Openlayers?
http://openlayers.org/dev/examples/
The GeoRSS Marker example maybe?
Jim
Andre Marcelo-Tanner wrote, On Thursday, 24 June, 2010 08:53 AM:
Is there an easy way to link to OSM.org with a waypoint on it? I know
you can do the MLat + MLon in the query string for 1 marker,
Hi Guys.
This may be off-topic but maybe not.
@Maning - Just wanted to check if the file size is right? I have Fridays OSMPH
Garmin map and I haven't updated for a few days, but when I checked today the
size seems off. Last friday the map was at 18Mb+, today it's at 11Mb?
Bart
maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@... writes:
compressed, it should be ~11 MB
uncompressed, it should be ~18 MB
can you double-check?
Yep, that just confirms it. I'm a moron.
I'll just chalk it up as a symptom of nicotine withdrawal... ;)
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bart Bartolome
linuxbast...@paglalakbay.com wrote:
I'll just chalk it up as a symptom of nicotine withdrawal... ;)
Good for you!
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
Hi guys,
The final venue for the Skillshare meetup is at Coffee Bean Tea Leaf at
1800 Eastwood Avenue. This branch is the one facing the Eastwood Mall park,
and not the one at City Walk 2. Here's the map:
http://osm.org/go/4zhSl61HJ--?m
See you guys tomorrow!
I'll probably be there much, much
Just wanted to share this with the group. Another tool for mapping.
Waze is a social mobile application providing free turn-by-turn navigation
based on the live conditions of the road.
100% powered by users, the more you drive, the better it gets. Join the
community of drivers in your area
2010/6/25 filip wolters filip_wolt...@hotmail.com:
Weet iemand de juiste spelling van een deelgemeente van Meise? Ik vind zowel
Imde als Impde terug in het WWW en op de kaarten.
Op
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.comwrote:
No, they are not out of copyright. All the rights of USSR were
transfered to Russian Federation. Neither USSR, nor Russian Federation
ever transferred those maps to public domain or in any other way
allowed free use
Have you really officially purchased them from Russian government, its
military divisions or perhaps from Roskartografiya?
2010/6/24 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.comwrote:
No, they are not out
We purchased them from this site :
http://mapstor.com/
Here the same data is available from a usaid sponsored project :
http://www.bunkertrails.org/maps.php
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Eugene Iline evge...@ily.in wrote:
Have you really officially purchased them from Russian government,
I would like to say this, those maps are not very detailed, and really, have
been used for very rough corrections, and adding in some streams or placing
cities.
mike
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:42 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
We purchased them from
Did they show you any documents confirming that that do really have
ANY rights to sell those maps? I\m sure they did not...
K.
2010/6/24 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
We purchased them from this site :
http://mapstor.com/
Here the same data is available from
Purchasing stolen maps does not make them public domain...
2010/6/24 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, they are not out of copyright. All the rights of USSR were
transfered to
It makes no difference how you used them!!! They are not good for osm!
K.
2010/6/24 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
I would like to say this, those maps are not very detailed, and really, have
been used for very rough corrections, and adding in some streams or
He shouldn't draw then into the database, as this mixes OSM data and his
own data. Why not just use a layer on top of the OSM data?
One of the big advantages of OSM is that you the drawing tools. An option
would be to create a blank database on top of the OSM data by using the OSM
tools.
Hi,
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
He shouldn't draw then into the database, as this mixes OSM data and his
own data. Why not just use a layer on top of the OSM data?
One of the big advantages of OSM is that you the drawing tools. An option
would be to create a blank database on top of the OSM
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Oliver (skobbler)
osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am still concerned that some business users cannot make use of
OpenStreetMap data because of the Share-Alike-rule as they don't want or
cannot share proprietary data.
Umm, if you want it so
Hello, thanks.
