On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:16 +0100, Dave F. wrote:
On 11/07/2011 17:56, Mikel Maron wrote:
Everyone
This thread was on the topic of the atmosphere of the Australian
community and talk-au,
-Mikel on behalf of Talk Moderators
Then, as a moderator, you should give Steve C. a
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 15:02 +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I think it's reasonably obvious by now that the two sides in this debate
aren't ever going to be reconciled.
I guess that depends on your definition of reconciled.
It's not exclusively an .au problem, but it is mostly. If you look
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 06:53 +0200, Mike Dupont wrote:
Besides all the flames and smoke, what are the real issues here? I
think that we dont need to continue this endless discussion. Lets just
stop the fighting and do something more productive.
I think a main issue here, comes down to what
Hi Nick,
Just a quick note that my understanding is those figures are generated
based on v1 history, none of the bot edits would have been v1 unless
they created a new entity, not just a new/modified tag.
David
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 15:09 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
Hi Mark,
Yes if we
You may have messages filtered, but I indeed have noticed a lot of
missing messages, and often messages that are missing but arrive a few
hours late, after Ive already seen the responses to them. I have no
blocks or filters, that would be stupid since I am actually interested
in following all
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:51 -0700, All Blokes wrote:
I would not in any way presume to speak for any other Australians
other than myself, but I object most strenuously to the implication
that I have in some way been perverted by 80n or any other person at
all.
FWIW, Id like to point out that
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 08:11 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
Why did you stop then? Is there no aerial imagery where you are other
than nearmap?
Theres this thing in Australia called loyalty. You seem to understand
very little about Australian culture. Its almost the height of rudeness
after someone
As others have said..
1) Ive moved to fosm since the lockout
2) Im feeling pretty disillusioned at the whole thing, and seriously
wonder if its not worth just paying 5 bucks for a map that I cannot
share, rather than deal with the politics of a staggered mapping project
3) Ive made a couple of
The URLs you sent didnt work here, but personally Ive bought a few GPS
receivers from dealextreme.com Theyre a hong kong based business but
have free shipping and low prices. I think my GPS data logger cost
about $15 there. Most of their LCD GPS units simply run windows CE so
you simply have to
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 23:35 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/7/5 Matthias Meisser dig...@arcor.de:
Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2011, 19:48 +0200 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Maybe we can also open a discussion about this related projects
list. IMHO googlemapmaker - although having a
Maybe someone should suggest to SteveC if he's looking for spots Bing
can update, is the parts that yahoo are removing. Oh well, as long as
OSM still has Microsofts products to help, everythings all good..
Microsoft will never change/shutdown their service once theyve burned
the bridges with
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 20:50 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 23 June 2011 18:41, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
did you see this?
http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
That's nice. Just a thought: shouldn't there be some
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:22 +0200, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen wrote:
@Eugene
Please do not extend the discussion with incompatible examples.
My example fits exactly the description of what is called
forking:
Try
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:08 +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Markus Lindholm wrote:
But there's no need to store them on the client, as all users have to
log in the preferences can be stored server-side. Atleast I throw away
all cookies when I close the browser.
That works for osm.org but
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:17 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I wonder what would happen if someone involved in running Google Map
Maker were to post a similar message. Hey, don't like how things go in
OSM? Why not come to Google Map Maker where all license issues are solved!
Except that
a) Map
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 13:49 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
Personally I hope as soon as possible. I suspect it will be nice to
give you 'no' guys some time to reconsider, as some already have.
Such a pity you dont extend the same feelings to those 'yes guys' who
wish to change their acceptance.
in the first
place.
David
On 6/22/2011 4:22 PM, David Murn wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:17 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I wonder what would happen if someone involved in running Google Map
Maker were to post a similar message. Hey, don't like how things go in
OSM? Why not come to Google Map
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:49 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Just like we have a tagging list for tagging-specific discussions.
So if someone decided to change every highway=track into
highway=unclassified or decided to mass-change aerodrome into airport,
would that be an issue for tagging (since it
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 06:55 -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Ok. How do you fancy volunteering to be the person who posts the concrete
information, then?
You seem to be under the impression that magic communication fairies will
crop up and make everything ok. It doesn't work like that.
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 09:29 +1000, Mark Pulley wrote:
Quoting John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 20 June 2011 02:11, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Please clarify for us the sources of these edits?
What does it matter since I'm never going to agree to the CT...
