely used tag)
but that's where something demonstrably is the real
On 12/05/2015 11:30, Andy Robinson wrote:
Where I see these on C/U roads I change the ref= tag to
highway_authority_ref=
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/highway_authority_ref
276 of those - that's one that I wasn't aware of!
Cheers,
Andy
On 12/05/2015 09:52, Bob Kerr wrote:
On residential roads where there has been a ref= added is being
rendered on Mapnik. Is this something new since I have not been
checking recently. This is all over the highlands
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/57.5695/-4.4282
I don't think
On 04/05/2015 08:35, Graham Jones wrote:
I don't know where the discussion got to, but thought I should point
out that at least one road in North Yorkshire is a C road that is
signposted as such.
The road here does have signs with the C designation.
On 04/05/2015 10:50, Philip Barnes wrote:
In this case if you have surveyed it and it is signed then it would be
helpful if it was tagged as signed=yes, or something similar.
SomeoneElse I think he has used similar tagging for unsigned A roads.
FWIW I've used name:signed=no and ref:signed
On 04/05/2015 11:10, Steve Doerr wrote:
Personally, I quite like the fact that our map has C numbers on where
other maps don't. What I don't like, though, is seeing U numbers for
unclassified roads, which are cluttering up the map of my home area
On 05/03/2015 20:39, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I'm happy to import *JUST the six notes* if that's preferred, without
any node
Could you have a go at locating these notes a bit better than the
previous reverted import (e.g. put the note for the one that says that
is in the Swan Hotel in Stafford
On 06/02/2015 12:08, Brian Prangle wrote:
... So we thought that adding Notes about road names that need fixing
on the standard OSM map, asking for confirmation of the correct name,
might elicit some response via a comment indicating the correct name.
I see that you and RobJN have added
Hijacking the thread somewhat, but something that I was wondering about
recently...
There are many roads that are signed, and we can add them to OSM. Great!
There are some roads that are signed, and the sign differs from what the
local authority thinks that a road is called (usually just
On 22/01/2015 21:59, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I need some help, please.
I want to compile a list of all the pubs (including taverns bars, etc)
in the UK, with the word Louise as part of the name.
Do you mean in the UK, or in OSM in the UK?
How might I do this, given that I am not a coder?
My
On 20/01/2015 00:51, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I have the impression that Saturday meetings seem to have a higher
turnout than evening meetings, as they also allow people from a bit
further afield to join. Maybe we could also plan again one or two
Saturday meetings in the Summer?
I believe
On 10/01/2015 17:09, Donald Noble wrote:
I know that tagging for the renderer is not particularly helpful,
however, might it be appropriate in this instance to map the
significant slopes around the edges of the crater with
man_made=embankment ? There are slopes there in reality, and they are
On 29/12/2014 17:06, SK53 wrote:
So I'd like to suggest everyone meets at the rendezvous, and that at
least the first short walk is done as a group.
Has anyone cleared parking at the pub? Some places can get sniffy about
it (even if spending lots of money there later). There's also
On 21/12/2014 12:02, Andrew Hain wrote:
Betfred took over Totesport a few years ago but there are still tags
name=Totesport, name=totesport or operator=Totesport in Ashford,
Birmingham(2), London (2), Manchester (2), Northampton, Oxford, Rotherham
and Wakefield.
I'd be tempted to add OSM
On 18/12/2014 18:59, Rovastar wrote:
Well please share the thoughts about what suggestions you have.
The big problem is not really whether a particular shop has an
apostrophe in the name or not, but the fact that we don't have anything
like all of said shops mapped. I suggested that any
On 18/12/2014 10:48, Dan S wrote:
2014-12-18 10:39 GMT+00:00 SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk:
On 18/12/2014 02:10, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
If you oppose this proposal, or if you want to register particular
areas or objects for an opt-out, please edit the wiki page under the
section
On 18/12/2014 10:24, Dan S wrote:
Hi Matthijs,
The DWG email used the word consensus inappropriately, since
consensus means everyone agreeing, and we didn't. However, consensus
is essentially impossible in big wiki communities like ours, so let's
assume there's a relative meaning of the term ;)
On 01/12/2014 11:58, John Aldridge wrote:
On 01/12/2014 11:39, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Looking for some advice in Bletchley, specifically, but to answer a
more general point about footpaths.