Solved. I think the problem was that I was downloading the file to a remote
disk (R: mapped to \\lanserver\data)
Another question: after exporting the whole planet (recently) to Postgres, what
is the size of the largest table created (which I presume will take up 80% of
the
On 06/24/2010 09:34 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Oliver (skobbler)
Really, if people (businesses, charities, individuals or whoever) have
data they wish to keep private, they can still use OSM data
internally. If they want to Publicly Convey this Database, any
Andy Allan gravityst...@... writes:
No. That would be avoiding the whole point of the share-alike license.
If they have geographic data that we don't have, and they mix it with
OSM data, then the whole point is that we end up with access to their
geographic data. It's called share-alike!
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Andy Allan writes:
If they have geographic data that we don't have, and they mix it
with OSM data, then the whole point is that we end up with access
to their geographic data.
[...]
You are obviously reading section 4.5 in a different way that I do.
[...]
For me
On 06/24/2010 10:07 AM, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
For me it looks like business users can feel safe with their data if they do
not
make derivative databases, for example by enhancing their own data by taking
tags from OSM database.
If enhancing means incorporating the data into a single
Richard Fairhurst rich...@... writes:
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Andy Allan writes:
If they have geographic data that we don't have, and they mix it
with OSM data, then the whole point is that we end up with access
to their geographic data.
[...]
You are obviously reading section 4.5
What we're currently seeing is import mania,
poeple trying to stuff every possible bit of information into OSM
because that's the easiest way for them to use it in conjunction with
OSM data. There is too much geodata in the world for this to be
sustainable - OSM must stick to things that mappers
We purchased them from this site :
http://mapstor.com/
AFAIK this is not legal seller of maps, and poehali.org too. They both
hosted outside Russia. So this maps can't be reliable identified as public
domain maps.
Here the same data is available from a usaid sponsored project :
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Users must just take care that they do not edit cable lines according to
what they see on the OSM map, otherwise all of the cable network data
will be considered to be derived from OSM data and thus fall under odbl.
Very very broadly yes, but actually at that point
I think you should take this to the legal list.
As far as I know, the copyright laws of england count for osm, not those of
russia.
mike
2010/6/24 Alexandr Zeinalov shu...@sbin.ru
We purchased them from this site :
http://mapstor.com/
AFAIK this is not legal seller of maps, and
Well that got more of a reaction than floating a discussion on the
tagging list, didn't it? The tagging list was set up so that the main
list wouldn't be bothered with such stuff.
There was no debate on the wiki, except a brief comment that
presumably resulted in the tag-to-higher approach (from
So you want to say that you do not care for those osm-users, which are
in Russia and which may have problems using osm with copyright data in
it? Did I get you right?
K.
24 июня 2010 г. 13:56 пользователь jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com написал:
I think you should
I am not saying that. I am saying that this is a topic for lawyers.
from what I learned about the discussion on wikipedia datapoints, it is uk
law that governs osm data.
mike
2010/6/24 Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com
So you want to say that you do not care for those osm-users, which are
Well then assuming this we can even say that anyone not being physically in
UK can use any copyrighted source (Google sat.) for instance to contribute
to OSM, right?
24 июня 2010 г. 14:22 пользователь jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com написал:
I am not saying that.
On 24 June 2010 09:31, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
He shouldn't draw then into the database, as this mixes OSM data and his
own data. Why not just use a layer on top of the OSM data?
One of the big advantages of OSM is that you the drawing
But you should know that there are some copyright international agreements
between many countries. Russian laws can't be used in England, and russian
military secrets can't be protected by English laws. But it doesn't
concern with copyright laws. Roscartographia is a copyright holder for
soviet
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
I think that OSM as a whole - and this is not a legal issue - needs to
improve interoperability. What we're currently seeing is import mania,
poeple trying to stuff every possible bit of information into OSM
because that's the easiest way for them to use
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well that got more of a reaction than floating a discussion on the
tagging list, didn't it? The tagging list was set up so that the main
list wouldn't be bothered with such stuff.
The tagging list was
I believe this junction is tagged as per the wiki (which Andy kindly
reverted to it's previous state).