Now you're
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:16 -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
when all the nearmap-derived data is removed
It seems like you missed an email a couple of days ago?
Current NearMap derived data does not need to be removed
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 14:09 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
I'm speaking personally and there are no guarantees here but I'd like to
get input on what areas you would like Bing to prioritise for aerial
and/or satellite imagery in the coming year.
There are numerous programs that exist which show
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 13:52 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 17 June 2011 13:19, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
There are numerous programs that exist which show the density of mapping
in certain areas. Maybe it would be useful to find the more heavily
mapped areas that dont have
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:14 +1000, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
The current boundaries will be removed in the near future, so if I
were you I wouldn't spend to much time fussing over them.
Oh? Do tell?
All ABS boundaries
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 14:21 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
Ben said,
I say again: that's exactly what it was intended to achive
and it was written by our lawyers to do just that. :)
Thanks Ben,
That makes it crystal clear that nearmappers can accept the CT's.
Well, mappers who exclusively
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:49 -0400, Josh Doe wrote:
Perhaps it is trivial, but I have yet to hear of anyone working on a
script or even pseudocode as to how the cleanup will be performed.
Seems like an important item to address IMHO.
-Josh
According to the implementation plan, sometime after
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 23:54 +0200, Henk Hoff wrote:
During the time of the OSMF-membership vote, there was also a vote
initiated by the community, which can be seen here:
http://doodle.com/feqszqirqqxi4r7w
Outcome: 75% would accept the new license, 11% undecided, 14% not (at
that time)
You
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:39 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised, with apologies for the delay, here is the statement from
NearMap regarding
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 22:18 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
Yes, you got blocked on 16th May by the looks of it. I don't think I did
it so it was probably one of my colleagues.
Is there not some sort of audit trail or changelog for when users get
blocked?
I think it would be useful if one could
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 16:12 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
I think I know why - its because I'm coming from a microsoft.com domain!
It thinks I'm a bing crawler.
I can't be bothered to join a mailing list to do this. Maybe someone on
talk@ will care enough.
In before Frederik.. but shouldnt
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 20:00 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
A nearmapper has decided that badly out-of-date nearmap imagery was
more authorative than my GPS traces (taken last weekend) and has
For anyone interested in the area, NearMap imagery of the new suburbs
(taken the Friday before Nicks
In other news, someone somewhere did something, and someone somewhere
should deal with it.
Would you care to point out what the problems are, or heaven forbid fix
them yourself? We've got this wonderful interface that anyone (even
you) can use to change data in the database that people have
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:03 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 9 May 2011 01:28, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
These current edits are of value to OSM, newly developed roads in
developing suburbs ('some of which already have people living on them').
How can newly developed roads
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 21:53 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 8 May 2011 21:41, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
As usual - non trolls are welcome to let me know if I've missed anything (or
made some mistakes).
So people asking difficult, but honest questions are labelled trolls
so
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 21:22 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
Unfortunately this has meant that Canberra OSM data is now badly out
of date. I have recently heard of a situation where up-to-date
Canberra data could have been *extremely* usefull to somebody.
Just out of interest, I noticed youve been
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:19 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 6 May 2011 10:47, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
You mentioned previously that Bing was out of alinement by up to 100m,
if this is the case it is a clear case of vandalism since he should be
at the vest least realigning Bing
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 14:02 +1000, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On 6 May 2011 10:47, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Given its age (over 10 years old in Canberra), and these nasty accuracy
limitations anyone would be crazy to use it in preference to NearMap.
Was surveying around Casey
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 15:31 +1000, Ian Sergeant wrote:
This is the Australian list, in case you didn't realise
Ah, so you are speaking for all Australians!
Well, I have yet to hear any Australians complain about the freedom of
the data, other than being incompatible with the new
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 20:29 +1000, Ian Sergeant wrote:
I'm not objecting to freedom of data. The comment I objected to is
the one that said if it is good enough for the Australian government,
then it must be good enough for all Australians, with no need to
examine it further. That may be
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 21:22 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
Unfortunately this has meant that Canberra OSM data is now badly out
of date. I have recently heard of a situation where up-to-date
Canberra data could have been *extremely* usefull to somebody.
As an active Canberra mapper, exactly which
New Caledonia is not part of Australia. It is approx 2000km east of the
closest point in Australia, about the same distance as New Zealand is.
Does the Australia file (which doesnt seem to be on that linked page at
the moment) cover the entire oceania region?