:
So what is the guidance here? Ought the road have a distinct footpath
both sides? Or not footpath,
On 29/11/2014 12:16, tony wroblewski wrote:
Hi
I've been unable to access the OS OpenData layer in both JOSM and ID.
Has the address or URL changed, or is the server just down at the
moment?
Server room maintenance perhaps?
There's some work mentioned here:
On 29/11/2014 12:44, tony wroblewski wrote:
Thanks Andy
Yep, I guess it's hosted on faffy, and it's currently down.
It's actually a little more complicated than that I think. It _was_
hosted there, but that broke (hardware failure of some sort) during the
last maintenance period). The
On 27/11/2014 13:50, Nick Bearman wrote:
and what areas in Liverpool would benefit most from the students
contribution. Currently, giving the time available to the students, I
would be thinking of a desk-based digitisation exercise, but this can
be flexible.
Based on a fleeting visit to
On 20/11/2014 07:52, Lester Caine wrote:
... although the list of other local mappers on your profile is one
place where I would like to see that particular link included!
... and don't forget that iD already includes an edits by section at
the bottom of the screen which links to people who
For info, I added a comment to the first of these changesets and the
editor replied there:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26783815
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
There seem to be quite a few GB motorways in OSM with names, and some of
those names don't look very plausible. For example, there's:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37906957
This is the M4 past Heathrow and apparently it is named the Chiswick to
Langley Special Road. That name seems to
and interpretation (and a local survey!) to see how
everything on the ground relates to everything else.
Based on their error rate so far I'd definitely still suggest that local
mappers check their edits.
Cheers,
Andy
On 08/11/2014 22:51, SomeoneElse wrote:
An anonymous note adder (http
On 12/11/2014 10:59, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Please pass the details back to me, and I will discuss it with them and also
with the community if things need reverting.
Thanks Stuart. All of my detailed comments so far have been on
changesets. I went through
For completeness, I've also added a changeset discussion comment to:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26688781
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
An anonymous note adder (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/267719) and
someone on IRC noticed some problematical railway edits near
Sutton-in-Ashfield:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311380489#map=15/53.1247/-1.2346layers=N
It looks like an attempt to dual the Robin Hood line went a bit
I'd always assumed that the correct way to map turn lanes is via:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes .
However, some mappers in the UK* have started mapping each individual
lane as a separate parallel road. Here's an example:
On 05/11/2014 17:24, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Could you please have a look at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Math1985/UK_Shop_Names
if there are any other changes that need removing or changing?
Wilkinson we know are in a process of rebranding to Wilko; so I
might be
for
years take for granted.
Cheers,
Andy
** http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse/notes
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 01/11/2014 20:08, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I in fact even proposed incorporating a system that makes this
explicit in the notes API:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-August/070423.html
Unfortunately, my suggestion in that thread didn't gain traction.
It's great to have
On 24/10/2014 14:06, Dave F. wrote:
On 23/10/2014 13:04, SomeoneElse wrote:
They maybe more visible, but that doesn't mean they get updated or
offer more relevant data. If Fixmes had a front end overlay they'd,
obviously, be just as noticeable.
You could argue that they do:
http
On 24/10/2014 14:06, Dave F. wrote:
Specific Q lots of these notes in my area are 'Incorrect speed limit.
Reported speed limit is 40 mph' from 'anonymous'. Where is it
'reported' from. Is it being compared with another database?
That was mentioned on talk:
On 22/10/2014 23:04, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Dear all,
For all objects tagged with shop=betting and name Betfred, Coral,
Ladbrokes, Paddy Power or William Hill, I am planning to change the
tag shop=betting into shop=bookmaker.
I'm usually the first to stand up for a diversity of tags in OSM
On 23/10/2014 12:57, Dave F. wrote:
I'm not convinced Notes are cleared up any more than Fixmes
They certainly are more visible to me - they're available for a simple
overlay on the main map and get announced in IRC channels.
In order to clear them up I wrote something* to create a Garmin
On 06/10/2014 11:30, Tom Chance wrote:
My principal difficulty is in working out what people have done in
each changeset. The best tool we had for this - OWL - is now defunct.
This let you browse around the area looking at all changesets, seeing
features that had been deleted / moved /
With new editors though I sometimes think we forget how hard it is for
someone to start editing now in e.g. the centre of London compared to
when we experienced mappers started. Here, for example (courtesy of
Martijn Van Exel's OSM Then and Now) is what the area I started
mapping in looked
On 04/10/2014 10:14, David Woolley wrote:
... it is probably a mistaken attempt at personal mapping.