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.73915lon=-1.10389zoom=15layers=B000FTF
Here's the same junction as per the cycle map layer:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
the root of the discussion seems to have no basis in
the tags, and seems entirely to be around rendering artefacts that you
dislike.
What purpose do the _link tags serve other than rendering?
If there's a serious
When people in one country use servers in another country, the laws affecting
those users may not be the same as those affecting the servers themselves. For
example, some works are public-domain in Australia, but still in copyright in
the USA. So, it is legal for those works to be on the
This is only possible if those countries are nt members of
international copyright treaties. Russia (and USSR) and UK - are
members of those treaties. So same laws apply.
And by the way I am 100% sure that in UK stolen and later sold
copyright materials are not treated us public domain.
K.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.comwrote:
And by the way I am 100% sure that in UK stolen and later sold
copyright materials are not treated us public domain.
Can I see some documentation on this theft?
Why dont you start with some dcma takedown notices for
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
the root of the discussion seems to have no basis in
the tags, and seems entirely to be around rendering artefacts that you
On 24 June 2010 23:00, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can I see some documentation on this theft?
Why dont you start with some dcma takedown notices for the people selling
them, and see what happens?
You do realise DCMA is only for sites hosted in the US
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
What purpose do the _link tags serve other than rendering?
They can be used by routers to give more accurate descriptions...
* Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio juan_lucas...@yahoo.com [2010-06-24 01:34 -0700]:
Another question: after exporting the whole planet (recently) to
Postgres, what is the size of the largest table created (which I presume
will take up 80% of the whole DB)?
I can't speak for the whole planet.osm
Andy Allan wrote:
They can be used by routers to give more accurate descriptions - e.g.
since we don't (yet) indicate junction priorities, it can be helpful
if you are on a *_link and going onto a * to announce it as join the
main carriageway. If it was e.g. just highway=trunk for both, the
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:09:11 +0100, Richard Mann wrote:
[..] But tag-for-lower is better.
And I still haven't read why you think this is better, apart from rendering
issues.
As Andy said, the burden of demonstrating the goodness of a change is up to who
wants to make that change.
--
. ''`.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
juan_lucas...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello, thanks.
Solved. I think the problem was that I was downloading the file to a remote
disk (R: mapped to \\lanserver\data)
Another question: after exporting the whole planet (recently) to
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
What purpose do the _link tags serve
On 25 June 2010 00:22, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
And I still haven't read why you think this is better, apart from rendering
issues.
As Andy said, the burden of demonstrating the goodness of a change is up to
who
wants to make that change.
I've been following this thread and
On 25 June 2010 00:28, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
overall disk use ~ 130 GB and growing about 2.5 GB/week at the moment.
Is there a way to reduce this overhead without re-importing?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to explain, without referring to renderering *at any point in
the discussion* why your solution is both conceptually better than
what we have, and why your solution is worth all the hassle and
confusion that
Has the update frequency changed for OpenCycleMap? Some bike lanes added in
late May and early June still haven't appeared yet.
Ed Hillsman
Senior Research Associate
Center for Urban Transportation Research
University of South Florida
4202 Fowler Ave., CUT100
Tampa, FL 33620-5375
813-974-2977
there is no mention of PD for these maps at mapstore.com. they are not even
free of copyright from poehali.net
free download doesn't mean PD
Can I use the maps in my own project?
You have the right to use maps for the purpose of familiarization for personal
use. To use the maps or other
i think this can be a good start point
http://linfiniti.com/dla/
videopdf to introduce the GIS with qgis
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2010/6/24 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
views or oppose them, but certainly the main point of this discussion
is that should we want to change it you can't just change the wiki and
declare it done!
I completely agree to this and think it also applies to many other
wiki edits. Sadly, as
Updates that I've made in the past week are now showing on zooms = 12. It's
not quite there for zooms 12, but I suspect that that's simply because the
tiles haven't managed to upload to Andy's web host yet from the machine
where he carries out the main rendering.