Maybe its worth looking at putting
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 19:33 +1000, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Sure if we can convince them to use more liberal licensing it would be
great. Personally I would use it for areas not covered by nearmap.
While not necessarily beneficial for future new OSM, it could be
beneficial to any forks if they
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:18 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
Thankfully, I've been careful to use source=nearmap. I've also been
making a point to go around and survey streets I've traced, check
their alignment, name them and set source=survey.
Unless youve realigned the ways based on GPS tracks
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 12:40 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
Unless youve realigned the ways based on GPS tracks after you traced
from nearmap, tagging the ways as source=survey is incorrect. You
can add a source:name=survey or similar, but if youve traced from a
source, just because you
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 20:30 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that you are correct. Have you
ever tried to join a committee and been rebuffed?
For the past 2 years Ive been a secretary of a national non-profit
organisation in my country. If we had made
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 20:09 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
David Murn stated
If anyone is interested, I can provide the simple C code I used to
generate these numbers and/or a list of usernames/uids that are
involved.
Well. you'd be a right piece of work then.
Right, get
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 11:33 +0100, 80n wrote:
There's no tileserver yet, that's a priority, there's no gratification
if things are rendered.
Is it possible to setup some sort of tiles@home-like system for fosm?
That could be a way to reduce your load.
David
I was wondering this question tonight.
How many OSM users have accepted the new terms, without fully
understanding that sources they have used in the past prohibit them from
doing so.
So, I wrote a little script to find out and the numbers are surprising.
Using my australian test extract from
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:17 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
I am a volunteer member (like all the members) of the Licensing
Working Group (LWG), OSM Sysadmin Team along with a few other
OpenStreetMap groups.
Does this mean we can ask (and receive definitive answers from) you the
hard questions
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 19:47 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
Today I watched a few people sign up for OSM and they all ticked the PD
box without even looking at it, it was very entertaining.
Many people have become accustomed to simply checking/accepting any
terms and conditions displayed, for fear
Ive noticed a few discrepancies with the graph..
How come on the 2-day graph, the scale for decline goes 10300 to 10800
while on 5-day graph the range is 10200 to 10800. The accept scale is
0-100 on 2-day but 0-120 on 5-day. The upshot is that the 'accepted'
value is 99.8% of the full range,
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 17:25 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
It makes them readable. If you used the same scale you won't see the
handful of no-votes against the 1 yes-votes.
It appears the scales have changed, and the readability hasnt changed.
If anything the 2 lines are now more
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:27 -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
For what it's worth, I just legally signed my state tax return with
nothing but a checkbox on a web form...
You mean all you had to do to do your tax, was check a checkbox and
click accept? Or did you also provide information persuant to
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 18:35 +0100, Thomas Davie wrote:
While I agree that there is a problem with the no votes disapearing if
you show the whole graph, it would be useful to show the same *range*
on each scale.
I actually meant that the 2 graphs had different scales. When youre
showing
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:53 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
...which is ignoring the 70% or so of all of those people who never
edited and can be switched over without incident.
That sounds like the thinking of the parties in a real vote, 'if
everyone who didnt vote, voted for us, we would have
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 12:16 +0200, Michael Collinson wrote:
If we make the numbers, then these new users are unaffected.
If we do not, new users are still unaffected, they have agreed to the
use of either CC-BY-SA or ODbL.
What about a case for example of a mapper who wants to map the
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 17:09 -0700, Kai Krueger wrote:
Dermot McNally wrote:
FWIW I would have favoured earlier specific requests for a vote, but
it's basically been an impossible position for the LWG from what I can
see as an outsider.
No, the vote part really isn't that difficult.
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:00 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 04/16/2011 05:40 PM, Graham Jones wrote:
... it is not clear whether OS Opendata in the UK, or Nearmap in
Austrailia is compatible. I would have expected these issues to be
resolved before forcing people to re-licence.
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 20:36 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue
[...]
I have answered on legal-talk.
We dont care if you answered on a podcast sent to the moon. The
question was asked
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 16:49 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Eric Marsden wrote:
It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read on
the wiki, whether choosing Decline is a irreversible decision, or
whether one would still be able later to accept the licence + CT.
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 20:10 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
I am sure there are going to be a few cases where difficult decisions
are going to have to be made. We will not have been the only open
source project to have had to make these sorts of decisions.