That's what it looked like to me, certainly.
The big problem with relations is that they tend to be subject to
frequent edits, so reverts may fail, because they would take out a
On 06/09/2014 23:09, Guy Collins wrote:
... inadvertently made the runways disappear ...
and see also this issue raised against the standard style sheet today:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/927
(Airport runways have disappeared)
Hi,
User Gavaasuren has been adding a series of imaginary footpaths over
the last few weeks, each with the changeset comment zwischen
Fußgängerzonen und Straßen Fußweg erstellt. What they seem to be doing
is joining pedestrian islands to random nearby roads in order to
resolve routing
On 13/08/2014 10:05, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:37 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
But it's a bit like the 'name' problem where a few roads have locally
known names, but these are not displayed on signs :( Need recording but
not necessarily displaying.
I think thats an important
On 06/08/2014 19:17, richard wrote:
Firstly a disclaimer, I am mostly an armchair mapper.
I am working my way around the canals of Britain, tracing the canal banks and
tidying up locks etc. (I have probably seen a dozen different ways that locks
have been tagged.)
(on the more general point)
On 05/08/2014 07:58, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
Not, it is not a job for external services. It is much better to use
single service(OSM) rather than multiple(OSM+Wikidata).
Personally, I'd argue that OSM isn't a service so much as a large
lump of data. It has services, but these are designed for
On 05/08/2014 08:11, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
I will use my own knowledge obtained on school lessons of history,
geography and English. Large cities are worldwide-known.
OK...
I will be right saying that I can not know all cities, especially
small. I will search ukrainian web articles to see if
On 01/08/2014 11:17, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
OK. Clearly I'm going to have to think on this for a bit longer. I
think looking at somewhere like Swanley is a good idea, and also at
somewhere like Derbyshire if the stops data hasn't been imported there.
If you want to test a merge/import in
On 04/08/2014 18:08, Philip Barnes wrote:
The big problem with transliteration to help pronunciation is where do
you stop, Berlin for example has 194 name tags for different
languages, 84 of which just say Berlin.
Which gets straight to the nub of the problem. Berlin does _not_ need a
On 04/08/2014 16:15, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
Hi! I would like to add ukrainian names for cities of UK, but found
that SomeoneElse_Revert removed some of name:uk-tags in changeset
20757217 with a comment reverting undiscussed Ukrainian
translations including ones for which there's nothing on the
On 29/07/2014 23:03, Dave F. wrote:
... Is the data valid? Is it an accurate import? Would he have flagged
it up if the user had added them manually one at a time? If the
answers are Yes/Yes/No, then is there a genuine problem?
I suspect the answers are currently FSVO valid (inasmuch it's
On 27/07/2014 22:26, ianmspen...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that there is a tagging system in place which is
ambiguous from an International point of view.
It is indeed the case that when someone in Germany tags a trunk road the
default access rules are different to when someone in
On 16/07/2014 19:09, SK53 wrote:
I think all are acceptable. FWIW I've always followed Harry Wood's
dictum and lumped these in as shop=beauty (aka Beauty Salon) possibly
with a sub-tag beauty=tanning. But given the paucity of usage on
taginfo.uk http://taginfo.uk, I suspect I haven't been
On 11/07/2014 14:15, SomeoneElse wrote:
This message from Grant (and the previous items in the thread)
explains what happened, I think?
D'oh - more coffee clearly required - thankfully Andy Street beat me to
it and actually included a link
Paweł Stankiewicz wrote:
Hi
Recently many railways in Fife have been resurrected like from Kelty
and from Dunfermline to NW and to W:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/56.1121/-3.4351
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104131260/history
The author can be easy found by googling his name and
On 18/05/2014 19:19, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
Hi
Sum Wum has replied and was apologetic. They have attempted to
correct their edits but several footpaths were still distorted. I
have therefore reverted this changeset and the original edits.
Thanks Dudley - looks much less higgledypiggledy
Andy Robinson wrote:
I reverted this morning before I saw this thread.