I do remember seeing Andy
El 23/06/2010 16:33, sko...@free.fr escribió:
Would anyone recommend a good book on GIS/Geodesy/etc that could be
used to understand the underlying concepts behind most GIS
applications ?
Try:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Library
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Libros_de_SIG
Best,
--
Iván Sánchez
Hi Gregory,
Your a little out of date of the way that the cycle map is run. It uses the
live mapnk rendering, with no upload required. However it is still a weekly
update, and can take a week to fully update assuming that the disk doesn't fill
up first.
Shaun
On 24 Jun 2010, at 16:40,
Yeah I emailed Andy when I first started contributing to OSM because
changes weren't showing up and some zoom levels in my area returned
nothing but error tiles. He said the server was totally overloaded but
that he was working on an upgrade. Since then updates have been hit
and miss and the zoom
Ooops. Thanks for correcting my Shaun. Unfortunately I've not had quite so
much time to keep up-to-date on OSM happenings of late.
From: Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk]
Sent: 24 June 2010 16:55
To: Gregory Williams
Cc: 'Hillsman, Edward'; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re:
On 24/06/2010 16:57, Toby Murray wrote:
Two days ago he tweeted that the new server
was nearly ready so hopefully things will improve soon!
And don't forget, if you think OpenCycleMap.org is great, you could
always call in at the shop on the way out:
http://shop.opencyclemap.org/
On 24 Jun 2010, at 5:24 , Richard Mann wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
the root of the discussion seems to have no basis in
the tags, and seems entirely to be around rendering artefacts that you
dislike.
What purpose do the _link tags
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
Subject:
Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Postgres table sizes (was: Failed to download 9.5 GB
planet)
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010,
4:28 PM
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:34 AM,
Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
juan_lucas...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Yeah. Also, as Toby says, it's pretty much totally overloaded, and
has been for the last few months.
What's happened recently was that the updates broke for a few weeks,
and were restarted last Wednesday. The disk cache then filled up
completely on Friday, so there was only a small window for the
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags for the two
roads it connects. In principle there is no need to duplicate the information.
In practice a renderer such as Mapnik may not allow you to write such
Ed Avis wrote:
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags for the two
roads it connects. In principle there is no need to duplicate the information.
But how do you know that a way IS a slip from one
On 25 June 2010 02:59, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
download a section of map. As well as taking care of the different kinds of
link road, these could also provide 'is_in', 'leading_to' and 'dead_end' for
dead_end can't be guessed at, it could be bad mapping, is_in is
redundant, you can
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags for the
two
roads it connects. In principle there is no need to
Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a
primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags
An alternative is to use Maperitive and render on the local PC. Its just a
matter of using the right rules for rendering but you do need an .OSM file
from the web unless you have a local copy.
Cheerio John
On 24 June 2010 12:53, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. Also, as Toby
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:39 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 June 2010 00:28, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
overall disk use ~ 130 GB and growing about 2.5 GB/week at the moment.
Is there a way to reduce this overhead without re-importing?
I'm not sure I
On 25 June 2010 04:37, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question.
Over time, the overhead increases, not just the amount of data.
You can import a bounding box or extract and have smaller tables.
You can import without --slim, if you have the hardware for
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Anthony wrote:
You could always have highway=link.
But some links ARE motorway rules and some ARE trunk road so just saying
link does not work.
I guess, but now you're using a different definition of *_link. Not
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Andy Allan wrote:
It starts coming down to questions of time and money, and I only have
a limited supply of both :-)
Usually one has either time OR money, and never both at once
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
You could always have highway=link.
But some links ARE motorway rules and some ARE trunk road so just saying link
does not work.
highway=*
link=yes
?
___
talk mailing list
2010/6/24 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
highway=*
link=yes
actually I like this, but it's not the first time it is proposed here,
and I think you can hardly change tags used as often and for so long
time as this. It would probably end up in a similar mess than path and
footway.
cheers,
2010/6/23 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 21:11:44 Christ van Willegen wrote:
Maar, ik loop net wat wegen te editten in JOSM, krijg ik een melding:
Communication with the OSM server 'http://openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/'
timed out, Please retry later.