Out of interest Grant, what other
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 18:50 +0100, Dermot McNally wrote:
But your suggested course of action has me confused - you are happy to
make contributions under the new CT and intend to do so, but yet you
wish to vote against the change. Your choice, I supposed.
Its not terribly confusing from here.
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 23:53 +0100, Dermot McNally wrote:
On 14 April 2011 23:38, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Its not terribly confusing from here. What he is suggesting, is
creating an account to contribute 'clean' data, which he is prepared to
agree to OSMF's terms about
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 01:08 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
What about if you become aware that once youve got someone, who has
agreed and who has contributed tainted data? Will you (or someone else
wielding the magical OSMF+3 wand) reverse it?
If data is tainted
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 20:56 +0200, Michael Collinson wrote:
If you were a contributor before this date and have not accepted yet,
you will be asked to accept or decline the new terms. [..snip..]
Even if you choose to decline the new terms, you will still be able to
continue editing.
With the
There is actually a proposal for project of the week for gyms.
Apparently there are 66k pubs but only 400 gyms tagged in OSM.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Project_of_the_week/Proposals
David
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 20:29 +, John-Michael Wiley wrote:
I was trying to map a plaza
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 22:12 +1000, Ashley Kyd wrote:
Hi all,
Just trying to do a bit of research to catch up on the issues but
found the wiki a bit unhelpful. I've started categorising data sources
by license. If you have a spare moment or two and know of any I've
missed, please pop by and
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 23:27 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 7 April 2011 23:03, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
I contacted the nowwhere.com.au/MapData-Sciences who are managers of
the BP and Shell data in October 2010...
...
Also the locations have been fixed for numerous
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:09 +1000, Michael Hampson wrote:
So is Phase 4 the end for those that don't agree? What happens to the
data if we don't agree? and the data built on top of that data?
Well, it depends what you read. According to the wiki, stage 4 is when
OSM asks the community what
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 09:17 +1000, Michael Hampson wrote:
This came through over night.
Is it a standard mailer going out to all?
I received the same, so presumably yes.
One has to wonder how many innocent users who dont want to be banished
from the project, simply click 'agree' or follow
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 03:19 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
For clarity: (according to odbl.de)
In Australia:
For pete's sake! Stop making up blatantly untrue stuff.
Those are likely the precentages if we moved *today* without even
formally contacting/emailing anyone.
I never made
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 12:03 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The Google StreetView database isn't in Europe, it doesn't
have anyspecial conditions attached to its use,
it has. At least if there aren't for Streetview in particular, the
ones of Googlemaps in general do apply.
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 22:51 +0200, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Oandrzej zaborowski wrote:
For the record, in East Europe where Google Street View has no
coverage, there's a an almost identical service provided by Norc.ro,
who explicitly allow usage in OSM.
There's a similar service in Germany:
Is there a reason why you decided to split this proposal into a
different page for each section (with 2-3 paragraphs per page) instead
of just one large page like most other parts of the wiki? Im upto the
4th page and still dont quite understand what you're proposing.
David
On Mon, 2011-03-28
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 06:15 +1100, Ben Kelley wrote:
Hi.
I think this is an important question, but probably not something
someone on this list can answer.
I presume this issue is of concern more widely than Australia.
Sadly, I dont think anyone can give a proper answer, whichever list
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 09:50 +, Grant Slater wrote:
On 25 March 2011 05:49, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
The problem is, any fork under the existing licence can continue without
problem. Any fork under the new licence, cannot use any data unless the
user who contributed
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 00:11 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
Y'know, I'm not understanding something. People whinge about CC-By-SA
not being free enough, and that OSM should be public domain. The
proper response to them (which I think most people agree with) is: if
you don't like the license, fork
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 13:16 +0100, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Exactly start an OSM Meetup group now? How to explain to them
that if they make certain types of corrections, their work will be
deleted?
Are we forced to read
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 14:01 +0100, Matthias Meißer wrote:
Might be the legal talklist a better place to discuss this very specific
topic? I guess there are more users that are familar with the process
itself.
This isnt a legalese issue. Well, as much as someone stealing your car
is a
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:45 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
the question becomes (in my mind): why do we have a single way mapped
'coastline'? this implies the boundary between land and water is
static, but of course it moves - a number of times per day.