Oops - forgot to mention earlier - I added a Unibus 6 relation that
matched the path of the added and then deleted service road:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3706081
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 22/04/14 13:29, SomeoneElse wrote:
1) place=city in OSM might or might not not mean the same as is a
ceremonial city, as defined in the UK
There is no might about it. The wiki at least is explicit:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity
Absolutely
jonathan wrote:
I hate to do this but I don't have time to look in to this for ages.
This new user has made one edit with various changes but a few pages
of deletions. This always worries me, it may need reverting?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21863539#map=18/52.95394/-1.47650
I
This was last discussed back in February:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2014-February/015867.html
when someone (in the UK) changed a number of place=city to place=town.
The discussion at the time covered:
1) place=city in OSM might or might not not mean the same as is a
Brian Prangle wrote:
...
BUT …. now all the extant OpenStreetBugs Notes have migrated over ,
some of which are YEARS old, it’s all getting a bit crowded and hard
to differentiate new notes.
Most of the migrated notes (such as e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/110664 ) presumably
Philip Barnes wrote:
The number of edits suggests to me that they are not inexperienced.
Is it possible to get some sort of block until they start responding
to emails?
Phil (trigpoint)
Unfortunately, the problem is still occurring:
On 18/03/2014 07:13, Filip Chirita Rares Cristian wrote:
What seems to be the general purpose of his edits? His change sets
have no comments, so could it be that this is just a case of an
inexperienced mapper, at worst a vandal?
I'm not sure what the purpose is, as I've not had a reply to
On 19/03/2014 11:04, Filip Chirita Rares Cristian wrote:
According to this, there's a lot of edits all over the UK, but also in
the US, in some non-descript towns.
http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?dbisping
Since the number of edits is so high, over 4 years, I don't think
reverting everything this
There has been a large series of recent edits to major road junctions
across England such as:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21125717
There have been about half a dozen by the same mapper near me (I'm in
North Derbyshire) which are problematical for a number of reasons:
a) Bus
Brian Prangle wrote:
Try anywhere across Wolverhampton through Willenhall to Walsall - as
you zoom through to level 19 you'll briefly see a nice sharp clear
image which then reverts spontaneously to a less clear image with a
huge shadow which furhter obscures detail.
Have you got a link for
(taking these in a slightly different order)
Eric Grosso wrote:
So from my point of view, the problem described initially by Will is
still a current one.
Indeed - higher up this thread I mentioned a location in Mansfield which
used to have z18 imagery and now no longer does for me (in
Andy Robinson wrote:
Zooming in on Nottingham I'm seeing three different imagery versions at
different zoom levels. I don't anything missing.
Here's a specific example, to the north in Mansfield:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=19/53.14850/-1.18456
(using P2 because
Interestingly, Bing imagery that was present in December but missing in
January has now reappeared:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=18/52.72279/-2.12197
so perhaps some kind of scheduled renewal process?
Cheers,
Andy
___
Alasdair McKinnon wrote:
I've spotted that the A9 West of Perth is wrongly designated as the M9
and A93. It has also been re-routed over a short length.
Thanks for mentioning it. From looking at it, it appears that the
current status is as a result of a revert 10 days ago:
Their edits in Australia have led to a block being requested:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2014-February/010286.html
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Donald Noble wrote:
Hi All,
The user robbief14 [1] has changed sections of the M90 around the New
Forth Road Bridge which are still currently under construction to live
motorway. They had also deleted all of the tags for the current road
bridge.
... and they're back:
Roger Calvert wrote:
It might be worth considering a 'play' version of the data base, where
beginners, schools and others could try things out without damaging
the main map. This would be refreshed every so often, and changes
would disappear.
I've occasionally pointed new mappers at
Brian Prangle wrote:
What's happened to the tiles here? In JOSM I can't see anything at
higher zoom levels except No Tiles at this Zoom Level Is it me or
is there a system failure somehwere?
Is that the same hole that's between Stafford and the A5, west of
Penkridge? If so it's been there
For info, another example - I've reverted
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20083935
which moved the source (for the relation membership) from one way to the
relation as a whole so that
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1438826/history
had tag source=paths at each end, which is
On 19/12/2013 10:15, Tom Chance wrote:
...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19400206
... Would somebody be able to revert it?
Done in
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19528645
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Does anyone use the fact that some of these were set to N/A by the
original Naptan import? If so, you might want to discuss changeset
19472400 with its author, which has removed a number of these.