Toch sund...
On Thursday 24 June 2010 04:02:16 Andre Engels wrote:
2010/6/23 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Er was even geen ruimte op de partitie meer. Het scriptje draait nogmaals
en over ongeveer 15 minuten zou alles erop moeten staan.
Bedankt; ik ben gestart met het vergelijken van de lijst van
On Thursday 24 June 2010 10:22:57 Christ van Willegen wrote:
Ik heb al een (heel) aantal keren geprobeerd om te uploaden. Heb ook
al een paar keer gekregen 'Change set already closed' (dus JOSM
sluiten en opnieuw editten), maar nog steeds die time-out.
Overigens binnen een paar seconden.
2010/6/24 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Zou kunnen dat er in die lijst geen pleinen staan. Ik zou area=yes eruit
kunnen filteren. Maar weet niet of dat in alle gevallen gewenst is. Er zijn
namelijk ook vaak situaties te bedenken waar een plein ook huizen eraan vast
heeft welke dus als
2010/6/24 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
On Thursday 24 June 2010 10:22:57 Christ van Willegen wrote:
Ik heb al een (heel) aantal keren geprobeerd om te uploaden. Heb ook
al een paar keer gekregen 'Change set already closed' (dus JOSM
sluiten en opnieuw editten), maar nog steeds die
Maneiríssimo.
Dá para exportar para a imagem e traçar sobre no JOSM, né? O problema é ter
alguma referência... tem alguma trilha GPX dessa região?
[]s
Em 23 de junho de 2010 18:13, Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.comescreveu:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thiago Avila
Hi,
The CBERS images on my wms server have now been georeferenced, using
precious GPS tracks when available, or Landsat otherwise (as suggested
by INPE).
If you have used an un-georeferenced image yesterday for mapping without
adjusting with another source (as for Branquinha streets, or a
Pessoal,
Sabado vai rolar o esforço de mapeamento remoto de Alagoas. Em São Paulo
vamos estar na Casa de Cultura Digital. Levem seus computadores!
Vou fazer um webstreaming também.
Temos que baixar e alinhar as imagens das áreas mais afetadas, para que as
pessoas possam ajudar.
Vejam o release
Beleza,
Vou tentar chegar antes do meio-dia pra ajudar
2010/6/24 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com
Pessoal,
Sabado vai rolar o esforço de mapeamento remoto de Alagoas. Em São Paulo
vamos estar na Casa de Cultura Digital. Levem seus computadores!
Vou fazer um webstreaming também.
Temos
Caros
Noticia divulgada no Geoinformação Online e também via twitter .
Boa sorte e parabéns pela inciativa.
Luiz Amadeu Coutinho
Geógrafo
http://geoinformacaonline.com
- Original Message -
From: Vitor George
To: OSM talk-br
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:15 PM
Subject:
Hi !
ich wollte die Norddeutschen nur kurz darüber informieren das die örtl.
Kirche OSM für eine größere Veranstaltung nutzt - als Referenz.
In der örtlichen Presse war schon eine Karte zusehen und im Web gibt es [1].
Vielleicht ein Anfang der gemacht ist.
gruß Jan :-)
[1]
Moin moin,
Florian Lohoff schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 03:55:07PM +0200, Georg Feddern wrote:
Bei mir ist Track alles was ich zeit meines Lebens als Fahrweg
(Feldweg,Waldweg, Wirtschaftsweg) kenne.
Warum wollt ihr mit aller Macht eine Zugangsbeschränkung in eine
Straßen/Wege-Klasse
Am 24.06.2010 03:17, schrieb Stephan Wolff:
Die Bezeichnung Track Seuche ist unpassend.
Na gut.
In vielen Gegenden findet
man lokale Vorlieben. Manchmal ist jedes Dorf mindestens mit einer
Tertiary-Road versehen (in den Niederlanden sogar fast jeder Weg
außerorts).
war mir auch
Moin moin,
Stephan Wolff schrieb:
Moin, moin!