The coastline is (as generally accepted on
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 20:52 -0300, Diego Woitasen wrote:
This is the matrix showing how the tolls are calculated:
http://www.westlinkm7.com.au/cmsAdmin/uploads/Tollmatrix_Janto_Mar2011.pdf
What do you think about something like:
cost:car_2axle = $X
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 12:34 -0300, Diego Woitasen wrote:
Hi,
Mapping the tolls of a highway a found that there is no tag to assign
the cost of the toll. I haven't found examples in taginfo or tagwatch.
Are you using something for this?
I know this is a little complex because the cost of
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:03 +, Ed Avis wrote:
I would hope that this new state of play has changed the timetable a little
bit.
Has the OSMF board discussed the new Creative Commons offer?
I believe the board (or possibly lwg) has discussed it before, as Im
fairly sure Ive seen it in
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 03:45 -0800, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Joseph Reeves wrote:
without explaining in layman's terms what this means.
http://old.opengeodata.org/2008/01/07/the-licence-where-we-are-where-were-going/index.html
Follow-ups to legal-talk please, so that those here who have
I think this could even be extended to newsagencies too? Most
newsagencies in Australia are often dominated by stationary supplies.
David
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:16 +0100, Matthias Meißer wrote:
This week, we suggest to put your eyes on the local stationery shops
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 13:54 -0700, flambe...@gmail.com wrote:
There are currently three (3) main files - one for the United States,
one for Canada and one for Europe.
This is great, but the US is 300m, Canada 34m and Europe 700m. The
world population is just under 6.8 million. Is there any
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:12 +1100, {withheld} wrote:
However I still hold the community should accept the offer and be
grateful. Carping about internal politics just looks bad. And whiny. And
doesn't encourage anybody else ever offering similar largesse ever again.
Well, to be fair, the
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 10:38 +0800, Andrew Laughton wrote:
Hi Marcus
Unfortunately OSM has recently forced a change to it's licence
agreement to a version where attribution is not required on any copies
that are made of OSM data, probably to appease Microsoft and Bing maps
who will then be
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 19:40 -0800, Daniel Sabo wrote:
Maybe you don't like it, but you are not the entire OSM community. Yes,
in this case someone overwritten what I presume was good surveyed data
with an import was stupid. But in general the fact that data was
gathered by a government
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 09:54 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
On 19 February 2011 12:06, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Your search - murn site:svn.openstreetmap.org - did not match any
documents.
i think this does not move us forward - david is as valued as anyone
when making
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 15:35 -0800, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I find tracing endless residential subdivisions from aerials to be a chore
and no fun.
I know many who disagree, fortunately. Last year I was laid up in bed
for around 3 months after surgery, just after hi-res aerial imagery
became
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:16 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/18 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
Because the use of (min_)levels,height is in use by 3D renderers and
IMHO this min_level-part of the advanced building proposal is not
working (is using wrong semantics), at least
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 16:59 +, Grant Slater wrote:
The new java based XAPI is running and responding to test queries, but
be warned it is still under active development. See:
Am I missing something here...? People are complaining about how bogged
down and slow the current service is, so
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:33 +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Am 18.02.2011 22:47, schrieb David Murn:
If the service isnt designed to be portable (it only runs on one system
currently, in the world), then who cares about java,
What makes you think, that it only has to be running on one system
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 10:36 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:17 AM, {withheld} pheasant.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note the last line of that article: Both the town and Phil Down
will revert to their original names in a month.
Why bother?
Because it's fun.
The
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 18:50 +0100, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:10 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
wrote:
Second, an underground building. Connects to other buildings
that are at
ground level and have basements
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 08:02 +0100, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Make a new specific tag (unsuitable_for_caravans=yes;
source:unsuitable_for_caravans=survey), and document it on the wiki
(with a photo of a sign). At least that's explicit and clear.
I see the problem with my HGV proposal. On my
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:43 +1000, John Smith wrote:
I agree with the access suggestion, eg
access:caravan=yes/no/designated/unsuitable
I now regret using 4wd_only, this should have be an access: tag
instead, eg access:4wd=only/yes/no etc
This should be quite easy to script a change for, as
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 19:57 +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:56:54 -0500
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Since giving long ground-level ways nonzero layers screws up every
place they cross another way, it seems clear what should be done.
-1 is used for
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 14:04 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
On 17 February 2011 12:21, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Ive fixed quite a number of spots where keepright has picked up a river
and highway on the same layer (=0), generally without a junction node.
i wonder what would
1 - 100 di 266 matches
Mail list logo