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Matthijs Melissen wrote:
In Birmingham, all bus stops have been imported from Naptan, but
during the import, the name tag has not been set. I am considering
adding the name tag, by setting it to something like:
camelcase(naptan:Street) + ' / ' + naptan:CommonName
That way, the name tag in OSM
Jonathan wrote:
I can almost see OSM splitting into two halves, one half concentrating
on the human facing side of OSM, such as map rendering, interfacing
with users and building user apps and features, and the other half
concentrating on the data side, such as editing, data structure,
Jonathan wrote:
... but are traces really that important now? They have some uses but
the bulk of sources now and going forward are from other methods?
If other methods means copying from other data sources rather than
actually going out and surveying then you're never going to get the
best
On 09/11/2013 13:14, Rob Nickerson wrote:
We are mixing up two issues here. One is as to whether historic layers
should be removed from the default menus
What exactly do you mean by the default menus here? There are no
default menus in OSM, only menus in different instances of different
Paul Norman wrote:
It's worth pointing out that iD doesn't actually have an imagery list.
It inherits its from the editor-imagery-index project at
http://osmlab.github.io/editor-imagery-index/, which is for
OpenStreetMap editing, not historical mapping or a general list of all
possible
A number of potentially problematical edits to railways have been made
in the Manchester and Leeds areas over the last day or so. It's by a new
mapper who seems to be still feeling their way a bit and people local to
those areas might want to check some of their edits.
For example in Leeds
David Fisher wrote:
(P.S. and as a local, I can confirm that no ways are actually named
Vanguard Way on the ground, at least not in the Croydon area)
Thanks for that. It's something that happens fairly regularly around my
patch too - people add the name of the long distance route to the
Andrew Hain wrote:
Is there a useful distinction between the two 1:25000 layers?
In the area that I was looking at (just south of Kirk Ireton in
Derbyshire) they appear to be different original maps, and it appears
that coverage of each layer is slightly different.
On the subject of the
Rob Nickerson wrote:
2). iD is a general purpose editor. It can be used for
OpenHistoricalMap too.
Indeed - perhaps I should have been clearer that I'm talking about the
instance in use on the OSM site used to edit the OSM map, not any other
instance which presumably could feature any
UrbanRambler1 wrote:
Hi David,
(it was me that said this, actually)
It looks like the Vanguard Way website uses OS maps, and the ways
that form part of it in OSM haven't all been surveyed for e.g.
surface, gates and stiles, and that sort of thing.
I can assure you that I walked every bit of
Just spotted this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86545
There do seem to be an awful lot of roads and footpaths called Vanguard
Way or blah / Vanguard Way in that relation. I'm guessing that
perhaps on the ground they're not really called that...
Cheers,
andy
I logged a bug with iD regarding the non-visibility of some items in the
background layer menu:
https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1929#issuecomment-27236976
The issue that I actually logged is actually being addressed as part of
a different bug, but another question span out of it. Of
Over the weekend I spotted that Sheffield seems to have been added twice
recently:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2510041800
and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2494466157
as both are recent edits, I presume that both were added in good faith,
possibly almost in parallel.
Tom Chance wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to get this user account suspended/banned:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Quercus1/edits
For info, I've just reverted
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18538612. See
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18542407 for details.
Andy Mabbett wrote:
Can someone remind me of the method of fixing these en mass, please?
JOSM todo list plugin, perhaps?
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/24052/josm-and-taginfo-how-to-easily-move-through-a-list
Cheers,
Andy
___
Tom Chance wrote:
On 23 September 2013 12:22, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
mailto:frede...@remote.org wrote:
It seems you have already repaired the most obvious damage yourself.
Of the changesets in my local area - others covered some other edits.
For info, I've just reverted
Dudley Ibbett wrote:
In Upper Hulme (Old Buxton Road and Roach Road) and on roads above
(Back of the Rocks) and below (Blackshaw Lane) there seem to be odd
changes between Unclassified and Tertiary Road tags.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/53.1444/-1.9821
I've no experience with
Hi Peter,
Thanks for replying here.
Peter Miller wrote:
So...on the basis that we should tag what is there, we see a white
sign with a black diagonal line on it then that is what we should
indicate. We do of course interpret that by putting what we believe if
the correct legal speed limit
Richard Mann wrote:
IIRC a lot of those tags were added by Chriscf, without any local
surveying
I think that you're thinking about these:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/81529513/history
(a slightly different case)
Cheers,
Andy
___
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