Am 23.06.2010 10:03, schrieb Chris66:
Meiner Meinung nach sollte jede legal per Auto ansteuerbare
Adresse über das Highway-Netz exclusive Tracks erreichbar
sein. Der Trend geht aber eher in die Richtung, alles
was halbwegs nach
Hi,
dann stelle ich mir aber prinzipiell die Frage, welchen Weg der Notarzt
nehmen wuerde? Bei einem Track kann auch mal eine Schranke oder ein
Forstfahrzeug im Weg sein. Auf dem Hauptzufahrtsweg zu einem bewohnbaren
Grunstueck muessen Feuerwehr und Notarzt immer durchkommen koennen. Und
da kommt
Moin,
da wir Orts- und Stadtteilgrenzen nicht selbst mappen können, habe ich
beim Katasteramt nachgefragt, ob ich diese dort erhalten könnte. Da
mir bekannt war, dass die Nutzungsbedingungen der niedersächsischen
Geobehörden Web-Mapping-Dienste grundsätzlich von der Nutzung
ausschließen [1}, habe
Ja,
siehe dxf2osm (twonickels branch of dime)
http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@openstreetmap.org/msg10255.html
mfg,
mike
2010/6/24 Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de
Moin,
da wir Orts- und Stadtteilgrenzen nicht selbst mappen können, habe ich
beim Katasteramt nachgefragt, ob ich diese dort erhalten
hi,
anlieger frei oder zufahrt zu haus penelope frei sagt doch, dass da
jedermann fahren darf, der dort was zu erledigen hat.
was soll da eine schranke/schleuse/sperre auf dem weg - eventuell auch noch
abgeschlossen ?
d.h technisch kann da jedermann durch.
gruss
walter
-
Der Student
Hallo zusammen,
Inzwischen ist die Karte auf den Toolserver umgezogen. Ausserdem sind
es jetzt keine gerenderten Tiles mehr, sondern ein weltweiter Vektor-
Overlay, der seine Daten minuten-aktuell aus der Datenbank zieht:
http://toolserver.org/~ti/ftm/
Gruss,
Thomas
Hallo Liste,
Weiß jemand zufällig was mit dem OWL viewer los ist?
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/owl_viewer/
Mein RSS Feed wird seit zwei Tage nicht mehr aktualisiert und auf den Links der
alten Aktualisierungen bekomme ich nur eine Fehlermeldung...
Gruß UMAX974
Am 24.06.2010 03:17, schrieb Stephan Wolff:
Wenn ich eine Klassifizierung sehr unpassend finde, ändere
ich sie einfach und schreibe den Grund z.B. als note=kein
Durchgangsverkehr.
Stichwort Durchgangsverkehr:
Wie üblich gehen die Meinungen bei dem Thema auseinander,
was heisst das für die
Chris66 chris66...@gmx.de wrote:
Meiner Meinung nach sollte jede legal per Auto ansteuerbare
Adresse über das Highway-Netz exclusive Tracks erreichbar
sein. Der Trend geht aber eher in die Richtung, alles
was halbwegs nach Landwirtschaft riecht als Track zu mappen.
Der von Nord-Ost kommende
Hi,
mal abgesehen, dass bei uns in der Gegend der Zugangsweg zu den
Forsthaeusern auch ueber eine Schranke verfuegt, duerfen auf den
Forstwegen die Forstfahrzeuge einfach stehenbleiben, was auf dem
Zugangsweg nicht erlaubt ist. Dort muessen sie den Rettungsweg freihalten.
Ich gebe dir aber
Hallo Welt,
in Vorbereitung auf den Sommerurlaub hab ich letzte Nacht die AIO für
Europa mal wieder updaten wollen, aber mein Edge 705 mit Firmware 3.10
erkennt sie nicht. Im Kartenmenü taucht nix auf, die im Garmin fest
eingebaute Basiskarte ist das Einzige was noch funktioniert.
Die
1 - 100 di 318 matches
Mail list logo
